are you a .com or a .org?
DESCRIPTION
The Social Enterprise Alliance North Texas Chapter convened entrepreneurs, nonprofit executives and social enterprise practitioners in June to learn about new legal and tax structures for social enterprise organizations. New hybrid organizations are adopting emerging social enterprise models, employing innovative strategies, and creating business alliances to drive positive social change. This interactive presentation helped nonprofit leaders and social entrepreneurs understand a myriad of legal, tax, and governance challenges in the Fourth Sector and learn ways to overcome them by using business efficiencies to achieve nonprofit goals. Marc Lane, a national-recognized expert on social enterprise law, led the discussion and offered his practical advice and answered questions about these issues and others: The L3C business model and how social enterprises are already benefiting Relieving legal tension between financial and social objectives Understanding social enterprise legal issues · Reducing the risks and financial burden of earned-income social ventures · Leveraging foundations' "program-related investments" to attract private-sector capital for earned-income ventures Converting nonprofit funders into social venture capitalistsTRANSCRIPT
Are you aAre you a[.com] or a [.org]??
Marc J. LaneMarc J. Lane
June 30, 2011June 30, 2011
Copyright © 2011, by Marc J. Lane Advisors, L3C. All rights reserved.
The 1-2-3 PunchThe 1-2-3 Punch
Socially responsible and mission-related Socially responsible and mission-related investinginvesting
Impact investingImpact investing
Program-related investingProgram-related investing
Socially responsible Socially responsible and mission-related investingand mission-related investing
ScreeningScreening
Shareholder advocacyShareholder advocacy
Community investingCommunity investing
Impact investingImpact investing
Seeks to solve a social or environmental problem Seeks to solve a social or environmental problem while generating a financial return to investorswhile generating a financial return to investors
Complements philanthropy and government Complements philanthropy and government effortsefforts
Program-related investing Program-related investing and the Land the L33CC
Make grants of 5% of "non-charitable-use" Make grants of 5% of "non-charitable-use" assets to charitable causes annuallyassets to charitable causes annually
oror
Make "program-related investments" of Make "program-related investments" of 5% of "non-charitable-use" assets annually5% of "non-charitable-use" assets annually
The Foundation's ChoiceThe Foundation's Choice
Venture capital and other high-risk investments that would otherwise Venture capital and other high-risk investments that would otherwise subject foundation and its manager to 10% jeopardizing investment subject foundation and its manager to 10% jeopardizing investment excise tax.excise tax.
Primary purpose is charitable - - religious, scientific, literary or Primary purpose is charitable - - religious, scientific, literary or educational, fostering amateur sports competition, or preventing educational, fostering amateur sports competition, or preventing cruelty to children or animalscruelty to children or animals
Income production or property appreciation not a significant purposeIncome production or property appreciation not a significant purpose
Purpose is not to attempt to influence legislation; or to participate in, Purpose is not to attempt to influence legislation; or to participate in, oppose or intervene in a political campaign of candidate for public oppose or intervene in a political campaign of candidate for public officeoffice
PRIsPRIs
PRIsPRIs come in many flavors come in many flavorsInterest-free or below-market-rate loansInterest-free or below-market-rate loans
Loan participationsLoan participations
Loan guaranteesLoan guarantees
Deposits in community development Deposits in community development banksbanks
LeasesLeases
Equity investmentsEquity investments
PRIsPRIs in Action in ActionLow-interest loans to needy studentsLow-interest loans to needy studentsInvestments in low-income housing projectsInvestments in low-income housing projectsLow-interest loans to disadvantaged business ownersLow-interest loans to disadvantaged business ownersDirect investments in businesses which create jobsDirect investments in businesses which create jobsInvestments in land conservation or brownfields mitigationInvestments in land conservation or brownfields mitigationInvestments in arts groups or cultural organizationsInvestments in arts groups or cultural organizationsInvestments in faith-based programsInvestments in faith-based programsInvestments in child care centersInvestments in child care centersInvestments in community development initiativesInvestments in community development initiativesInvestments in social services organizationsInvestments in social services organizationsInvestments in educational or workforce development training opportunitiesInvestments in educational or workforce development training opportunitiesInvestments in businesses that develop cutting-edge technology in rapidly changing Investments in businesses that develop cutting-edge technology in rapidly changing environmental or health-related fieldsenvironmental or health-related fieldsInvestments in historic preservationInvestments in historic preservation
Additional PRI Examples Additional PRI Examples ProposedProposed
by ABA Section of Taxationby ABA Section of TaxationDevelopment of new drugDevelopment of new organic-farming processLoan made to media in former Communist bloc countriesEconomic redevelopment of terrorism site or site of national disasterEnvironmental investments in Third World or economically depressed countriesForeign economic developmentInvestment that lessens the burdens of government
PRIs have been seen as complex PRIs have been seen as complex
and expensiveand expensiveNo process to guarantee that an investment complies with No process to guarantee that an investment complies with PRI tax regulationsPRI tax regulations
No standards to ensure that an entity is a proper recipient No standards to ensure that an entity is a proper recipient of PRIsof PRIs
IRS private letter rulings expensive and time-consumingIRS private letter rulings expensive and time-consuming
A Low-Profit Limited Liability A Low-Profit Limited Liability Company (LCompany (L33C) is an LLCC) is an LLC
• Non-corporate form of doing business that limits owners' Non-corporate form of doing business that limits owners' liabilityliability
• Affords them flow-through tax treatment, andAffords them flow-through tax treatment, and
• Offers operating flexibility through participation in Offers operating flexibility through participation in managementmanagement
But a special kind of LLCBut a special kind of LLCOne or more for-profit "members" and one or more One or more for-profit "members" and one or more non-profit "members"non-profit "members"Charitable or educational purposesCharitable or educational purposesWould not have been formed except to accomplish Would not have been formed except to accomplish those purposesthose purposesNo significant purpose to produce income or property No significant purpose to produce income or property appreciationappreciationBut But maymay produce significant income or property produce significant income or property appreciationappreciationNo political or legislative purposeNo political or legislative purpose
The LThe L33C's PromiseC's PromiseShifting economic risk to third partiesShifting economic risk to third parties
Financial self-sufficiencyFinancial self-sufficiency
Continuing foundation inputContinuing foundation input
Effective leveraging Effective leveraging
Capital flow to "double bottom-line" ventureCapital flow to "double bottom-line" venture
A “win-win” for both for-profits and non-profitsA “win-win” for both for-profits and non-profits
Capital Structure Illustration #1Capital Structure Illustration #1
Social ReturnSocial Return
Financial ReturnFinancial Return
FoundationFoundation
Foundation incurs high Foundation incurs high financial risk, earns low (1%) financial risk, earns low (1%) financial return, but high financial return, but high social returnsocial return
Capital Structure Illustration #1Capital Structure Illustration #1
Social ReturnSocial Return
Financial ReturnFinancial Return
Mezzanine investorMezzanine investorSocially conscious investor incurs lower financial risk, earns higher (3%) financial return.
Capital Structure Illustration #1Capital Structure Illustration #1
Social Social ReturnReturn
Financial Financial ReturnReturn
Market-driven investorMarket-driven investorMarket-driven investor incurs market-rate risk, earns market-rate (6%) financial return.
Blended rate of return:Blended rate of return: 4% - - which L4% - - which L33C can generate, but not C can generate, but not without the catalyst of the foundation’s without the catalyst of the foundation’s
PRI.PRI.
Capital Structure Illustration #2Capital Structure Illustration #2
Development agency makes a grant, seeking high social return but earning no financial return.
Social ReturnSocial Return
Financial Financial ReturnReturn
GovernmentGovernment
Capital Structure Illustration #2Capital Structure Illustration #2
Foundation earns low (2%) financial return, but high social return.
Social ReturnSocial Return
Financial ReturnFinancial Return
FoundationFoundation
Capital Structure Illustration #2Capital Structure Illustration #2
Outside investor incurs market-rate risk, earns market rate (7%) return.
Social ReturnSocial Return
Financial ReturnFinancial Return
Market-driven investorMarket-driven investor
Blended rate of return:Blended rate of return: Again, 4% - - which the LAgain, 4% - - which the L33C can C can
generate, but not without the catalyst generate, but not without the catalyst of the foundation's PRI.of the foundation's PRI.
Inherent Conflict of InterestInherent Conflict of Interest
Managers of for-profits must maximize Managers of for-profits must maximize financial returns to owners.financial returns to owners.
v.v.
PRI recipients must not produce income PRI recipients must not produce income or property appreciation as "significant or property appreciation as "significant purpose."purpose."
SolutionsSolutions
1.1.Reliance on applicable constituency statuteReliance on applicable constituency statute
2.2.““Expenditure responsibility”Expenditure responsibility”
1. Reliance on applicable constituency 1. Reliance on applicable constituency statutesstatutes
Texas Business Organization Code § 21.401Texas Business Organization Code § 21.401
Sec. 21.401. MANAGEMENT BY BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
(a) …
(b) In discharging the duties of director under this code or otherwise and in considering the best interests of the corporation, a director may consider the long-term and short-term interests of the corporation and the shareholders of the corporation, including the possibility that those interests may be best served by the continued independence of the corporation.
(Source: Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 182, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 2006.)
(805 ILCS 5/8385) (from Ch. 32, par. 8.85) Sec. 8.85. In discharging the duties of their respective positions, the board of directors, committees of the board, individual directors and individual officers may, in considering the best long term and short term interests of the corporation, consider the effects of any action (including without limitation, action which may involve or relate to a change or potential change in control of the corporation) upon employees, suppliers and customers of the corporation or its subsidiaries, communities in which offices or other establishments of the corporation or its subsidiaries are located, and all other pertinent factors.
(Source: P.A. 86-126)
2. “Expenditure responsibilities” 2. “Expenditure responsibilities” requirementsrequirementsManager’s Commitments
Use of funds for agreed purposeAnnual financial reportingMaintenance and availability of adequate books of recordsNo support of propaganda, the influence of legislation, the outcome of public elections or voter registration drives
The Optimal VentureThe Optimal Venture
Socially beneficial missionSocially beneficial mission
Consistent cash flowConsistent cash flow
EntrepreneurialEntrepreneurial
LL33C ApplicationsC Applications
For social ventures seeking to secure PRI support from foundations that forgo market-rate returns and thus subsidize private-sector investors who can thereby earn market-rate returnsAs single-purpose, wholly owned subsidiaries of tax-exempt organizationsFor ventures that seek to draw consumer and funder attention to their status as social enterprisesFor coalitions of nonprofits that join forces to tackle a social problem through the application of business principles
Proposed Philanthropic Proposed Philanthropic Facilitation ActFacilitation Act
Voluntary
Safe-harbor registration by entity
Annual reporting
LL33C LegislationC Legislation
2008VermonVermontt
2009MichiganMichigan
UtahUtah
WyomingWyoming
2010IllinoisIllinois
LouisianaLouisiana
North North CarolinaCarolina
2011MaineMaine
2012Rhode IslandRhode Island
The Benefit Corporation: The Benefit Corporation: Creating a “Public Benefit”Creating a “Public Benefit”
The Requirements of a Benefit The Requirements of a Benefit CorporationCorporation
The corporation must create a material, positive impact on society and the environment.Impact must be measured by a third party. A “benefit report” must be published annually.
The Benefit Corporation’s BenefitThe Benefit Corporation’s Benefit
Directors have“immunity from liability”“in the reasonable performance of their duties.”
But not too fast…But not too fast…
Lack of policingLitigation risk may shift – From shareholder claims that the board is not
maximizing profit– To shareholder claims that the board is not
sufficiently pursuing the corporation’s general or specific public benefit
Still…Still…
Most early adopters are more interested in branding than derivative lawsuit protection.The Benefit Corporation codifies the entrepreneur’s social and environmental ethos.It offers legal recognition of the venture’s core values.
Benefit Corporation LegislationBenefit Corporation Legislation
2010Maryland*Maryland*
VermontVermont
2011New JerseyNew Jersey
VirginiaVirginia
Hawaii**Hawaii**
* 2011: Benefit LLC legislation
** Sustainable business corporation legislation
Pay-For-Success BondsPay-For-Success Bonds(aka Social Impact Bonds)(aka Social Impact Bonds)
Pay-For-Success BondsPay-For-Success Bonds
Aligns interests of government agencies, private investors, and nonprofits around specific social outcomes.Leverages private investment capital to pay for early intervention programs delivered by service providers.Government pays financial returns to investors if and when improved social outcomes are achieved:– If outcomes don’t improve, investors lose their money.– If outcomes are achieved, government returns principal
plus specified return.
Social Impact Bonds: The Seminal U.K. Example
Of 40,200 adults serving short-term criminal sentences, 60% were expected to re-offend within one year, at great cost to society and taxpayers.In October 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation among others invested £5 million (about $8 million) in bonds to fund counseling, employment, housing and other support services for recently released prisoners.– If re-offending is reduced by 7.5% or more, investors
will receive payments from the U.K. government reflecting a share of its long-term savings.
– If not, investors will lose their money.
Minnesota’s Pay For Performance Act of 2011*
The Act would have established $20 million pilot program.The State would have contracted with pre-qualified providers.Funds would have come from “special appropriation” bonds issued in municipal bond market.Providers would have been paid only if the State’s return on investment was positive.
* The Act was included within the State’s general appropriation bill, which was vetoes on May 24, 2011.
Massachusetts’ Pay For Success Contracts:The Ask
The State’s Executive Office for Contracts Administration and Finance (EOAF) issued a Request for Information on May 6, 2011 to learn: Which social services are the most promising candidates for pay for success contracts?Are there innovative social solutions to social problems that have been demonstrated on a relatively small scale that have the potential to be scaled up using pay for success contracts in a way that would reduce costs/or improve outcomes?Are there areas where targeted investments in preventative services would have a high likelihood of reducing future budgetary costs by more than the cost of the services?Are there other areas of government activity where upfront investments and innovative contracting strategies could improve performance and reduce costs?How should pay for success contracts and social impact bonds be structured to support these goals?What information would be useful to EOAF in drafting a more detailed procurement solicitation for these contracts?
Massachusetts’ Pay For Success Contracts: Next Steps
Responses were received by June 10, 2011.EOAF will issue a Request for Response targeted at the most promising applications.
For further information:For further information:
The Law Offices ofThe Law Offices of
MMARC ARC JJ. . LLANEANEA PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
180 North LaSalle StreetChicago, IL 60601-2701(312) 372-1040(800) 372-1040Fax (312) 346-1040www.MarcJLane.com