group debate using six thinking hats approach

GROUP DYNAMICS

PRESENTED BY:

SYAFIQAH HUSINEMMA JAPARI

LISA SABRI HADI JUFRI

QAYYUM MUNTASSIR

• Discussion about the six thinking hats

• Each individuals choose their own color

• No conflict during the discussion

• Each manager is comfortable with their roles assigned.

Choices of communication

SYAFF

EMMA

QAYYUMHADI

LISA

WHY ALL STAR NETWORK?

• Open Discussion

• All Members Gets To Participate

• Faster Decision Making

• Immediate Response

Red Hat

• Women should have equal rights and opportunities.

• What men can do women can do too.

Yellow Hat

• Women can have equal rights.• Set up policy for women rights in

every branch.• Everyone will be happy.

• Having equal rights can be done

• But not in every country.

• We should research further in to this matter to avoid mistakes.

Green Hat

• What if we set up a trial policy for equal rights.

• Do it in a few branches in a few countries.

• Every hat gave good points.

• Equal rights for women can be done.

• We should try the green hat’s suggestion.

• Offices in 66 countries.

• Company avoids promoting females executives for senior positions.

• No policies behind these actions.

• Over 50% of employees are female.

Pros and Cons Using the Six Thinking Hats Models

SIX THINKING HATS PROS CONS

THINKING DELIBERATE DIFFERENT WAYS DIFFICULT TO ALTER LOGICAL AND WEAK POINTS

ALLOWS ONE TO SAY THINGS WITHOUT RISK

NEEDS TO UNDERSTAND AND PRACTICE THE CONCEPT

FOCUS IN ONE ASPECT

CREATIVE THINKING THROUGH UNHAMPERED DIALOGUE

IMPROVE COMMUNICATION