3.2 land use, socioeconomic, and farmland€¦ · 3.2 land use, socioeconomic, and farmland this...

21
I-73 Location Study 3.2-1 Final Environmental Impact Statement 3.2 LAND USE, SOCIOECONOMIC, AND FARMLAND This section summarizes the existing and forecasted land use, residential areas, public facilities, farmlands and forested lands use, socioeconomic setting, environmental justice, and land use policies in the study area. A complete description is found in the Land Use, Socioeconomic and Farmlands Technical Report. . The study area encompasses the City of Salem; however, all alternatives considered are located outside the city. Consequently, limited information regarding Salem is provided. 3.2.1 Existing Land Use Land use information was compiled from aerial photographs. General descriptions of the development in the area are based on field visits conducted during 1997 and early 1998. The study area exhibits a varied topography and is predominately rural in character. The City of Roanoke and the City of Salem are at the corridor’s northern end and the City of Martinsville is near the southern end. Five incorporated towns and numerous rural unincorporated places are located within the study area. The corridor’s western area is dominated by mountainous terrain, with major land uses including dairy farms and small manufacturing establishments. The corridor’s eastern side is characterized by rolling hills with croplands and rural/small town development. Major features within the study area include portions of the Jefferson National Forest, the Appalachian Trail, Mill Mountain, Cahas Mountain, the Blue Ridge Parkway, the Blackwater River, the Pigg River, the Smith River, Grassy Hill, Fork Mountain, and Chestnut Mountain. Major land use features near (but outside) the study area are Smith Mountain Lake to the east and Philpott Reservoir to the west. A description of the land uses and unique features is provided. Figure 3.2-1 shows existing land use. Table 3.2-1 provides the area in acres and hectares for each existing land use type in the study area. 3.2.1.1 Roanoke City, Salem City, Vinton, Roanoke County, Botetourt County, and Bedford County Roanoke City, Salem City, Vinton, and Roanoke County possess the most intensely developed land uses, the highest populations, and the greatest level of urban services/facilities. The I-581 and U.S. Route 220 Corridor runs south through the City of Roanoke’s older neighborhoods, commercial, and industrial core. This part of the study corridor includes the largest regional shopping center (Valley View Mall), the Roanoke Regional Airport, the Norfolk Southern Railroad Regional offices and yards, the Roanoke Civic Center, and historic downtown Roanoke. Roanoke County is slightly less developed than Roanoke City. Residential development dominates areas surrounding Roanoke City and Salem. Rural development dominates areas along the west and south county borders. The urbanizing portions of Botetourt County are located south of I-81 - in the vicinity of U.S. Route 220 Alternate, U.S. Route 11, and U.S. Route 460. The county’s largest concentration of commercial and office land uses are located in the vicinity of the Exit 150 interchange on I-81. Highway commercial businesses dominate this area. The southwest portion of Botetourt County includes portions of the industrial base located in the U.S. Route 11 and I-81 corridor between the Roanoke County line and the Town of Troutville. Other industrial land use concentrations are located in the area of Blue Ridge and in the portions of the county closest to the intersection of U.S. Route 220 Alternate and U.S. Route 221/U.S. Route 460. Bedford County portions of the study area are generally rural, with scattered development along Route 24. Land uses along Route 24 in the vicinity of the study area are primarily highway commercial, with low-density residential uses located on the surrounding area roads. Land coverage is dominated by forested lands.

Upload: others

Post on 27-Oct-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 3.2 LAND USE, SOCIOECONOMIC, AND FARMLAND€¦ · 3.2 land use, socioeconomic, and farmland This section summarizes the existing and forecasted land use, residential areas, public

I-73 Location Study 3.2-1 Final Environmental Impact Statement

3.2 LAND USE, SOCIOECONOMIC, AND FARMLAND

This section summarizes the existing and forecasted land use, residential areas, public facilities, farmlands and forested lands use, socioeconomic setting, environmental justice, and land use policies in the study area. A complete description is found in the Land Use, Socioeconomic and Farmlands Technical Report. . The study area encompasses the City of Salem; however, all alternatives considered are located outside the city. Consequently, limited information regarding Salem is provided.

3.2.1 Existing Land Use

Land use information was compiled from aerial photographs. General descriptions of the development in the area are based on field visits conducted during 1997 and early 1998. The study area exhibits a varied topography and is predominately rural in character. The City of Roanoke and the City of Salem are at the corridor’s northern end and the City of Martinsville is near the southern end. Five incorporated towns and numerous rural unincorporated places are located within the study area. The corridor’s western area is dominated by mountainous terrain, with major land uses including dairy farms and small manufacturing establishments. The corridor’s eastern side is characterized by rolling hills with croplands and rural/small town development. Major features within the study area include portions of the Jefferson National Forest, the Appalachian Trail, Mill Mountain, Cahas Mountain, the Blue Ridge Parkway, the Blackwater River, the Pigg River, the Smith River, Grassy Hill, Fork Mountain, and Chestnut Mountain. Major land use features near (but outside) the study area are Smith Mountain Lake to the east and Philpott Reservoir to the west. A description of the land uses and unique features is provided. Figure 3.2-1 shows existing land use. Table 3.2-1 provides the area in acres and hectares for each existing land use type in the study area.

3.2.1.1 Roanoke City, Salem City, Vinton, Roanoke County, Botetourt County, and Bedford County

Roanoke City, Salem City, Vinton, and Roanoke County possess the most intensely developed land uses, the highest populations, and the greatest level of urban services/facilities. The I-581 and U.S. Route 220 Corridor runs south through the City of Roanoke’s older neighborhoods, commercial, and industrial core. This part of the study corridor includes the largest regional shopping center (Valley View Mall), the Roanoke Regional Airport, the Norfolk Southern Railroad Regional offices and yards, the Roanoke Civic Center, and historic downtown Roanoke. Roanoke County is slightly less developed than Roanoke City. Residential development dominates areas surrounding Roanoke City and Salem. Rural development dominates areas along the west and south county borders.

The urbanizing portions of Botetourt County are located south of I-81 - in the vicinity of U.S. Route 220 Alternate, U.S. Route 11, and U.S. Route 460. The county’s largest concentration of commercial and office land uses are located in the vicinity of the Exit 150 interchange on I-81. Highway commercial businesses dominate this area. The southwest portion of Botetourt County includes portions of the industrial base located in the U.S. Route 11 and I-81 corridor between the Roanoke County line and the Town of Troutville. Other industrial land use concentrations are located in the area of Blue Ridge and in the portions of the county closest to the intersection of U.S. Route 220 Alternate and U.S. Route 221/U.S. Route 460.

Bedford County portions of the study area are generally rural, with scattered development along Route 24. Land uses along Route 24 in the vicinity of the study area are primarily highway commercial, with low-density residential uses located on the surrounding area roads. Land coverage is dominated by forested lands.

Page 2: 3.2 LAND USE, SOCIOECONOMIC, AND FARMLAND€¦ · 3.2 land use, socioeconomic, and farmland This section summarizes the existing and forecasted land use, residential areas, public
Page 3: 3.2 LAND USE, SOCIOECONOMIC, AND FARMLAND€¦ · 3.2 land use, socioeconomic, and farmland This section summarizes the existing and forecasted land use, residential areas, public

����� ������������������ ������������� ����������������

������������� ����������� �������������� ����

�������

����

�� ���������������������

������������� ��������

�� �����

���

�� ���������

���������

����

����������������������������������������

����������������������������

������� ��������

�������������������������

������������

� � � �����

��

������

� � � ���� �!�"�

Page 4: 3.2 LAND USE, SOCIOECONOMIC, AND FARMLAND€¦ · 3.2 land use, socioeconomic, and farmland This section summarizes the existing and forecasted land use, residential areas, public
Page 5: 3.2 LAND USE, SOCIOECONOMIC, AND FARMLAND€¦ · 3.2 land use, socioeconomic, and farmland This section summarizes the existing and forecasted land use, residential areas, public

I-73

Loca

tion

Stud

y 3.

2-3

Fina

l Env

ironm

enta

l Im

pact

Sta

tem

ent

Tabl

e 3.

2-1

EX

ISTI

NG

STU

DY

AR

EA A

CR

EAG

E B

Y LA

ND

USE

CA

TEG

OR

Y

Lan

d U

se

Cat

egor

y C

omm

erci

al

and

Indu

stria

l Fo

rest

O

pen

Spac

e,

Past

urel

and,

A

gric

ultu

re, a

nd

Wet

land

s Pa

rks

Publ

ic F

acili

ties

Res

iden

tial

Tota

l

A

cres

H

ecta

res

Acr

es

Hec

tare

sA

cres

H

ecta

res

Acr

es

Hec

tare

s A

cres

H

ecta

res

Acr

es

Hec

tare

sA

cres

H

ecta

res

Nor

th A

rea

Roa

noke

City

6,

807

2,75

5 3,

266

1,32

21,

849

748

1,61

365

3 24

610

013

,681

5,53

727

,462

11,1

14

City

of S

alem

1,

466

593

847

343

2,18

788

50

0 14

759

4,48

01,

813

9,12

73,

694

Tow

n of

Vin

ton

240

97

364

147

266

108

00

00

1,16

447

12,

034

823

Roa

noke

Cou

nty

3,15

5 1,

277

44,6

1218

,054

14,1

605,

731

3,23

71,

310

153

6214

,126

5,71

779

,443

32,1

51

Bed

ford

Cou

nty

271

110

21,8

198,

830

10,1

884,

123

2912

35

143,

220

1,30

335

,562

14,3

92

Bot

etou

rt C

ount

y 1,

261

510

25,9

6310

,507

13,0

795,

293

1,04

842

4 47

194,

115

1,66

545

,513

18,4

19

Cen

tral

Are

a To

wn

of B

oone

s M

ill 87

35

27

010

98

30

0 0

010

743

472

191

Tow

n of

Roc

ky

Mou

nt

581

235

964

390

611

247

00

3012

671

272

2,85

71,

156

Fran

klin

Cou

nty

1,89

6 76

7 14

8,51

460

,104

65,0

9226

,343

335

136

187

11,9

744,

846

227,

829

92,2

02

Sout

h A

rea

City

of M

artin

sville

1,

104

447

3,00

01,

214

303

123

00

4719

2,59

11,

049

7,04

52,

851

Tow

n of

R

idge

way

29

12

45

018

20

00

0 29

1292

3760

024

3

Hen

ry C

ount

y 4,

144

1677

120

,998

48,9

6822

,349

9,04

576

31

392

159

15,0

086,

074

162,

967

65,9

53

Tota

l 21

,041

8,

515

371,

067

150,

171

130,

092

52,6

486,

338

2,56

5 1,

144

463

71,2

2928

,826

600,

911

243,

189

Sour

ce: B

ased

on

aeria

l pho

togr

aphy

Page 6: 3.2 LAND USE, SOCIOECONOMIC, AND FARMLAND€¦ · 3.2 land use, socioeconomic, and farmland This section summarizes the existing and forecasted land use, residential areas, public

I-73 Location Study 3.2-4 Final Environmental Impact Statement

3.2.1.2 Franklin County, Boones Mill and Rocky Mount

The primary land uses within Franklin County include forestland, farmlands, and pastureland or vacant lands. The Blackwater River valley is one of the more open areas in western Franklin County. U.S. Route 220 between Boones Mill and the Rocky Mount town limit is lined with residential and commercial developments. Commercial development increases at the merger of U.S. Route 220 Business and U.S. Route 220 (Rocky Mount Bypass) at the north end of Rocky Mount. The majority of the town’s retail fronts U.S. Route 220.

The Town of Boones Mill is located between Roanoke and Rocky Mount, and is bisected by U.S. Route 220 at Route 739. Growth traditionally has come from new residents moving from the more urban areas of Roanoke City and Roanoke County. Highway commercial development is focused in the first several blocks along U.S. Route 220. Residential development is located on the hills behind the commercial development.

In Rocky Mount, industrial development is concentrated north of the downtown area and in two industrial parks that straddle the northern part of U.S. Route 220 Business. Heavy manufacturing (including lumberyards, mills and textile plants) are located at the southern edge of the town. Residential development occurs on the western side of town with areas of “light residential” in the northwest and south of the railroad tracks. The downtown area is comprised of two general areas - (1) moderate-density commercial uses and strip commercial uses along U.S. Route 220 Business and (2) strip commercial mixed with public facilities along Route 40 west. Rocky Mount Shopping Center is located adjacent to the U.S. Route 220 on-ramp from Route 40.

3.2.1.3 Henry County, Martinsville, and Ridgeway

Scattered rural residential development occurs in Henry County along state roads such as U.S. Route 220. Henry County is more developed than Franklin County and has long-standing tobacco and furniture industries. Development is primarily centered at the crossroads of U.S. Route 220 with Route 57 and U.S. Route 58, and has grown along the Smith River. Industrial development concentrations are located in the Route 57 corridor (Basset Forks to Basset). Two industrial parks north of Martinsville are located along Kings Mountain Road. Other industrial areas include the U.S. Route 58 Business corridor in Martinsville and the U.S. Route 220 corridor from Martinsville to the Town of Ridgeway. Forest lands and agricultural lands continue to comprise the largest land cover in Henry County.

3.2.2 Residential Developments

Much of the study area’s rural nature does not support formal neighborhoods; however, the urban areas of Roanoke City, Roanoke County, and Martinsville do have distinct housing developments. Henry County has identified growth areas. Figures 3.2-2 and 3.2-3 illustrate the location of neighborhoods in the study area. The residential developments listed below may be affected by proposed I-73 alternatives.

• Roanoke City: Thirlane, Williamson Road Action Forum, Washington Park, Gainsboro, Southeast neighborhood, Old Southwest neighborhood, Raleigh Court, South Roanoke, Downtown, and Riverland.

• Roanoke County: The Hollins area, Glenvar, Windsor Hills, Back Creek, Cave Spring, Clearbrook, and Mount Pleasant.

• Bedford County: Cascade Forest and Big Bear Run.

• Botetourt County: The unincorporated place of Blue Ridge.

• Franklin County: No specific neighborhoods or neighborhood associations were identified.

• Henry County: No specific neighborhoods or neighborhood associations were identified.

• Martinsville: The Northside neighborhood, Uptown area, the Westside neighborhood, Chatham Heights, Southside, and Forest Park/ Druid Hills.

Page 7: 3.2 LAND USE, SOCIOECONOMIC, AND FARMLAND€¦ · 3.2 land use, socioeconomic, and farmland This section summarizes the existing and forecasted land use, residential areas, public

����

����

��

��

�� ��

��

��

��

��������������������� ���������������������������������� �������������������������������������������� �������������������� ��������������������� ������������������������ ���������� ������������������ ������������� ���������������������� ����������������������������������������������������� ����� �!����"���� ����� ��������������� ������������������������������������������������ �����������������������������������

����������������� ��� ����

��

�������

����

��

���

����

��

���������

�����������

���

��������

����������

������

������

����������

�#$%#

&'( #

)*+,$-

�#$%#&'(

#)*+,$-

�#$%#&'( #)*+,

����

���

��

��

��

��

���

�������

������������

����������

����� �

������

�������!���

�#.-#',�/0,$

�#.-#',���/0,$

"#

$

$%

#&

$'

##

#(

% )&

*+

#$

'

$)$+

$&$"$( $#$$

$*

,�-.� ��

!�.���/��������� �������

,������� ����

������0���1

�����-����

#)$1,2��#.-#',��#)-*3��#44)-/*3��&.-��������������/*/5,-��.$*/1/6.*/#-!�����"

�2+&�3� ��������.��

� � �/&,7

�"� �"� �/&#4,*,$7

3�1������� ������� ����� ���������������������������������� ����������

���4���&5#2#��� �����

��� ��� ����

������������� �� ������������������������������"8�

Page 8: 3.2 LAND USE, SOCIOECONOMIC, AND FARMLAND€¦ · 3.2 land use, socioeconomic, and farmland This section summarizes the existing and forecasted land use, residential areas, public

��

� �

�� ��

��

��

���� ��

��

��

��

��

��

��

�����������

��������������������

�������������� �����������

�������

��������

�����

������������

�������������

��������������������

�����������������������

�������

���������

���!���"�#

��������������

������������������

"���������

��

��$����������

������

����� ����

�����������

��

�����

���

���

%���

��

��

��

�!��&��

���

��

'���������������

��������������

(�����������

���� ����

����!���

��� ����

���

"#

�����

�$ %&�'("�#"�%�'("�)�%$#���&*%&* �&"'+&%���$)%&�'("�!$ "�%��* ,( )'(�&'���- � - ����

-.� � -.� ,��������

�)*+ �&����������

����/�0�1���2��������������������������������-334�)����5�������� ����������.

���, %+-.)+�/,0�� %�

�%����/ �//"�

6.�74 ������������������ ������������� ����������������

Page 9: 3.2 LAND USE, SOCIOECONOMIC, AND FARMLAND€¦ · 3.2 land use, socioeconomic, and farmland This section summarizes the existing and forecasted land use, residential areas, public

I-73 Location Study 3.2-7 Final Environmental Impact Statement

3.2.3 Future Land Use

The comprehensive plans for each jurisdiction define visions of future growth. A common theme to these plans emphasizes each jurisdiction’s desire for rural areas to maintain their rural qualities and for urban areas to remain urban. Future growth goals and objectives, as defined in the plan of each jurisdiction, are summarized in following sections. The study area includes the City of Salem; however, all alternatives considered are located outside the city. Consequently, no detailed description of Salem future land use is provided.

Figure 3.2-4 shows future land use. Table 3.2-2 provides the area in acres and hectares for each future land use type in the study area.

3.2.3.1 Roanoke City, Roanoke County, Botetourt County, and Bedford County

Roanoke City’s plan focuses on the redevelopment of downtown and the maintenance and enhancement of city neighborhoods. Maintaining and improving gateways to the downtown along major transportation routes is a key objective.

Roanoke County seeks to stabilize growth in currently developed portions of the study area. Specifically, Windsor Hills and Cave Spring are designated for stabilization, while Glenvar, Mount Pleasant, Clearbrook, Back Creek, and Bent Mountain are designated for limited growth. An urban development boundary is defined, which follows the Blue Ridge Parkway and the northern edge of the Mount Pleasant planning area. Development areas are defined, however, at the intersection of U.S. Route 221 and Route 419, the Tanglewood Mall area, and east of Vinton. Each of the planning areas adjacent to the Blue Ridge Parkway has established viewshed protection.

Botetourt County’s future land uses recognize the commercial core and the existing traffic problems at the I-81/U.S. Route 220 Alternate interchange (Exit 150). The Exit 150 area is projected as the county’s primary location for commercial/office uses. The plan states that this area will “continue as a commercial hub over the next five years. Water and sewer facilities exist in the area for such development to occur, however, the County should consider the impact of increased commercial development on the environment, existing traffic patterns and adjacent uses (Botetourt County Plan, November 1998.).

Bedford County identifies where new medium to high-density developments should be clustered. The plan identifies rural service centers where services (rescue squads, post offices, and schools) for rural areas will be centered. Commercial centers, industrial parks, and public facilities will be placed in the growth areas. No rural service centers are identified within the study area, so the area will continue as agriculture or forested lands. Policies protect farmland and forests and enforce sediment and erosion control regulations, promoting best management practices (BMP) for timber removal and reforestation of harvested areas.

3.2.3.2 Franklin County, Boones Mill, and Rocky Mount

Franklin County designates Town and Community Centers, Rural Village Centers, and Commercial Highway Corridors. Farmlands and forested lands are to be preserved. The majority of the study area is within the farm and forest designations. Incorporated towns and unincorporated area centers are the focus for commercial and social activity. Rural village centers provide basic services and amenities.

The plan identifies two future locations for proposed I-73, noted as a priority for planning efforts associated with the I-73 Location Study. Future interstate highway interchanges are identified. Franklin County will consider the impact of interchanges on existing land uses and potential development patterns. Farmlands and forested lands are valued for their conservation and economic roles. The future land use plan sets forth preservation objectives and, for farmland, compatible land use criteria to avoid nuisance complaints by new development.

Page 10: 3.2 LAND USE, SOCIOECONOMIC, AND FARMLAND€¦ · 3.2 land use, socioeconomic, and farmland This section summarizes the existing and forecasted land use, residential areas, public
Page 11: 3.2 LAND USE, SOCIOECONOMIC, AND FARMLAND€¦ · 3.2 land use, socioeconomic, and farmland This section summarizes the existing and forecasted land use, residential areas, public

����� ������������������ ������������� ����������������

����������������� ����������� �������������

�������

����

�� ���������������������

������������� ��������

�� �����

���

�� ���������

��������

������

����������������� �������� ���������� ��

��������� ���������� ������

��� ������� �����

����������������������

������������

� � � �����

��

�����

� � � ��� !�"�#�

Page 12: 3.2 LAND USE, SOCIOECONOMIC, AND FARMLAND€¦ · 3.2 land use, socioeconomic, and farmland This section summarizes the existing and forecasted land use, residential areas, public
Page 13: 3.2 LAND USE, SOCIOECONOMIC, AND FARMLAND€¦ · 3.2 land use, socioeconomic, and farmland This section summarizes the existing and forecasted land use, residential areas, public

I-73

Loca

tion

Stud

y 3.

2-9

Fina

l Env

ironm

enta

l Im

pact

Sta

tem

ent

TAB

LE 3

.2-2

FU

TUR

E ST

UD

Y A

REA

AC

REA

GE

BY

LAN

D U

SE C

ATE

GO

RY

Land

Use

C

ateg

ory

Com

mer

cial

and

In

dust

rial

Fore

st

Ope

n Sp

ace,

Pa

stur

elan

d,

Agr

icul

ture

, and

W

etla

nds

Park

s Pu

blic

Fac

ilitie

sR

esid

entia

l To

tal

A

cres

H

ecta

res

Acr

es

Hec

tare

sA

cres

H

ecta

res

Acr

es

Hec

tare

s A

cres

H

ecta

res

Acr

es

Hec

tare

sA

cres

H

ecta

res

Nor

th A

rea

Roa

noke

City

7,

321

2,96

3 1,

834

742

1,63

666

21,

613

653

246

100

14,8

125,

994

27,4

6211

,114

City

of S

alem

2,

444

989

542

219

1,33

253

90

0 14

759

4,66

21,

887

9,12

73,

693

Tow

n of

Vin

ton

310

125

169

6813

454

00

00

1,42

157

52,

034

822

Roa

noke

C

ount

y 11

,404

4,

615

27,5

1611

,136

8,94

23,

619

3,23

71,

310

153

6228

,191

11,4

0979

,443

32,1

51

Bed

ford

Cou

nty

9,89

6 4,

005

4,32

11,

749

2,02

381

929

12

3514

19,2

587,

794

35,5

6214

,393

Bot

etou

rt C

ount

y 3,

923

1,58

8 17

,380

7,03

47,

101

2,87

41,

048

424

4719

16,0

146,

481

45,5

1318

,420

Cen

tral

Are

a To

wn

of B

oone

s M

ill 36

4 14

7 1

00

00

0 0

010

743

472

190

Tow

n of

Roc

ky

Mou

nt

2,00

0 80

9 23

911

245

00

3012

692

280

2,85

71,

155

Fran

klin

Cou

nty

7,08

8 2,

869

136,

728

55,3

3457

,227

23,1

6033

513

6 18

726

,433

10,6

9722

7,82

992

,203

Sout

h A

rea

City

of

Mar

tinsv

ille

1,13

4 45

9 2,

970

1,20

230

312

30

0 47

192,

591

1,04

97,

045

2,85

2

Tow

n of

R

idge

way

47

9 19

4 0

00

00

0 29

1292

3760

024

3

Hen

ry C

ount

y 55

,185

22

,333

77

,805

31,4

8814

,501

5,86

976

31

392

159

15,0

086,

074

162,

967

65,9

54

Tota

l 10

1,54

8 41

,096

269

,289

108,

981

93,3

1137

,764

6,33

82,

566

1,14

446

312

9,28

152

,320

600,

911

243,

190

Sour

ce: L

ocal

com

preh

ensi

ve p

lans

.

Page 14: 3.2 LAND USE, SOCIOECONOMIC, AND FARMLAND€¦ · 3.2 land use, socioeconomic, and farmland This section summarizes the existing and forecasted land use, residential areas, public

I-73 Location Study 3.2-10 Final Environmental Impact Statement

The county’s remaining areas include several types of residential development from low- to medium-density, certain commercial and industrial uses, public and semi-public uses, and environmentally sensitive resources. The plan calls for delineation of critical and environmentally sensitive resources to facilitate their protection.

3.2.3.3 Henry County, Martinsville, and Ridgeway

Henry County categorizes all areas in the county into one of two areas: growth or rural areas. Growth areas are established to accommodate growth with public infrastructure while maintaining protection of environmentally sensitive areas. Growth areas in Henry County include many areas that are already developed, and where redevelopment and infill are encouraged by the plan.

The City of Martinsville’s plan consists of specific policy objectives and a future land use map. One focus of the plan is upgrading the major arterials throughout Martinsville to commerce or scenic parkways. U.S. Route 220, U.S. Route 58, Route 108, Clearview Drive, and Commonwealth Boulevard are designated as commerce parkways. The major city streets through residential sections and the uptown district are designated as scenic parkways. The northern part of Martinsville adjacent to Clearview Drive is planned for development as a commerce park, and some areas on the north/west side of Chatham Road (Route 57) are planned for future residential development. Most of the land available for new residential development is in areas of moderate and steep terrain, so the plan calls for stricter zoning to control the environmental impacts of this potential development.

3.2.4 Public Facilities

Emergency services, fire/police protection, schools/libraries, and sewer/water/sanitary services are dispersed, and located in rural crossroads (see Figures 3.2-5a through 3.2-5e). Several services are located on or adjacent to U.S. Route 220.

3.2.4.1 Roanoke City, Roanoke County, Bedford County, and Botetourt County

Roanoke City

Of Roanoke City and County’s eight medical facilities, three are within a mile of U.S. Route 220 and located in Roanoke City. The medical facilities in Roanoke City, Roanoke County and Salem also serve the citizens of Bedford and Botetourt counties within the study area. Roanoke City has one fire station within a mile east of U.S. Route 220. Roanoke City has a police station and a dispatch station located in downtown Roanoke north of the study area.

In Roanoke City, 14 schools are located within a few miles of U.S. Route 220. The University of Virginia School of Medicine is just east of U.S. Route 220 in the downtown. The Virginia Western Community College is close to the U.S. Route 220 right-of-way. Four of six city libraries are in the study area.

The Roanoke Valley Resource Authority, which serves Roanoke City, Roanoke County and the Town of Vinton, operates a landfill and a regional transfer station in Roanoke County. One regional sewage treatment plant serves Roanoke City, Roanoke County, Salem, Vinton, and Botetourt County. The Roanoke Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant is located 1.5 miles (2.41 kilometers) east of the Elm Street/I-581 Interchange on Bennington Avenue. The Crystal Springs Water Treatment Plant, serving Roanoke City, is in the study area.

Page 15: 3.2 LAND USE, SOCIOECONOMIC, AND FARMLAND€¦ · 3.2 land use, socioeconomic, and farmland This section summarizes the existing and forecasted land use, residential areas, public

Æ$

Æ$

#

#

#

#

#

(/(/

(/

(/

(/(/

',

',

þ

þ

þ þ

þ

þ

þþ

þ

þþþ

þ

þ

þ

þ

Æc

Æc

ÆcÆcÆcÆc Æc

Æc

Æc

Æc

Æc

Æc

Ê

ò

òò ò

ò

òò

òò òòò

òòò òò

ò

ò

òò

òò

òòò

ò ò

òò

ò ò òò

òòò

ò

ò

òòòò

ò

òòò

òòò

ò

òò

Ñ

Franklin County

Roanoke County

Roa

BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY

Hollins

Cave Spring

Nor

folk

/Sou

ther

n

11

460

11

220

81

581

668

Roanoke

Salem

221

220

668

RoanokeRiver

S24

S21

S20S22

S5

S18S19

S10S8 S12 S13

S14

S9S1

S11 S20S2

S15S16

S4 S5

L8

L6

L5L1

L4L2 L3

L11

F5

F1

F2 F3

S69S68 S70S71

S72 S73

S74

S75

S76

S77S78

S101

L7

L24

F21

F23

F22

F38

F25

F32

E16

S103

S102F33

L9

S86 S87 S88S89

S90S9

F26

F29

F27

F28

F24

S79

S81

S82

S91

S92

S95S93

S94

S96

S83

S84S80S85

Wabun

Glenvar

Source: City of Roanoke Comprehensive Plan, 1986. Franklin County Comprehensive Plan, 1995. Henry County Comprehensive Plan, 1995.

I-73 Location Study

S

N

EW

1 0 1 Miles

1.5 0 1.5 Kilometers

Legend

SCHOOL LIBRARY FIRE STATION EMERGENCY MEDICALSERVICE

òÆcþÑ

FIGURE 3.2-5aPUBLIC FACILITIES

WESTERN ROANOKE COUNTY(SHEET 1 OF 5)

SHEET1 OF 5

SHEET3 OF 5

SHEET4 OF 5

SHEET5 OF 5

SHEET2 OF 5

3.2-11 Final Environmental Impact StatementI-73 Location Study

Page 16: 3.2 LAND USE, SOCIOECONOMIC, AND FARMLAND€¦ · 3.2 land use, socioeconomic, and farmland This section summarizes the existing and forecasted land use, residential areas, public

Æ$

Æ$

Æ$

Æ$

#

#

#

#

#

#

(/

(/(/

(/

(/

(/

(/

(/

',

',

#S

þ

þ

þ þ

þþ

þ þ

þ

þþ

þþ

þ

þ

þ

þÆc

Æc

ÆcÆcÆc

Æc

Æc Æc

Æc

Æc

Æc

Æc

ò

òò ò

ò

òò

òò òòò

òòò òò

òòò

òòòò

òò

òòò

ò ò

òò

ò ò òò

òòò

ò

òò

ò

ò

òò ò

òò

ò

òò

Ñ

Ñ

Ñ

Ñ

Ñ

Franklin County

Roanoke County

Bedford County

Roanoke County

Botetourt County

BLUE

R

IDG

E

GE PARKWAY

Hollins

CaveSpring

Nor

folk

/Sou

ther

n

Norfolk

/Sou

thern

PAR

KWAY

460

11

220

460

220

460

81

581

634

116

668

24Vinton

Roanoke

Cloverdale

Bonsack

221

220

668

Kennett

River

Roanoke River

S24

S21

S20S22

S5

S18S19

S10S8 S12 S13

S14

S9S1

S11 S20S2

S15 S17S16

S4 S5

S6 S7

L8

L6

L5L1

L4

L12

L2 L3 L13

L11

F5

F1

F2 F3

F4F6

E1

E2

E18

E20

E19

S78F25

S86 S87 S88S89

S90S97

S98

S99

F26

F29

F30

F6

F27

F28F31

F24

S79

S81

S82

S91

S92

S95

S105

S106

S104

S93

S94

S96

S83

S84S80 S85

S100

S109

S110

S112F35

S108

Source: City of Roanoke Comprehensive Plan, 1986. Franklin County Comprehensive Plan, 1995. Henry County Comprehensive Plan, 1995.

I-73 Location Study

S

N

EW

1 0 1 Miles

1.5 0 1.5 Kilometers

Legend

SCHOOL LIBRARY FIRE STATION EMERGENCY MEDICALSERVICE

òÆcþÑ

FIGURE 3.2-5bPUBLIC FACILITIES

EASTERN ROANOKE COUNTY(SHEET 2 OF 5)

3.2-12 Final Environmental Impact StatementI-73 Location Study

Page 17: 3.2 LAND USE, SOCIOECONOMIC, AND FARMLAND€¦ · 3.2 land use, socioeconomic, and farmland This section summarizes the existing and forecasted land use, residential areas, public

Æ$

Æ$Æ$

Æ$

Æ$

Æ$

Æ$

Æ$

Æ$

Æ$

Æ$

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

(/

(/

#S

#S

þ

þþ

þþ

Æc

Æc

Æc

Ê

Ê

Ê

Ê

òò

òòò

ò

òò

ò

ò

ò

Ñ

Ñ

Ñ

Ñ

Ñ

Franklin County

Roanoke County

Burnt Chimney

Red Valley

Taylors Store

Redwood

Crossroads

Gogginsville

Retreat

Dillons Mill

Callaway

Ferrum

Henry Fork

Gladehill

Norfolk/Southern

Norfolk/S

outhern

SmithMountain

Lake

Rocky Mount

767

602

724

718

640

641

643

641

116

122

122

670

Sontag

Hodgesville40

40

Patti

220

220

Kennett

Boones Mill

Bonbrook

Wes

HelmWirtz

Blackwater River

BlackwaterRiver

Pigg

River

Pigg

River

S28

S27

S26

S30S29

L14

F8

F7

F10S34

F11

L15

S37

S35

S31

S33S32

S36

F12L16

E2

E3

E7

E5

E6

F5

Source: City of Roanoke Comprehensive Plan Undated. Franklin County Comprehensive Plan 1995. Henry County Comprehensive Plan 1995.

I-73 Location Study

S

N

EW

1 0 1 Miles

1.5 0 1.5 Kilometers

Legend

SCHOOL LIBRARY FIRE STATION POLICE/SHERIFF EMERGENCY MEDICALSERVICE

òÆc

þÊÚÑ

FIGURE 3.2-5cPUBLIC FACILITIES

NORTHERN FRANKLIN COUNTY(SHEET 3 OF 5)

3.2-13 Final Environmental Impact StatementI-73 Location Study

Page 18: 3.2 LAND USE, SOCIOECONOMIC, AND FARMLAND€¦ · 3.2 land use, socioeconomic, and farmland This section summarizes the existing and forecasted land use, residential areas, public

Æ$

Æ$

Æ$

Æ$

Æ$

Æ$

Æ$

Æ$

Æ$

Æ$ Æ$

Æ$

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

(/

(/

#S

#S

þ

þ

þ

þþ

Æc

Æc

Æc

Ê

Ê

Ê

ò òò

ò

ò

òò

ò

òòò

ò

òò

Ñ

Ñ

Ñ

Ñ

Ñ

Ñ

Henry County

Franklin County

Redwood

Gogginsville

Callaway

Bassett

Snow Creek

Figsboro

Oak Level

Philpott

PhilpottDam

Henry

Prilliman

Ferrum

Sydnorsville

Henry Fork

Gladehill

Norfolk/S

outhern

SmithMountain

Lake

Rocky Mount

605

767

602

605

724

718

619

890

640

641641

Sontag

Hodgesville40

40

Patti

220

220

108

Reed Creek

Dyers Store

West Bassett 1

Blackwater

River

Pigg River

S34

S29 S30

S33

S32 L15F10

S31

S3

F11

S36

S38

F12L16S37

S39

F13

S40

S41

S42L17F14

E7

E5

E9E8

E6

Source: City of Roanoke Comprehensive Plan Undated. Franklin County Comprehensive Plan 1995. Henry County Comprehensive Plan 1995.

I-73 Location Study

S

N

EW

1 0 1 Miles

1.5 0 1.5 Kilometers

LegendSCHOOL LIBRARY FIRE STATION POLICE/SHERIFF EMERGENCY MEDICALSERVICE

òÆc

þÊÚ

Ñ

FIGURE 3.2-5dPUBLIC FACILITIES

SOUTHERN FRANKLIN COUNTY(SHEET 4 OF 5)

3.2-14 Final Environmental Impact StatementI-73 Location Study

Page 19: 3.2 LAND USE, SOCIOECONOMIC, AND FARMLAND€¦ · 3.2 land use, socioeconomic, and farmland This section summarizes the existing and forecasted land use, residential areas, public

Æ$

Æ$

Æ$

Æ$

Æ$

Æ$

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

#

#

# #

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

(/ (/

(/

(/

(/

(/ (/

(/

(/

(/

#S

#S

#S

þ

þ

þ

þ

þ

þ

þ

Æc

Æc

ÆcÆc Æc

Æc

òò

ò

ò

ò

ò

ò

ò ò

òò

òò ò

òòò ò ò

ò ò

òò

ò

ò òò

Ñ

Ñ

Ñ

Ñ

Ñ

Ñ

Henry

County

VirginiaNorth Carolina

Henry CountyRockingham County

Ridgeway

Irisburg

Axton

Horse Pasture

Pleasant Grove

Fieldale

Collinsville

Bassett ForksStanleytown

Bassett

Leatherwood

PhilpottDam

Norfolk

/Southe

rn

MartinsvilleSpeedway

108

174

Dyers Store

57

57

West Bassett

220220

Sandy Level

GrassyCreek

87

22058

220

220

692

687

650

Eden

5

58

58

Spencer

687

220

58

KoehlerLaurelPark

Carlisle

Chatmoss

Martinsville

Smith River

North Fork

MayoRiver

ver

S40

S41

S62

S43 S44S48

S47

S46S45

S57

S52

S50

F14

F17

F15L18

L19 L20

L21

F20

F16

S42

S60

S59S58

S61

S56S55

S54

S51

S53

S49

S63

S64S65

S66

F18

F19

L22

S67

E10

E11

E12

E14

E13

E15

I-73 Location Study

S

N

EW

1 0 1 Miles

1.5 0 1.5 Kilometers

LegendSCHOOL LIBRARY FIRE STATION POLICE/SHERIFF EMERGENCY MEDICALSERVICES

òÆc

þÊÚÑ

FIGURE 3.2-5ePUBLIC FACILITIES

HENRY COUNTY(SHEET 5 OF 5)

Source: City of Roanoke Comprehensive Plan Undated. Franklin County Comprehensive Plan 1995. Henry County Comprehensive Plan 1995.

3.2-15 Final Environmental Impact StatementI-73 Location Study

Page 20: 3.2 LAND USE, SOCIOECONOMIC, AND FARMLAND€¦ · 3.2 land use, socioeconomic, and farmland This section summarizes the existing and forecasted land use, residential areas, public

I-73 Location Study 3.2-16 Final Environmental Impact Statement

Roanoke County

Roanoke County has 11 Fire Department Stations. The county has two fire stations within a few miles of U.S. Route 220, one in Cave Springs and one in Mount Pleasant. The Roanoke County Police Department has two offices allowing for a response time of five minutes or less. The main office is north of Roanoke City and the satellite office is at the Tanglewood Mall. The Town of Vinton operates its own police department with 17 full-time police officers.

There are 10 Roanoke County schools that are immediately east and west of U.S. Route 220. The Roanoke County Main Library and its branches in Blue Ridge, Bent Mountain, Glenvar, Mount Pleasant and Vinton are located in the study area.

Most of Roanoke County is served by the Roanoke County Water Treatment Facility located west of Salem. Vinton operates another plant and uses the Falling Creek Aquifer to provide water for its residents and those of eastern Roanoke County.

Botetourt County

Two of the County’s four volunteer rescue squads service the study area. Three of the seven volunteer fire departments are in the study area. The Botetourt County Sheriff’s Department, the Buchanan Police Department, and the State Police serve Botetourt County. Headquartered in Fincastle off U.S. Route 220, the county sheriff’s department serves the county and incorporated towns of Troutville and Fincastle.

There are five Botetort County schools the study area. The Blue Ridge branch library is located on U.S. Route 460 in Botetourt County just east of the Roanoke County line.

The county owns a sanitary landfill, which is located in the southwestern portion of the county off of Route 779. Public sewerage is provided in the incorporated areas of the county as well as in the Troutville, Daleville and Cloverdale areas. Through a contract with Roanoke City, sewage from the county inceptor plants is treated at the Roanoke Regional Water Pollution Control Plant. Public water from underground wells is provided for the approximately 62 private and public water systems in Botetourt County.

Bedford County

There are two volunteer rescue squads in the county, which are in the study area. Two of the 11 volunteer fire departments are located in the study area and law enforcement is provided by the sheriff’s department and supported by the state police.

Two of the county’s 18 schools are in the study area. Bedford County and Bedford City are served by a regional library system. The Stewartsville branch library is in the study area.

Bedford County provides solid waste containers, instead of curbside service, at 25 localized container sites, two of which are located in the study area. In Bedford County there are two public sewage treatment facilities. The City of Bedford operates the only large capacity sewage treatment facility. Water in Bedford County is supplied by the Public Services Authority, private systems, subdivision systems, and individual wells. There are five subdivisions with water systems in the study area.

3.2.4.2 Franklin County, Boones Mill and Rocky Mount

There is one main hospital in Franklin County, located in downtown Rocky Mount. Also located in Rocky Mount are two smaller clinics. The Boones Mill Medical Center is a small clinic located on U.S. Route 220 south of Boones Mill. Other small clinics in the study area include one in Burnt Chimney and one in Glade Hill. Nine of the 12 Emergency Medical Service districts that serve Franklin County are a few miles from U.S. Route 220.

Page 21: 3.2 LAND USE, SOCIOECONOMIC, AND FARMLAND€¦ · 3.2 land use, socioeconomic, and farmland This section summarizes the existing and forecasted land use, residential areas, public

I-73 Location Study 3.2-17 Final Environmental Impact Statement

Eight of the 13 fire companies serving Franklin County are located on or near U.S. Route 220. There are four police stations in Franklin County; the Rocky Mount Police Department, the Franklin County Sheriff’s Office, the Town of Boones Mill Police Department and the Ferrum College Campus Police Department.

Franklin County has three grade schools and Ferrum College are within the study area. In Franklin County, there is one public and one private library. The Franklin County Public Library is located in Rocky Mount and Ferrum College is home to the Stanley Library.

There is one active landfill located south of Rocky Mount in the study area. Curbside trash service is not provided, rather, a green box network is provided where citizens may bring their solid waste and recyclable items. There are 74 collection centers, including public buildings, 51 of which are in the study area. The county does not provide water and sewer services. Rocky Mount, Boones Mill and Ferrum have separate water treatment and sewer treatment facilities.

3.2.4.3 Henry County, Martinsville and Ridgeway

The main hospital serving Henry County is in Martinsville. Also the Health Department and a walk-in clinic provide care. Of the six volunteer rescue squads, five are located in the study area. Six of eight fire stations in Henry County are in the study area. The Sheriff’s Office includes an elected sheriff and 87 employees. The City of Martinsville has its own Police Department.

There are 21 schools in Henry County with an enrollment of 9,052 students. There are six public schools in Martinsville and one community college. The Blue Ridge Regional Library in Martinsville serves both the city and county. Three branch libraries are located in the study area. The local college library and Planning District Library are in Martinsville.

Solid waste goes to the Martinsville City landfill, located northeast of the city off Clearview Drive. Henry County has 14 green box containers in the study area. The Henry County Public Service Authority provides water and sewer service. There are two water filtration plants in the county. The city of Martinsville owns and manages its water plant located in the northern portion of the city.

3.2.5 Farmlands and Forested Lands

Farming and forestry have been and continue to be some of the largest land uses and the products from those activities remain important components of the economy for much of the study area. The majority of land in the study area in southern Roanoke, western Bedford, southern Botetourt and Franklin and Henry counties is in either farmland or woodland uses (see Figures 3.2-6a through 3.2-6e). These are discussed in this section.

(This area left blank intentionally)