aldo rolfo, national clinical development manager, genesis cancer care, australia - cancer care...
TRANSCRIPT
Cancer Care Service of the FutureGC UK Clinical CollaborativeNovember 2016
Genesis CancerCare is the largest private provider in Australia
‒ Provides radiotherapy services at 27 sites, with 55 linear accelerators across all major Australian states
‒ Medical oncology services in WA and NSW (11 chairs)‒ c.700 full time employees (incl. doctors)‒ c.340k attendances p.a.
(1) Includes shared care arrangements in Victoria.
GenesisCare is the leading provider of essential, high quality cancer services in the Australian market
Strong reputation for clinical excellence
‒ Achieved through continuous improvement and innovation in technology and treatment
‒ Well-established and defined clinical governance framework ‒ Focus on delivery of quality patient outcomes
Commitment to research
‒ c.47 clinical trials currently in progress ‒ Contribution to over 1,000 peer reviewed publications‒ Partnership with TROG Cancer Research, a leader in radiotherapy
research
Strong public sector relationships
‒ Partnering with government to deliver unique solutions‒ 8 State Government public private partnerships(1)
‒ A number of additional PPP opportunities identified
4
What is the CCSOF about? The Cancer Care Service of the Future (CCSOF)
─ A program that seeks to redefine best practice across the drivers of our business (Quality, Access and Efficiency) in order to deliver on our vision of “Innovating Healthcare. Transforming Lives.”
The project provides a platform to:
─ Ensure sustainability & growth of the network despite declining reimbursement
─ Enhanced service offering to patient and referrers
─ Better and more engaging place for our staff to work
─ Provide opportunities for leaders to live our vision and values
─ Development of our brand around quality, outcomes and research
─ Support the development of a globally scalable service model into regions of need
CancerCareService of the Future
Quality
AccessEfficiency• Innovative, low-
cost operations• Easy access for all
• High-quality, evidence-based care
Page 4
Page 5
Our vision for the CCSOF is informed by overseas centres of excellence who are innovating service delivery
Outcomes ReportingMcLaren / Karmanos
Detroit, USA
Rapid AccessSunnybrook Hospital
Toronto, Canada
Care PathwaysLaval Integrated Cancer Centre
Montreal, Canada
Research & QualityThe Christie
Manchester, UK
Automation & Throughput
Private Radiotherapy CentreMetz, France
Adaptive RT & EPID Dosimetry
Lake Constance Radiation Oncology CentreSingen, Germany
CCSOF Vision: What does success look like in 3 years?
Page 6
Patient satisfaction 90%+ NPS
Patient outcome reporting (Staging, intent, QOL, control) for key tumour streams
5% of patients enrolled in clinical trials
100% NSQHS and RO Practice Standards accreditation
Avg. radical case wait time 5 business days from RFC
Support existing and pioneer introduction of new treatment modalities: e.g. DIBH, SRS/ SBRT, Dose guided RO, MRI Linac
Develop Wellness / Survivorship / Allied Health programs
High utilisation of VMAT and IMRT treatments
Improved Linac utilisation
Clinical productivity improvement
Shared services costs decrease as % of revenue
Performance reporting to key referrers (wait times, patient satisfaction, outcomes)
Reduction in Other costs (Equip., medical, rent, OH, etc.) as a % of revenue
Leadership development program for Staff and Doctors
Employee engagement 70%
GenesisCare Foundation to support R&D and Access
Rapid Access Palliative Service (“See, Plan, Treat”)
Standardised care pathways for 90% of courses
Measure and report adherence to clinical guidelines (NCCN, EviQ)
Comprehensive marketing, communications and education program to share key messages on services and outcomes
Page 7
CancerCare Service of the Future case studyAdvances in technology and workflow are delivering on Quality, Access and Efficiency
Comparison of treatment options Situation: 84 y.o. Italian man with extensive metastatic cancer, widespread pain and a poor quality of life
Outcome: The patient received VMAT palliative treatment at GenesisCare less than 2 days after referral
Public facility GenesisCare facility
Technique Photons & Electrons
VMAT
Planning time 2 Weeks, manual 30min, automated
Quality Assurance time
1 week 1 day
Dose distribution
Non personalised Highly personalised
Normal tissue avoidance
Difficult to achieve
High level of avoidance
Time on couch 40min/day 5min/day
Doctor satisfaction
“The VMAT plan on this patient is better than the IMRT plans we see on our curative patients….” – Dr. M
Complex disease, conformal treatment
Lungs, Heart, Spinal Cord all protected from higher doses
Page 8
The world needs a high quality, efficient radiotherapy provider to improve access to care for billions of people
26.511.9
10.9
10.4
4.5
1.5
0.5
4.5
3.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.5
0.5
1.5
0.9
1.9
4.8
5.8
4.9
2.8
1.8
0.9
3.80.8
0.9
0.8
0.9
8.8
5.3
0.7
7.7
0.3
3.7
3.7 4.7
0.7
1.7
2.3
1.7
1.3
0.3
1.7
0.3
0.7
7.3
7.6
2.6
0.6
6.6
6.0
2.4
1.4
0.40.4 0.00.0
2.41.0
0.0
0.2
1.2 0.2
0.2
0.20.2 0.2
0.20.1
6.1
0.10.1
0.1
1.1
1.1
7.1
0.1
4.1
0.1
0.10.1
0.1
Linacs per million population (2015)Number of linacs per million population in selected regionsNumber of linacs per million population in Australia Region
Country
Note: “West” defined as North America, Western Europe, and Southern & Western Pacific (ANZ); Blanks are where linac data unavailable; GDP figures normalised (PPP).Source: World Bank 2015 population and GDP data; IAEA Directory of Radiotherapy Centres (2015)
0
2
4
6
8
10
The "West"
8.4
Rest of World
0.7
0
2
4
6B
The "West"
0.04B
Rest of World
5.39B
0
10
20
30
40
$50K
The "West"
$47K
Rest of World
$12K
Linacs per million people(2015)
People without Australian levels of access(2015, billions)
GDP per capita(2015, USD PPP)
Reimbursement (Andrew Saunders) Communication (Amy Hallam) Procurement (Finance – Peter Moore)
Leadership & Culture (Natasha Winton, Monica Lonergan)Business intelligence (Mike McFadden) IT Platforms (Thomas Pinn, Denise Hunt, Fraser Hughes)
CCSOF SteerCo: Keith Hansen (Chair), Aldo Rolfo, Andrew Saunders, Mike McFadden, Project Leads, HR, IT, CC project mgr.
8 key CCSOF workstreams to deliver the program, with several key supporting enablers
Patient Experience Access & Engagement
Centre Structure, Mgmt. & Tools
Care Pathways & Outcome Reporting
Planning Room of the Future Research & Trials Quality & Safety Physics Service of
the Future
Key Driver Access Access Efficiency Quality / Efficiency Efficiency Quality Quality Quality / Efficiency
Project Leads Ada Ryan Andrew Saunders Kate Evans Aldo Rolfo Aldo Rolfo & Mike McFadden
Peter O’Brien & Sophie Mepham
Peter O’Brien & Joan Sheppard
Aldo Rolfo & Brendan Hill
Key projects / initiatives
• Best practice patient experience (“Just Start” projects)
• Patient journey mapping and gap analysis
• Enhanced physical environment (Wembley refurb)
• Partnerships with consumer groups
• Patient portal • Wellness / Survivorship
• Project Destiny (education & comms.)
• Best practice referrer communication, including performance reporting
• Referrer portal• Service differentiation• GP education• GC Foundation
• Org. structure• Role structure, clarity,
re-design• Leadership training • Performance Mgmt. &
Dev.• Throughput• Site mgmt. tools• Lean process review• Dashboards• Playbook & Training• Rapid access workflow• PS/nursing w’flow
• Care pathways• RO Portal• IQ Scripts and
standardized workflows
• Minimum data sets by tumour stream
• Outcomes data reporting
• VMAT implementation• SMART Planning
validation and implementation (GenPlan, DVP+, GenPrinter, GenReconciler)
• Sim-to-QA workflow• Auto contouring • Planning quality
benchmarks • Best practice planning
room
• Clinical trials engagement
• GC Foundation• Expanding the role of
Radiotherapy• Partnerships (TROG,
Elekta, ECU etc)
• NSQHS accreditation• RO practice standards • Automation of auditing
• New technology assessment (e.g. PerFraction)
• RS reporting and governance
• Role in planning • Daily patient specific
QA (e.g. EPID)
Key KPIs Patient satisfaction % sites offering
wellness services Partnerships Testimonials
• Linac utilisation • Growth in courses• Performance reporting • Referrer satisfaction• Letters out in 48hrs
• Time to Tx • Linac utilisation• DLH / Tx• Non Dr Rem %
Revenue• Staff engagement
• Guidelines adherence • Data capture • Outcome reporting• Care path utilization• IMRT / VMAT rates
• Time to Tx • Plan quality• Planning times /
efficiency • Adaptive treatments
• % patients enrolled in clinical trials
• Abstracts accepted• Papers published• Grant $$$
• Accreditation• Workforce efficiency • WHS compliance
• IMRT / VMAT rates• Workforce efficiency • Time to Tx • Plan quality
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
ab c
d e fEnablers
9
Page 10
KPI: Patient satisfaction 90%Engaging more deeply with our patients is having a meaningful impact on patient satisfaction
0
20
40
60
80
100%
Patient satisfaction Net promter score
2014
70
Sep-16
87
Goal
90
People & Culture
Distinctly positive
experience
Coordinated Care
Expedited Time to
Treatment
Wembley refurbishment
and multi-disciplinary pod
model
“Just Start” initiatives and deep patient engagement
Page 11
KPI: Patient outcome reporting and care pathwaysDrives continuous clinical improvement
GC UK DataBase
Input of Clinical/Administrative data(Manually / Automatically)
Insightive software with a dynamic analysis of data(Varian & GenesisCare algorithms)
Input of patient data by the patient(Manuually / Automatically)
GC UK DataBase
Input of Clinical/Administrative data(Manually / Automatically)
Insightive software with a dynamic analysis of data(Varian & GenesisCare algorithms)
Input of patient data by the patient(Manuually / Automatically)
Care Pathways & Outcomes Reporting
Platform
Clinical consensus on
treatment protocols
Automated Care Pathway via the
Electronic Medical Record
Collate structured
patient data (internal & external)
Collect patient reported
outcomes via portal
Structured big data accessible in
real time
Page 12
KPI: GenesisCare Foundation to support R&D and AccessGenesisCare board have approved the establishment and launch of the GC Foundation
Our new partners CRG and Macquarie Capital have kindly donated $5m of seed funding to commence the GenesisCare Foundation• Commitment from GC Board to provide further annual funding• Foundation will be established to receive tax-deductible gifts
Foundation will have two main focus areas of health promotion:• Research: Support a strong clinical trials program • Access to Care: Committed to supporting disadvantaged patients receiving
access to care
More details will be shared in the coming months on this fantastic initiative!
Page 13
KPI: 100% NSQHS and RO Practice Standards accreditationWe are building a culture of Quality and Safety
0
20
40
60
80
100%
GenesisCare Employee Culture Survey Percent of positive respondents
My team consistently delivers high
quality patient care.
2014 2015
84 86
Safety risks, once identified, are
dealt with promptly and appropriately.
70
76
The organisation has appropriate
processes in place for me to raise safety issues.
72
84
We are willing to speak out about
safety risks.
81
87
Accreditation achieved at NSW, QLD; others to be completed by late 2016
Self-assessment completed across GCC against the Tripartite Standards
All Practices using Riskman to report and manage clinical and organisational risks
Risks reported monthly to Board, Clinical Leaders Forum and state-based Clinical Management Committees
Page 14
KPI: Leadership development program for Staff and DoctorsLeadership development for doctors and leadership across practices is underway
Doctor Development ProgramEnrich, support, encourage and challenge doctors
to be better leaders
GC Leadership & Mgmt. DevelopmentProvide training and tools for our leaders and staff
to develop
CC Leadership Team ChallengeExperiential learning to help leaders reflect, coach,
manage, lead and engage
“Benefits of the DDP [include]:• Empowering others and giving them responsibility• Being more proactive with [performance management] and
rewards.• Accepting that I am GenesisCare, [and] I really want
GenesisCare/myself to be successful” - Radiation Oncologist
LEAD program
Management Essentials
Program (MEP)
Performance development & management
training
Project management
training
Resilience & Comms. Training
Watch this space for future programs…
CT Sim Contouring Planning RT Plan QA Physics Plan QA
KPI: Avg. radical case wait time 5 business days from RFCAutomated tools will support increasing VMAT penetration while shortening the work day
Page 15
CT Scan Simulation for treatment planning
Delineation of tumour and organs at risk
Plan checking / QA - Performed by RT
Generation of the optimal treatment plan
Plan QA - Performed by Physics
Leverage commercially available auto-segmentation software tools MIM Maestro
which uses Atlas based contouring tools
GC scripts drive a automated treatment plan through the Pinnacle Treatment Planning
system
Developed in house plan checking tools (DVP+,
Reconciler and Printer)
Facilitate a simple traffic light report for RT review
Automated Phantom free IMRT QA through direct
measurement of dose on the EPID Panel
Automated; • Dose capture • QA processing • Alerts
GC Automation
Projects
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
31/01/2016 29/02/2016 31/03/2016 30/04/2016 31/05/2016 30/06/2016 31/07/2016
Total Target (month end)
Page 16
KPI: High Utilisation of VMAT and IMRT treatmentsTeams around the network have mobilised to shift patients to the best treatment protocols available
“In my public centre I struggle to get 3DCRT plans for my palliative
patients. I would love to have VMAT but it seems years away”
Doctor
“Moving to IMRT/VMAT has allowed us to reduce patient Out of Pocket costs by up to ~20% (depending on
treatment type, course length, etc.)”Patient Services Officer
“I can produce a high quality plan in 30 minutes with VMAT.
3D CRT would not even get close!”
Planner
Case study: South Terrace ST3
% VMAT Treatments
Average tx time
Combining Quality (more personalised), Access (greater capacity) and Efficiency (faster treatment times)
Page 17
KPI: Support existing & pioneer new treatment modalitiesWe continue to invest in a wide range of new treatments, including DIBH, SRS/ SBRT, Dose guided RO and MRI Linac
First MRI Linac in Asia• Supporting Hypofractionation & New Indications
(Pancreas, Liver, Sarcomas)
Roadmap to Adaptive Radiotherapy• Quality Assurance (QA) for every patient, every day• Ensures personalised targeting and dose delivery
Deep Inspiration Breath Hold (DIBH)• 1 site in July 2015, 100% in April 2016
SRS/SBRT treatments• 2 sites in 2014, 50% in April 2016
2015 - 2016 2017 and beyond
Page 18
KPI: Develop Wellness / Survivorship / Allied Health programs
Live Life Get Active FREE Exercise programs with Olympian Jane Flemming in x3 locations
Cancer Council NSW FREE 8 week survivorship program launched at Hurstville
Working with PCFA on a trial to investigate the benefits of exercise for people with cancer
(ECU) Health and Wellness Institute’s exercise clinic at GenesisCare, Shenton House.
KPI: Comprehensive marketing, communications & education program to share key messages on services and outcomesInteractive educational content, available via web /ipad, and integrated in the care pathway
Page 19
‘Informed consent’ online tool for doctors to walk patient through a radiation therapy
treatment consultation
A patient resource website to expand on radiation therapy treatment information
provided during consultation, to help make it easier for patients
+
Interactive educational content for patients, their families and carers
Available on a variety of formats
Integrated as part of the care pathway• Used by doctors, nurses, patient services to assist
with engagement around key aspects of care coordination
• iPads, web, mobile
• Patient stories: actual patients telling it like it is• Pathway videos to demystify the treatment process
Page 20
KPI: Employee engagement 70%We recognise how important staff engagement is to the patient experience, and we are committed improving it
0
20
40
60
80%
CancerCare Employee Engagement
Health & Comm. Services 44%
2014
45
2015
52
Target
70
Health & Comm. Services 44%
Employee engagement is trending upwards
67% of CancerCare employees are proud to
work for GenesisCare
57% of employees believe GenesisCare is a great place
to work
65% of employees agree that GenesisCare’s new
vision of “Innovating HealthCare. Transforming
Lives.” resonates with them
Why does this matter? There is clear proof that this improves patient satisfaction
50
60
70
80
90
100%
25 35 45 55 65 75%
Net engagement score: % Engaged minus % Disengaged (Oct 2015)
Patient Net Promoter Score (Apr-Sep 2015)
NSWROV
CWAARC
HCWA
OPT
ACP
HCP
CCQHCV
HCP removed from regression due to low number of responses to patient survey
R2 = 0.50P values < 0.05
CC
HC
Legend
Page 21
KPI: Clinical productivity improvement of 30%Improving our processes to allow us to work “smarter not harder” will provide faster access to treatment for patients and allow us to improve clinical productivity
PATIENT SERVICES AUTOMATIONReplacing manual processes with automation to allow for
greater productivity and better patient experience
BEST PRACTICE PLANNING ROOMEnsuring quick turnaround of plans so that no patient is
delayed for non-clinical reasons
PLAYBOOK / LEAVE PLANNER / BI TOOLSRegular, consistent approach for our leaders to
review & improve operations
Practice Playbook
Leave planner
BI dashboards
One team’ approach to
planning through VPR
RO engagement
Quality and efficiency KPI management
Enabled by SMART planning tools and
automated QA
EMDAT Notification Manager
Validation Engine PBRC automation
“A lot of administrative time is saved by using EMDAT which will result in more time spent on patient services and efficiency in running a busy practice.”
Patient services team CWA
Workstation model Integration with ePathology
CURRENT STATE
8am-5pm~75-80% Utilisation
3 RT FTE
FUTURE STATE
8am-3pm~95-100% Utilisation
3 RT FTE, with ½ day Planning / Training /Project
WHAT IT WILL TAKE
Smart SchedulingNo gaps in day, PSOs own bookings
Review treatment rostersWorkstation model for treatment staff
Activity codes Phase1Matching scheduled treatment times to actual treatment time
National Best Practice Tx timesLEAN review of treatment process
Utilisation managementDashboards, CL ownership
KPI: Ave. Linac utilisation 45 patients / machine / dayEnsuring our machines are fully utilised and have high ‘throughput’ to provide timely access to all patients
Improving our treatment times by just 1 minute per patient would provide ~24 hours of additional time across the network every day leading to: Capacity to treat over 100 more patients within our current working hours More time for project work/research Enhanced patient experience (less time on the couch)
WHY?
Page 23
KPI: 10% reduction in Other costs as a % of revenueThrough better coordination and innovation, we are taking advantage of our national scale to deliver better service and cost savings
• Global procurement deal for linear accelerators
• Improved EMR service
Equipment procurement
• Group ordering of key medical consumables
• 3D Printing of electron shields & wax blocks to reduce dependence on the need for mould rooms
Medical consumables
• Telstra contract renegotiation
• Concur Expense Management
• BidEnergy energy bill consolidation
• Travel• Other national procurement
initiatives
National procurement initiatives
Efficiency:Innovative, low cost
operations
Quality:High-quality,
best in class shared services
Culture:CollaborationCompassionInnovation Outcomes
Access:Easy access
for all
Payroll processing accuracy > 99.61%
Shared service feedback score > 8/10
Mosaiq uptime 99.99% (from 99.86%) Shared services costs as % of revenue
4.5% (from 5%)
Automated, self-service site-based P&L’s and per patient cost of delivery
Month end close of 3 days (from 15 days)
HBO Cost per employee $2,000 (from $2,700)
BI: dashboards for activity reporting, time-to-treat, HC quality data
Comprehensive clinical outcomes reporting
Insights and analytics for the top 200 actual and potential CC referrers and 20,000+ HC referrers to enable increased share of wallet
Labour utilisation reporting to drive Non-Dr Labour cost as % of revenue 21% (from 32%)
Patient satisfaction 90%
Leadership development program for Staff and Doctors
Staff engagement 80%
Service Desk response & resolution time met 95% of SLA
Finance Accuracy rate 9/10
Performance reviews undertaken for 100% of staff
New Finance System (ERP). HR Systems (HRIS)
BI Project Management (PM)
KPI: Shared services costs decrease by 15% (as % of revenue)Project Monarch will deliver improved service levels, efficiency and scalability for Shared Services
Thank-you
Page 26
This year’s Collaborative is about showcasing the efforts that all of you are making to drive the CCSOF
Patient Experience Access & Engagement Centre Structure,
Mgmt. & ToolsCare Pathways &
Outcome Reporting
Planning Room of the Future Research & Trials Quality &
Safety Physics Service of the
Future
Key Driver Access Access Efficiency Quality/Efficiency Efficiency Quality Quality Quality/Efficiency
Project Leads Ada Ryan Andrew Saunders Kate Evans Aldo Rolfo Aldo Rolfo & Mike McFadden
Peter O’Brien & Sophie Mepham
Peter O’Brien & Joan Sheppard
Aldo Rolfo & Brendan Hill
Presentations • An Oxford-based case study on the initial clinical and patient experience of the Information-Guided Care Coordination (IGCC) system
• Consumer Engagement Journey & Wembley re-development case study
• Improving patient care through resilience training for staff
• Spanish Cyberknife experience in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
• DIBH in Victoria: 12 months post implementation review
• 11.40am The development of an iPad application to educate paediatric cancer patients about radiation therapy
• AccessiBull radiotherapy for Central Queensland Patients
• Sequence Reversal: Preoperative Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer patients
• Prone Breast technique implementation and the verification of medial breast dose
• Rapid Access at Nambour – our experience so far and future directions
• From Rock Bottom to Rock Stars: The effect of improving workplace culture on patient satisfaction
• Stress, satisfaction and burnout amongst Australian and New Zealand Radiation Oncology trainees: what next?
• Breaking New Ground: Reflections from our first Cancer Care Nurse Consultant
• Managing increasing patient numbers with decreased time slots
• Collaborative Continuing Professional Development
• New Paradigm in Leadership: non-RT Centre Leaders “The good news is, great minds don’t think alike…”
• Improving communication between Physics, Engineering and RTs
• RO Portal Demonstration and Care Pathways
• Breast Hypo-fractionation and Breast Care Pathways
• A Demonstration of MIM Maestro
• Planning room of the future – Centralized Planning in action
• GenPlan - The Next Generation
• Audit of Palliative VMAT utilization at St Vincent’s Sydney from 2008
• How can we evaluate advanced MIM modules using deformable image registration applications? Any ideas?
• Cost minimalisation analysis (CMA) comparing adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) with endocrine therapy (ET) in elderly patients with oestrogen-receptor positive, low risk, early breast cancer.
• MRI for Breast Lumpectomy Cavity Delineation: CT Comparison and Sequence Variation
• An update on the prospective analysis of SpaceOAR hydrogel rectal spacing and rectal toxicity in the treatment of prostate cancer at Genesis Cancer Care Victoria
• A Comparative Analysis of FB-IMRT to DIBH-IMRT Left Breast Irradiation: Exploring Cardiac and Lung Dose
• Impact of research on workspace culture
• Zooming in on Clinical Governance
• Training of future Physicists at ARC/GenesisCare
• PerFraction - EPID based IMRT/VMAT QA of the future
• Treatment planning QA models
• Moving to standardization for acceptance and commissioning for Elekta linear accelerators
• Clinical case study with implementing deformable dose accumulation strategy: An example of 4D evaluation in the case of liver SBRT
• Physicists in the planning room – insights from a 3-month placement
• Why do we “Care”? Insights from quantum cosmology and applications in the CancerCare Physics Service of the Future
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Page 27
Appendix