2019 Bond Program

Roadways and Infrastructure

June 20, 2019

Roadways and Infrastructure Needs

• Address existing transportation infrastructure deficiencies such as:

• Capacity

• Congestion

• Safety

• Address future capacity needs based on projected growth

• Funding future phases of ongoing projects

• Continue Street Reconstruction OCI Improvement

2June 13, 2019 ID 19-449

3

Proposed Program Funding

Staff is in discussion with

multiple agencies to leverage the

City’s bond funding to

achieve 3x the value in capital

projects.

Proposition 2 – Staff Prioritization

Project Total Project CostStaff Recommended

City Bond Funding

Proposition 2: Roadways and Infrastructure

Bonnie Brae (V, VI, VII) $111.5M $27M

Hickory Creek $160M $34M

Street Rehab Program $35M $35M

Sidewalks $12M $12M

Robinson Road $12.3M $12.3M

Ryan Road $47.66M $44.26M

Jim Christal $16.8M $1.65M

FM 428 $44M -

Other Proposition Requests

Street Lighting $5M - $15M $0

Total $444M - $454M $166.21M

Arterial Projects

4

PROJECT SELECTION:

• Demand in high growth areas

• Historically unsafe roadways

• Regional connectivity• Capacity improvements

• Funding opportunities

• Improve safety in adjacent neighborhoods

Area 1

Area 2

Area 3

June 13, 2019 ID 19-449

June 13, 2019 ID 19-449

Area 1 –Upcoming Developments

5

June 13, 2019 ID 19-449

Area 2 –Upcoming Developments

6

June 13, 2019 ID 19-449

Area 3 –Upcoming Developments

7

Project Cost Information• The total cost to complete the all elements of the project is estimated.

• The total cost is the sum of:

• Design

• Right-of-Way Acquisition

• Construction

• Contingency

• Inflation

• Staff Time

• Contract Incentives/Disincentives

• For each project, the total project cost and the City’s projected cost have been estimated.

8June 13, 2019 ID 19-449

Bonnie Brae Street Phases V, VI, & VII

• Limits: Scripture Street to Loop 288

• Scope: Widen approximately 3 miles to 4-lane divided

• Characteristics/LOS:

• Existing - Peak hour LOS D or worse

• Proposed – LOS A or B

• Total Cost: $111.5M

• City Cost: $27M

9June 13, 2019 ID 19-449

Hickory Creek Road

10

•Limits: I-35 W To FM 2499 (5.75 miles)

•Scope: Construct/Widen to a 6-lane divided

facility

•Characteristics/LOS:

•Current - LOS D or worse

•Proposed – LOS A or B

•Total Cost: $160M City Cost: $34M

June 13, 2019 ID 19-449

Neighborhood Streets Rehabilitation

11June 13, 2019 ID 19-449

Overall Condition Index (OCI)

• Numerical score ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best)

• OCI Consist of the following

• 80 % PCI (Pavement Condition Index)

• 20% RI (Ride Index)

• Typically performed by a pavement management consultant using specialized equipment

• OCI scores are used in conjunction with a pavementmanagement software program to develop preventativemaintenance plans to help manage street assets

Pavement Life Cycle Curve

Time

Pavem

en

t Q

uali

ty

has a 15% drop in quality

15% of pavement life

$1 spent now

Costs $8 if delayed

Very Good

Good

Very Poor

Poor

Excellent

Fair

40% of pavement life

has a 40% drop in quality

Typical Pavement Life Cycle Maintenance Impacts on Pavement Life Cycle

Neighborhood Streets

14

• City wide average OCI is 64

June 13, 2019 ID 19-449

OCI Range Description Relative Remaining Life Definition

85 – 100 Excellent 15 to 25 YearsLike new condition – little to no maintenance required; routine maintenance such as crack and joint sealing.

75 – 85 Very Good 12 to 20 YearsRoutine maintenance such as patching and crack sealing with surface treatments such as seal coats or slurries.

65 – 75 Good 10 to 15 YearsHeavier surface treatments and thin overlays. Localized panel replacements.

45 – 65 Fair to Marginal 7 to 12 Years Heavy surface-based inlays or overlays with localized repairs. Moderate to extensive panel replacements.

30 – 45 Poor 5 to 10 Years Sections will require very thick overlays, surface replacement, base reconstruction, and possible subgrade stabilization.

0 – 30 Very Poor 0 to 5 Years High percentage of full reconstruction.

Project Selection

15

OPTIONS:

• Option 1: Lowest OCI First

• Option 2: Low OCI grouped

• Option 3: Hybrid

June 13, 2019 ID 19-449

Neighborhood Streets

16

Advantages:

• Addresses the “very poor” streets that have an expected remaining life of 5-years or less.

Disadvantages:

• Potential to increase construction cost

• Does not include connecting streets

• Adds to construction fatigue

June 13, 2019 ID 19-449

OCI Segments Lane Miles Project Cost0 – 5 3 1 $1 M

0 – 10 15 5 $5 M0 – 15 61 20 $20 M0 – 20 135 42 $35 M0 – 25 230 72 $60 M0 – 30 362 115 $95 M

Neighborhood Streets

17

Area 1

Area 2

Area 3

June 13, 2019 ID 19-449

Segments Lane Miles Project CostSection 1 49 12.88 $10.8 MSection 2 49 13.24 $11.1 MSection 3 73 21.32 $17.9 MSection 4 51 12.78 $10.7 MSection 5 24 11.38 $9.5 MSection 6 20 6.91 $5.8 MSection 7 20 4.98 $4.2 M

TOTAL 286 83.49 $70.0 M

Advantages:

• Most efficient with respect to costs

• Includes connecting streets

• Improves all infrastructure in neighborhood

• Shortens construction fatigue experience

Disadvantages:

• Does not address all “very poor” streets

Neighborhood Streets Section

18

• 12.8 Lane Miles

• Total Cost: $10.7M

• Average OCI – 27.7

• Projected OCI – 75*

June 13, 2019 ID 19-449

Staff Recommended Option

19

Staff recommends a combination of the Neighborhoods and Lowest OCI Options.

Advantages:

• Addresses more of the “very poor” streets

• Gains more efficiency with respect to costs

• Includes connecting streets

• Improves all infrastructure in selected neighborhoods

• Shortens construction fatigue experience

Disadvantages:

• Does not address all “very poor” streets

• Does not minimize construction fatigue

• Still has some remaining disconnected segments

Recommended Option Cost: $70M

June 13, 2019 ID 19-449

Neighborhoods

Lowest OCI

Segments Lane Miles Project CostSection 1 49 12.88 $10.8 MSection 2 49 13.24 $11.1 MSection 3 73 21.32 $17.9 MSection 4 51 12.78 $10.7 MSection 5 24 11.38 $9.5 MSection 6 20 6.91 $5.8 MSection 7 20 4.98 $4.2 M

TOTAL 286 83.49 $70.0 M

OCI Segments Lane Miles Project Cost0 – 5 2 0.8 $0.8 M

0 – 10 13 4.8 $4.8 M0 – 15 48 16.9 $18.2 M0 – 20 102 32.3 $30 M0 – 25 230 72 $60 M0 – 30 362 115 $95 M

Sidewalks

20June 13, 2019 ID 19-449

Project Selection

21June 13, 2019 ID 19-449

Complete construction of unfunded sidewalks in 2018 and 2019 sidewalk bundles.

• 2018 Sidewalks – $1M, 2 miles

• 2019 Sidewalks - $2.2M, 3.25 miles

Project Selection

22June 13, 2019 ID 19-449

• Within ¼ mile of a School ($18.7 M), 28.4 miles

• Within ½ mile of a School ($130.8M), 198.3miles

• Within 1 mile of a School ($276.3M), 418.6miles

BASED ON PROXIMITY TO SCHOOLS

Example:Evers/Strickland

23June 13, 2019 ID 19-449

• 3 Miles of sidewalk to be added.

• Total Cost: $2M

Plan

24June 13, 2019 ID 19-449

• Design and acquire right-of-way or easements for sidewalks for the following year

• Construct sidewalks designed in previous year

• Leverage City funds to get Federal and State funds. SRTS funding typical City match is 20%

25June 13, 2019 ID 19-449

• Limits: FM 2499 to Teasley Lane

• Scope: Widen approximately 3,700 feet (0.7 miles) from 2 lanes to 4-lane divided

• Characteristics/LOS:

• Current LOS E

• Project LOS A

• Total Cost: $12.3M

• City Cost: $12.3M

Robinson Road

26June 13, 2019 ID 19-449

Ryan Road

• Limits: Teasley Lane to Country Club Road

• Scope: Widen approximately 2 miles from 2 lanes to 4 lanes divided

• Characteristics/LOS:

• Current LOS D or worse

• Proposed LOS A

• Total Cost: $47.66M

• City Cost: $44.26M

27June 13, 2019 ID 19-449

Ryan Road

• Limits: Teasley Lane to Country Club Road

• Scope: Area study shows future need is for a 2-lane road with intersection improvements at FM2181 and FM1830.

• Characteristics/LOS:

• Currently LOS D or worse

• Project LOS A

• Total Cost: $10M to $25M

• City Cost: $4M to $19M

28June 13, 2019 ID 19-449

• Limits: I-35 to Western Boulevard

• Scope: Widen approximately 1 mile from 2 lanes to 4-lane divided

• Characteristics:

Heavy Truck Traffic

• Total Cost: $16.8M

• City Cost: $1.65M

Jim Christal Road

29June 13, 2019 ID 19-449

Sherman Drive (FM 428)

• Limits: Loop 288 to Clear Creek (2 miles)

• Scope: Widen 2 lanes to 6-lane divided (ultimate)

TxDOT managed and funded

• Total Cost: $44M

• City Cost: $0

Project Funding Sources

30

ProjectTotal Project

Cost

Committed

Funding

Utility

Funding

TxDOT

Funds

NCTCOG

Funds

County

Funds

Other

Funds

City

FundingBonnie Brae (V, VI,

VII)$111.5M $19.2M $1.9M $36.8M $26.6M $27M

Hickory Creek $160M $13.8M $3.2M $36M $37M $ 36M $34M

Street Rehab Program $70M $70M

Sidewalks $12M $12M

Robinson Road $12.3M $12.3M

Ryan Road $10M - $25M $3M $3M $4M-$19M

Jim Christal $16.8M $15.4M $1.65M

FM 428 $44M $44M

Total $436.6M-

$451.6M$33M $8.1M $116.8M $37M $36M $42M

$161M-

$176M

April 1, 2019 ID 19-449

31

Proposed Program Funding

Staff is in discussion with

multiple agencies to leverage the

City’s bond funding to

achieve 3x the value in capital

projects.

Project Total Project CostStaff Recommended

City Bond Funding

Proposition 2: Roadways and Infrastructure

Bonnie Brae (V, VI, VII) $111.5M $27M

Hickory Creek $160M $34M

Street Rehab Program $70M $70M

Sidewalks $12M $12M

Robinson Road $12.3M $12.3M

Ryan Road $10M - $25M $4M-19M

Jim Christal $16.8M $1.65M

FM 428 $44M -

Other Proposition Requests

Street Lighting $5M - $15M $0

Total $442M - $467M $161M-176M

Proposition 2 – Staff Prioritization

Additional Projects for Consideration

Street Lighting

• Install upgraded lighting along arterial

and collector roadways as part of the

City’s CIP; developing a prioritized

program to select streets

• Invest $0.8M - $2.5M per year for the

next six years

• Total Cost: $5M - $15M

• City Cost: $5M - $15M

33

Example Priority Projects

Cost Estimates

University Drive $6.93M

FM 2499 $3.8M

FM 2181 $5.2M

US 377 $2.1M

Questions?

34April 1, 2019 ID 19-449