battery-upgraded transmission gridsise.rutgers.edu/sites/default/files/uploads/energy...
TRANSCRIPT
Confidential & Proprietary | Copyright © 2016
BATTERY-UPGRADED TRANSMISSION GRIDS
Dr. Hisham Othman
Sept 16, 2016
Confidential & Proprietary | Copyright © 2016
Grid Technologies
Slide 2
HVAC
USA : 283,000 Miles USA : 10,000 Miles
HVDC
SVC TCSC
Global : 90,000 MVAr Global : 2,000 MVAr
Battery Storage
USA : 600 MW
Wires .vs. Non-Wires
Passive .vs. Active
Q .vs. P
Confidential & Proprietary | Copyright © 2016
Congestion Relief (N-x)
Slide 3
Alternative B:
Battery System
Area B
Expensive
Area A
Cheap
Alternative A: Line Upgrade
Existing Lines
100 MW
100MW
1-8 Hrs
Annual cost of congestion in the US Eastern Interconnection estimated at $8 billion, or $40 per person.
Confidential & Proprietary | Copyright © 2016
Comparative Economics of Battery vs Line
Slide 4
Energy Storage can be in the Competitive Range
Confidential & Proprietary | Copyright © 2016
Transformative Technology
Slide 5
• Urban Areas
• Battery Cost RoadmapCompetitive
• Incremental Investment
• Lower RiskModular
• Enables Higher Renewable Penetration
Renewable Integration
• Local Capacity
• Grid ReliabilityValue Stacking
Confidential & Proprietary | Copyright © 2016
What Next
Slide 6
■ FERC 1000 - reliability and market efficiency
■ Optimized Siting & Sizing
■ Control & Protection Coordination
■ Regulatory Enablers
Confidential & Proprietary | Copyright © 2016
Quanta Technology, LLC
4020 Westchase Blvd., Suite 300Raleigh, NC 27607 USA
(919) 344-3000 www.quanta-technology.com
Thank You!
Dr. Hisham Othman
DNV GL © 2016 SAFER, SMARTER, GREENERDNV GL © 2016
Comparing Alternative Futures for Utilities: DSO, Transactive Energy and B
1
DNV GL Presentation, Utility of the Future and Energy
Innovation Workshop
September 16, 2016
DNV GL © 2016
Modeling Operations and Economics Across the Grid
2
Microgrid OptimizerEnd Use
ES GridTM
Distribution Valuation
PLEXOS Production Cost
KERMIT Grid Simulation
Transmission Distribution ConsumerGeneration Transmission Distribution ConsumerGeneration
Wind
Farms
Photo
Voltaic
Aggregated Utility Scale
2-50 MW
Utility Scale
100kW-2MW
Distributed Scale
25kW-100kW
ResidentialCommercial & Industrial
DistributionTransmissionGeneration
Bulk Storage
> 50 MW
Applications
– Renewables Integration
– Frequency and Reliability
– Storage and DERs
– Resource Planning
– Policy analysis
*DNV GL Proprietary Tools
– Congestion and renewable energy curtailment
– Asset valuation and market design
– Investment strategy
– Microgrids
– Voltage support
DNV GL © 2016
Architecture of Today’s Electric Power System
3
Source: PNNL
DNV GL © 2016
DER Value Streams – Where is the business model?
4
DNV GL © 2016
Mapping The DER Service Transaction Onto Possible Future Utility Architectures
5
Fully CentralizedFully Decentralized
DNV GL © 2016
The DSO Model – Centralized “Mini-ISO” for Dispatch of DER Services
6
Source: PNNL
DNV GL © 2016
A “Transactive Energy” Model (TEMIX) – Decentralized Dispatch; Centralized Transaction Clearing
7
DNV GL © 2016
A Transactive Energy Device Interface
8
DNV GL © 2016
The Bitcoin Model – Decentralized “Agent-based” Dispatch; Decentralized Transaction
9
DNV GL © 2016
The “Bitcoin Utility” using Blockchain Nodes
10
Dispatch
Signals
Dispatch
Signals
Dispatch
Signals
Dispatch of
supply and
demand based on
negotiated price.
Emergency management
based on reliability
contracts. Provider of last
resort is assigned via
contract negotiated through
regulatory process
DNV GL © 2016
SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER
www.dnvgl.com
Thank You!
11
J. David Erickson – Head of Section: DER
Mobile: 707-303-0990
Modular Transportable Energy Storage
Shihab Kuran, Ph.D.
1
Introduction to Power Edison
2
Approach
Team Work Experience Previous Team Project Deployments
Product
+
3
Transportable Energy Storage Systems Solves Key Industry Roadblocks
Source: Rocky Mountain Institute
Mostvaluableservices
RegulatoryBarriers
The Key for Economic Energy Storage Deployment
Thinking Storage? Think Transportable
4
Permanent Energy Storage
Participates in limited number of services Can participate in virtually any service across the grid
Limited revenue accrued during life Potential to collect maximum revenue
Need extensive permits for construction, site preparation etc.
Minimal permits needed as system is mobile
Months needed to build and connect to grid Can be interconnected within minutes of arriving at site
Power/Energy system ratings cannot be modified easily System’s modularity and electrical connection flexibility allows system to be connected with any system rating
Cannot be relocated for reliability purposes during emergencies (ex. natural disasters)
Can be easily disconnected, transported and redeployed in minimal time during emergencies
Modular Transportable Energy Storage
5
Thank You For Your Attention!
Any Questions?
1
DISTRIBUTED GRID OFFERINGS
Opportunities/Challenges
• Need to accommodate increasing levels of DER
• Determining optimal technology investments for grid modernization deployment
• Developing a compelling business case for technology investments
• Assessing impact of DER on distribution system loading
• Identifying right mix of technologies for non-wires alternative (NWA) solutions
• Quantifying DER value
Solutions
• Benchmark efforts to industry best practices
• Develop robust & defensible business cases for investments
• Determine locational value of DER
• NWA Analyses
• Targeted Marketing, Customer Analytics & Enhanced Energy Interactive
2
CHP Technologies and Market Analysis
CHP Installation Database (U.S.)•Market status/trends•CHP technology characterizations
(cost and performance)
CHP Market Modeling•Technical/economic potential•Expected market penetration• Impact of varying policy scenarios
https://doe.icfwebservices.com/chpdb/
CHP Potential in SoCal
3
System Benefit Charge (SBC) funded CHPPrograms
Benefits
• Greater fuel efficiency
• Reduced GHG emission
• Avoiding losses from transmission and distribution
• Increased reliability of critical care facilities (hospitals, data centers, and waste water treatment facilities)
• Support for grid stability in areas that require local generation
• Economic benefits for manufacturing and industry
General Program Structures
• Electric customer
• Various sizes and technologies
• Savings goals (kW, kWh, and thermal)
• Incentives ($400/kW to $2,000/kW)
• System efficiency (60-65%)
• Cost effectiveness (TRC, Simple payback)
• Monitoring/Evaluation (12+ data, evaluation)
4
CHP Lessons Learned
Lessons learned
• Projects take longer than anticipated to get online…always.
• Incentives do drive participation and project size
• Need a project “champion”
• Don’t underestimate complexity of the internal customer approval process – need top management’s full support to move forward
• CHP is a complex/complicated process for customers.