amy criniti's presentation
TRANSCRIPT
Fertility options for HIV discordant couples
Amy Criniti MDFellow Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility
University of Washington Medical [email protected]
“We hope to have a vaccine ready for testing in about 2 years. Yet another terrible disease is about to yield to patience, persistence, and outright genius.”
Margaret Heclker, US Health & Human Services, April 23, 1984Margaret Heclker, US Health & Human Services, April 23, 1984
HIV statistics
• Nearly 42 million persons affected worldwide
• 75% of those affected are between the ages of 20 and 40
• Antiretroviral treatment has significantly changed prognosis
Antiretrovirals
• AZT approved in 1987• Saquinavir approved in 1995
• 1996 AIDS deaths in U.S. ↓ by 42%• Mortality Rate: Mortality Rate per
100 Patient Years — Not on therapy 65— HAART therapy 3.4
Desire to conceive
• 28% of HIV infected adults desire to have biologic children
• High priority for many HIV positive women
Chen et al, Family Planning Perspectives, 2001
HIV Discordant Couples
• 20% had engaged in unprotected intercourse to achieve pregnancy
• 50% did not consider donor sperm a reasonable option
• Many would consider unprotected intercourse if fertility treatment was not an option
• More than 50% feel that their reproductive options have not been addressed sufficiently
Previous Recommendations
• 1985: CDC encourages HIV infected women to avoid pregnancy
• 1987: ACOG encourages HIV infected women to avoid pregnancy
• 1994: ASRM presents donor sperm or adoption as options
New Recommendations
• ACOG states that ART should not be denied to HIV infected couples solely on the basis of HIV status
• CDC recommends that HIV positive women receive nondirective counseling about all options
HIV positive female partner
• Risk to child
• Risk to unaffected partner
Preconception Counseling
• Discussion of risk of vertical transmission
• Assessment of status of HIV infection CD4 count and viral load
• History of prior or current antiretroviral therapy
• Hepatitis C status
• Discussion about breast feeding
Perinatal HIV Transmission
15% Breastfeeding
<2% HAART and viral load <1000
< 2% AZT + scheduled C/S
5-8% AZT
25-40% No intervention
Risk Vertical Transmission Delivery Mode/Factors
Antiretrovirals in Pregnancy
• Perinatal transmission ↑ with viral load
• Transmission <2% in women on HAART
• If already on meds, continue
• If not on meds, defer to after 1st trimester
Antiretrovirals in pregnancy
• Combination therapy recommended when viral load > 1000
• Always include AZT
• Avoid Efavirenz ddI +d4T Nevirapine Amprenavir
• Risks
ACOG Recommendations
• Elective C/S if viral load>1000 copies/mL
• C/S should be performed at 38 weeks
• Intrapartum AZT prophylaxis
• If viral load <1000 and receiving HAART, vaginal delivery may be considered
• AROM, scalp electrodes and other invasive procedures to be avoided
Reducing Risk to Male Partner
• Timed intercourse
• Self insemination
• Intrauterine Insemination
HIV positive male partner
• Risk to female partner
• Effect of HIV infection and treatment on sperm function
• Ability to detect virus in semen
• Semen washing techniques
• “ART” (Assisted Reproductive Technologies)
Risks of HIV transmission
• Male to female 1/1000
• Female to male <1/1000
• Increased risk with advanced disease, genital infection, STD
Semen vs Blood
• Genital tract thought to act as a distinct reservoir for HIV
• 4-10% of men with undetectable viral loads still have viral shedding in semen
Vernazza et al, AIDS 2000Bujan et al, AIDS 2004
Impact of viral load on seminal viral excretion
• Estimated risk of infection per act of unprotected intercourse not known
• Longitudinal Ugandan study in 415 discordant couples
- no seroconversions when VL<1500 - probability of transmission rose to .0023 per act at VL >38,500
Gray et al, Lancet 2001
HIV and Semen Parameters
• Majority of HIV+ men have normal parameters
• However all parameters impaired compared to HIV-
• Parameters correlate with CD4 count
Nicopoullos et al, Human Reprod 2004
Sperm Washing
• Based on theory that HIV virus exists in seminal fluid and not within sperm cells
• Cell associated form in the seminal leukocytes
• Cell free form in seminal plasma
Semen Washing
• Gradient Centrifugation
• Washing
• Spontaneous Migration (aka Swim Up)
Detection of virus in semen
• RT-PCR of seminal plasma has limitations
• Inhibitors in semen reduce the sensitivity of the assay
• Nested PCR improves sensitivity
Timed Intercourse
• 1997 Lancet study followed 96 HIV discordant couples attempting pregnancy
• 104 pregnancies with 2 seroconversions
• Infection rate significantly higher than expected
Intrauterine Insemination (IUI)
• Sperm is collected, washed, and motile fraction separated
• Sample placed into uterine cavity around the time of the LH surge
• Success rate approx 8% per cycle
Intrauterine Insemination
• Used extensively in Europe
• 10 clinics have used this method
• 3166 inseminations performed in 1263 women
• 571 pregnancies w/o seroconversion
• Pregnancy rates per cycle 10-20%
Is Intrauterine Insemination Safe?
• Unclear whether it is safer than intercourse
• Places millions of sperm above the immunological barrier of the cervix
• Need more cases to demonstrate safety
• CDC does not currently support IUI
Assisted Reproductive Technology
State of the ART
• Includes IVF and ICSI
• Involves extensive screening
• May be cost prohibitive for many couples
• Involves risk
Cycle Specifics
• Patient stimulated with gonadotropins
• Eggs aspirated from ovary by ultrasound guided procedure
• Eggs fertilized with sperm from partner
IVF Monitoring
Sonographic Egg Recovery
•
ICSI
Embryo Development
• Fertilization and early embryo development occurs in the lab
• Embryos transferred into uterus of on day 3 or 5 of development
Embryo Transfer
• Done under ultrasound guidance
• Soft catheter used
• No anesthesia needed
• Full bladder helps
Extensive Screening
• Ovarian reserve testing (antral follicle count and Day 3 FSH)
• Uterine evaluation (HSG, SHG, OH)
• Semen analysis
• Genetic history
IVF/ICSI Trial Discordant Couples N=61
Cycles = 113
HIV testing 3 and 6 mosAfter Embryo Transfer
Infants and mothers testedat delivery and 3 mos
No seroconversions !
IVF and ICSI
Sauer et al, Fert Stert 2003
Cycle Outcome
0 20 40 60 80 100
Multiple
Delivery
Pregnancy
Advantages of IVF/ICSI
• Reduces exposure from millions to a single sperm cell
• Only motile spermatozoa used
• Routine laboratory testing of semen for HIV virus is relatively experimental
• Higher success rates than with IUI (fewer exposures)
• Can be used even if sperm parameters are poor
Disadvantages of IVF/ICSI
• Invasive
• Expensive
• Risk of Ovarian Hyperstimulation
• Risk of Multiple Pregnancy
• Questions about the safety of IVF and ICSI
Cost of IVF/ICSI
• Pre Cycle Evaluation $2000
• Medications $3500
• IVF Procedures $8000
• ICSI $1500________
$15,000
Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
• Severe cases are rare
• Can cause fluid shifts, hemoconcentration, and ARDS
• Can require ICU admission
Multiple Pregnancy
Number of Embryos Transferred
CDC Assisted Reproductive Technology Success Rates, 2001
6.2%
27.3%
34.5%
20.6%
11.4%
Embryo Transfer GuidelinesASRM/SART (11/99)
Female RecommendedAge Transfer No.
<35 1–235–38 2–338–40 3–4>40 4–6
Twins are not an ideal ART outcome
• Fetal and maternal complications
• 12 fold increase in cerebral palsy
• 5-10 fold increase in perinatal mortality
• $600 million excess cost in year 2000
Kinzler et al, 2000
Conclusions
• Fertility counseling and treatment options should be presented to HIV discordant couples
• IUI and ICSI both appear to be safe options, although numbers are still relatively small
• Neither are yet the standard of care and prevention can not be guaranteed.
• IUI is not widely available in the United States
Ethical Issues
• Risk of transmission to the seronegative partner
• Risk of transmission to the infant
• Early death of one or both parents
• Possible need for third party parenting
• Posthumous reproduction