b2b case 2 nal final

Upload: jamal-shahid

Post on 14-Apr-2018

238 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 B2B Case 2 NAL Final

    1/33

    Case 2- NAL

    By VijayHarsJamaKara

    KomKumLlewM VrMaheMann

    9/2

  • 7/29/2019 B2B Case 2 NAL Final

    2/33

    PROBLEM SOLVINGAPPROACH FOR DSP 2

    9/2

  • 7/29/2019 B2B Case 2 NAL Final

    3/33

    SYMPTOMS

    Low share of DSPs consumption two of six departments and 30of potential

    Resident Representative has not met GM, steel plant of DSP forlast 3.5 years. Infrequent communication - visit only once in aweek

    9/2

  • 7/29/2019 B2B Case 2 NAL Final

    4/33

    PROBABLE CAUSATIVE FACTORS OBJECTIVESETTING

    Customization of contracts according to various sub divisions of the company Improper Sales Quota Improper sales territory definition Improper Sales strategy, situation and style Low Employee Morale, Growth opportunity Personal reasons of Regional Representative for not living in Durgapur Improper identification and communication with appropriate members of DM

    like Initiator Decision maker Buyer user Influencer Gate Keeper

    9/2

  • 7/29/2019 B2B Case 2 NAL Final

    5/33

    TARGET AND LIMITATIONS

    TARGET

    To win entire DSPaccount

    LIMITATIONS

    Intra industry rivalry

    Bargaining power of DSP due torise in power of other supplier

    Threat of new entrants

    Pressure from parent company

    Risk aversion policies of the cli

    Internal conflicts in DMU

    Replacing of people like Mr. Ya9/2

  • 7/29/2019 B2B Case 2 NAL Final

    6/33

    COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS

    Reorganization Cost

    Training Cost

    Cost of setting up and monitoringcommunication channels

    Increased Market share and

    Avoiding merger with Austra

    Faster response to changing

    COSTS BENEFITS

    9/2

  • 7/29/2019 B2B Case 2 NAL Final

    7/33

    Implementation

    Independent Variables

    Type of Product Fabricated product

    Time pressure on Buyers - High

    Perceived risk of Buyers - High

    Size of the Firm - Large

    Buyers background PSU

    Situtional factors Assuming they remain constant and do not have averse effect Dependant Variables

    Degree of centralization Mixed

    Degree of Source Loyalty Low loyaity (exists till personal needs are satisfied

    Cost vs Quality Varies to different departments

    Purchase criterion - Varies to different departments

    Interaction between Buyers and Actual users - Less 9/2

  • 7/29/2019 B2B Case 2 NAL Final

    8/33

    Implementation

    Improper Sales Quota

    Setting proper sales target

    Revisiting the policy for setting sales target on a regular basis

    Setting up mechanism for Monitoring and control of Regional representatives

    Activity based compensation for Regional representative

    To interact all members of DMU daily

    Maintain the database of contacts for DMU Submission of status reports related to summary of interaction on a regular basis

    Improper sales territory definition Defining DSP as a separate territory

    Deploying sales force appropriately - appointing separate sales team for eachdepartment of DSP

    9/2

  • 7/29/2019 B2B Case 2 NAL Final

    9/33

    Implementation

    Improper usage of Selling Strategy and Style in the given selling situation Changing definition of selling situation from Outside order taker to Creative sel

    of Tangible products

    Change selling strategy from Commercial selling to Client profit planning

    Changing selling style from Commercial/Technical to Consultative selling

    Identify Intermediate variables

    Identify Composition of DMU Technical GM

    AGM of utilities and Maintenance

    Buyers and Accounts department

    Identify conflicts in decision making unit

    Identify whether conflicts take place if so between who?

    Information handling habits

    Identify information needed by DMU before, during and after purchasing decision9/2

  • 7/29/2019 B2B Case 2 NAL Final

    10/33

    PROBLEM SOLVINGAPPROACH FOR ZUARI 10

    9/2

  • 7/29/2019 B2B Case 2 NAL Final

    11/33

    Symptoms

    Despite of BETZ not supplying to Zuari, NAL is not able to increase their shar

    Relationship with company is not what is expected.

    Competition is trying to eat into market share of NAL.

    9/2

  • 7/29/2019 B2B Case 2 NAL Final

    12/33

    Causative factors

    RR based at Mumbai which is at distant location from Goa where Zuari is bas

    Expensive products as compared to Local suppliers.

    Perceived as only order taker.

    Absence from the promotional activities.

    Very infrequent follow up.

    Buyer was extremely price-conscious.

    9/2

  • 7/29/2019 B2B Case 2 NAL Final

    13/33

    Objective setting

    Proactive approach.

    Total Technical Service.

    To achieve 70% of the total purchases done by Zuari, within the next 2 years.

    To create an impression on all the probable members of decision making unit(mixed decentralized buyer firm).

    9/2

  • 7/29/2019 B2B Case 2 NAL Final

    14/33

    Target and Limitations

    TARGET Increasing share of supplies to

    70% of the total purchases byZUARI.

    LIMITATIONS Much lower price offered by

    local suppliers.

    Man power constraint.

    Compromising Profit Margin. Production constraints.

    Factory location.

    Motivation level of RRs.

    9/2

  • 7/29/2019 B2B Case 2 NAL Final

    15/33

    Alternatives

    Relaxed credit terms

    Improving service level by deploying a dedicated personnel at clocation.

    Decreasing price by 5%

    Promotion by advertising.

    9/2

  • 7/29/2019 B2B Case 2 NAL Final

    16/33

    Cost Benefit Analysis

    Alternative 1 : Cost

    Before relaxed credit terms After relaxing credit terms

    Total purchase by Zuari 5 (lets

    say).

    Total purchase by Zuari - 5

    NALs share 2 (40%). NALs share 3.5 (70% - objectified).

    Interest on Current credit for 2

    months for 50% of sale 0.0133

    Interest on Future credit for 6 months

    for 50% of sale 0.07

    Profit Margin - 0.15 (assumed) Profit Margin - 0.15 (assumed)

    Total profit 0.3 Total profit 0.525

    Actual profit 0.287 Actual profit 0.455

    Adjusted profit 0.143 Adjusted profit 0.13

    B

    Increased

    Zuari.

    Preferred

    competito

    Healthierthe decisi

    and NAL.

    9/2

  • 7/29/2019 B2B Case 2 NAL Final

    17/33

    Cost Benefit Analysis

    Extra lodging, fooding, travel and phone bill charges toemployee 3 lakh per year approx.

    Demotivated employee because of his distance from the

    main office.

    Infrequent reporting to the main office of the company.

    Alternative 2 : Cost Ben

    Free flow of com

    between vendor a

    Greater percenta

    productive intera

    Regular follow up

    Ensured total te

    9/2

  • 7/29/2019 B2B Case 2 NAL Final

    18/33

    Cost Benefit Analysis

    Reduced profit by 5 %.

    Should concentrate on volume sales to compensate for thereduced profit margin.

    Alternative 3 : Cost Ben

    Buyers are very

    vendor can levera

    Increased share

    purchases by the

    Cost cutting fact

    9/2

  • 7/29/2019 B2B Case 2 NAL Final

    19/33

    Cost Benefit Analysis

    Advertisement cost for the vendor can be as much as 3 croreper year.

    Wrong communication by the advertisers can lead todisaster.

    Industrial products might not be adept for promotionthrough advertising.

    Can lead to development of a new front for the war fromthe competitors.

    Alternative 4: Cost Ben

    Result in top of

    the buyers view.

    One of the most

    communicate it

    increase the awar

    9/2

  • 7/29/2019 B2B Case 2 NAL Final

    20/33

    Best alternative

    Best alternatives with which the vendor should go are:

    It should relax the credit terms.

    It should deploy an employee at the buyers site.

    9/2

  • 7/29/2019 B2B Case 2 NAL Final

    21/33

    Implementation

    An in-depth analysis should be done about the decision making unit of the buyer. Presentation should be customized according to the attributes of the DMU, to successfully conve

    sales leads.

    Who is the most important person of the entire unit?

    Their expectations from any vendor regarding the materials quality and selling terms.

    Feedback in both the cases - for satisfaction and dissatisfaction among the buyer Proper CRM mechanisms should be in place, so that the customer is not felt left out of the proce

    anywhere.

    Since the weightage of decision is 50-50% each for the technical people and comnegotiation, both should be communicated frequently.

    Thorough research about the competitors as in what extra the offer which is notoffered by NAL.

    The commercial and quality aspect of the competitors product.

    9/2

  • 7/29/2019 B2B Case 2 NAL Final

    22/33

    Implementation

    Usage of Selling Strategy and Style in the given selling situation Change selling strategy from Commercial selling to Client profit planning

    Changing selling style from Commercial/Technical to Consultative selling

    Setting of Quotas

    Activity based compensation for Regional representative

    To interact all members of DMU daily (Sole purpose of deploying a local RR)

    Maintain the database of contacts for DMU Submission of status reports related to summary of interaction on a regular basis

    9/2

  • 7/29/2019 B2B Case 2 NAL Final

    23/33

    PROBLEM SOLVINGAPPROACH FOR NOCIL 23

    9/2

  • 7/29/2019 B2B Case 2 NAL Final

    24/33

    SYMPTOMS

    Relation with NOCIL top management not up to the mark.

    Very expensive as compared to other local manufacturers(perceived as expensive)

    9/2

  • 7/29/2019 B2B Case 2 NAL Final

    25/33

    PROBABLE CAUSATIVE FACTORS- ObjectiveSetting

    RR not giving proper time to NOCIL Acting very late at the time of contract renewal only

    Not having a proactive approach

    Import from USA After sales service (BETZ RR was present all around the week)

    9/2

  • 7/29/2019 B2B Case 2 NAL Final

    26/33

    OBJECTIVE SETTING

    Setting up a synergy between the Sales and After Sales Approach

    Sales ObjectivesAfter SalesObjectives

    9/2

  • 7/29/2019 B2B Case 2 NAL Final

    27/33

    TARGET AND LIMITATIONSTARGET

    To reach 2 cr business from NOCILtaking much of the share fromlocal manufacturer

    LIMITATIONS

    A3 is based in Pune so easier for them tsupply with incurring low cost

    Current perception of customers that Nonly order taker

    Compromise with the profit

    Perception of NOCIL is that NAL is veryexpensive

    Reluctance of the top management to gfor reduction in price

    Manufacturing capacity might not be abto meet the increased demand

    Justifying NOCIL that there would not bany supply irregularity 9/2

  • 7/29/2019 B2B Case 2 NAL Final

    28/33

    COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS

    High Investments to be made initially

    High degree of risk involved due t lesseramount of suppliers(assuming A3&A4 havebeen sept out)

    High delivery time

    Lower consumption rate of c

    eventually saves on the toal

    High quality products being

    Constant supply of high qual

    Easily available in the marke

    COSTS BENEFITS

    Company %age ofTotalBusiness

    Total Cost per unitof SpecialtyChemical(Assumed)

    Total units Sold ConcentStrength

    NAL 25 100 1,00,00,000/100 = 1,00,000 1

    A&B 25 70 1,00,00,000/70 = 1,428,571 2 9/2

  • 7/29/2019 B2B Case 2 NAL Final

    29/33

    ACTIVITY ANALYSIS

    Setting up of SalesTerritory

    Proper Training forthe RR

    After sales technicalsupport should beoutsourced from a

    local trusted agency

    A team supporting theRR should be formed

    Appointing local tech.rep. which will be

    solely responsible forday to day working of

    NOCIL

    Try to get rawmaterials from India

    or from China forlow cost ofproduction

    Increase output ofthe plant

    Introduction of leanmanagementtechniques to

    improvise cost ofproduction

    Distribution networkto avoid long lead

    time in supply chain

    Convincing NOCILabout the

    differentiationfactor High quality

    and dedicatedmaintainence

    Come up wibetter prom

    technique witManagemen

    NOCIL

    9/2

  • 7/29/2019 B2B Case 2 NAL Final

    30/33

    CONFLICT MANAGEMENT

    MOTIVATIONProviding a base

    pay andincentivizing theRR for additionalperks and benefitsbased on the aftersales feedback C

    ONTRO

    LTop Managementshould visit theNOCIL centersatleast twice amonth to bridgeand solve anyformulation-

    implementationgapGUIDANC

    ERR as wlocal terepreseshould provideadvancin the U

    foreseeproblemfollow arather reactiv

    9/2

  • 7/29/2019 B2B Case 2 NAL Final

    31/33

    Implementation

    Independent Variables

    Type of Product Fabricated product

    Time pressure on Buyers - High

    Perceived risk of Buyers - High

    Size of the Firm - Large

    Buyers background Private

    Situational factors Assuming they remain constant and do not have averse effec

    Dependant Variables

    Degree of centralization Highly Decentralized

    Degree of Source Loyalty Low loyalty (High for Competitor- BETZ)

    Cost vs Quality Technical Quality very important. Buying Unit has very lower sa

    Purchase criterion Technical Qualities is the main decider

    Interaction between Buyers and Actual users - Less 9/2

  • 7/29/2019 B2B Case 2 NAL Final

    32/33

    Implementation

    Improper Sales Quota

    Setting proper sales target

    Setting the quota to 50% of total business from NOCIL.

    Setting up mechanism for Monitoring and control of Regional representatives

    Activity based compensation for Regional representative

    To interact all members of DMU daily

    Maintain the database of contacts for DMU

    Submission of status reports related to summary of interaction on a regular basis

    Improper sales territory definition Defining NOCIL as a separate territory separate from Zuari Agro Chemicals

    Deploying sales force appropriately - appointing separate sales team for eachdepartment of NOCIL

    9/2

  • 7/29/2019 B2B Case 2 NAL Final

    33/33

    Implementation

    Improper usage of Selling Strategy and Style in the given selling situation Changing definition of selling situation from Outside order taker to Creative sel

    of Tangible products

    Change selling strategy from Commercial selling to Client profit planning

    Changing selling style from Commercial/Technical to Consultative selling

    Identify Intermediate variables

    Identify Composition of DMU

    Technical GM

    AGM of utilities and Maintenance

    Buyers and Accounts department

    Identify conflicts in decision making unit

    Identify whether conflicts take place if so between who?

    Information handling habits

    Identify information needed by DMU before, during and after purchasing decision9/2