APPENDIX 4: STAKEHOLDER MEETING PRESENTATION DECK

Geo

rge

Mas

sey

Tunn

el

Rep

lace

men

t Pro

ject

PH

ASE

3 C

ON

SULT

ATIO

N

Proj

ect D

efin

ition

Rep

ort

16 D

ec 2

015

– 28

Jan

201

6

New

3.3

km

brid

ge

(8 la

nes

plus

2 tr

ansi

t/HO

V la

nes)

Rep

lace

3 k

ey in

terc

hang

es

24 k

m o

f Hig

hway

99

impr

ovem

ents

50 k

m o

f ded

icat

ed tr

ansi

t/HO

V la

nes

(tr

ansi

t prio

rity

to C

anad

a Li

ne a

t Brid

gepo

rt)

Bik

e an

d pe

dest

rian

path

way

Allo

w fo

r fut

ure

rapi

d tra

nsit

Dec

omm

issi

on T

unne

l

Cos

t: $3

.5 b

illio

n

Ben

efit/

Cos

t Rat

io:

2.1

to 1

Fund

ing:

Fu

nded

thro

ugh

user

to

lls

Ove

rvie

w

30-y

ear p

ublic

priv

ate

part

ners

hip

Proc

urem

ent t

o be

gin

in

2016

2

Pro

ject

Chr

onol

ogy

2013

20

14-2

015

2012

Nov

embe

r: P

hase

1 C

onsu

ltatio

n (u

nder

stan

ding

the

need

)

Mar

ch: P

hase

2 C

onsu

ltatio

n (e

xplo

ring

the

optio

ns);

tech

nica

l wor

k

Sept

embe

r: N

ew b

ridge

with

in th

e ex

istin

g co

rrid

or a

nnou

nced

, sub

ject

to a

Pro

ject

D

efin

ition

Rep

ort a

nd B

usin

ess

Cas

e

Tech

nica

l wor

k; c

ost e

stim

ate;

bu

sine

ss c

ase

anal

ysis

Con

sulta

tion

with

mun

icip

aliti

es,

stak

ehol

ders

and

Firs

t Nat

ions

Alte

rnat

ive

Cor

ridor

S

tudi

es

1991

-199

5 20

01/2

004

Tunn

el S

eism

ic

Rev

iew

s

3

Con

ditio

n of

Exi

stin

g Tu

nnel

4

Ope

ned

in 1

959

Des

igne

d to

hig

hway

st

anda

rds

of th

e 19

50s

Elec

tric

al/m

echa

nica

l sy

stem

is 5

0+ y

ears

30+

year

old

cou

nter

flow

sy

stem

Part

ial s

eism

ic u

pgra

de

com

plet

ed s

prin

g 20

06

Vuln

erab

le to

sei

smic

ev

ent;

1950

s ap

proa

ch

Add

ition

al s

eism

ic

upgr

ades

are

hig

h ris

k

Geo

rge

Mas

sey

Tunn

el

40%

Vancou

ver

59%

Richmon

d

1%

Burnaby/

NewWestminster

19%

North

Delta

/Surrey

8%

Tilbury

2%

Delta

port

19%

Tsaw

wassen

17%

Ladn

er

35%

U.S.B

orde

r/

WhiteRock/

SouthSurreyO

RIG

IN

DES

TIN

ATIO

N

Traf

fic A

naly

sis:

Nor

thbo

und

Traf

fic

Geo

rge

Mas

sey

Tunn

el

34%

Vancou

ver

65%

Richmon

d

1%

Burnaby/

NewWestminster

21%

North

Delta

/Surrey

7%

Tilbury

36%

U.S.B

orde

r/

WhiteRock/

SouthSurrey

34%

Ladn

er/

Tsaw

wassen

2%

Delta

port

Traf

fic A

naly

sis:

Sou

thbo

und

Traf

fic

OR

IGIN

DES

TIN

ATIO

N

Pro

ject

Goa

ls

Impr

ove

safe

ty

Red

uce

cong

estio

n

Enh

ance

the

Env

ironm

ent

Sup

port

impr

oved

tra

nsit

on H

wy

99

Sup

port

trade

an

d co

mm

erce

Sup

port

optio

ns fo

r pe

dest

rians

and

cyc

lists

7

Pro

ject

Sco

pe

8

Brid

gepo

rt R

oad

to H

ighw

ay 9

1

• 20

0 la

ne k

m o

f roa

dway

• 

50 k

m o

f new

ded

icat

ed

tran

sit/H

OV

lane

s • 

Rep

lace

3 in

terc

hang

es

• C

onst

ruct

new

brid

ge

• R

epla

ce 5

ove

rpas

ses

• D

ecom

mis

sion

Tun

nel

New

Brid

ge S

cope

9

Maj

or B

ridge

s in

the

Low

er M

ainl

and

10

3.3

km

long

6

60 m

cle

ar s

pan

over

the

Fras

er R

iver

2

00 m

hig

h to

wer

s

Des

ign

for f

utur

e ra

pid

tran

sit

1 D

edic

ated

tran

sit/H

OV

lane

s

3 R

egul

ar tr

affic

lane

s

(sam

e as

toda

y in

rush

hou

r)

1 L

ane

for s

low

, mer

ging

traf

fic

Ben

efits

:

• Im

prov

ed m

ergi

ng s

afet

y

• R

educ

ed w

eavi

ng

• R

educ

ed c

onge

stio

n/in

crea

sed

relia

bilit

y

• Im

prov

ed e

mer

genc

y re

spon

se

acce

ss

Why

Fiv

e La

nes

in E

ach

Dire

ctio

n?

11

Four

lane

s in

eac

h di

rect

ion

wou

ld re

sult

in c

onge

stio

n on

op

enin

g da

y

50 L

AN

E K

ILO

MET

RES

OF

DED

ICAT

ED/M

EDIA

N T

RA

NSI

T LA

NES

Pro

ject

Sco

pe –

Tra

nsit

12

Ded

icat

ed T

rans

it co

nnec

tion

betw

een

Hig

hway

99

and

Brid

gepo

rt C

anad

a Li

ne S

tatio

n

Inte

grat

ed T

rans

it St

op: S

teve

ston

Hig

hway

Inte

grat

ed T

rans

it St

op: H

ighw

ay 1

7A

RIC

HM

ON

D

DE

LTA

She

ll R

oad

• Im

prov

ed a

cces

s fro

m O

dlin

Stre

et,

para

llel t

o H

ighw

ay 9

9

• Im

prov

ed c

ross

Hig

hway

99

acce

ss

Wes

tmin

ster

Hig

hway

• Im

prov

ed c

ross

Hig

hway

99

acce

ss

Ste

vest

on H

ighw

ay

• Im

prov

ed c

ross

Hig

hway

99

acce

ss

(sou

th s

ide

only

)

• A

cces

s to

new

cro

ssin

g fro

m b

oth

side

s of

Hig

hway

99

• Im

prov

ed a

cces

s to

Ric

e M

ill R

oad

and

Dyk

e Tr

ail

• A

cces

s to

med

ian

trans

it st

op p

latfo

rms

Riv

er R

oad

• A

cces

s to

new

cro

ssin

g fro

m b

oth

side

s of

Hig

hway

99

via

Riv

er R

oad

and

64th

• Im

prov

ed a

cces

s to

Mill

enni

um T

rail

Pro

ject

Sco

pe –

Cyc

ling

and

Ped

estri

an A

cces

s 13

Ben

efit/

Cos

t Ana

lysi

s

• U

ser B

enef

its:

• C

onge

stio

n re

duct

ion,

trav

el ti

me

savi

ngs,

impr

oved

re

liabi

lity,

veh

icle

ope

ratin

g co

st s

avin

gs

• Tr

affic

saf

ety

(35%

redu

ctio

n in

col

lisio

ns)

• R

educ

ed s

eism

ic ri

sk

• C

yclis

t/ped

estri

an, t

rans

it, m

arin

e tra

ffic

impr

ovem

ents

• Lo

ng-te

rm E

cono

mic

Ben

efits

14

Cos

t: $3

.5 b

illio

n B

enef

it/C

ost R

atio

: 2.1

to 1

Why

Tol

ling?

• S

igni

fican

t ben

efits

for t

hose

usi

ng th

e ne

w B

ridge

• A

llow

s pr

ojec

t to

proc

eed

now

, with

out

taki

ng a

way

from

gov

ernm

ent f

undi

ng

for h

ealth

and

edu

catio

n

• S

imila

r for

mat

to P

ort M

ann

Brid

ge

• W

orki

ng w

ith fe

dera

l gov

ernm

ent o

n po

tent

ial c

ontri

butio

ns

15

Ant

icip

ated

Effe

cts

of T

ollin

g N

ew C

ross

ing

16

TUN

NEL

TO

DAY

“R

ush

Hou

r” (6

-8 h

ours

):

• Th

e Tu

nnel

and

Ale

x Fr

aser

B

ridge

(AFB

) are

hea

vily

co

nges

ted

Mid

day

(6 h

ours

):

• Tu

nnel

, AFB

and

Ric

hmon

d C

onne

ctor

nea

r con

gest

ion;

in

cide

nt s

ensi

tive

Ove

rnig

ht/W

eeke

nds:

• Fr

ee-fl

owin

g tra

ffic

WIT

H A

NEW

BR

IDG

E R

ush

Hou

r:

• N

ew B

ridge

free

-flow

ing

• Tr

affic

in q

ueue

s at

AFB

will

m

ove

to n

ew B

ridge

Mid

day:

• Li

mite

d tra

ffic

dive

rsio

n to

A

FB d

ue to

con

gest

ion

on

Eas

t/Wes

t Con

nect

or

Ove

rnig

ht/W

eeke

nds:

• S

ome

traffi

c di

vers

ion

to A

FB

Env

ironm

enta

l Ben

efits

17

• Tr

ansi

t enh

ance

men

ts to

incr

ease

ride

rshi

p

• M

ulti-

use

path

way

to e

ncou

rage

cyc

ling/

wal

king

• Le

ss id

ling;

redu

ced

GH

G e

mis

sion

s

• R

esto

ring

Gre

en S

loug

h to

his

toric

alig

nmen

t

• B

io-fi

ltrat

ion

mar

shes

for s

torm

wat

er

man

agem

ent

• E

nviro

nmen

tal e

nhan

cem

ents

in D

eas

Slo

ugh

• Im

prov

emen

ts to

Mill

enni

um T

rail

Wha

t Hap

pens

at t

he O

ak S

treet

Brid

ge?

• M

orni

ng q

ueue

s w

ill c

ontin

ue a

s to

day;

traf

fic p

atte

rns

may

ch

ange

som

ewha

t but

no

sign

ifica

nt c

hang

e in

tota

l tra

ffic

• 60

% o

f tun

nel u

sers

end

thei

r trip

in R

ichm

ond

• E

ffici

ency

of O

ak S

treet

Brid

ge w

ill

cont

inue

to b

e go

vern

ed b

y tra

ffic

light

s

at 7

0th S

treet

• Tr

affic

vol

umes

on

the

Oak

Stre

et

Brid

ge h

ave

been

rela

tivel

y co

nsta

nt

or d

eclin

ing

over

the

past

dec

ade

(Can

ada

Line

effe

ct)

18

Nav

igat

ion/

Riv

er D

epth

Effe

cts

19

PD

R C

onsu

ltatio

n To

pics

1. 

Feed

back

on

Pro

ject

sco

pe, i

nclu

ding

: • 

HO

V a

nd T

rans

it la

nes

• N

ew g

ener

al p

urpo

se la

nes

• M

ultiu

se p

athw

ay

2. 

Sug

gest

ions

for t

raffi

c m

anag

emen

t dur

ing

cons

truct

ion

3. 

Que

stio

ns a

bout

upc

omin

g en

viro

nmen

tal r

evie

w

4. 

Feed

back

on

fram

ewor

k to

eva

luat

e pr

ojec

t suc

cess

5. 

Feed

back

on

tolli

ng a

s a

fund

ing

sour

ce

20

Pro

ject

Def

initi

on R

epor

t 16

Dec

– 2

8 Ja

n

• O

nlin

e:

mas

seyt

unne

l.ca

• In

per

son:

P

roje

ct O

ffice

in R

ichm

ond

Ope

n H

ouse

s

• Em

ail:

mas

seyt

unne

l@go

v.bc

.ca

EA

Pro

ject

Rev

iew

P

art 1

: 15

Jan

– 15

Feb

P

art 2

: Spr

ing

• O

nlin

e:

http

://w

ww

.eao

.gov

.bc.

ca/p

cp/

inde

x.ht

ml

• M

ail:

Mic

hael

She

pard

P

roje

ct A

sses

smen

t Man

ager

E

nviro

nmen

tal A

sses

smen

t Offi

ce

PO

Box

942

6 S

tn P

rov

Gov

t Vi

ctor

ia B

C V

8W 9

V1

• Fa

x: 2

50-3

87-0

230

Cur

rent

Con

sulta

tion

21

Ope

n H

ouse

s 22

Tues

day,

Jan

uary

26,

201

6

2:00

p.m

. to

8:00

p.m

. S

andm

an S

igna

ture

Hot

el V

anco

uver

Airp

ort

Rou

nd R

oom

10

251

St.

Edw

ards

Driv

e, R

ichm

ond

BC

W

edne

sday

, Jan

uary

27,

201

6

2:00

p.m

. to

8:00

p.m

. D

elta

Tow

n &

Cou

ntry

Inn

B

allro

om

6005

Hig

hway

17A

, Del

ta B

C

w: w

ww

.mas

seyt

unne

l.ca

t: 1-

8-55

5-M

ASS

EY

e: m

asse

ytun

nel@

gov.

bc.c

a

Phas

e 3

Con

sulta

tion

Dec

embe

r 16,

201

5 to

Jan

uary

28,

201

6 EA

Com

men

t Per

iod

Janu

ary

15 to

Feb

ruar

y 15

, 201

6 Fo

r mor

e in

form

atio

n: