accuracy of photomod aerial triangulation, ivan katzarsky, vanya petrova accuracy of photomod aerial...

12
ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION, Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION AERIAL TRIANGULATION Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA PETROVA GIS SOFIA Ltd., Bulgaria GIS SOFIA Ltd., Bulgaria

Upload: addison-pillar

Post on 28-Mar-2015

248 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION, Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA GIS SOFIA

ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION, Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA

ACCURACY OF ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL PHOTOMOD AERIAL

TRIANGULATIONTRIANGULATIONIvan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVAIvan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA

GIS SOFIA Ltd., BulgariaGIS SOFIA Ltd., Bulgaria

Page 2: ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION, Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA GIS SOFIA

ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION, Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA

• For evaluation the capacity of a digital photogrammetric system of special

importance is the accuracy of the aerial triangulation

• An experiment in 4 variants in Photogrammetry Department at GIS

SOFIA Ltd. determines the accuracy of PHOTOMOD

INTRODUCTION

Page 3: ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION, Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA GIS SOFIA

ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION, Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA

SOFIA SOFIA MUNICIPALITYMUNICIPALITY

Test areaTest area

TEST AREA

• Contractor: Hansa Luftbild Sensorik und Photogrammetry GmbH, Münster

• Execution of the photo-flight: 19.05.2006

• Aircraft: Cessna 404 Titan

• Aerial camera: Zeiss RMK TOP 30/23 (Z/I Imaging)

• Overlap between the pictures: forward 60 %, side 30 %

• Aerial film: Kodak Aerocolor Negative 2444 III, 19 DIN

• Film processor: Colenta

• Area: 3103 hectares

• Terrain: flat, lightly hilly and hilly not dense urban area with predominantly

low houses

• Average height of the terrain above sea level: 750 m

Test area characteristics

Aerial photography

Page 4: ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION, Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA GIS SOFIA

ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION, Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA

DELTASCAN

GeoSystem Scientific Production Enterprise

12 μm pixel size

Scanning

Pre-marked on the terrain ground control and

check points, determined by GPS-receiver

Topcon GGD with an accuracy of ± 2 cm

in position and ± 3 cm in height

Land surveying

Page 5: ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION, Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA GIS SOFIA

ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION, Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA

General information

EXPERIMENT DESCRIPTION

• Blocks of aerial pictures……………………………………………….. 1

• Strips of aerial pictures………………………………………………… 6

• Aerial pictures…………………………… 14+17+18+18+19+19 = 105

• Approximate picture scale…………………………………….. 1 : 4710

• Average flight height above the terrain, m……………………… 1440

• Ground pixel size, cm………………………………………………. 5.7

• Pre-marked points on the terrain……………………………………. 36

• Pictures per 1 pre-marked point……………………………………… 3

• Tie points…………………………………………………………….. 786

Page 6: ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION, Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA GIS SOFIA

ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION, Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA

Scheme of the experimental block

Page 7: ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION, Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA GIS SOFIA

ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION, Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA

Experimented variants

• PHOTOMOD Montage Desktop

• PHOTOMOD AT

• PHOTOMOD Solver

Aerial triangulation by PHOTOMOD 4.2 modules

Polynomial correction of 2nd degree in X, Y and Z axes are applied

VariantsGroundcontrolpoints

Check pointsPictures

per 1 GCPPictures

per 1 ChP

I 25 11 4.2 9.5II 20 16 5.2 6.6III 15 21 7 5IV 10 26 10.5 4

Page 8: ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION, Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA GIS SOFIA

ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION, Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA

The accuracy of aerial triangulation is evaluated by mean square

differences between geodetic and photogrammetric coordinates

of the ground control and check points

RESULTS

Accuracy on the terrain, based on ground control points

Mean square differences between geodetic andphotogrammetric coordinates of the ground control pointsVariants

in X-axis in Y-axis in XY-plane in Z-axisI ± 3.3 cm ± 3.7 cm ± 5.0 cm ± 7.1 cmII ± 3.3 cm ± 3.4 cm ± 4.8 cm ± 5.5 cmIII ± 3.2 cm ± 3.5 cm ± 4.8 cm ± 4.8 cmIV ± 3.8 cm ± 1.1 cm ± 4.0 cm ± 2.3 cm

Page 9: ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION, Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA GIS SOFIA

ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION, Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA

Accuracy on the terrain, based on check points

Mean square differences between geodetic andPhotogrammetric coordinates of the check pointsVariants

in X-axis in Y-axis in XY-plane in Z-axisI ± 4.5 cm ± 4.3 cm ± 6.3 cm ± 8.0 cmII ± 5.7 cm ± 5.7 cm ± 8.1 cm ±14.4 cmIII ± 6.5 cm ± 5.8 cm ± 8.7 cm ±14.4 cmIV ± 7.3 cm ± 9.3 cm ±11.8 cm ±26.7 cm

Page 10: ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION, Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA GIS SOFIA

ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION, Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA

ANALYSIS

The mean square differences between geodetic and photogrammetric

• In X-axis : ± 3.2 cm to ± 3.8 cm

• In Y-axis : ± 1.1 cm to ± 3.7 cm

• In XY-plane : ± 4.0 cm to ± 5.0 cm

• In Z-axis : ± 2.3 cm to ± 7.1 cm

co-ordinates of the ground control points are in the following range

The mean square differences between geodetic and photogrammetric

co-ordinates of the check points are in the following range

• In X-axis : ± 4.5 cm to ± 7.3 cm

• In Y-axis: ± 4.3 cm to ± 9.3 cm

• In XY-plane: ± 6.3 cm to ± 11.8 cm

• In Z-axis: ± 8.0 cm to ± 26.7 cm

Page 11: ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION, Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA GIS SOFIA

ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION, Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA

CONCLUSIONS

• PHOTOMOD aerial triangulation, based on one ground control point

per 4 to 7 pictures, shows best result

• The results strongly depend on the experimental conditions and

parameters. It gives an idea only for the capacity of PHOTOMOD

aerial triangulation. Another experiment could show other results

• Aerial triangulation carried out by PHOTOMOD shows a reliable

accuracy

Page 12: ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION, Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA GIS SOFIA

ACCURACY OF PHOTOMOD AERIAL TRIANGULATION, Ivan KATZARSKY, Vanya PETROVA

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ivan Katzarsky

22 Omourtag Street

BG-1124 Sofia, Bulgaria

Tel.: +359 (0)2 8466953

GSM: +359 (0)88 5325509

[email protected]

Vanya Petrova, M.Sc.

GIS SOFIA Ltd., Photogrammetry Dept.

5 Serdica Str., BG-1000 Sofia, Bulgaria

Tel.: +359 (0)2 9238338; 9307946

GSM: +359 (0)88 6067306

[email protected]

Authors