state strategies to end child poverty - csg knowledge...

Post on 19-Mar-2020

3 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

2

State Strategies to End Child Poverty as a Barrier to Education Success

Kristin Anderson Moore, Ph.D.

February 20, 2014

Presented to Council of State Governments

3 State strategies to end child poverty K. Moore

Discussion topics

• Quick overview of Child Trends

• Child poverty by the numbers

• How poverty harms children

• What we know about poverty and educational outcomes

• Policy considerations

4

About Child Trends

Child Trends is a nonprofit, nonpartisan research center that improves the lives and prospects of children and youth by conducting high-quality research and sharing the resulting knowledge with practitioners and policymakers.

childtrends.org

We . . . 1. take a whole child approach 2. study children in the real world 3. want children to flourish 4. value objectivity and rigor 5. pursue knowledge development and knowledge transfer

Infants and Toddlers: An Action Agenda David Murphey

5 State strategies to end child poverty K. Moore

Poverty remains high among children (17 and under)

27.3

14.0

22.3 19.5

22.7

16.2

22.0

21.8

0

10

20

30

40

50

1958 1963 1968 1973 1978 1983 1988 1993 1998 2003 2008 2013

Pe

rce

nt

Percentage of Children Living Below Poverty Thresholds, Selected Years, 1959-2012

Bureau, Current Population Survey, Annual Social and Economic Supplement. Income, poverty and health insurance in the United States: detailed tables. Available at

Sources: Poverty level data for 1959-2001: U.S. Census Bureau. Historical poverty tables-People: Current Population Survey. Table 3. Available at http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/data/historical/people.html. Other data 1975-1985: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. (2002). Trends in the well-being of America's children and youth 2001. Table ES 1.2.A. Author. Available at: http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/01trends/ . Other data for 1990-2000: U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population

6 State strategies to end child poverty K. Moore

Children are more often poor than adults

7 State strategies to end child poverty K. Moore

Younger children are more often poor

8 State strategies to end child poverty K. Moore

Poverty varies by race/ethnicity

12.3

37.9

33.8

13.8

0

10

20

30

40

50

Non-Hispanic White Black Hispanic Asian

Pe

rce

nt

Percentage of Children who are Poor by Race and Hispanic Origin, 2012

Source: U.S. Census Bureau. CPS Table Creator (online tool), available at:

Note: Estimates reflect the new OMB race definitions, and include only those who are

9 State strategies to end child poverty K. Moore

Highest state-level poverty rates are found in the South

10 State strategies to end child poverty K. Moore

5 ways poverty harms children

1. Poverty harms the brain and other body systems

• Poverty can negatively affect how the body and mind develop and alter the fundamental architecture of the brain.

• Children who experience poverty have an increased likelihood, extending into adulthood, for numerous chronic illnesses and for a shortened life expectancy.

11 State strategies to end child poverty K. Moore

5 ways poverty harms children

2. Poverty leads to poor physical, emotional, and behavioral health. • Growing up poor increases the likelihood that children

will have poor health, including poor emotional and behavioral health.

• Poor children are more likely to lack "food security," as well as have diets deficient in important nutrients.

• Rates of several chronic health conditions, such as asthma, are higher among poor children.

• Poor children are less likely to receive preventive medical and dental care.

12 State strategies to end child poverty K. Moore

5 ways poverty harms children

3. Poor children are more likely to live in neighborhoods with concentrated poverty, which is associated with numerous social ills, including:

• Exposure to environmental toxins and crime and violence

• Schools in districts with fewer resources, with facilities that are grossly inadequate, and with school leadership that is more transient.

13 State strategies to end child poverty K. Moore

5 ways poverty harms children

4. Poverty can harm children through the negative effects it has on their families and the home environment. • Poor parents report higher stress, aggravation,

and depressive symptoms than higher-income parents.

• Parents with scarce economic resources face difficulty planning, preparing, and providing for their families material needs.

• Poor families have fewer books and other educational resources at home, and children are less likely to experience family outings, activities, and learning enrichment

14 State strategies to end child poverty K. Moore

5 ways poverty harms children

5. Poverty creates and widens early achievement gaps.

• Children growing up in poverty, when compared with their economically more secure peers, fall behind early.

• Poor children lag behind their peers at entry to kindergarten, in reading ability at the end of third grade, and in school attendance in eighth grade.

• Poor children are more likely to drop out of school, or fail to obtain post- secondary education.

15 State strategies to end child poverty K. Moore

Policy considerations

• Programs that increased family income found improvements in children's social and academic outcomes.

• Integrated student supports models that target academic and non-academic supports are promising approaches for improving educational outcomes.

• High-quality early childhood education has been proven to improve outcomes for at-risk children.

16 State strategies to end child poverty K. Moore

The value of family support

• The family is the child’s first developmental context: material, social, and emotional

• Poverty, low parental education, and stress can compromise the quality of family relationships and the child’s involvement in experiences that enrich development

• Family support programs can increase family engagement and parents’ knowledge of child development; provide job training and work supports; help parents access health and nutrition services or treatment for substance abuse; and reduce stress

17 State strategies to end child poverty K. Moore

Policy choices for family support

• Voluntary, evidence-based home visiting for new and expectant mothers at risk for negative child outcomes

• Parent education and parent-child interaction programs that are linguistically and culturally sensitive

• Access to child care assistance, with provisions for quality and continuity of care

• Enrollment in programs that promote family economic stability and parents’ participation in education or training

• Prevention programs and services for children at risk for maltreatment and their families

• Access to health care and education programs for children cared for by grandparents and other relatives

18 State strategies to end child poverty K. Moore

Accountability systems

• Evaluate the quality of learning environments, caregiver/child interaction, and teaching strategies

• Collect data for children and families

• Assess program elements and the workforce

• Consider longitudinal, linked data systems between programs and state agencies that can be disaggregated by risk factors

• Early warning systems can allow timely intervention

• Professional development for data users (teachers, front line workers, and administrators)

19 State strategies to end child poverty K. Moore

Thank you!

Kristin Anderson Moore, Ph.D.

Senior Scholar

Child Trends

Bethesda, MD

kmoore@childtrends.org

Visit us at: childtrends.org

State Strategies to End Child Poverty as a Barrier to Educational Success

CSG Webinar

Ron Haskins

Senior Fellow, The Brookings Institution

Senior Consultant, The Annie E. Casey Foundation

February 20, 2014

21

Poverty Rate of People 65 Years and Over

35.2

9.1

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Perc

en

t in

Po

vert

y

Source: Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Historical Poverty Tables, "Table 3. Poverty Status of People, by Age, Race, and Hispanic Origin: 1959 to

2012."

22

Employment-Population Ratios for Never-Married Mothers, 1980-2012

61%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

19

80

19

81

19

82

19

83

19

84

19

85

19

86

19

87

19

88

19

89

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

Perc

en

t o

f P

op

ula

tio

n E

mp

loyed

Year

Source: Brookings tabulations of data from the Annual Social and Economic Supplement to the Current Population Survey, 1980-2010.

Notes: Only includes noninstitutionalized civilians ages 16 and up who are heads of household or the spouses of heads. Never-married mothers are female heads of household

at least 16 years of age who are never married and have at least one never-married child under age 18 in the family. Never-married mothers who are not heads of households,

for example those in subfamilies, are excluded from this analysis. Single mothers include all women who are never-married, separated, divorced, or widowed and have at least

one never-married child under age 18 in the family.

23

Poverty Rates for All Children, Black Children, and Female-Headed Households with Children, 1975-2011

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2011.

40.9

38.8

21.9

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

19

75

19

76

19

77

19

78

19

79

19

80

19

81

19

82

19

83

19

84

19

85

19

86

19

87

19

88

19

89

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

Perc

en

t in

Po

vert

y

Year

Female-Headed Families with Children

Black Children

All Children in Poverty

24

What Accounts for Success?

1-2 Norms 23%

30%

The Three Norms

•Complete high school

•Work full time

•Wait until age 21 and marry before children

Income Class, by Adherence to Social Norms, 2007

0 Norms

77%

4%

Poor

(< 100% poverty level)

Middle class and above

(> 300% poverty level)

3 Norms 72%

2%

Source: Authors' calculations based on the U.S. Census Bureau, Annual Social and Economic Supplement to the Current Population Survey.

Senate Majority Leader John Unger West Virginia

top related