advances in non-invasive monitoring

45
Advances in Non- Invasive Monitoring Michael O’Reilly, M.D., M.S. Chief Medical Officer Masimo Corporation Professor of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care University of California-Irvine Adjunct Associate Professor University of Michigan

Upload: ivi

Post on 24-Feb-2016

32 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring. Michael O’Reilly, M.D., M.S. Chief Medical Officer Masimo Corporation Professor of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care University of California-Irvine Adjunct Associate Professor University of Michigan. Technology and Patient Safety. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

Michael O’Reilly, M.D., M.S.Chief Medical OfficerMasimo Corporation

Professor of Anesthesiology and Perioperative CareUniversity of California-IrvineAdjunct Associate Professor

University of Michigan

Page 2: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

Technology and Patient Safety

Michael O’Reilly, M.D., M.S.Chief Medical OfficerMasimo Corporation

Professor of Anesthesiology and Perioperative CareUniversity of California-IrvineAdjunct Associate Professor

University of Michigan

Page 3: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

Technology Convergence

Monito

ring Information

Communication

Page 4: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

Conflict of Interest Statement

Masimo Corporation

Page 5: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring
Page 6: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring
Page 7: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

The influence of anesthesia care on surgical outcomes

Page 8: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

ACS-NSQIP

(ACS=American College of Surgeons)

Page 9: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

1

0

2

3

NSQIP Annual Report – FY 2000Mortality O/E Ratios for All Operations

Page 10: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

But No Intraoperative Data!No…Estimated Blood Loss (EBL)BP, HR, SPO2, TemperatureDuration of SurgeryUrine Output………Nothing.

But they have 30 Day Outcome.

Surgery meets Anesthesiology

Page 11: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

Lancet 2012; 380: 1059–65

European Surgical Outcomes Study (EuSOS) group for the Trials groups of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the European Society of Anaesthesiology

Page 12: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

Lancet 2012; 380: 1059–65

Methods:• 7 day cohort study• Consecutive patients aged ≥16 years • Inpatient non-cardiac surgery• 498 hospitals• 28 European nations• Patients followed up to 60 days• Primary endpoint in-hospital mortality• Secondary outcome LOS and ICU

admission

Page 13: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

Lancet 2012; 380: 1059–65

Results:• 46 539 patients

• 1855 (4%) died before hospital discharge• 3599 (8%) patients were admitted to critical

care• median LOS of 1・ 2 days (IQR 0・ 9–3・

6) • 1358 (73%) patients who died were not

admitted to critical care at any stage after surgery.

• Crude mortality rates between countries (from 1.2% for Iceland to 21.5% for Latvia)

Page 14: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

Lanc

et 2

012;

380

: 105

9–65

Note the Log Scale!

Page 15: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

Lancet 2012; 380: 1059–65

Conclusion:The mortality rate for patients undergoing inpatient non-cardiac surgery was higher than anticipated.

Variations in mortality between countries suggest the need for national and international strategies to improve care for this group of patients.

Page 16: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

From the Michigan Surgical Collaborativefor Outcomes Research and Evaluation,the Department of Surgery, University ofMichigan, Ann Arbor.

n engl j med 361:14; 2009

Page 17: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

• 84,730 patients • Inpatient general and vascular surgery• Data from the American College of Surgeons National

Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP)• Hospitals ranked according to risk-adjusted overall rate of

death• Divided into five groups

Each overall mortality quintile assessed the incidence of overall and major complications and the rate of death among patients with major complications.

METHODS

n engl j med 361:14; 2009

Page 18: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

n en

gl j

med

361

:14;

200

9

Page 19: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

CONCLUSION“In addition to efforts aimed at avoiding complications in the first place, reducing mortality associated with inpatient surgery will require greater attention to the timely recognition and management of complications once they occur.”

n engl j med 361:14; 2009

Page 20: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

Preventing “Failure to Rescue”

Page 21: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

Data

We have a lot of data!

Information

But what we really need is information!

Decisions

So we make the right decisions

Actions

Leading to the right action.

Page 22: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

DataSensors InformationLight-SpO2

-SpHb

-Cerebral oximetry

-Tissue Oximetry

Electrical-EKG

-EEG

-Impedance

Acoustic

Radar

Ultrasound

EHR Lab

Pharmacy

Page 23: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

Sensors Information Decisions ActionsData

Providers

Different roles, different locations

Page 24: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

Technology Convergence

Monito

ring Information

Communication

Page 25: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

Peter Pronovost, MD

Page 26: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring
Page 27: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

!. Hand washing

2. Full barrier precautions

3. Clean the site with chlorhexidine

4. Avoid the femoral site

5. Remove unnecessary catheters

Preventing CLABSI

Page 28: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring
Page 29: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

“To really make progress, need cooperation of

vendors, clinicians and administrators.”

Page 30: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

Implement known patient safety practices.

Get vendors to provide open access to data.

Page 31: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring
Page 32: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

Technology Convergence

Monito

ring Information

Communication

Page 33: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

© 2009-2010 Masimo Corporation - CONFIDENTIAL

Critical Care Medicine 2:317; 1974C

Page 34: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

© 2009-2010 Masimo Corporation - CONFIDENTIAL

Critical Care Medicine 2:317; 1974C

Page 35: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

Liver TransplantContinuous Noninvasive Hemoglobin

Page 36: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

A blood transfusion is an organ transplant.

Page 37: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

Qian F. Et al. Ann Surg. 2013 Feb;257(2):266-78

Variation of blood transfusion in patients undergoing major non-

cardiac surgery

Page 38: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

Goodnough L.T. Shander A. A&A 2012

The 1-3units of RBC transfused

Blood Transfusion: Who is at risk

Page 39: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

Remote Monitoring & Clinician Notification System

Page 40: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

Anesthesiology 112:284-9; 2010

Page 41: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

Transfers to ICU

Comparison Unit 2

Comparison Unit 1 PSN

5.02.6

Anesthesiology 112:284-9; 2010

Page 42: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

Reduction in Rescue Calls

PSN Comparison Unit 1 Comparison Unit 2

3.41.0

Taenzer, et al., Anesthesiology 112:284-9; 2010

Page 43: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

Significant Financial Implications

Over a 12 month period decreased transfers to the ICU from 54 to 28 for one unit.

With an average LOS of 6.3 days, translates into 163 ICU days saved

Page 44: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring

© 2012 Masimo Corporation

Page 45: Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring