adequate yearly progress (ayp)

ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP)

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (SIP)

AYP INDICATORS, COMPONENTS AND

STANDARDS Reading/ELA

Performance: 87% Proficiency Rate Participation: 95% Participating

Mathematics Performance: 83% Proficiency Rate Participation Rate: 95% Participating

Other Indicator Graduation Rate (High School): 75% Target Attendance Rate (Junior and Elementary Schools): 90%

Rate

AYP MEASURESAll Students and the following student groups: African American Hispanic White Economically Disadvantaged Special Education Limited English Proficient

FEDERAL CAP Federal regulations limit the number of

proficient assessment results from alternate assessments that may be counted as proficient in evaluating AYP.

A district’s federal cap limit is based on the total number of students enrolled in the district in grades 3-8 and 10 on the day of the test.

1% Cap: STAAR Alternate

2% Cap: STAAR Modified/TAKS-M

2012 AYP STATUS: MEETS AYP

IMPACT ECHS Peter Hyland Program Highlands Junior Austin Elementary Bowie Elementary San Jacinto Elementary Hopper Primary

2012 AYP STATUS: “MISSED AYP”

District: Reading Performance: AA, Hispanic, ED, Sp. Ed., LEP Math Performance: AA, ED, Sp. Ed., LEPGraduation Rate: Sp. Ed.

Lee High School: Reading Performance: All, Hispanic, White, ED, Sp. Ed.

Math Performance: All, Hispanic, White, ED, Sp. Ed.Graduation Rate: Sp. Ed.

Sterling High School: Reading Performance: AA, ED, Sp. Ed.

Math Performance: All, AA, Hispanic, ED, Sp. Ed. Graduation Rate: Sp. Ed.

Memorial High School: Math Performance: All, AA, Hispanic, ED Baytown Junior: Reading Performance: All, AA, Hispanic, ED

Math Performance:: All, AA, Hispanic, ED Cedar Bayou Junior: Reading Performance: Hispanic, ED, Sp. Ed. Gentry Junior: Math Performance: AA, ED, Sp. Ed.

Horace Mann Junior: Reading Performance: All, AA, White, ED, Sp. Ed.Math Performance: All, AA, ED, Sp. Ed

2012 AYP STATUS: “MISSED AYP”

Alamo Elementary: Reading Performance: All, HispanicMath Performance: AA, ED

Ashbel Smith Elementary: Reading Performance: All, Hispanic, ED, LEPMath Performance: All, Hispanic, ED

Carver Elementary: Reading Performance: All, AA, Hispanic, ED

Math Performance: All, AA, ED

Crockett Elementary: Reading Performance: ED

De Zavala Elementary: Reading Performance: Hispanic, ED

Harlem Elementary: Math Performance: AA, ED Highlands Elementary: Reading Performance: AA, LEP Lamar Elementary: Reading Performance: All, AA, Hispanic, ED, Sp. Ed,, LEP

Math Performance: All, AA,, Hispanic, ED, Sp. Ed., LEP Travis Elementary: Math Performance: AA Victoria Walker Elementary:Reading Performance: AA

Math Performance: AA, ED

TITLE I SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT

Districts and campuses receiving Title I, Part A funds are subject to School Improvement requirements if they do not meet the AYP standard for the same indictor (Reading/ELA, Mathematics, Graduation Rate or Attendance Rate) for two or more consecutive years.

Districts and campuses are no longer subject to School Improvement when they meet the AYP standard for two consecutive years for the same indicator that originally triggered School Improvement.

GOOSE CREEK CISD SIP STATUS

District: Stage 2 (Reading)

Alamo Elementary: Stage 1 Year 1 (Reading)

Carver Elementary: Stage 1 Year 1 (Reading)

Travis Elementary: Stage 1 Year 1 (Math)

DETERMINING SIP STATUS District Stage 2: Result of missing AYP

in Reading for three years in a row.

Campus Stage 1 Year 1: Result of missing AYP in the same indicator two years in a row

SIP REQUIREMENTS: DISTRICT STAGE 2

Select a District Coordinator of School Improvement (DCSI) by September 7, 2012

Parent notification by September 15, 2012

Establish a District Leadership Team to conduct and monitor improvement activities

Implement and revise the district improvement plan developed under Stage 1

SIP REQUIREMENTS: CAMPUS STAGE 1 YEAR

1 Principals view applicable webinars in September

Principals attend Texas Accountability Intervention System (TAIS), Part 1 training at Region 4 on September 10, 2012

Establish Intervention Team

Conduct a student level review and data analysis

Conduct a needs assessment

SIP REQUIREMENTS: CAMPUS STAGE 1 YEAR 1

(Cont.) Develop an improvement plan

Conduct a targeted student analysis

Revise CIP within 3 months

District provides technical assistance as the campus develops and implements the CIP

District reviews CIP

Support Focus Priority

Defin

ition Formerly AU CIT released

SIP Stage 1 (Year 1)

AU 1 or 2 SIP Stage 1 (Year 2), 2, & 3 Formerly AU with CIT

AU 3-6 SIP Stage 4 & 5+

Tech

nica

l As

sist

ance LEA

ESC LEA ESC PSP (Professional Service Provider) TCDSS (TX Center for District & School Support)

LEA ESC PSP (Professional Service Provider) TCDSS (TX Center for District & School Support)

Requ

ired Im

prov

emen

t Int

erve

ntion

s

All C

ampu

ses in

Impr

ovem

ent

Designate District Coordinator of School Improvement (DCSI) in ISAM

Sept. 7 Designate District Coordinator of School Improvement (DCSI) & PSP in ISAM

Sept. 7 Designate District Coordinator of School Improvement (DCSI) & PSP in ISAM

Sept. 7

Texas Accountability Intervention System (TAIS), Part 1: District Foundations (ESC led): District level staff (DCSI, if named), optional for principal

Mid-Aug. – Mid-Sept.





Data Analysis, Needs Assessment, and Improvement Plan

* Data Analysis, Needs Assessment, and Improvement Plan

Oct. 15 Data Analysis, Needs Assessment, and Improvement Plan

Oct. 15

Review of Student Level Data

* Review of Student Level Data

Oct. 31, June 30 Review of Student Level Data

Oct. 31, June 30

Targeted Student Analysis * Targeted Student Analysis Oct. 31, Jan. 31, March 31, June 30

Targeted Student Analysis Oct. 31, Jan. 31, March 31, June 30

Monitoring Reporting * Monitoring Reporting Sept-June & Aug Monitoring Reporting Sept-June & Aug

Stat

e O

nly

AU 2 Reconstitution Planning

Drafts Oct. and Jan., final in June

AU 3 Reconstitution Plan Implementation AU 6 Parent Petition Option

Fede

ral O

nly

SIP Stage 1 (Year 1) SIP Stage 1 (Year 2), 2, & 3 SIP Stage 4 & 5+ Parent Notification & School Choice letter sent & submitted in ISAM

Aug. 13 Parent Notification & School Choice letter sent & maintained locally

Aug. 13 Parent Notification & School Choice letter sent & maintained locally

Aug. 13

Stage 1, Year 1 Webinar: DCSI

Sept. Supplemental Educational Services (SES)**

Send letter by Sept. 10

Supplemental Educational Services (SES)

Send letter by Sept. 10

TAIS, Part 2: District Support Modules (TCDSS led)

Mid-Sept. – Early Oct.

TAIS, Part 2: District Support Modules (TCDSS led)

Mid-Sept. – Early Oct.

2-year CIP Within 3 months of notification



HQ records submitted in ISAM, if requested



AIE Conference: Principal and DCSI

Oct. 17-18 AIE Conference: Principal and DCSI

Oct. 17-18

SIP Funding Application Level 2 - 20% SIP funds to ESC for support

Oct. 25 SIP Funding Application ***SIP Effective Strategy Choice

Oct. 25 SIP Funding Application ***SIP Effective Strategy Choice

Oct. 25

Stage 3 Corrective Action (CA)****

Progress reports Oct., Jan., and June

Stage 4 Restructuring**** Stage 5 Alt. Gov.****

Progress reports Oct., Jan., and June

*Ongoing documentation at the local level, but ISAM submission is not required **SES is not a requirement for Stage 1, Year 2 campuses ***Only applicable if effective strategy funding is selected **** For TTIPS campuses, their SIG intervention model is the CA, Restructuring or Alt. Gov.

REQUIREMENTS: NON-TITLE I CAMPUSES Non-Title I schools that do not meet AYP for two

consecutive years are required to amend their school improvement plan to address the deficit areas. Non-Title I campuses and school districts will not be subject to other school improvement activities, supplemental services and corrective actions.

Sterling High School (Math)

Cedar Bayou Junior (Reading)

SIP FISCAL RESPONSIBILITIES Professional development (District)

Professional development (Stage 1 campuses)

School Choice transportation

Systems for Continuous District

and School Improvement

adequate yearly progress (ayp)

Documents