oak harbor workshop slides

Clean Water Facility

Final Siting Workshop

7/9/14 1

Final Siting Approach

1. Identify

factors that must be

considered All

2. Develop site alternatives

Charrette

3. Evaluate cost, risk, long-term

benefit Staff

4. Select final alternative

Council (with public

Input)

STATUS Completed 4/16

7/9/14 2

Siting Factors Technical Factors

(no particular order)Transportation Integrate with long-term transportation plan

Business Parking Retain minimum parking spaces required by Code

Geotechnical Minimize structures on deeper, poor soils

Cultural Risk Minimize excavation in higher-risk areas

WWTP Access Provide suitable ingress/egress to facility

WWTP Footprint Provide suitable area for facility (± 2.5 acres)

Supplemental “Site” Factors(no particular order)

Park Impact Minimize impact on Windjammer Park space

Site “Amenities” Allow for additional amenities now, in future

Ball Fields Evaluate impact on existing fields

Park Access Improve pedestrian access to Windjammer Park

Commercial Value Enhance frontage, access, lot configuration

Added Parking Retain/increase parking for peak demands

“Fix” Intersections Correct traffic flow at current intersections

7/9/14 3

Final Siting Approach

1. Identify

factors that must be

considered All

2. Develop site alternatives

Charrette

3. Evaluate cost, risk, long-term

benefit Staff

4. Select final alternative

Council (with public

Input)

STATUS Completed 5/15

7/9/14 4

May 15 Charrette

Attended by approx. 25 individuals City staff Consultant staff Members of the community

Confirmed technical and supplemental factors

Provided input and additional factors to consider

7/9/14 5

Two conceptual layouts were considered to start the charrette…

Illustration of Site Concept 1FIX

FIX

?

Illustration of Site Concept 2PARK

ACCESS

?

?

7/9/14 6

Many ideas were discussed during the process.

7

Charrette Group Input (no particular order)

Views Preserve view corridor down City Beach Street

Windmill Maintain separation from windmill as much as possible

Future Ball Field Relocation

Do not limit future planning based on ball field location (i.e. may be relocated in the future)

Future Bayshore Design future Bayshore Drive as a slow connector street (not a major arterial)

7/9/14 8

Charrette Group Input (no particular order)

Pedestrian Access

Enhance pedestrian connection between Pioneer Way and Windjammer Park

Park Impact Strive for no net loss of Windjammer Park space

Park Integration

Design treatment facility to integrate with and add value to existing Windjammer Park

WIB Building Consider integrating facility with recently purchased Whidbey Island Bank (WIB) building

Event Parking Limit “peak” event parking to reduce impact on park and other year-round uses in the vicinity

7/9/14 9

Final Siting Approach

1. Identify

factors that must be

considered All

2. Develop site alternatives

Charrette

3. Evaluate cost, risk, long-term

benefit Staff

4. Select final alternative

Council (with public

Input)

STATUS Completed 6/9

7/9/14 10

On June 9, City staff refined layouts based on charrette input, cost and schedule. Achieving Technical

Factors helps to control cost and reduce risk

Schedule impacts are based on input from funding agency reps.

Many good ideas from the charrette process can be included in initial and future phases

Technical Factors(no particular order)

Transportation Integrate with long-term transportation plan

Business Parking Retain minimum parking spaces required by Code

Geotechnical Minimize structures on deeper, poor soils

Cultural Risk Minimize excavation in higher-risk areas

WWTP Access Provide suitable ingress/egress to facility

WWTP Footprint Provide suitable area for facility (± 2.5 acres)

Supplemental “Site” Factors(no particular order)

Park Impact Minimize impact on Windjammer Park space

Site “Amenities” Allow for additional amenities now, in future

Ball Fields Evaluate impact on existing fields

Park Access Improve pedestrian access to Windjammer Park

Commercial Value Enhance frontage, access, lot configuration

Added Parking Retain/increase parking for peak demands

“Fix” Intersections Correct traffic flow at current intersections

Charrette Group Input(no particular order)

Views Preserve view corridor down City Beach Street

Windmill Maintain separation from windmill as much as possible

Ball Fields Do not limit future planning based on ballfieldlocation (i.e. may be relocated in the future)

Future Bayshore Design future Bayshore Drive as a slow connector street (not a major arterial)

Pedestrian Access Enhance pedestrian connection between Pioneer Way and Windjammer Park

Park Impact Strive for no net loss of Windjammer Park space

Park Integration Design treatment facility to integrate with and add value to existing Windjammer Park

WIB Building Consider integrating facility with recently purchased Whidbey Island Bank (WIB) building11

Multiple layouts were considered during the June 9 work session.

Two refined layouts were ultimately evaluated and ranked by staff.

Refined Concept No. 1 Future Bayshore Drive aligned to the

north of new treatment facility.

Refined Concept No. 2 Future Bayshore Drive aligned to the

south of new treatment facility.

7/9/14 13

Refined Layout

Technical Factors 1 2Transportation

Business Parking

Geotechnical

Cultural Risk

WWTP Access

WWTP Footprint

Ability to Meet Schedule

Supplemental Factors 1 2Park Impact

Site "Amenities"

Ball Fields

Park Access

Commercial Value

Added Parking

"Fix" Intersections

Charrette Group Input 1 2Views

Windmill

Ball Fields (Potential Future Project)

Future Bayshore

Pedestrian Access

Park Impact

Park Integration

WIB Building

Event Parking

? X X

?

X

? ?

X

? ?

?

Refined Concept No. 1

Refined Concept No. 2

Conclusions and Recommendations

Both layouts address supplemental criteria and charrette input in a similar fashion Impact on park space is similar for both, considering WWTP

and Bayshore alignment

Layout No. 2 better addresses technical factors; is more likely to reduce cost and risk

Layout No. 2 recommended as a basis for preliminary design with GC/CM input

7/9/14 15

Rendered Plan of Preferred Concept

Treatment Plant

Rendered Plan of Preferred Concept

Treatment Plant

Plaza

Multi-Use Parking Area (~45 spaces)

Pedestrian Connection

Admin Comm.

Bldg

7/9/14 17

Final Siting Approach

1. Identify

factors that must be

considered All

2. Develop site alternatives

Charrette

3. Evaluate cost, risk, long-term

benefit Staff

4. Select final alternative

Council (with public

Input)

STATUS 8/6 Council Mtg.

7/9/14 18

Next Steps

Obtain Council approval of final location Work with GC/CM to refine layout within selected

location Gather additional input from the community : Develop the “look and feel” of the facility Form, function for public spaces that may be included in the

project Additional ideas on how to integrate with the park, WIB

building

7/9/14 19

What could the facility look like?

mountain

forest

river

community

ocean

View Northeast from Park to Community Building

21

View South from City Building Down Promenade to Park

22

View South Along City Beach to Park

23

Concepts for Future Bayshore Drive

7/9/14

Love it? Hate it? Have other good ideas? Sign up to participate!

FACILITY DESIGN CHARRETTE DATE: SPRING 2015 CONTACT: Joe Stowell or John Piccone

7/9/14 25