References

1. Abdullah (S B) and Lancaster (F W). The contribution of scientists tothe popular literature, their role as expert witness and their influence ontheir peers: a case study in the field of acid rain. Scientometrics. 120;1991; 55-64.

2. Abt (H A). Institutional productivities. Publications of the AstronomicalSociety of the Pacific. 105; 1993; 794-798

3. Abt (H A). Some trends in American Astronomical Publications.Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 93; 1981; 269­272.

4. Abt (H A). Publications practices in various sciences. Scientometrics.24,3; 1992; 441-447.

5. Adeniran (0 R). Bibliometrics of computer science literature in Nigeria.International Library Review. 20, 3; 1988; 347-359.

6. Adithya Kumari (H) and Shivaram Rao (K). The Nucleus: anInternational journal of cytology and allied topics - a bibliometric study.SERLS Journal of Information Management. 31; 2000; 59-71.

7. Afolabi (Michael). Productivity of journals, which published NigerianLibrary literature, 1910-1985. Annals of Library Science andDocumentation. 39, 4; 1992; 139-144.

8. Afolabi (M). The literature on librarianship in Nigeria, 1950-1073:Publications, citations and bibliographic control. Nigerial Lib. 12; 1976;179-191.

9. Afolabi (M). Bradford's law and labour literature on Nigeria, 1910-1970.Lib Scientist. 4; 1977; 89-99.

10. Afolabi (M). Productivity of journals which published Nigerian libraryliterature, 1910-1985. Annals of Library Science and Documentation.39, 4; 1992; 139-44.

11. Aiyepeku (Wilson 0). The Productivity of Geographical Authors: ACase study from Nigeria. Journal of Documentation. 32, 2; 1976; 105­117.

12. Aiyepeku (Wilson 0). The Bradford distribution theory: Thecompounding of Bradford periodical literature in Geography. Journal ofDocumentation. 33, 3; 1977, p210-219

283

13. Akinboro (E 0). Analysis of the publications of research scientists ofthe national cereals research institute. Nigeria. IAALD_ QuarterlyBulletin. XXXV; 1990; 77-80.

14. Alabi (G A). The citation pattern of Nigerian scientists. IneternationalLibrary Review. 21; 1989; 129-135.

15. Amba (K N) and Raghavendran (P R). Technical note on Bradford'slaw of scatter as applied to periodical literature on leather. Annals ofLibrary Science & Documentation. 19, 4; 1972; 222-224.

16. Anand (AK). Analysis of communication in Journal of the IndianChemical Society.IASLlCBulletin. 26,1; 1981; 17-21.

17. Aparna Basu and Vinu Kumar (B S). International collaboration inIndian scientific papers. Scientometrics. 48, 3; 2000; 381-402.

18. Aparna Basu. Science publication indicators for India: Questions ofinterpretations. Scientometrics. 44, 3; 1999; 347-360.

19. Arunachalam (S) and Udai Singh (N). Access to information and thescientific output of India. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research.51, Feb; 1992; 99-119.

20. Arunachalam (S). Scientific journals in India: their relevance tointernational science. Science Today. 1979; 45-50.

21. Arunachalam (S) and Udai Singh (N). Where do Israeli scientistspublish? Journal oflnformation Science. 14, 4; 1988; 221-231.

22. Arundhaty Das. Bibliometric analysis of publications in 'Plasmaphysics' contributed by the Scientists at the Institute for PlasmaResearch. IASLIC Bulletin. 45, 4; 2000; 145-160.

23. Ashok Jain and Garg (K C). Laser research in India: Scientometricstudy and model projections. Scientometrics. 23, 3; 1992; 395-415.

24. Ashoor (Mohammad Saleh) and Chaudhry (Abdus Sattar). Publicationpatterns of scientists working in Saudi Arabia. International Informationand Library Review. 25; 1993; 61-71.

25. Baker (Dale B). World's chemical literature continues to expand.Chemical Engineering News. 49, 28; 1971; 37-40.

26. Baker (Dale B). Chemical literature expands. Chemical EngineeringNews. 44, 23; 1966; 84-88.

27. Banin (A). The Scientific impact of the VIKING mission: survey of thepublication record. Advances in Space Research. 22, 3; 1998; 445­446.

284

28. Barclay (Rebecca 0). Technical communication practices of Dutch andU.S. Aerospace Engineers and Scientists: International Perspectiveson Aerospace. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. 37,2; 1994; 97-107.

29. Barooah (P K) and Sharma (N N). A Bibliometric study of researchpapers to evaluate the collection development program of library.Annals of Library and Information Studies. 48, 4; 2001; 157-165.

30. Benoit (Godin) and Yues (Gingras). The impact of collaborativeresearch on scientific production. http://www.aucc.ca/bibingue/research/collab_en.pdf

31. Bhat (V G) and Elisharaju (R). Ranking of periodicals in the field ofAstronautics and Aeronautics. Annals of Library Science andDocumentation. 24, 3-4; 1977; 114-118.

32. Bhattacharjee ( K K). Scattering coefficient and rank of periodicalliterature on glass and ceramics. IASLIC Bulletin. 20, 1; 1975; 1-6.

33. Biradar (B S) and Mathad (Sujatha M). Research collaboration invarious disciplines of S &T: a bibliometric study. IASLIC Bulletin. 45, 4;2000; 167-172.

34. Bordons (Maria) and Barrigon (S). Bibliometric analysis of publicationsof Spanish pharmacologists in the SCI (1984-89). Part II.Scientometrics. 25, 3; 1992; 425-446.

35: Bottle (R T). Scientists, information transfer and literaturecharacteristics. Journal of Documentation. 29, 3; 1973; 281-294.

36. Bottle (R T) and Efthimiadis (E N). Library and information scienceliterature: authorship and growth patterns. Journal of Library Science.9; 1984; 107-116.

37. Bottle (R T) and Rees (M K). Liquid crystal literature: A novel growthpattern. Journal oflnformation Science, 1; 1979; 117-119.

38. Bradford (S C). Sources of information on specific subject.Engineering. 1237; 1934; 85-86.

39. Brookes (B C). Theory of the Bradford Law. Journal of Documentation.33,3; 1977, p180-209

40. Brookes (B C) and Optimum (P). Library and Scientific Periodicals.Nature. 232; 1971; 458-461.

41. Brookes (B C). Bradford's law and the bibliography of science. Nature.224, 5223; 1969; 953-956.

285

42. Brookes (B C). Numerical methods in bibliographical analysis. LibraryTrends. 22, 1; 1973; 18-43.

43. Bujdose (Erno) and Braun (Tibor). Publication indicators of relativeresearch efforts in physics sub fields. Journal of the American Societyfor Information Science. 34, 2; 1983; 150-155.

44. Carpenter (M P) and Narin (F). National publication and citationcomparisons. Journal of the American Society for Information Science.26, 2; 1975; 80-93.

45. Carpentr (M P). Bibliometric profiles for British academic institutions.Scientometrics. 14; 1988; 213-233.

46. Cermakova (Jirina). The report literature: Production and distribution inthe USA. Annales of Library Science and Documentation. 22, 1; 1975;12-20.

47. Chandra (M). International collaboration and the Indian scientists: aCSIR case study. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research. 44,Jun; 1985; 295-301.

48. Chetal (Rakesh) and Ashok Raj. Sponsored R&D in India: The projectsponsoring pattern and main outcome of projects sponsored by majorcentral departments/agencies. Scientometrics. 43, 3; 1998; 393-421.

49. Clarke (Beverly L). Multiple authorship trends in scientific papers.Science. 143,3608; 1964; 822-824.

50. Cohen (J E). Size, Age and Productivity of scientific and technicalresearch groups. Scientometrics. 20, 3; 1991; 395-416.

51. Coile (R C). Bibliometric study of scientific productivity. AD-A054442;1978, http://www.sti.nasa.gov

52. Coile (R C). A Bibliometric examination of the square root theory ofscientific publication productivity. ADA047237; 1977,http://www.sti.nasa.gov

53. Cole (Jonathan R) and Cole (Stephen). The Ortega Hypothesis.Science. Oct; 1972; 368-375.

54. Crewe (I). Reputation, research and reality: the publication records ofUK Departments of politics 1978-1984. Scientometrics. 14; 1988; 235­250.

55. Cronin (Blaise). The need for a theory of citing. Journal ofDocumentation. 37,1; 1981; 16-24.

286

56. Crouch (D), Irvine (J) and Martin (B R). An evaluation of the UnitedKingdom's research performance in Ocean currents and proteincrystallography. Scientometrics. 9; 1986; 239-243.

57. Croxton (F E) and Cowden (0 J). Applied general statistics. London.1978.

58. Dalai (B K) and Ramesh (0 B). Publication pattern in scientific andindustrial research in India: a bibliometric study. Annals of LibraryScience and Documentation. 42, 1; 1995; 35-38.

59. Dalrymple (P) and Varlejs (J). Trends in publication productivity oflibrary and information science faculty 1978-1988. Journal of Educationfor Library and Information Science. 36, 2; 1995; 87-103.

60. Davoust (E) and Schmadel (L 0), A Study of the publishing activity ofastronomers since 1969. Scientometrics. 22, 1; 1991; 9-39.

61. De Arenas (Judith Licea). Significant Mexican research in the healthsciences: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics. 53, 1; 2002; 39-48.

62. Dhawan (S M) and Yadav (R S). A study on most frequently citedjournals by Indian Scientists in physics. Annales of Library Science andDocumentation. 19, 4; 1972; 185-193

63. Dimitroff (Alexandra) and Arlitsch (Kenning). Self-citations in the libraryand information science literature. Journal of Documentation. 51, 1;1995; 44-56.

64. Ding (Y). A Bibliometric analysis of collaboration in the field ofinformation retrieval. The International Information & Library Review.30; 1999; 367-376.

65. Dizon (L B) and Sadorra (M S M). Patterns of publication by the staff ofan international fisheries research center. Scientometrics. 32, 1; 1995;67-75.

66. Donohue (Joseph C). Bibliometric analysis of certain informationscience literature. Journal of the American Society for InformationScience. 1972; 313-317.

67. Dore (Jean-Christophe) and Ojasoo (Tiiu). How to analyse publicationtime trends by correspondence factor analysis: analysis of publicationsby 48 countries in 18 disciplines over 12 years. Journal of the AmericanSociety for Information Science and Technology. 52, 9; 2001; 763-769.

68. Edem (Selong U). Quantitative measurement of publication outputamong librarians in Nigerian Universities. Annales of Library Scienceand Documentation. 41, 2; 1994; 55-62.

287

69. Egghe (L). Methodological aspects of bibliometrics, Library Science.25, 3; 1988; 179-191.

70. Egghe (L). Theory of collaboration and collaborative measures.Information Processing and Management. 27, 2/3; 1991; 177-202.

71. Eisenhofer (Graeme). Scientific productivity: Waning importance forcareer development of today's scientists?, http://his.com/-graeme/pandp.html

72. Finkenstaedt (T). Measuring research performance in the Humanities.Scientometrics. 19, 5-6; 1990; 34-37.

73. Fox (M F). Publication productivity among scientists: a critical review.Social Studies of Science. 13; 1983; 93-116.

74. Frame (J D). Measuring scientific activity in lesser developed countries.Scientometrics, 2, 2; 1980; 133-145.

75. Frohlich (Cliff) and Resler (Lynn). Analysis of publications and citationsfrom a Geophysical Research Institute. Journal of the AmericanSociety for Information Science and Technology. 52, 2; 2001; 701-713.

76. Frohmann (Bernd). Bibliometric analysis of the literature of cataloguingand classification. Library Research. 4, 4; 1982; 355-373.

77. Fox (M F). Publication productivity among scientists: a critical view.Social Studies of Science. 13; 1983; 93-116.

78. Furqan (Ullah M). Contribution of Indian· hydrologists in journal ofhydrology: A scientometric analysis. Annals of Library Science andDocumentation. 41, 3; 1994; 95-101.

79. Gaillard (J). Use of publication lists to study scientific production andstrategies of scientists in developing countries. Scientometrics. 23, 1;1992; 57-73.

80. Garfield (Eugene). Citation analysis as a tool in Journal Evaluation.Science. 178; 1972; 471-479.

81. Garfield (Eugene). How lSI selects journals for coverage quantitativeand qualitative considerations. Current Science. 22; 1990; 5-13.

82. Garg (K C) and Dutt (B). Bibliometrics of Agricultural Research in India.IAALD Quarterly Bulletin. XXXVII, 3; 1992; 133-139.

83. Garg (K C) and Ashok Kumar. Information gathering habits of R&Dscientists: a survey. Annals of Library Science and Documentation. 31,1-2; 1984; 63-73.

288

84. Garg (K C) and Karki (M M S). Bibliometrics of researchcommunications of INSA fellows. Journal of Scientific and IndustrialResearch. 51, Dec; 1992; 929-935.

85. Garg (K C) and Dutt (B). Bibliometrics of Indian science as reflectedthrough Science Citation Index. Journal of Scientific and IndustrialResearch. 51, Apr; 1992; 329-340.

86. Garg (K C) and Lalitha Sharma. A Study of R&D indicators in Indianindustry using Bradford's law. Journal of Scientific and IndustrialResearch. 53, Feb; 1994; 81-87.

87. Garg (K.C) and Rao (M.K.D). Bibliometric analysis of scientificproductivity: a case study of Indian Physics Laboratory. Scientometrics.13; 1988; 261-269.

88. Gayatri Mahapatra. Correlation between growth of publications andcitations: a study based on growth curves. Annals of Library Scienceand Documentation. 41, 1; 1994; 8-12.

89. Gayatri Mahapatra and Rama Kaul. Bibliometric analysis of citationclassics in life sciences. Library Science. 31, 3; 1994; 129-134.

90. Gillett (R). Determining the best departments by their best publications:a strategy best avoided. Scientometrics. 17, 1-2; 1989.

91. Godin (Benoit). The Canadian Government's scientific output: abibliometric profile. 2000. http://www.ost.qc.ca

92. Goel (Kamlesh). Bibliometrics of Social Science Research in India.University News, 39, 15; 2001; 9-11.

93. Goel (K) and Garg (K C). Social science research in India: abibliometric study. Collection Management. 17,4; 1993; 95-104.

94. Goffman (William A). Mathematical method for analyzing the growth ofa scientific discipline. Journal of the Association for ComputingMachinery. 18,2; 1971; 173-185.

95. Gomez (Monique). A Bibliometric study to manage a journal collectionin an astronomical library: Some results. Library and InformationServices in Astronomy, IV, Prague, Czech Republic, 2002. p214-222

96. Gomez (I), Sanz (E) and Mendez (A). Utility of bibliometric analysis forresearch policy: a case study of Spanish research in neuroscience.Research Policy. 19,5; 1990; 457-466.

97. Griffith (Belver C). The aging of scientific literature: a citation analysis.Journal of Documentation. 35, 3; 1979; 179-196.

289

98. Gu (Yinian). An exploratory study of Malaysian publication productivityin computer science and information technology. Journal of theAmerican Society for Information Science and Technology. 53, 12;2002; 974-986.

99. Gupta (8 M). Science in India: Performance of Council of Scientific andIndustrial Research laboratories based on the productivity profile ofscientists. Research Evaluation. 8, 3; 1999; 177-187.

100. Gupta (8 M) and Suresh Kumar. Scientific productivity in theoreticalpopulations genetics: a case study in core journals. Library Sciencewith a slant to Documentation and information studies. 35, 2; 1998; 89­97.

101. Gupta (8 M). Modeling the growth of world social science literature.Scientomertrics. 53,1; 2002; 161-164.

102. Gupta (8 M) and Nathan (S S). Scientific and technological journals indeveloping countries. ILA bulletin. 15, 1-2; 1979; 11-19.

103. Gupta (8 M). Productivity of physics research efforts in India. ILABulletin. XV, 3-4; 1979

104. Gupta (8 M). A Citation analysis of internal and external connections ofa research branch: a case study of solar energy research in the USSR.Annals of Library Science and Documentation. 27, 1-4; 1980; 61-65.

105. Gupta (0 K). Author productivity patterns: Geoscientific literature ofNigeria for the period 1904-1979. Library Science with a slat toDocumentation. 130, 2; 1993; 76-89.

106. Gupta (0 K). Lotka's law and its application to author productivitydistribution of psychological literature of Africa, 1966-1975. Herald ofLibrary Science. 38,4; 1989; 318-327.

107. Gupta (0 K). Collaborative research trends in exploration geophysics.Annals of Library Science and Documentation. 40, 2; 1993; 48-55.

108. Gupta (0 K). Lotka's law and productivity patterns of entomologicalresearch in Nigeria for the period 1900-1973. Scientometrics. 12, 1-2;1987; 33-46.

109. Gupta (0 K). Scientometric study of exploration geophysics - authorproductivity trends. Annals of Library Science and Documentation. 39,4; 1992; 145-152.

110. Howe (Harlan). PUblish or Perish: It's not just for academics anymore.Microwave Journal. Sep; 1999; 172-181.

290

111. Huanwen (Cheng). A bibliometric study of library and informationresearch in India. IFLA General Conference, 62nd

, 1995.

112. Humayoon Kabir (S). Authorship trend and solo research inbibliometrics: a bibliometric study, Library Science. 31, 2; 1994; 87-90.

113. Humayoon Kabir (S). Pattern of distributionof research publications: acase study regarding scientists in CMFRI, Cochin. Library Herald.27, 1­2; 1988; 20-28.

114. Hussain (S S M). British Otortionolaryngological research: an analysisof publications. Scientometrics. 26, 2; 1993; 255-261.

115. IS : 2381-1978 Recommendations for bibliographical references:Essential and supplementary elements (first revision). Indian StandardInstitution.

116. Irvine (J). International comparisons of scientific performance revisited.Scientometrics. 15; 1989; 281-308.

117. Jacobs (Daisy) and Ingwersen (Peter). A Bibliometric study of thepublication patterns in the sciences of South African scholars 1981­1986. Scientometrics. 47, 1; 2000; 75-93.

118. Jeevan (V K) and Gupta (B M. A). Scientometric analysis of researchoutput from Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur. Scientometrics.53,1; 2002; 165-168.

119. Jordan (Kelly M) and Conkling (Thomas W). The Use of AerospaceJournal Citations in Collection Management. Aerospace SciencesMeeting &- Exhibit, 34th

, Reno NV, Jan 6-10,1997. AIAA-97-0468

120. Joshi (Anupama N) and Maheswarappa (B S). Studies in scientificproductivity: a review of literature. INICAE. 15,2; 1996; 161-177.

121 . Joshi (Y). Analysis of publications of the Central Plantation CropsResearch Institute. Quarterly Bulletin of IAALD. XXIX, 1; 1984; 5-10.

122. Kademani (B S), Kalyane (V L) and Kademani (A B). Bibliometricindicators for productivity analysis of an individual scientists. TheInternational Journal of Scientometrics and Infometrics. 2, 4; 1996; 49­58.

123. Kalyane (V L), Sen (B K). A bibliometric study of the journal of oil seedsresearch. Annales of Library Science and Documentation. 43, 2; 1995;121-141.

124. Kapoor (S K). Citation analysis of earth science literature. Annals ofLibrary Science and Documentation. 31, 1-2; 1984; 56-62.

291

125. Karanjai (A). CSIR research output 1988: a bibliometric study. 1988.CSIR; New Delhi.

126. Karki (M M S). Environmental science research in India: an analysis ofpublications. Scientometrics. 18, 5-6; 1990; 363-373.

127. Kim (Mee-Jean). Citation pattern of Korean physicists and mechanicalengineers: Differences by type of publication source and type ofauthorship. Scientometrics. 55,3; 2002; 421-436

128. Kim (Mee-Jean). A' bibliometric analysis of physics publications inKorea, 1994-1998. Scientometrics. 50, 3; 2001; 503-521.

129. King (J). Review of bibliometric and other science indicators and theirrole in research evaluation. Journal of Information Science. 13; 1987;261-276.

130. Klaic (B), Scientometric analysis of the research activities of chemistsfrom the Rugier Boskovic Institute (Yugoslavia), 1976-1985.Scientometrics. 19; 1990; 11-24.

131. Klaic (B). Analysis of the scientific productivity of researchers from therepublic of Croatia for the period 1990-1992. Scientometrics. 32, 2;1992; 133-152.

132. Kochhar (V B). Materials research in India: a quantitative analysis ofpublications output in scientific journals. Journal of Library andInformation Science. 17, 2; 1992; 198-207.

133. Koenig (M E D). Determinants of experts judgment of researchperformance. Scientometrics._4; 1982; 361-378.

134. Kostoff (Ronald N). Evaluating productivity. http://www.the-scientists.com/vr2000/oct/let 001016.html

135. Kostoff (R N). Performance measures for Government sponsoredresearch: Overview and background. Scientometrics. 36, 3; 1996; 281­292.

136. Laharia (S N) and Singh (V P). Scientific productivity measurement.Productivity. 18, 1; 1987; 57-64.

137. Lal (A) and Ray (P K). Pattern of research contribution in leadinghorticultural journals of the world: a comparative study. IASLIC Bulletin.36,3; 1991; p95-102.

292

138. Lalitha Kumari and Sengupta (I N). Analysis of the growth of Lectinliterature: 1983-1986. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research. 47,Dec; 1988; 692-696.

139. Lancaster (F W) and Mehrotra (R). Where Indian Scientists Publish.Current Science, 53; 1984; 684-688.

140. Lancaster (F W). Publication patterns in Brazil. Science and Culture.34; 1982; 627-634.

141. Lancaster (F W) and Lee (Ja-ich), Acid rains. Journal of the AmericanSociety for Information Science. 36, 6; 1983; 389

142. Lancaster (F W), Mehrota (Rashmi) and Ostu (Kiyoushi). Somepublication patterns in Indian and Japanese science: a bibliometriccomparision. Scientometrics. 9, 4; 1984; p11-16.

143. Lawani (S M). Periodical literature of tropical agriculture. UnescoBulletin of Library. 26, 2; 1973; 88-92.

144. Lawrence (Barbara), Jakim (Boris) and Lenti (Anthony). An Analysis ofNational Publication trends in the Aerospace Literature. Congress ofthe International Astronautical Federation, 45th

, Jerusalem, Israel, Oct9-14, 1994. 10p IAF-94IAA 5.2.670

145. Leeuwen (T N V) and Tussen (R J W). Assessing multidisciplinaryareas of Science and Technology: a synthetic bibliometric study ofDutch Nuclear energy research. Scientometrics. 26, 1; 1993; p115-133.

146. Leimkubler (Ferdinand F). The Bradford distribution. Journal ofDocumentation. 23, 3; 1967; 197-207.

147. Lemoine (W). The frequency distribution of research papers andpatents according sex: The case of CSIR, India. Scientometrics. 23, 3;1992; p449-469.

148. Licea De Arenas (Judith), Castanos-Lomnitz (Heriberta), Arenas-Licea(Judit). Significant Mexican research in the health sciences: Abibliometric analysis. Scientometrics)...53 , 1; 2002; 39-48.

149. Lotka (A J). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journalof the Washington Academy of Science. 16; 1926; p32.

150. Luukkonen (T). The measurement of international scientificcollaboration. Scientometrics. 28, 1; 1993; 15-36.

151. Mackerle (J). Some remarks on progress with finite elements.Computers & Structures. 55, 6; 1005; 1101-1106.

293

152. Maclean (J) and Janagap (C). The publication productivity ofinternational agriculture research centers. Scientometrics. 28, 3; 1993;329-340.

153. Macroberts (M H) and Macroroberts (Barbara R). Problems of citationanalysis. Scientometrics. 36, 3; 1996; 435-444.

154. Macroberts (M H) and Macroroberts (Barbara R). A re-evaluation ofLotka's law of scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science. 12 ;1982; 443-450.

155. Mahapatra (M). On the validity of the theory of exponential growth ofscientific literature. IASLIC Conference, 15, 1985. p61-70

156. Mahapatra (G) and Kaul (R). Self citation by Indian botanists. ILABulletin. XXVII, 4; 1992; 161-167.

157. Mahapatra (G). Correlation between growth of publications andcitations: a study based on growth curves. Annales of library scienceand documentation. 41, 1; 1994; 8-12.

158. Maheswarappa (B S). Bibliographical phenomena of phytomorphologyliterature: a citation analysis. Annals of Library Science andDocumentation. 30, 1; 1983; 22-30.

159. Maheswarappa (B S) and Nagaraju (A). Botanical literature in India1973-1983. International Library Review. 20, 4; 1988; 509-515.

160. Maheswarappa (B S) and Surya Rao (K). Journal literature of foodscience and technology: a bibliometric study. Annals of Library Scienceand Documentation. 29, 3; 1982; 126-134.

161. Maheswarappa (B S) and Nagappa (B). Research collaboration in thefield of phytopathology - a bibliometric study. Annals of library scienceand documentation. 34, 4; 1987; 173-176.

162. Maheswarappa (B S), Nagappa (B) and Mathias (S A). Collaborativeresearch in science and technology in India a bibliometric study.Journal of Library and Information Science (India). 9, 2; 1984; 154-159.

163. Maheswarappa (B S). Collaborative research in science andtechnology in India: a bibliometric study. Journal of Library andInformation science. 9, 2; 1984; 154-159.

164. Maheswarappa (B S) and Mathias (S A). Research collaborationindifferent disciplines of applied sciences in India. (1965-1983): abibliometric study. ISALIC Bulletin. 32, 3; 1987; 105-114.

294

165. Maheswarappa (B S) and Mathias (S A). Multiple authorship andcollaborative research in biological sciences in India: a bibliometricstudy. Library Herald. 27, 3-4; 1988; 86-94.

166. Maheswarappa (B S) and Mathias (S A). Authorial collaboration invarious disciplines of the physical sciences in India: a bibliometricstudy. Journal of Library and Information Science. 12, 2; 1987; 136­155.

167. Maheswarappa (B S) and Vinutha (A). Collaborative research inGenetics. International Library Review. 21,2; 1989; 173-176.

168. Maheswarappa (B S) and Ningoji (M M). Growth of literature in the fieldof applied science in India (1965-89). International Information,Communication and Education. 12, 2; 1993; 191-200

169. Marrao (Patti M). An Analysis of the citation' patterns of federally­employed marine science researchers: A Citation analysis.http://www.nmfs.org

170. Martin (John). Citation analysis. Journal of Documentation. 31, 4; 1975;290-297.

171. Martin (B R) and Irvine (J). Assessing basic research: Some partialindicators of scientific progress in Radioastronomy. Research Policy.12; 1983; 61-80.

172. Mcmurtray (Frances) and Ginski (John M). Citation patterns of thecardiovascular serial literature. Journal of the American Society forInformation Science, May-Jun; 1972; 172-175.

173. Melin (G) and Persson (0). Studying research collaboration using co­authorships. Scientometrics. 36, 3; 1996; 363-377.

174. Mendez (A). Six years of Spanish scientific activity in physics andengineering through Inspec and Compendex. Scientometrics. 12; 1987;81-100.

175. Mendez (A) and Gomez (I). Spanish scientific productivity through eightinternational databases. Scientometrics. 10, 3-4; 1986; 207-219.

176. Meyyappan (N), Srinivasan (R) and Shanmugasigamani (K).Bibliometric study on electrochemical research based on paperspublished in core journals. Malaysian Journal of Library andInformation Science. 2, 1; 1997; 1-11.

177. Mills (P R). Characteristics of published conference proceedings.Journal of Documentation. 29, 1; 1973; 36-50.

295

178. Mitra (A C). Literature cited by Indian scientists: a study of the usepattern of literature and its English language, foreign language anddomestic components published in various periods. Annales of LibraryScience and Documentation. 19, 3; 1972; 119-145.

179. Moed (H F). The use of bibliometric data for the measurement ofUniversity research performance. Research Policy. 14; 1985; 131

180. Moravcsik ( M J). An analysis of citation pattern in Indian physics.Science and Culture. 42, 6; 1976; 295-301.

181. Mularski (Carol A) and Bradigam (P S). Academic health scienceslibrarians publication patterns. Bulletin of the Medical LibraryAssociation. 79, 2; 1991; 168-177.

182. Myscko-Mergrin (A V). Estimates of the annual total number of titles onmedicine and its disciplines and scientific productivity of physicians.Scientometrics. 18, 5-6; 1990; 375-388.

183. Naderhof (A J). Changes in publication patterns of biotechnologists: Anevolution of the impact of Government stimulation programs in sixindustrial nations. Scientometrics. 14; 1988; 475-485.

184. Naderhof (A J), Meiger (R F), Moed (H F) and Van Raan (A F J).Research performance indicator for University departments: a study ofan agricultural university. Scientometries. 27; 1993; 157-178.

185. Nagpaul (P S). Contribution of Indian industries to the mainstreamscientific literature: a bibliometric assessment. Scientometrics. 4; 1995;11-36.

186. Nagpaul (P S), Garg (K C), Gupta (B M), Bhattacharya (S), AparnaBasu, Praveen Sharma and Suresh Kumar. Emerging trends inscientometrics. 1999. Allied Publishers; New Delhi.

187. Narin (F) and Rozek (R P). Bibliometric analysis of US pharmaceuticalindustry research performance. Research Policy. 17; 1988; 139-154.

188. Narin (F). Evaluative bibliometric: the use of publication and citationanalysis and evaluation of scientific activity. 1976. Computer Horizons;New Jersey.

189. Nazim Ali (S). Food science and technology literature: a bibliometricanalysis. Library Science with a slant to documentation. 20, 1; 1983;31-38.

190. Nordstrom (L 0). Applied versus basic science in the literature of plantbiology: a bibliometric perspective. Scientometrics. 12; 1987; 381-393.

296

191. Osareh (Farideh). Bibliometrics, Citation Analysis and Co-Citationanalysis: A Review of Literature I. Libri. 46; 1996; 149-158.

192. Osareh (Farideh). Bibliometrics, Citation Analysis and Co-Citationanalysis: A Review of Literature II. Libri. 46; 1996; 217-225.

193. Otsu (Kiyoshi). Bibliometric study of Japanese science and socialscience publications. Library and Information Science. 21; 1983; 19-27.

194. Pao (Miranda Lee). Lotka's law: a testing procedure. Informationprocessing and management. 21, 4; 1985; 305-320.

195. Parvathanmma (N) and Gunjal (S.R). Growth pattern of literature andscientific productivity of authors in Indian Earth Science (1978-88): ABibliometric study. Library Science with a slant to Documentation. 30,2; 1993; 54-64.

196. Phelan (Thomas J). Evaluation of scientific productivity.http://www.ucla.edu

197. Pinelli (Thomas E), Barclay (Rebecca 0), Keene (Michael L), Flammia(Madelyn) and Kennedy (John M). The Technical CommunicationPractice of Russian and US Aerospace Engineers and Scientists. IEEETransactions on Professional Communication. 36, 2; 1993; 95-104.

198. Potter (W G). Lotka's law revised. Library Trends. 3, 1; 1981; 21-39.

199. Prakash Chand and Sengar (Oharmendra Sing). A Bibliometric study ofsolar energy research in India. Journal of Library and InformationScience. 25, 1; 2000; 70-83.

200. Price (0 J de Solla). Little science, big science. 1963. ColumbiaUniversity Press; New York.

201. Price (0). Network of scientific papers. Science. 149; 1965; 510-515.

202. Prichard (A). Statistical bibliography of bibliometrics. Journal ofDocumentation. 25, 4; 1969; 348-349.

203. Pulta Reddy (V) and Sharma (S B S R). Bibliometric study of researchpublications in Indian environmental Genetic Toxicology. IASLICBulletin. 33,1; 1988; 7-14.

204. Quaesada-Allue (L A) and Giflin (0 S). Scientific output in Argentina1966-1983. Scientometrics. 34, 1; 1995; 27-35.

205. Radhakrishnan (T) and Kernizan (R). Lotka's law and computerscience literature. Journal of the American Society for InformationScience. Jan; 1979; 50-54.

297

206. Rahman (Khan A). Technical report literature in chemistry andengineering: Bibliometric and content analysis. 1988.http://www.sti.nasa.gov

207. Raina (Roshan). Information needs and publishing habits ofGeoscientists: a case study. Annales of Library Science andDocumentation. 34, 4; 1987; 163-172.

208. Ramakrishna (N V) and Pangannaya (N B). Growth of biotechnologyliterature: a bibliometric study. Information studies. 5, 1; 1999; 25-37.

209. Ramakrishna (N V) and Pangannaya (N B). Bibliometrics of animal cellculture technology literature: a study based on the animal cellbiotechnology. Annales of Library Science and Documentation. 46, 3;1999; 81-96.

210. Ramesh (LSRCV). Publication pattern in Oryza from 1986-1995: abibliometric study. SERLS Journal of Information Management. 37, 3;2000; 215-277.

211. Rana (Madan S) and Sunita Agarwal. Authorship trends in Indianwildlife and fisheries literature - a bibliometric study. Annals of Libraryand Documentation. 41, 1; 1994; 13-18.

212. Ranga Rao (B V). Scientific research in India: Analysis of publications.Journal of Scientific Industrial Research. 26; 1967; 166-196.

213. Ravichandra Rao (I.K). The Distribution of scientific productivity andsocial change. Journal of the American Society for InformationScience, 1980; 111-122.

214. Rey-Rocha (Jesus). Research productivity of scientists in consolidatedvs. non-consolidated teams: The case of Spanish university geologists.Scientometrics. 55, 1; 2002; 137-156.

215. Roshan Raina. Information needs and publishing habits ofGeoscientists: a case study. Annals of Library Science andDocumentation. 34, 4; 1987; 163-172.

216. Rousseau (Ronald). Suggestions for research topics in citation andpublication analysis. Library Science, 32, 1; 1995; 3-12.

217. Russell (Jane M). Publishing patterns of Mexican Scientists:Differences between national and international papers. Scientometrics.41,1-2; 1998; 113-124.

218. Sarojam (N). Bibliometric analysis of Indian forest entomologyliterature. Library Science. 26; 1989; 228-244.

298

219. Schubart (A) and Brawn (T). Some scientometrics measures ofpublishing performance of 85 Hungarian research institute.Scientometrics. 3; 1981; 379-282.

220. Seemungal (0). Neuroscience research: an audit of research activity.http://www.wellcom.ac. uk

221. Seglen (Per 0) and Aksnes (Oag W). Scientific productivity and groupsize: a bibliometric analysis of Norwegian microbiological research.Scientometries. 49, 1; 2000; 125-143.

222. Selong Edem (U). Quantitative measurement of publication outputamong librarians in Nigerian Universities. Annals of Library Scienceand Documentation. 41, 2; 1994; 52-62.

223. Sen (B.K) and Narendra Kumar. Indian contributions in bibliometrics1958-1984: a review. Annals of Library Science and Documentation.33, 3; 1986; 85-103.

224. Sen (B K) and Shailendra (K). Evaluation of recent scientific researchoutput by a bibliometric method. Scientometrics. 23, 1; 1992; 31-46.

225. Sen (Subir K) and Gan (Shyamal). Bibliometrics: Concepts andapplications in the study of productivity of scientists. InternationalForum on Information and Documentation. 15,3; 1990; 13-21

226. Sengupta (I N). Bibliometrics and identification of core periodicals.Herald of Library Science. 29, 3-4; 1990; 226-242

227. Sengupta (I N), Ghosh (B N), and Sengupta (K N). Role of bibliometryin journal selection and library management. ISALIC Bulletin. 25, 2;1980; 87-92.

228. Shukla (Milind C). Publication patterns in the field of renewable energy:an analysis of Indian energy abstracts. Indian Energy Abstracts. 8, 1;1989; 1-18.

229. Singh (J P). Citation patterns of optical engineering. ILA Bulletin. XXV,1; 1989; 26-37.

230. Sinha (S C) and Bhatnagar (I M S). The Information profile of a plantpathologist: a bibliometric study. Annals of Library Science andDocumentation. 27,1-4; 1980; 106-113.

231. Sinha (S C) and Furqan Ullah (M). Eleven years of CBRI researchoutput, 1980-90 - A Bibliometric study. Annals of Library Science andDocumentation. 40, 3; 1993; 77-91.

299

232. Sinha (S C) and Dhiman (A K). Science citation index: a failure underIndian scientific environment. Annals of Library Science andDocumentation. 47, 2; 2000; 63-66.

233. Singh (Udai N) and Subbaiah Arunachalam. Sophisticated Science inmiddle-level countries: Publication and citation patterns insuperconductivity research in Canada, India and Australia in the pre­high Tc superconductivity era. Journal of Scientific and IndustrialResearch, 49, Feb; 1990; 53-60.

234. Six (J) and Bustamante (M C). Bibliometric analysis of publications inexperimental particle physics on cosmic rays and with accelerators.Scientometrics. 37, 1; 1996; 25-37.

235. Sridhar (M S). A study of co-authorship and collaborative researchamong Indian Space Technologist. R&D Management. 12, 3; 1985;243-249.

236. Sridhar (M S). Citing patterns of Indian Space Technologists.International Library Review. 17; 1985; 259-274.

237. Sridhar (M S). A study of correlation of use, citation and publishing ofjournal papers by Indian Space Technologists. Collection Management.12,1-2; 1990; 147-152.

238. Subbaiah (R). Eight years of grape research in India (1901-1981): Abibliometric study. Annals of Library Science and Documentation. 31,1-2; 1984; 18-26.

239. Subramanyam (K). Research productivity and breadth of Interest ofComputer Scientists. Journal of the American Society for InformationScience. 35, 6; 1984; 369-371.

240. Subramanyam (K). Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: areview. Journal of Information Science. 6; 1983; 33-38

241. Suriya (M) and Manimekalai. Research productivity of the academiccommunity of the marine biological center, Annamalai University.Kelpro Bulletin, 1, 1; 1997; 20-26.

242. Sylviain (C). Canadian research activity in aquaculture: a bibliometricanalysis. Scientometrics. 27, 3; 1993; 295-316.

243. Sylvan Katz (J). Bibliometric indicators for National Systems ofInnovation. http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Users/sylvank/best/nsi/part1.html

244. Tagliacozzo (Renata). Self-citations in scientific literature. Journal ofDocumentation. 33, 4; 1977; 251-265.

300

245. Tague (J). What is the use of bibliometrics? In Egghe (L) andRousseau (R), Ed. Infomtrics 87/88. 1988. Elsevier. P271-278

246. Tague (J), Beheshti (Jamshid) and Rees-Potter (Lorna). The Law ofexponential growth: Evidence, implications and forecasts. LibraryTrends. Summer; 1981; 125-149

247. Tapaswi (M P) and Maheswarappa (B S). Some trends in Indianoceanographic research publications. Library Science with a slant todocumentation and information studies. 36, 3; 1999; 173-192.

248. Thomas (K Kurian). Evaluation of Indian agro-biology journals:coverage in abstracting/lndexing services. IAALD Quarterly Bulletin.XLI; 1996; 245-250.

249. Ugolini (0), Parodi (S) and Santi (L). Analysis of publication quality incancer research. Scientometrics. 38, 2; 1997; 265-274.

250. Upadhyay (J L). Bibliometric analysis of breast cancer literature. IndianJournal of Information, Library & Society. 2, 3-4; 1989; 270-284:

251. Uzun (A) and Ozel (M E). Publication patterns of Turkish astronomers.Scientometrics. 37,1; 1996; 159-169.

252. Uzun (A). Bibliometric analysis of physics publications from middleeastern countries. Scientometrics. 36, 2; 1996; 259-269.

253. Uzun (A). A quantitative analysis of Turkish publication output inphysics between 1938-1987. Scientometrics. 19; 1990; 57-73.

254. Van Raan (A F J). Measuring science: Capita Selecta of current mainissues. In Handbook of Quantitative Science and TechnologyResearch. 2004. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Oordrecht. p19-50.

255. Verma (R K), Sharma (Y K) and Khatri (H SO). Trends in Nuclear. Research and its publications - An analysis based on five yearscoverage in the Indian Science abstracts. Annals of Library Scienceand Documentation. 29, 2; 1982; 64-69.

256. Villagra (Rubio A). Scientific production of Spanish universities in thefield of social science and language. Scientometrics. 24, 1; 1992; 3-19.

257. Vinkler (Peter). Evaluation of the publication activity of research teamsby means of scientometric indicators. Current Science. 79, 5; 2000;602-612.

258. Viswanathan (B) and Krishnan (C N). Our science and technologyjournal: can we improve them? Annals of Library Science andDocumentation. 35, 1; 1988; 20-25.

301

259. Voos (H). Lotka and information science. Journal of the AmericanSociety oflnformation Science. 25, 4; 1974; 270-272.

260. Wallace (Danny P). The use of statistical methods in library andinformation science. Journal of the American Society for InformationScience. 36, 6; 1985; 402-410.

261. Windsor (Donald A) and Windsor (Diane M). Citation of the literature byinformation scientists in their own publications. Journal of the AmericanSociety of Information Science. 24; 1973; 377-381

262. White (Howard D) and Griffith (Belver C). Authors as markers ofintellectual space: Co-citation in studies of science, technology andsociety. Journal of Documentation. 38, 4; 1982; 255-272.

263. Wolfe (Joe). How to write a Ph D thesis. http://www.unsw.edu/au

264. Zener (C). An analysis of scientific productivity. Applied MathematicalReview. 59; 1968; 1078-1081

302