a review of optics austin roorda, ph.d. university of houston college of optometry

63
A Review of Optics A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

Upload: deborah-porter

Post on 01-Jan-2016

247 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

A Review of OpticsA Review of Optics

Austin Roorda, Ph.D.University of Houston College of Optometry

Page 2: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

These slides were prepared by Austin Roorda, except where otherwise noted.

Full permission is granted to anyone who would like to use any or all of these slides for educational purposes.

Page 3: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

Geometrical Optics

Relationships between pupil size, refractive error

and blur

Page 4: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

Optics of the eye: Depth of Focus Optics of the eye: Depth of Focus

2 mm 4 mm 6 mm

Page 5: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

2 mm 4 mm 6 mm

In focus

Focused in front of retina

Focused behind retina

Optics of the eye: Depth of Focus Optics of the eye: Depth of Focus

Page 6: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

7 mm pupil

Bigger blurcircle

Courtesy of RA ApplegateCourtesy of RA Applegate

Page 7: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

Smaller blurcircle

2 mm pupil

Courtesy of RA ApplegateCourtesy of RA Applegate

Page 8: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

DemonstrationRole of Pupil Size and Defocus on Retinal Blur

Draw a cross like this one on a page, hold it so close that is it completely out of focus, then squint. You should see the horizontal line become clear. The line becomes clear because you have made you have used your eyelids to make your effective pupil size smaller, thereby reducing the blur due to defocus on the retina image. Only the horizontal line appears clear because you have only reduced the blur in the horizontal direction.

Page 9: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

Physical Optics

The Wavefront

Page 10: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

What is the Wavefront?What is the Wavefront?

converging beam=

spherical wavefront

parallel beam=

plane wavefront

Page 11: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

What is the Wavefront?What is the Wavefront?ideal wavefrontparallel beam

=plane wavefront

defocused wavefront

Page 12: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

What is the Wavefront?What is the Wavefront?parallel beam

=plane wavefront

aberrated beam=

irregular wavefront

ideal wavefront

Page 13: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

What is the Wavefront?What is the Wavefront?

aberrated beam=

irregular wavefront

diverging beam=

spherical wavefront

ideal wavefront

Page 14: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

The Wave Aberration

Page 15: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

What is the What is the Wave AberrationWave Aberration??diverging beam

=spherical wavefront wave aberration

Page 16: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

Wavefront Aberration

mm (right-left)m

m (

supe

rior

-infe

rior)

Wave Aberration of a SurfaceWave Aberration of a Surface

Page 17: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

Diffraction

Page 18: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

DiffractionDiffraction

“Any deviation of light rays from a rectilinear path which cannot be interpreted as reflection or refraction”

Sommerfeld, ~ 1894

Page 19: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

Fraunhofer DiffractionFraunhofer Diffraction

• Also called far-field diffraction• Occurs when the screen is held far from

the aperture.

• Occurs at the focal point of a lens!

Page 20: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

Diffraction and InterferenceDiffraction and Interference

• diffraction causes light to bend perpendicular to the direction of the diffracting edge

• interference due to the size of the aperture causes the diffracted light to have peaks and valleys

Page 21: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

rectangular aperture

square aperture

Page 22: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

Airy Disc

circular aperture

Page 23: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

The Point Spread Function

Page 24: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

The Point Spread Function, or PSF, is the image that an optical system

forms of a point source.

The point source is the most fundamental object, and forms the

basis for any complex object.

The PSF is analogous to the Impulse Response Function in electronics.

Page 25: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

Airy Disc

The Point Spread FunctionThe Point Spread Function

The PSF for a perfect optical system is the Airy disc, which is the Fraunhofer diffraction pattern for a circular pupil.

Page 26: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

Airy DiskAiry Disk

1.22

a

Page 27: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

angle subtended at the nodal point

wavelength of the light

pupil diameter

1.22

a

a

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

pupil diameter (mm)sepa

ratr

ion

betw

een

Airy

dis

k pe

ak a

nd 1

st m

in

(min

utes

of a

rc 5

00 n

m li

ght)

As the pupil size gets larger, the Airy disc gets smaller.

Page 28: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

Point Spread Function vs. Pupil SizePoint Spread Function vs. Pupil Size

1 mm 2 mm 3 mm 4 mm

5 mm 6 mm 7 mm

Page 29: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

Small PupilSmall Pupil

Page 30: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

Larger pupilLarger pupil

Page 31: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

1 mm 2 mm 3 mm 4 mm

5 mm 6 mm 7 mm

Point Spread Function vs. Pupil SizePerfect Eye

Page 32: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

pupil images

followed by

psfs for changing pupil size

1 mm 2 mm 3 mm 4 mm

5 mm 6 mm 7 mm

Point Spread Function vs. Pupil SizeTypical Eye

Page 33: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

DemonstrationObserve Your Own Point Spread Function

Page 34: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

Resolution

Page 35: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

Rayleigh resolution

limit

Unresolved point sources

Resolved

Page 36: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

AO image of binary star k-Peg on the 3.5-m telescope at the Starfire Optical Range

uncorrected corrected

arc of seconds 064.05.3

1090022.122.1 9

min

a

About 1000 times better than the eye!

Page 37: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

Keck telescope: (10 m reflector) About 4500 times better than the eye!

Wainscott

Page 38: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

Convolution

Page 39: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

( , ) ( , ) ( , )PSF x y O x y I x y

Convolution

Page 40: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

Simulated Images

20/40 letters

20/20 letters

Page 41: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

MTFModulation Transfer

Function

Page 42: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

low medium high

object:100% contrast

image

spatial frequency

cont

rast

1

0

Page 43: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

• The modulation transfer function (MTF) indicates the ability of an optical system to reproduce (transfer) various levels of detail (spatial frequencies) from the object to the image.

• Its units are the ratio of image contrast over the object contrast as a function of spatial frequency.

• It is the optical contribution to the contrast sensitivity function (CSF).

Page 44: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

MTF: Cutoff FrequencyMTF: Cutoff Frequency

0

0.5

1

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

1 mm2 mm4 mm6 mm8 mm

mo

du

lati

on

tra

nsf

er

spatial frequency (c/deg)

cut-off frequency

57.3cutoff

af

Rule of thumb: cutoff frequency increases by ~30 c/d for each mm increase in pupil size

Page 45: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

Effect of Defocus on the MTF

Charman and Jennings, 1976

450 nm

650 nm

Page 46: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

PTFPhase Transfer

Function

Page 47: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

object

image

spatial frequency

phas

e sh

ift 180

0

-180

low medium high

Page 48: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

Relationships Between Wave Aberration,

PSF and MTF

Page 49: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

2

( , ), ( , )

i W x y

i iPSF x y FT P x y e

, Amplitude ( , )x y i iMTF f f FT PSF x y

The PSF is the Fourier Transform (FT) of the pupil function

The MTF is the real part of the FT of the PSF

, Phase ( , )x y i iPTF f f FT PSF x y

The PTF is the imaginary part of the FT of the PSF

Page 50: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry
Page 51: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry
Page 52: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry
Page 53: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

Adaptive Optics Flattens the Wave Aberration

AO ON

AO OFF

Page 54: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

Other Metrics to Define Imagine Quality

Page 55: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

Strehl RatioStrehl Ratio

diffraction-limited PSF

Hdl

Heye

actual PSF

Strehl Ratio = eye

dl

H

H

Page 56: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

Retinal Sampling

Page 57: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

Projected Image Sampled Image

5 arc minutes20/20 letter

Sampling by Foveal ConesSampling by Foveal Cones

Page 58: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

5 arc minutes20/5 letter

Projected Image Sampled Image

Sampling by Foveal ConesSampling by Foveal Cones

Page 59: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

Nyquist Sampling TheoremNyquist Sampling Theorem

Page 60: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

Photoreceptor Sampling >> Spatial Frequency

I

0

1

I

0

1

nearly 100% transmitted

Page 61: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

I

0

1

I

0

1

nearly 100% transmitted

Photoreceptor Sampling = 2 x Spatial Frequency

Page 62: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

I

0

1

I

0

1

nothing transmitted

Photoreceptor Sampling = Spatial Frequency

Page 63: A Review of Optics Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

Nyquist theorem:The maximum spatial frequency that can be detected is equal to ½ of the sampling frequency.

foveal cone spacing ~ 120 samples/deg

maximum spatial frequency: 60 cycles/deg (20/10 or 6/3 acuity)