assessing variability in petroleum vapor intrusion with...

53
Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with PVIScreen Jim Weaver (US EPA, retired) 26 TH National Tanks Conference Louisville, KY Sept 10, 2018

Upload: others

Post on 23-Aug-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

Assessing Variability in

Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with

PVIScreenJim Weaver

(US EPA, retired)

26TH National Tanks Conference

Louisville, KY

Sept 10, 2018

Page 2: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

Outline

• Characteristics of Environmental Models

• Vapor Intrusion and Petroleum Vapor Intrusion

• PVIScreen model

• Excerpts from examples

– PVI indicated versus not indicated

• Secrets of PVIScreen

• Summary

• Availability

9/10/2018 2

Page 3: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

Why vapor intrusion and models?

• Technical Challenges

– ambient air contamination, internal sources/sinks, temporal changes

• Social

– RP or homeowner reluctance to sample

• In some cases—redeveloping a site—no building exists for

testing, so models are relied upon

9/10/2018 3

Page 4: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

Vapor Intrusion and Models

• Series of articles in the Denver Post in 2000

– The vapor intrusion model (Johnson-Ettinger) over-predicted

indoor air concentrations sometimes and under-predicted

indoor air concentrations sometimes

– Model used with defaults and very few site specific values

9/10/2018 4

Page 5: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

Example: Darcy’s Law

• Darcy flux q = -K dh/dl

– Relationship from

Darcy’s sand tank

experiments

– Empirical coefficient,

the hydraulic

conductivity (K), from

experiment:

measuring the flow (q)

Material Value (m/d)

Gravel 102 to 104

Sand 10-1 to 103

Clay 10-8 to 10-3

Sandstone 10-5 to 10

Basalt 10-6 to 10-2

9/10/2018 5

Page 6: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

Limits to Predictability

• Note the work of N. Oreskes on ideal

applications for models:

– Weather forecasting

• Forecast given and received with uncertainties

• Oreskes, Naomi, 2003, The role of quantitative models in science,

in Models in Ecosystem Science, C.D. Canham and W.K.

Lauenroth, eds. Princeton University Press, 13-31

9/10/2018 6

Page 7: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018

Chlorinated Solvent (left) petroleum (right) are distinguished by

prospects for biodegradation

U.S. EPA, 2012, Petroleum Hydrocarbons And

Chlorinated Hydrocarbons Differ In Their Potential For

Vapor Intrusion, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,

Washington, DC., March.

7

Page 8: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018

Petroleum Vapor Intrusion and biodegradation:

8

Page 9: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018

PVIScreen rests on a foundation of field data:

Robin V. Davis, 2009, Update on Recent Studies and Proposed

Screening Criteria for the Vapor-Intrusion Pathway, LUSTLine Bulletin

61, pp 11-14.9

Page 10: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018 10

Page 11: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018 11

Page 12: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018

Site assessment flow

chart from OUST guide

on PVI

Model Use:

•NOT without mitigating

immediate threats

•NOT without site

characterization

•As a line of evidence

for related to

determination of

vertical separation

distance*

*

*

12

Page 13: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018

Consider PVIScreen usage in marginal cases as a second line of evidence

13

Page 14: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018

http://www.epa.gov/land-research/pviscreen

14

Page 15: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

PVIScreen

• PVIScreen includes:– BioVapor equations, recoded in Java for speed

– Automated Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis• the native way the code is used

– Soil gas or ground water source

– Comparison to screening levels

– Flexible and customizable unit choices

– Automated Report

• Primary focus:– To add line of evidence for site assessment and

closure decisions

– To make uncertainty analysis practical by giving a prediction and estimate of its uncertainty

9/10/2018 15

Page 16: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018

PVIScreen Sources: Soil Gas Data

16

Page 17: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018

PVIScreen generates schematic

17

Page 18: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018

PVIScreen Sources: Ground Water Data

18

Page 19: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018

0.001 0.01 0.1 1

Relative TCE Concentration

1

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0

Dep

th (

m)

LegendDrainage

Imbibition

Water Table

Top of Tension Saturated Zone Imbibition

Top of Tension Saturated Zone Drainage

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

Moisture Content

1

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0

10 x Reduction

100 x Reduction

Concentration

relationships in the

capillary fringe: from

one data set*•Concentration reduction by

~1/10 through the capillary

fringe

*McCarthy, K.A. and Johnson,

R.L., 1993, Transport of volatile

organic compounds across the

capillary fringe, Water Resources

Research, 29(6) 1675-1683.

19

Page 20: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018

Schematic showing ground water source

20

Page 21: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

Perils of Ground Water as the Source for

PVIScreen

• Does the ground water concentration

represent the capillary fringe?

• Borehole dilution and screen length?

9/10/2018 21

Page 22: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

How does it work?

• PVIScreen is written in Java

• The interface: JavaFX

• All inputs and outputs saved in text files:

– File extensions managed by User Interface:• Input: ProblemName.pvi

• Output: ProblemName-DateTime.PVIScreen.Result.csv

• Input and output files are ASCII text files in comma-separated value

format—direct editing not advised.

• Runs from Windows Directory (double click)

9/10/2018 22

Page 23: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018

PVIScreen Interface:

The options run from right to left, and buttons become

active when the option is available

23

Page 24: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018

Approach to uncertainty: allow parameters to be

treated as uncertain, but incorporate all known

parameter values

•GUI allows

•Constant

•min to max range

•Command line also allows empirical and parametric

distributions

•(not included in GUI or today’s presentation)

24

Page 25: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018

Example inputs: constants or ranges

25

Page 26: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018

Inputs of multiple constituents•all oxygen should NOT go to degrade only benzene,

•Include TPH or petroleum fractions

26

Page 27: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018

Input of Screening Levels:

State-specific or EPA RSLhttps://www.epa.gov/risk/regional-screening-levels-rsls-generic-

tables

27

Page 28: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018

Factors controlling biodegradation are uncertain, variable

•Hydrocarbon degradation rates vary by factor of 100

•How does this impact PVI?

28

Page 29: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018

“Suggested” Values

29

Page 30: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

0.0

1.0

0.0

1.0

0.0

1.0

0.0

1.0

0.0

1.0

0.0

1.0

frequency

parameter value

frequency

frequency

parameter value

parameter value

A constant

Uniform

distribution:

min, max

Data-driven

empirical distribution

0.0

1.0

Results: indoor air

concentration

frequencyMultiple

Model

Runs

InputsResults

All other inputs,

Other distributions can

be used:

Triangular, truncated

normal

Log normal

9/10/2018 30

Page 31: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018

Soil gas input data example from a site in Utah:

31

Page 32: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018

Impacts to Off-Site Restaurant? PVIScreen

‘driven’ by soil gas data at 3’ below the surface

32

Page 33: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018

PVIScreen generates schematic

33

Page 34: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018 34

Page 35: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

Results: PVIScreen model runs indicate no impact

9/10/2018 35

PVIScreen Result

Page 36: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018 36

No graph because all

Results below screening level

(and plotting limits)

Page 37: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018 37

Statistics

Page 38: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018 38

If you used the average of all parameters in one simulation

Page 39: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018

Old style output:

39

Page 40: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018

Example with impact indicated:

40

Page 41: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018 41

Page 42: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018 42

Page 43: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018 43

Impact indicated

Page 44: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018 44

Page 45: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018 45

Simulation with equilavent soil gas inputs

Page 46: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018 46

Page 47: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018

Automated Report:

47

Page 48: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

Model Output – all parameter values saved with results

Method to display parameter values which exceed risk levels is being developed

9/10/2018 48

Page 49: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

Secrets of PVIScreen…• Java must be enabled.

• Always start PVIScreen by opening an existing file (examples or

templates).

– Template files regenerate every time the model is run—save under

different name.

– Create project directories for each project.

– All files are saved with date/time stamp (can pile up).

– If results are not displayed, exit and restart PVIScreen.

• If you see an orange line across the screen..

– Restart PVIScreen

9/10/2018 49

Page 50: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

Secrets of PVIScreen…• Use the correct template to begin.

• Concentrations needed to drive model.

• Biodegradation is always treated as being uncertain.

• When an impact is shown…

– Because of randomness, % will very with each simulation

– If result has marginal exceedances (say <5%) consider refining

ranges of parameters.

• DON’T only simulate benzene or BTEX.– you will probably never see an impact

– because TPH needs to be included.

9/10/2018 50

Page 51: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

9/10/2018

Results fit

within PVI

guidance

framework

--one line of

evidence

51

Page 52: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

Summary

• Immediate threats must be handled first.

• Site characterization and development of a

Conceptual Site Model next.

• Model use (including PVIScreen) should be

embedded with site assessment.

• PVIScreen incorporates parameter.

uncertainty into PVI modeling.

• Results can add a line of evidence to an

assessment.9/10/2018 52

Page 53: Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with ...neiwpcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Weaver.pdf · 9/10/2018 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Relative TCE Concentration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4

Available at http://www.epa.gov/land-

research/pviscreen

(look for copy dated Sept 2018)

• EPA Contact: [email protected]

• The views expressed in this presentation are

those of the author and do not necessarily

represent the views or policies of the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency

9/10/2018 53