attachment & cognitive therapy patricia m. crittenden, ph.d. © patricia m. crittenden, 2005

23
Attachment & Cognitive Therapy Patricia M. Crittenden, Ph.D. © Patricia M. Crittenden, 2005

Upload: claud-barber

Post on 26-Dec-2015

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Attachment & Cognitive Therapy

Patricia M. Crittenden, Ph.D.

© Patricia M. Crittenden, 2005

Four Growing Points

1. Symptoms: diagnoses & treatment

1. Emphasis on “cognitive” rational & verbal processes

1. Model of psychological functioning & psychopathology

1. Evaluation of harmful effects of psychotherapy

© Patricia M. Crittenden, 2005

Symptoms

• Distress = patient’s perspective

• Diagnosis = professional’s perspective

• Self-protective strategies

• Behaviors can serve many functions

© Patricia M. Crittenden, 2005

Symptoms, con’t

• 50%+ failure rate 1 year post-CT

• Focus on symptom vs. reason for symptom

• Competence with danger vs. competence with safety

• Strengths approach vs. vulnerability© Patricia M. Crittenden, 2005

“Cognition” & Affect

Cognition• Temporal, causal contingencies• Verbal generalizations about contingencies: core

beliefs

Affect• Response to intensity of sensory stimulation• Somatic & psychological feelings: images

© Patricia M. Crittenden, 2005

“Cognitive” Memory Systems

• Procedural Memory– Reflexive, sensorimotor schema– Preconscious– Learned from experienced consequences– Re-active

• Semantic memory– Verbalized procedural contingencies– When/then & if/then and (distorted) absolute forms– Borrowed– Should & ought to do

© Patricia M. Crittenden, 2005

“Affective” Memory Systems

• Imaged memory– Possibility of danger– Fight, flight, freeze– Bodily arousal and feeling anxious– Pro-active

• Connotative language– Brings images to mind– Elicits feeling in listener

© Patricia M. Crittenden, 2005

Integrative Memory Systems

• Episodic memory– Cognitive-affective integration– Learned at about 3 years– Dependent upon a dialogue– Biased by what parents will talk about

• Reflective integration– Permits information to be corrected– Is slow– Done best under safe conditions

© Patricia M. Crittenden, 2005

Memory SystemsTemporal Order

(Cognition)

Procedural

Semantic

Intensity(Affect)

Imaged

Connotative Language

Episodic

Reflective Integration© Patricia M. Crittenden, 2005

Dispositional Representation

• Relation of self to context

• Each different DR disposes behavior differently

• Each highlights some aspect of the problem, but obscures some other

© Patricia M. Crittenden, 2005

Arousal Scale1. Anxiety

• Pain • Sexual Desire• Fear• Anger• Desire for comfort

2. Comfort

3. Depression• Boredom • Tiredness• Sleep• Unconsciousness

© Patricia M. Crittenden, 2005

Transformations

Sensory stimulation

Transformations of information

Dispositional representations

Enacted behavior

© Patricia M. Crittenden, 2005

The only information that we have is information about the past

whereas

The only information that we need is information about the future.

© Patricia M. Crittenden, 2005

Transformations of Information

• True

• Erroneous

• Omitted

• Distorted

• Falsified

© Patricia M. Crittenden, 2005

Ty

pe

of

Tra

ns

form

ati

on

of

Info

rma

tio

n

False

True

Integration of Cognitive and Affective Information AffectiveCognitive

© Patricia M. Crittenden, 2005

Omits Affect

Cognitively Distortsby Simplification

IntegratedTrue Cognition-True

Affect AffectivelyOrganized

CognitivelyOrganized

Omits Cognition

Affectively Distorts

by Simplification

Ty

pe

of

Tra

ns

form

ati

on

of

Info

rma

tio

n

False

True

Integration of Cognitive and Affective Information AffectiveCognitive

© Patricia M. Crittenden, 2005

Adaptive in SafeContexts, but

Otherwise Maladaptive

Omits Affect

Cognitively Distortsby Simplification

Adaptive in Dangerous

Contexts, but Otherwise

Maladaptive

IntegratedTrue Cognition-True

Affect AffectivelyOrganized

CognitivelyOrganized

Increasing Risk of Mental Health

Problems

Increasing Risk of Mental Health

Problems

Adaptive in SafeContexts, but

Otherwise Maladaptive

Omits Cognition

Affectively Distorts

by Simplification

Adaptive in Dangerous

Contexts, but Otherwise

Maladaptive

Ty

pe

of

Tra

ns

form

ati

on

of

Info

rma

tio

n

False

True

Integration of Cognitive and Affective Information AffectiveCognitive

© Patricia M. Crittenden, 2005

Adaptive in SafeContexts, but

Otherwise Maladaptive

Omits Affect

Cognitively Distorts

by Simplification

Adaptive in Dangerous

Contexts, but Otherwise

MaladaptiveAAnti@ Integrated

False Cognition-False Affect

IntegratedTrue Cognition-True

Affect

Various CoerciveC+ Strategies

Various CompulsiveA+ Strategies

Type CCoercive/

Enmeshed(Anxious Ambivalent)

Type ADefended/

Disengaged(Anxious Avoidant)

Type A+/C+Unintegrated

Cognitive/Affect

Type BBalanced/

Secure

Type A+C+Psychopathy

AffectivelyOrganized

CognitivelyOrganized

ReactiveReserved

Increasing Risk of Mental Health

Problems

Increasing Risk of Mental Health

Problems

Adaptive in SafeContexts, but

Otherwise Maladaptive

Omits Cognition

Affectively Distorts

by Simplification

Adaptive in Dangerous

Contexts, but Otherwise

Maladaptive

Ty

pe

of

Tra

ns

form

ati

on

of

Info

rma

tio

n

False

True

Integration of Cognitive and Affective Information AffectiveCognitive

© Patricia M. Crittenden, 2005

A Dynamic-Maturational Model of Patterns of Attachment in Adulthood

False Affect

Cognition(Type A)

Affect(Type C)

Integrated False Information(Type A+C+)

Integrated True Information(Type B)

True Cognition

Compulsively Caregiving/Compliant

Delusional Idealization/Externally

Assembled Self

Compulsively Promiscuous/Self-Reliant

Socially Facile/Inhibited

ComfortableB3

ReservedB1-2 B4-5

Reactive

A1-2

A3-4

A7-8

A5-6

C7-8

C5-6

C3-4

C1-2Threatening/

Disarming

Aggressive/Feigned Helpless

Punitive/Seductive

Menacing/ParanoidAC

Psychopathy

A/C

True Affect

False Cognition© Patricia M. Crittenden, 2005

Treatment Outcomes

• There could be harmful effects

• Cognitive & affective strategies are psychological opposites

• They might need opposite treatments

© Patricia M. Crittenden, 2005

Ideas from Attachment Theory

• The importance of understanding the self-protective function of symptoms.

• The strategic organization of all persons, patients included.

• The importance of affect.

• The structure of human psychological organization as consisting of two opposite processes and their integration - with patients rarely displaying integration.

© Patricia M. Crittenden, 2005

Ideas from Attachment Theory

• The possibility that treatments may have different effects on people with similar symptoms, but opposite psychological organizations.

• The important of therapists knowing both the organization of each patient and also the effects on psychological functioning of each treatment technique that they employ.

• The importance of the therapist being, uniquely for each patient, a transitional attachment figure who helps to create enough safety and comfort for change to be explored.

© Patricia M. Crittenden, 2005

This talk can be down-loaded from:

www.patcrittenden.com

© Patricia M. Crittenden, 2005