9-1. 1-2 mcgraw-hill/irwin copyright © 2009 by the mcgraw-hill companies, inc. all rights reserved...

30
9-1

Upload: abel-heath

Post on 13-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 9-1. 1-2 McGraw-Hill/Irwin copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, inc. All Rights Reserved Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance “Polls estimate

9-1

Page 2: 9-1. 1-2 McGraw-Hill/Irwin copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, inc. All Rights Reserved Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance “Polls estimate

1-2McGraw-Hill/Irwin copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, inc. All Rights Reserved

Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance

“Polls estimate that if companies could get 3.7 percent more work out of each employee, the equivalent of 18 more minutes of work for each eight-hour shift, the gross domestic product in the U.S. would swell by $355 billion, twice the total GDP of Greece.”

~The Gallup Organization

Ch

apte

rC

hap

ter

9999

Page 3: 9-1. 1-2 McGraw-Hill/Irwin copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, inc. All Rights Reserved Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance “Polls estimate

9-3

Introduction

• The ability to motivate others is a fundamental leadership skill and has strong connections to managerial incompetence.

• Variation in work output varies significantly across leaders and followers.

• Creating highly motivated and satisfied followers depends, most of all, on understanding others.

Page 4: 9-1. 1-2 McGraw-Hill/Irwin copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, inc. All Rights Reserved Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance “Polls estimate

9-4

Defining Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance

• Motivation: Anything that provides direction, intensity, and persistence to behavior.– Not directly observable; must be inferred from

behavior.

• Performance: Behaviors directed toward the organization’s mission or goals, or the products and services resulting from those behaviors.– Differs from effectiveness.

• Job Satisfaction: How much one likes a specific kind of job or work activity.– Related to organizational citizenship

behaviors.

Page 5: 9-1. 1-2 McGraw-Hill/Irwin copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, inc. All Rights Reserved Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance “Polls estimate

9-5

Relationships between Leadership, Job Satisfaction, and Performance

Page 6: 9-1. 1-2 McGraw-Hill/Irwin copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, inc. All Rights Reserved Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance “Polls estimate

9-6

Understanding and Influencing Follower Motivation

• Motivational theories are useful in certain situations but not as applicable in others.

• Knowledge about different motivational theories helps choose the right theory for a particular follower and situation.– Often results in higher-performance and

more satisfied employees.• Most performance problems can be

attributed to unclear expectations, skill deficits, resource/ equipment shortages, or a lack of motivation.

Page 7: 9-1. 1-2 McGraw-Hill/Irwin copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, inc. All Rights Reserved Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance “Polls estimate

9-7

Eleven Motivational Approaches

Page 8: 9-1. 1-2 McGraw-Hill/Irwin copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, inc. All Rights Reserved Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance “Polls estimate

9-8

Need Theories

• Needs: Refer to internal states of tension or arousal, or uncomfortable states of deficiency people are motivated to change.– Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs theory– Alderfer’s Expectancy-Relatedness-Growth

(ERG) theory

Page 9: 9-1. 1-2 McGraw-Hill/Irwin copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, inc. All Rights Reserved Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance “Polls estimate

9-9

Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs

Page 10: 9-1. 1-2 McGraw-Hill/Irwin copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, inc. All Rights Reserved Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance “Polls estimate

9-10

Concluding Thoughts on Need Theories

• Leaders should start by determining if follower’s lower-level needs are being satisfied.

• These theories do not make specific predictions about what an individual will do to satisfy a particular need.

• Awareness of general nature of various sorts of basic human needs seems fundamentally useful to leaders.– Basic, fundamental areas need to be

addressed first.

Page 11: 9-1. 1-2 McGraw-Hill/Irwin copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, inc. All Rights Reserved Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance “Polls estimate

9-11

Individual Differences in Motivation

• Assumes people differ in key personality traits, work values, and the work they like to do.

• Concluding thoughts on individual differences in motivation:– Ensure that followers exert needed effort for task

accomplishment by selecting individuals already high in these motives.

– To determine what followers find to be intrinsically motivating, simply ask them what they like to do.

– By reassigning work according to values and intrinsic interests, leaders may be able to get higher-quality work and have more satisfied employees.

Page 12: 9-1. 1-2 McGraw-Hill/Irwin copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, inc. All Rights Reserved Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance “Polls estimate

9-12

Key Work Values andMotivational Strategies

Page 13: 9-1. 1-2 McGraw-Hill/Irwin copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, inc. All Rights Reserved Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance “Polls estimate

9-13

Cognitive Theories

• Goal setting: Goals are the most powerful determinants of task behavior.– Pygmalion Effect– Golem Effect

• Expectancy theory: Assumes that people act in ways that maximize their expectations of attaining valued outcomes.– Effort-to-performance expectancy– Performance-to-outcome expectancy– Valence

Page 14: 9-1. 1-2 McGraw-Hill/Irwin copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, inc. All Rights Reserved Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance “Polls estimate

9-14

An Example of Expectancy Theory

Page 15: 9-1. 1-2 McGraw-Hill/Irwin copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, inc. All Rights Reserved Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance “Polls estimate

9-15

Cognitive Theories (continued)• Equity theory: Assumes that people value

fairness in leader–follower exchange relationships.– Followers presumably reach decisions about

equitable relationships by assigning values to four elements.

• Self-efficacy: Concerns one’s core beliefs about being able to successfully perform a given task.– Positive self-efficacy

– Negative self-efficacy

Page 16: 9-1. 1-2 McGraw-Hill/Irwin copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, inc. All Rights Reserved Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance “Polls estimate

9-16

Concluding Thoughts on Cognitive Theories of Motivation

• All four cognitive theories assume that changing followers’ thoughts will help them engage in particular tasks and activities.

• Leaders can influence followers’ motivational levels by:– Clearly articulating expected outcomes.

– Clarifying the links between efforts and rewards.

– Providing training, coaching, and feedback to followers.

• Cognitive theories place a strong premium on leader–follower communication.

Page 17: 9-1. 1-2 McGraw-Hill/Irwin copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, inc. All Rights Reserved Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance “Polls estimate

9-17

Situational Approaches

• Operant Approach:– Reward– Punishment– Contingent rewards or punishments– Noncontingent rewards and punishments– Extinction

Page 18: 9-1. 1-2 McGraw-Hill/Irwin copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, inc. All Rights Reserved Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance “Polls estimate

9-18

Situational Approaches (continued)

• Operant principles:– Clearly specify what behaviors are important.

– Determine if those behaviors are currently being punished, rewarded, or ignored.

– Find out what followers actually find rewarding and punishing.

– Be wary of creating perceptions of inequity when administering individually tailored rewards.

– Do not limit oneself to administering organizationally sanctioned rewards and punishments.

– Administer rewards and punishments in a contingent manner whenever possible.

Page 19: 9-1. 1-2 McGraw-Hill/Irwin copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, inc. All Rights Reserved Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance “Polls estimate

9-19

Situational Approaches (continued)

• Empowerment:– Top-down approach to delegation

– Bottom-up approach to delegation

• Macro psychological components:– Motivation

– Learning

– Stress

• Micro components of empowerment:– Self-determination

– Meaning

– Competence

– Influence

Page 20: 9-1. 1-2 McGraw-Hill/Irwin copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, inc. All Rights Reserved Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance “Polls estimate

9-20

Concluding Thoughts on Situational Approaches to Motivation

• Leaders naively assume it is easier to change an individual than it is to change the situation.

• Leaders can often see positive changes in followers’ motivation levels by restructuring work processes and procedures.– It can increase their latitude to make

decisions and add more meaning to work.

• If properly designed and administered, then in many cases followers will successfully work through their resistance.

Page 21: 9-1. 1-2 McGraw-Hill/Irwin copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, inc. All Rights Reserved Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance “Polls estimate

9-21

The Empowerment Continuum

Page 22: 9-1. 1-2 McGraw-Hill/Irwin copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, inc. All Rights Reserved Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance “Polls estimate

9-22

Understanding and Influencing Follower Satisfaction

• Research has shown that satisfied workers are more likely to continue working for an organization.– More likely to engage in organizational citizenship

behaviors.

• Dissatisfied workers: More likely to be adversarial in their relations with leadership.– May engage in diverse sorts of counterproductive

behaviors.

• Employee turnover has the most immediate impact on leadership practitioners.– Functional turnover– Dysfunctional turnover

Page 23: 9-1. 1-2 McGraw-Hill/Irwin copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, inc. All Rights Reserved Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance “Polls estimate

9-23

Why People Leave or Stay with Organizations

Page 24: 9-1. 1-2 McGraw-Hill/Irwin copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, inc. All Rights Reserved Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance “Polls estimate

9-24

Global, Facet, and Life Satisfaction

• Three different types of items are typically found on a job satisfaction survey:– Global satisfaction– Facet satisfaction– Life satisfaction

• Other important findings include:– Hierarchy effect

– Life satisfaction

• Survey results are most useful when they can be compared with those from some reference group.

Page 25: 9-1. 1-2 McGraw-Hill/Irwin copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, inc. All Rights Reserved Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance “Polls estimate

9-25

Typical Items on a Satisfaction Questionnaire

Page 26: 9-1. 1-2 McGraw-Hill/Irwin copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, inc. All Rights Reserved Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance “Polls estimate

9-26

Results of a Facet Satisfaction Survey

Page 27: 9-1. 1-2 McGraw-Hill/Irwin copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, inc. All Rights Reserved Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance “Polls estimate

9-27

Theories of Job Satisfaction

• Affectivity: Refers to one’s tendency to react to stimuli in a consistent emotional manner.– Negative affectivity– Positive affectivity

• Hezberg’s Two-Factor Theory– Motivators– Hygiene factors

• Organizational Justice– Interactional justice– Distributive justice– Procedural justice

Page 28: 9-1. 1-2 McGraw-Hill/Irwin copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, inc. All Rights Reserved Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance “Polls estimate

9-28

Motivators and Hygiene Factors ofthe Two-Factor Theory

Page 29: 9-1. 1-2 McGraw-Hill/Irwin copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, inc. All Rights Reserved Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance “Polls estimate

9-29

Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory

Page 30: 9-1. 1-2 McGraw-Hill/Irwin copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, inc. All Rights Reserved Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance “Polls estimate

9-30

Summary

• Performance and motivation are not the same thing.

• People often have varying levels of satisfaction for different aspects of their jobs.

• Many of the approaches to understanding motivation have distinct implications for increasing performance and satisfaction.

• Followers, as well as leaders are more likely to have positive attitudes about work if they believe that what they do is important and that the reward and disciplinary systems are fair and just.