beating cancer sooner: rising to the challenge
TRANSCRIPT
BEATING CANCER SOONER: RISING TO THE CHALLENGE
Harpal KumarChief Executive Officer
Cancer Research UK
CANCER SURVIVAL AND MORTALITY IS IMPROVING IN WALES
MORTALITY
60.7%65.9%
69.4%72.7%
43.9%49.7%
53.8%57.1%
1 2 3 4
One year survival
1995-1999 2000-2004 2005-2009 2010-2014
Five year survival
Year of diagnosis
SURVIVAL
EASR per 100,000 population
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Powys THB
Hywel Dda UHB
Wales
Abertawe Bro Morgannwg UHB
Cardiff & Vale UHB
Betsi Cadwaladr UHB
Aneurin Bevan UHB
Cwm Taf UHB
5 related modules
Module 1: Epidemiological benchmarking study
Module 2: Public awareness, attitudes and beliefs
Module 3: The role of primary care and healthcare systems
Module 4: Variation in patient, diagnostic and treatment time intervals and routes to diagnosis
Module 5: Data comparability and early deaths (with an initial focus on co-morbidity for lung cancer)
Phase 219 jurisdictions, 5 countries+ Ireland+ New Zealand+ Canadian provinces+ Australian states
- Sweden- Denmark
8 cancer sites+ Oesophagus+ Stomach + Liver+ Pancreatic
- Breast
THE INTERNATIONAL CANCER BENCHMARKING PARTNERSHIP
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Australian registriesSwedish Regions
Canadian RegistriesNorway
DenmarkNorthern Ireland
UK (excluding Scotland)England
Wales
0% 5% 10% 15% 20%
Swedish RegionsCanadian RegistriesAustralian registries
NorwayDenmark
Northern IrelandUK (excluding Scotland)
EnglandWales
76% 78% 80% 82% 84% 86% 88% 90%
Swedish Regions
Australian registries
Norway
Canadian Registries
Denmark
Northern Ireland
England
UK (excluding Scotland)
Wales
32% 34% 36% 38% 40% 42% 44%
Canadian Registries
Norway
Australian registries
Denmark
England
UK (excluding Scotland)
Northern Ireland
Wales
ICBP MODULE 1: SURVIVAL BENCHMARK (2011)
THERE ARE DIFFERENCES IN TIME INTERVALS ALONG THE PATHWAY
Intervals for colorectal cancer (median, days) [Unpublished]
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Wales
England
Scotland
N Ireland
Denmark
Manitoba
Norway
Sweden
Ontario
Victoria
Patient Diagnostic Treatment
UPTAKE OF BOWEL CANCER SCREENING IS POOR
44.0%
46.0%
48.0%
50.0%
52.0%
54.0%
56.0%
58.0%
Abertawe BroMorgannwgUniversity
Aneurin BevanUniversity
BetsiCadwaladrUniversity
Cardiff & ValeUniversity
Cwm TafUniversity
Hywel DdaUniversity
PowysTeaching
WALES TOTAL
2014 2015 2016
FIT IMPLEMENTATION IS EXPECTED TO IMPROVE UPTAKE
• Expected to be introduced early 2019 – after Scotland and England
• A simpler test = increased uptake?
• Impact on endoscopy services
• A missed opportunity if the sensitivity threshold is
set too high
FOCUS ON DIAGNOSTIC CAPACITY
• Diagnostic spend
• Diagnostic workforce
• Infrastructure
• Raising the profile of diagnostic services
• Modelling future demand and requesting additional resource on the basis of need.
MULTIDISCIPLINARY DIAGNOSTIC CENTRES TO IMPROVE VAGUE SYMPTOMS PATHWAYS
Neath Port Talbot
Royal Glamorgan
NATIONAL CANCER DIAGNOSIS AUDIT (NCDA)
• The NCDA seeks to gather data about:• Interval length and number of consultations in primary care
• Use of investigations prior to referral
• Referral pathways for patients with cancer
• Benefits for practices and health boards
• Plans to re-run the audit across Wales
THE CHALLENGE AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR WALES
• Cancer must remain a priority in Wales• Services
• Research
• Opportunities – size, structures
• Can Wales’ survival catch up to international comparators?