the effects of environment on psychometric performance … · psychometric performance in masvingo...
Post on 20-Apr-2018
218 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
The Effects of Environment on Psychometric Performance in
Masvingo Province
Kumbirai Makaruke
DISSERTATION.COM
Boca Raton
The Effects of Environment on Psychometric Performance in Masvingo Province
Copyright © 2012 Kumbirai Makaruke All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by
any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the publisher.
Dissertation.com
Boca Raton, Florida USA • 2013
ISBN-10: 1-61233-406-7
ISBN-13: 978-1-61233-406-6
iii
DEDICATION
I dedicate this project to my beloved husband, Akim and my son, Darrell for the support they
gave me during my studies.
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to express my heartfelt gratitude to Prof F. Zindi for his wisdom in the
supervision of this thesis. My special thanks go to all the participants whose involvement
enabled the realisation of this project. I am also indebted to Dr J. Matambo for the role he
played in offering me financial support during my studies.
v
ABSTRACT
The study examined the effects of rural and urban orientations on pupils‟ performance on
WISC-R (a standardised intelligence test). The study made use of an experimental method.
The data were collected on a sample of 100 primary school pupils (50 rural and 50 urban).
The participants were from grade 5 and had an average age of 10 years. The independent
variable was the environment in which the pupil was raised. The dependant variable was the
performance of the pupils on the WISC-R intelligence test. The control group of the study
was the rural pupils whilst the urban based pupils were the experimental group. Participants
from the two backgrounds were each tested on WISC-R‟s 10 subtests. The results showed a
significant difference in performance on WISC-R between the two groups. The urban group
scored in the superior range whilst the rural group scored in the lower range in all the
subtests.
vi
CONTENTS
DECLARATION.................................................................................................................................... i
CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL ....................................................................................................... ii
DEDICATION...................................................................................................................................... iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................ iv
ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................................... v
CONTENTS.......................................................................................................................................... vi
CHAPTER 1 ........................................................................................................................................ 1
1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1
1.2. Statement of the problem ............................................................................................................. 2
1.3 Aim ............................................................................................................................................... 2
1.4 Objectives ..................................................................................................................................... 2
1.5 Hypothesis..................................................................................................................................... 3
1.6 Significance of the study ............................................................................................................... 3
1.7 Assumptions .................................................................................................................................. 3
1.8 Delimitations ................................................................................................................................. 3
1.9 Definition of terms ........................................................................................................................ 4
vii
CHAPTER 2 .......................................................................................................................................... 5
2.0 Literature Review .......................................................................................................................... 5
2.1 Intelligence and IQ testing ............................................................................................................ 5
2.2 Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) ...................................................... 6
2.3 Cultural Issues in Psychometric Testing ....................................................................................... 8
2.4 Differences between rural and urban schools ............................................................................. 12
2.5 The influence of family background on academic performance ................................................. 15
2.6 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................. 17
CHAPTER 3 ........................................................................................................................................ 18
3.0 Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 18
3.1 Research Design .......................................................................................................................... 18
3.1.1 Justification of the research design ...................................................................................... 18
3.1.2 Variables .............................................................................................................................. 18
3.1.3 Population ............................................................................................................................ 19
3.1.4 Sample .................................................................................................................................. 19
3.2 Instrumentation ........................................................................................................................... 20
viii
3.3 Data collection procedure ........................................................................................................... 20
3.4 Pilot Study ................................................................................................................................... 21
3.5 Data Processing and Analysis ..................................................................................................... 21
3.6 Ethical Considerations ................................................................................................................ 21
CHAPTER 4 ........................................................................................................................................ 23
4.0 Results Presentation and Discussions ......................................................................................... 23
4.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 23
4.2 Comparisons of the two groups‟ performance on specific WISC-R variables (subtests). .......... 23
4.2.1 Information .......................................................................................................................... 23
4.2.2 Similarities ........................................................................................................................... 25
4.2.3 Arithmetic ............................................................................................................................ 26
4.2.4 Vocabulary ........................................................................................................................... 27
4.2.5 Comprehension .................................................................................................................... 28
4.2.6 Picture Completion .............................................................................................................. 29
4.2.7 Picture Arrangement ............................................................................................................ 29
4.2.8 Block Design ........................................................................................................................ 30
ix
4.2.9 Object Assembly .................................................................................................................. 31
4.2.10 Coding ................................................................................................................................ 32
4.3 Comparisons of the two groups‟ verbal, performance and full scale IQ. .................................... 32
4.4 Overall Implications .................................................................................................................... 34
CHAPTER 5 ........................................................................................................................................ 37
5.0 Conclusion and Recommendations ............................................................................................. 37
5.1 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................. 37
5.2 Recommendations ....................................................................................................................... 38
REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................... 40
APPENDICES ..................................................................................................................................... 48
Appendix I – Letter to Provincial Education Director seeking permission to conduct research ...... 48
Appendix II – SPSS Output .............................................................................................................. 50
1
CHAPTER 1
1.1 Introduction
Psychometrics involves the measurement of intelligence, personality, attitudes, aptitudes and
interests (Anastasi, 1988). A standardized instrument is recommended when measuring these
attributes. Psychometric testing in particular, is very crucial in schools. It is useful for
screening purposes, identification of gifted children, identifying learning or teaching
problems and hence to facilitate intervention in the form of remedial programmes, if need be.
Wechsler Intelligence Scale - Revised (WISC-R) is an example of a psychometric test that is
widely used in Zimbabwean schools by psychologists to determine appropriate placement of
pupils. WISC-R provides a measure of general intellectual functioning. It consists of a verbal
scale and a performance scale. The verbal scale measures information, similarities,
arithmetic, vocabulary and comprehension while the performance scale consists of picture
completion, picture arrangement, block design, object assembly and coding. Approximately
50 to 75 minutes are required to administer a test of 10 subtests (Wechsler, 1976). However,
time taken to administer a test may vary depending on the examiner‟s techniques of
administering and also the children‟s test taking styles. Results from the verbal and
performance scale together give a full scale Intelligence Quotient (IQ) (Simpson, et al 2002).
The same WISC-R tests are used in both the rural and the urban schools in Zimbabwe. Rural
areas in Zimbabwe are home to mainly small scale farmers with very low disposable income.
The poverty, coupled with poor or sometimes non-existent electricity network makes access
to information in rural areas very difficult. However, the situation in urban areas is generally
top related