analysis of gas lin 00 hank

Upload: cdelbarco

Post on 14-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 Analysis of Gas Lin 00 Hank

    1/6

    ISSN 0097-0905

    ClownSHI.EPA

    no,S3

    Analysis of Gas Line Antifreeze,Windshield Washer Fluid, andEthylene Glycol AntifreezeBy Lester HankinA cooperative study by The Connecticut Agricultural ExperimentStation, New Haven and the Product Safety Division of theConnecticut Department of Consumer Protection, Hartford.

    >//?

    THE CONNECTICUT AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATIONNew Haven Bulletin 832 February 1 986~'

  • 7/30/2019 Analysis of Gas Lin 00 Hank

    2/6

    ANALYSIS OF GAS LINE ANTIFREEZE, WINDSHIELD WASHER FLUID AND ETHYLENE GLYCOL ANTIFREEZEBy Lester Hankin

    Antifreeze materials are added to protect waterfrom freezing in vehicle gasoline tanks, in reservoirsof windshield washer fluid, and in vehicle radiators.

    In gasoline tanks, gas line antifreeze products(commonly called dry gas) containing the active ingre-dients methanol (methyl alcohol) or isopropanol(isopropyl alcohol) are used. The alcohol mixes withtraces of water and prevents the water from freezing inthe gasoline tank or in gasoline lines.

    In windshield washer fluids, methanol is commonlyused. Manufacturers usually do not declare a percentageof alcohol, but labels generally state that the productwill protect from freezing down to -20 or -25F.According to published freezing point values (1) amixture of 33% methanol and 67* water will not freezeabove -20F. These products may contain a cleaning agentthat may also help to lower the freezing point.

    Ethylene glycol antifreeze is used in vehicleradiators. Manufacturers recommend using at least amixture of 50* ethylene glycol and 50* water. Thelabels state that the mixture will protect fromfreezing down to -25F.

    There are no standards for the amount and type ofactive ingredients used in these three types ofproducts. All products were tested by analyzing fortype and percentage of active ingredient and determi-ning if they met their label claims. If the freezingpoint stated on the label was inconsistent with thealcohol content (1) a freezing point determination wasmade.

    Connecticut Statutes require that productscontaining methanol show a warning statement on thelabel (2).

    In this study we examined 19 gas line antifreezeproducts, 13 windshield washer fluids, and six ethyleneglycol antifreeze products.

    MethodsSamples were collected by an inspector of the

    Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection andanalyzed at The Connecticut Agricultural ExperimentStation. Analyses for alcohols and ethylene glycol wereby gas chromatography. A Varian Model 920 with athermal conductivity detector and a Poropak Q stainlesssteel column was used. The temperature of the columnwas 150C and of the injection port was 170C. Thenitrogen carrier gas flowed at a rate of 40 millilitersper minute. Freezing points were determined by coolingthe sample with liquid nitrogen and observing freezing.

    Results

    The brands of the 19 gas line antifreeze productstested and the type and percentage of alcohol found arein Table 1. Fourteen contained only methanol, two only

    isopropanol, and two a mixture of methanol and isopro-panol. All products contained essentially all activeingredient. The two products with a mixture of methanoland isopropanol (numbers 9 and 10), however, were mis-branded under Connecticut Regulations since methanolwas not declared as an ingredient and a warningstatement about its toxicity was not shown.

    The brands of the 13 windshield washer fluids andthe type and percentage of alcohol found are inTable 2. All samples stated on the label that theywould protect from freezing to -20 or -25F, i.e., wouldnot freeze at a temperature above -20 or -25F. Based onactual alcohol content and published freezing pointvalues, sample numbers 1, 3, 11, and 12 would freezeabove -20F. Actual freezing point determinations,however, showed these four products did not freezeabove -20F. The addition of cleaning materials such asdetergents probably depressed the freezing point suffi-ciently to justify the label claim that they would notfreeze above -20F.Sample number 8 correctly declared on the labelthat it contained 35* methanol. Sample number 5contained 100* methanol, and the label on this productstates that below OF a 50* mixture in water should beused. We calculated that such a mixture would preventfreezing at least to -36F.

    The six brands of ethylene glycol antifreeze andthe percentage of ethylene glycol found are in Table 3.All contained at least 95* ethylene glycol. Calcula-tions show that a 50* solution of all six products inwater would not freeze above -30F. Thus the labelclaims that they would not freeze above -30F arecorrect.

    Conclusions

    All 19 gas line antifreeze products containedessentially all methanol. The label claims for 13windshield washer fluids that they would not freezeabove a stated temperature were correct. The labelclaims for six ethylene glycol radiator antifreezeproducts also were correct.

    AcknowledgmentsAnalyses were by Vipin Agarwal and Sunrae McLean.

    Samples were collected by Mark Guilietti under thedirection of Lois Bryant, Chief, Product Safety Divi-sion, Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection.

    References

    1. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 61st edition,1980-1981. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    2. General Statutes of Connecticut revised toJanuary 1, 1985, section 21a-335(e)(C).

  • 7/30/2019 Analysis of Gas Lin 00 Hank

    3/6

    Table 1. Alcohol Content of Gas Line Antifreeze.SampleNumber

    Brand % Alcohol & Type

    1 BG gas line antifreeze & dryer 98 - Isopropanol2 Caldor 100% gas line antifreeze 98 - Methanol3 Christy dry gas 99 - Methanol4 Auto Value gas line antifreeze 99 - Methanol5 Berkebile 2+2 gas line antifreeze 98 - Methanol6 Crown gas line dryer antifreeze 98 - Methanol7 Master gas line antifreeze 99 - Methanol8 Monarch gas line antifreeze 99 - Methanol9 NAPA Mac's fuel system treatment 40 - Methanol &

    60 - Isopropanol810 NAPA Mac's thermo-aid 40 - Methanol &

    60 - Isopropanol 311 PAHNOL gas line antifreeze &

    gas tank dryer 97 - Methanol12 Penn-Pride gas line antifreeze 98 - Methanol13 Prestone gas dryer & gas line

    antifreeze 99 - Methanol14 Q7 gas line antifreeze 99 - Isopropanol15 Rickel gas line antifreeze 97 - Methanol16 Savo gas line antifreeze 97 - Methanol17 Shell gas line antifreeze dryer 99 - Methanol18 Sure-Thaw gasoline antifreeze

    & dryer 97 - Methanol19 Uni-Guard Ice-ODry 98 - Isopropanola. Product misbranded since methanol not declared on label.

    Table 2. Alcohol Content of Windshield Washer Fluids.Sample Brand % Alcohol & TypeNumber

    ClaimedProtection To8

    89

    10111213

    Caldor windshield washer antifreeze 30CVS windshield washer & solvent 37Crown windshield washer fluid 31Kleen-Bright windshield washer antifreeze 37NAPA windshield washer solvent 100Our Own summer/winter windshield wash(Bradlees) 38 - MethanolPAHNOL windshield washer antifreezecleaner 37Pathmark antifreeze windshield washer 40Prestone windshield washer antifreeze/cleaner 35Rickel windshield washer 36Serv-U windshield washer 30Uni-Guard windshield washer antifreeze 30UNIFIDE windshield washer fluid 43

    MethanolMethanolMethanolMethanolMethanol13

    MethanolMethanolMethanolMethanolMethanolMethanolMethanol

    -20F-20F-25F-25F

    -25F-20F-25 F-20F-20F-20F-20F-20F

    a. All met their claims.b. This product is to be diluted with water before use.c. No claim.

    Table 3. Ethylene Glycol Content of Radiator Antifreeze.SampleNumber

    Brand % Ethylene Glycol

    1 Autovalue antifreeze coolant 962 Conoco antifreeze/coolant 953 NAPA antifreeze/coolant 954 Quaker State antifreeze coolant 955 Texaco antifreeze coolant 956 Zerex antifreeze/coolant (Conoco) 95

  • 7/30/2019 Analysis of Gas Lin 00 Hank

    4/6

    Digitized by the Internet Archivein 2011 with funding from

    LYRASIS members and Sloan Foundation

    http://www.archive.org/details/analysisofgaslinOOhank

  • 7/30/2019 Analysis of Gas Lin 00 Hank

    5/6

  • 7/30/2019 Analysis of Gas Lin 00 Hank

    6/6