evaluating pr campaigns - napier pr

Post on 24-Apr-2015

1.467 Views

Category:

Business

2 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

There are several different models and metrics used to evaluate PR campaigns, Napier take you through several to ensure you are evaluating your campaigns effectively.

TRANSCRIPT

Evaluating PR Campaigns

Napier Partnership Limited

www.napier.co.uk

@NapierPR

OUTPUT, OUT TAKE OR OUTCOME?

• Outputs – the activities that were undertaken (shooting the arrow)

• Out takes – the results of these tactics (hitting the target)

• Outcomes – the changes in behaviour (winning the archery competition)

Output

Out Take

Outcome

Outputs are meaningless if they don’t generate out-takes or outcomes.

The further down the chain towards the outcomes of the campaign, the better the evaluation, but the more difficult it is to measure.

Cuttings

• Press clippings evaluate outputs.

• By simply flicking through the clippings, it is fairly easy to see the volume and estimate the quality of the coverage.

Reach

• Reach = how many people in the target audience will have seen the campaign

• Adding up readership or circulation estimates reach

• Online reach can be hard to calculate: often estimated based upon overall site traffic

Frequency

• Messages must be communicated several times to have an impact.

• Frequency can be applied to a subset of the total target audience.

• (for example 10% of the target audience saw the message 4 times or more.)

Opportunity to See (OTS)

• Opportunities to see (OTS) is effective measure

• OTS = The number of times that an average member of the target audience is likely to have seen the campaign.

• Combines elements of frequency and reach

Share of Voice

• Rather than setting a bottom-up goal for the outputs, simply benchmark the campaign against competitors.

• Share of voice can be

measured in specific publications

ASSIGNING FINANCIAL VALUE – AVE• Gives a monetary value to PR results

• AVE = the cost of advertising to achieve the same results

• PR is far more effective than advertising so a multiplier is used

AVE is flawed• PR isn’t advertising• Publications don’t always charge rate

card• There’s no assessment of quality

Editorial Impact

Measure using several factors

• The credibility and relevance of the media.

• Where the coverage appeared and how big the article was.

• How many of the target audience would see the coverage.

• The quality of those people• The tone of the article

Surveys

Conduct a survey before and after the campaign to see an improvement in attitudes to the company.

Can be difficult to isolate the impact of the PR.

Make It Up – Your Own Metrics

Developing specific objectives means evaluation talks about real-world business objectives.

Link evaluation to the company’s business objectives.

Business objectives are compelling metrics for the CEO!

About the Author

Mike has directed major PR and marketing programmes for a wide range of technology clients throughout UK and Europe, ranging from technology start-ups to global market leading companies.

Mike Maynard Managing Director of Napier Partnership Limited

www.napier.co.uk

@NapierPR

top related