a virtual r&d organization
DESCRIPTION
An alternate approach to a dedicated R&D department; a virtual organization.TRANSCRIPT
An Alternate Approach to New Product Development
A VIRTUAL R&D ORGANIZATION
THE CHALLENGE
• Create a new product line to obsolete legacy products before the competition does
• The new technology has not yet been identified
• There is no budget to support a dedicated development team
• There is no product roadmap
BACKGROUND
• Brooks Instrument – Division of Emerson
• Products – Mass Flow Controllers (<2”Dia Piping)
• Diversified markets/customers
• Global organization
• Reputation – “solid”
PREVIOUS PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
• All Digital Mass Flow Controller – DOA
• New Project – Hybrid interface MFC
• Well received
• Slow sales ramp
• Slow time-to-market
• Followed with new calibration technology
THE CASE
• VP of Engineering challenged by CEO
• 30 year old technology
• Risk of displacement by improved technology
• “What are you going to do about it?”
THE APPROACH
RESEARCH NEW TECHNOLOGIES
• Conduct a survey of potential technologies
• Find out who, what, when, and how
• Develop selection criteria (samples)
• Intellectual Property
• Risk
• Time to market
• Expert consensus
• Costs
ORGANIZE A TECHNOLOGY SEMINAR
• Recruit internal and external experts to present and evaluate technologies
• Set time and agenda for seminar
• Use Nominal Group Technique
• Down-select the most promising technology
• Establish final consensus
• Close the seminar
THE PLAN• Engage key customers for product input
• Conduct market survey
• Roadmap product and technology
• Develop the team and partners (Need for flexibility)
• Establish the facility and tools
• Multiple technology surveys and trade studies (a sample)
• Displacement technology
• DSP
• Capillary tubing
• MEMS
CUSTOMER INPUT
• Engaged Key Customers
• Disclosed intent
• Explored product concepts
• Solicited feedback
• Market Survey
• Engaged The Wharton School to use as a classroom project
• Analyzed data
• Developed product specification and price point
FORM A CORE FEASIBILITY TEAM
• Determine skills required
• Survey in-house personnel skills
• Recruit most competent members
• Plan strategy to fill gaps (examples)
• Hire additional members
• Hire consultants
• Develop in-house personnel
• Establish the core team
THE TEAM
CONDUCT A FEASIBILITY STUDY
• Plan the project
• Set up a location for the work
• Purchase the necessary tools
• Establish success criteria
• Design initial key components
• Collect data
• Demonstrate compliance to success criteria
THE INITIAL TOOLS
FORM A VIRTUAL R&D TEAM
• Plan product development
• Develop product roadmap
• Recruit technology partners
• Recruit contractors and temps
• Develop a virtual team environment
SOME OF THE PARTNERS
c2v - Enscede, NL
THE ROADMAP
• Leverage Coriolis mass flow sensing technology
• Capillary tube sensor – then MEMS
• Liquid applications – then gas applications
• Move from flow to multivariable sensor
• Incorporate increased functional integration
DEVELOP TECHNOLOGIES & PROCESSES
• Develop system design
• Segment into subsystems
• Identify required technologies
• Prioritize by risk
• Establish strategies for risk management
• Coordinate technology development
DOCUMENT, DOCUMENT, DOCUMENT
• Identify risks
• Identify risk management strategies
• Document design intent
• Establish design strategies (Dfx)
• Incorporate document control early
• Build Bills of Materials (BOMs) as parts are identified
• Perform trade studies on manufacturing processes
COMMUNICATE, COMMUNICATE, COMMUNICATE
• Develop communications plan
• Core team
• Extended team
• Stakeholders
• Key customers
• Communicate consistently
• Plan regular design reviews
• Document, evaluate, and incorporate feedback
BUILD AND TEST PROTOTYPES
• Evaluate performance to goals
• Evaluate assembly process
• Evaluate costs
• Evaluate the design
• Document assembly process
• Collect data
• Critical design review
BEGIN MARKETING “SIZZLE”
• Communicate with sales force
• Communicate with key customers
• Publish “teaser” ads in industry magazines
• Introduced the fictional Dr. Direct to promote the product in a comic format
DEVELOP MANUFACTURING INFRASTRUCTURE
• Plan manufacturing facility
• Recruit manufacturing engineer
• Case: Identified candidate while contractor on project
• Build facility
• Procure and install equipment
• Transfer process documentation and BOMs from R&D
RECRUIT FIELD TEST PARTNERS (VALIDATION)
• Identify key customer POCs who are early adopters
• Incentivize POCs to evaluate pilot product
• Formalize an agreement for data sharing and schedule
RUN PILOT PRODUCTION
• Set the number of production units
• Statistically significant number is best
• If possible, automate data collection
• Analyze the data
• Wring out the variations using Six Sigma methodology
• Deliver pilot product to key customers for validation
COLLECT AND ANALYZE FIELD DATA
• Follow up regularly to assure that data is captured
• Collect data for validation
• Make adjustments to manufacturing
PRODUCTION READINESS REVIEW
• Design Review
• Design Verification Review
• Design Validation Review
• Regulatory Requirements Review
• Safety Review
PRODUCT LAUNCH
• Press conference @ Benjamin Franklin Institute
• Industry magazine editors invited
• Luncheon with entertainment
• Conference speakers
• Emerson CTO
• VP New Product Development
• Local Ben Franklin actor
• Dr. Direct actor
• Demo with Q&A by the development team
• An award-winning Mass Flow Controller
• New disruptive technologies to establish and extend a new product line
THE RESULT