7-2 decision making: how individuals and groups arrive at decisions copyright © 2008 by the...

41

Upload: ann-cook

Post on 27-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Page 2: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-2

Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups

Arrive at Decisions

Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/IrwinOrganizational Behavior, Core Concepts

7Organizational Behavior

core concepts

Page 3: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-3

Learning Objectives

• Compare the rational model of decision making with Simon’s normative model.

• Discuss knowledge management and ways that companies increase knowledge sharing.

• Explain the model of decision-making styles and the stages of the creative process.

Page 4: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-4

Learning Objectives

• Summarize pros and cons of involving groups in the decision-making process.

• Explain how participative management affects performance.

• Describe techniques used to improve the quality of group decisions

Page 5: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-5

Models of Decision Making

• Decision making – identifying and choosing solutions that lead

to a desired result

Page 6: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-6

Models of Decision Making

• The Rational Model – logical four-step approach to decision

making.

Page 7: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-7

The Rational Model

1. Identifying the problem

2. Generating alternative solutions

3. Selecting a solution

4. Implementing and evaluating the solution

Page 8: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-8

Rational Model

• Identifying the Problem– Problem – exists when the actual situation

and the desired situation differ

• Generating Solutions– For routine decisions alternatives are readily

available through decision rules

Page 9: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-9

Rational Model

• Selecting a Solution– Want to maximize the expected utility of an

outcome– People vary in their preferences for safety or

risk– Ethics should be considered

Page 10: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-10

Rational Model

• Selecting a Solution– Evaluating alternatives assume they can be

judged according to some criteria– Assumes valid criteria exists– Each alternative can be compared to these

criteria– Decision maker actually uses the criteria

Page 11: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-11

Rational Model

• Implementing and Evaluating the Solution– After solution is implemented, the evaluation

phase is used to evaluate its effectiveness– Optimizing – choosing the best possible

solution

Page 12: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-12

Simon’s Normative Model

Decision making is characterized by:

1. Limited information processing

2. Use of judgmental heuristics

3. Satisficing

Page 13: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-13

Simon’s Normative Model

• Bounded rationality – constraints that restrict decision making

Page 14: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-14

Simon’s Normative Model

Limited Information Processing

• Tendency to acquire manageable rather than optimal amounts of information

• Difficult for managers to identify all possible alternative solutions

Page 15: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-15

Question?

What is a rule of thumb that people use to reduce information processing demands?

A. Decision maker

B. Judgmental heuristics

C. Judgmental verdict

D. Decision conclusion

Page 16: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-16

Simon’s Normative Model

• Judgmental heuristics – rules of thumb or shortcuts that people use

to reduce information processing demands.

Page 17: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-17

Simon’s Normative Model

• Availability heuristic – tendency to base decisions on information

readily available in memory.

• Representativeness heuristic– tendency to assess the likelihood of an

event occurring based on impressions about similar occurrences.

Page 18: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-18

Simon’s Normative Model

• Satisficing – choosing a solution that meets a minimum

standard

Page 19: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-19

Dynamics of Decision Making

• Knowledge management – implementing systems and practices that

increase the sharing of knowledge and information throughout an organization

Page 20: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-20

Forms of Knowledge

• Tacit knowledge – information gained through experience that

is difficult to express and formalize.

• Explicit knowledge

– information that can be easily put into words and shared with others.

Page 21: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-21

General Decision Making Styles

• Decision making styles – combination of how individuals perceive and

respond to information

Page 22: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-22

General Decision Making Styles

• Value orientation – reflects the extent to which an individual

focuses on either task and technical concerns or people and social concerns when making decisions

• Tolerance for ambiguity – extent to which a person has a high need for

structure or control in his life

Page 23: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-23

Decision Making Styles

Figure 7-1

Page 24: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-24

Escalation of Commitment

• Escalation of commitment– sticking to an

ineffective course of action too long

Page 25: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-25

Escalation of Commitment

Psychological and Social Determinants

1. Tend to bias facts so that they support previous decisions

2. Take more risks when a decision is stated in negative terms

3. Get too ego-involved with the project

Page 26: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-26

Escalation of Commitment

Organizational Determinants

• Breakdowns in communication

• Workplace politics

• Organizational inertia

Page 27: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-27

Escalation of Commitment

Project Characteristics

• Tendency to attribute setbacks to temporary causes that are correctable with additional expenditures

Page 28: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-28

Escalation of Commitment

Contextual determinants

• Culture of the decision makers

• Political climate of the escalation situation

Page 29: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-29

Recommendations To Reduce Escalation of Commitment• Set minimum targets for performance,

and have decision makers compare their performance with these targets.

• Have different individuals make the initial and subsequent decisions about a project.

• Encourage decision makers to become less ego-involved with a project.

Page 30: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-30

Recommendations To Reduce Escalation of Commitment• Provide more frequent feedback about

project completion and costs.

• Reduce the risk or penalties of failure.

• Make decision makers aware of the costs of persistence.

Page 31: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-31

Question?

What is the process of using imagination to develop a new process?

A. Originality

B. Innovation

C. Creativity

D. Resourcefulness

Page 32: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-32

Creativity

• Creativity – process of using intelligence, imagination,

and skill to develop a new or novel product, object, process, or thought

Page 33: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-33

Stages of the Creative Process

• Preparation

• Concentration

• Incubation

• Illumination

• Verification

Page 34: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-34

Group Involvement

• Minority dissent – extent to which group members feel

comfortable disagreeing with other group members, and the extent to which group members participate in decision making

Page 35: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-35

Advantages and Disadvantages of Group-Aided Decision Making

Page 36: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-36

Participative Management

• Participative Management – involving employees in various forms of

decision making• Setting goals• Making decisions• Solving problems• Making changes in the organization

Page 37: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-37

Group Problem Solving Techniques• Consensus

– presenting opinions and gaining agreement to support a decision

• Brainstorming – process to generate a quantity of ideas

Page 38: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-38

Rules for Brainstorming

1. Defer judgment

2. Build on the ideas of others

3. Encourage wild ideas

4. Go for quantity over quality

5. Be visual

6. Stay focused on the topic

7. One conversation at a time

Page 39: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-39

Group Problem Solving Techniques• Nominal Group Technique

– process to generate ideas and evaluate solutions.

• Delphi technique – process to generate ideas from physically

dispersed experts

Page 40: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-40

Group Problem Solving Techniques• Computer-aided decision making

– reduces consensus roadblocks while collecting more information in a shorter period of time

Page 41: 7-2 Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

7-41

Computer-aided Decision Making

• Chauffeur-driven systems – ask participants to answer predetermined

questions on electronic keypads

• Group-driven meetings – conducted in special facilities equipped with

individual workstations that are networked to each other