binary power cycles universitat rovira i virgili doctorate program in chemical and process...
TRANSCRIPT
Binary Power CyclesBinary Power Cycles
Universitat Rovira i VirgiliDoctorate Program in Chemical and Process Engineering
Department of Chemical and Mechanical Engineering
New Working Fluids For The Binary Power CyclesTuesday 3 of February 2005, Tarragona Spain.
Driss BAHJA2005 URV
New Working Fluids For The Binary Power CyclesTuesday 3 of February 2005, Tarragona Spain.
Driss BAHJA2005 URV
Binary Power CyclesBinary Power Cycles
Contents:
Organic Rankine Cycles
Ammonia Power Cycles
New Working Fluid
Conclusion
Binary Power CyclesBinary Power Cycles
The goal of our investigation is to improve the thermal efficiency of the power cycles by minimizing the entropy generated.
For this purpose we have investigated the using of the NH3-H2O as binary working fluid and other fluids for the Organic Rankine Cycle.
The irreversibilities depends on the types of the working fluids and heat sources. A cycle with lower irreversibility results in a better performance.
Binary Power CyclesBinary Power Cycles
Organic Rankine CycleOrganic Rankine Cycle
Binary Power CyclesBinary Power Cycles
Binary Power CyclesBinary Power Cycles
Fluid MW Pc Tc Epsilon TypeIsobutane 58,12 36,4 407,8 -0,435 IsentropicIsopentane 72,15 33,7 460,4 1,073 Dry fluidn-Butane 58,12 37,96 425,1 -0,2702 Isentropicn-Hexane 86,17 30,58 507,9 1,969 Dry fluidn-Pentane 72,15 33,64 469,7 1,178 Dry fluidWater 18,02 220,6 647,1 -13,3 WetR11 137,4 44,08 471,2 -0,4506 IsentropicR12 120,9 41,14 385,2 -0,9609 DryR114 170,9 32,89 418,9 0,3804 IsentropicR123 152,9 36,68 456,8 0,1883 IsentropicR141b 117 42,49 477,4 -0,1952 IsentropicR152a 66,05 45,2 386,4 -2,492 Wet
Fluid MW Pc Tc Epsilon TypeIsobutane 58,12 36,4 407,8 -0,435 IsentropicIsopentane 72,15 33,7 460,4 1,073 Dry fluidn-Butane 58,12 37,96 425,1 -0,2702 Isentropicn-Hexane 86,17 30,58 507,9 1,969 Dry fluidn-Pentane 72,15 33,64 469,7 1,178 Dry fluidWater 18,02 220,6 647,1 -13,3 WetR11 137,4 44,08 471,2 -0,4506 IsentropicR12 120,9 41,14 385,2 -0,9609 DryR114 170,9 32,89 418,9 0,3804 IsentropicR123 152,9 36,68 456,8 0,1883 IsentropicR141b 117 42,49 477,4 -0,1952 IsentropicR152a 66,05 45,2 386,4 -2,492 Wet
Dry and Isentropic Working fluids are the more appropriate for the ORC
Binary Power CyclesBinary Power Cycles
The selection of suitable organic fluids for use in (ORC) still deserves intensive thermodynamic and physical study of the working fluids.
The thermodynamic characteristics give rise to thermodynamic limitations to the amount of energy that can be extracted from the heat source.
Binary Power CyclesBinary Power Cycles
Maximum and minimum pressure for ORC Pc Tc Pmax 120 ºC Pmin Bar 25ºCIsobutane 36,4 134,7 < 25 Bar 3,504Isopentane 33,7 187,2 < 10 Bar 0,9169n-Butane 37,96 152 < 20 Bar 2,437n-Hexane 30,58 234,7 < 5 Bar 0,2026n-Pentane 33,64 196,5 < 7 Bar 0,6892Water 220,6 374 < 3 Bar 0,03169R11 44,08 198 < 12 Bar 1,056R12 41,14 112 < 40 Bar 6,511R114 32,89 145,7 <20 Bar 2,132R123 36,68 183,7 < 12 0,9148R141b 42,49 204,2 < 10 Bar 0,7847R152a 45,2 113,3 < 40 Bar 5,972
Maximum and minimum pressure for ORC Pc Tc Pmax 120 ºC Pmin Bar 25ºCIsobutane 36,4 134,7 < 25 Bar 3,504Isopentane 33,7 187,2 < 10 Bar 0,9169n-Butane 37,96 152 < 20 Bar 2,437n-Hexane 30,58 234,7 < 5 Bar 0,2026n-Pentane 33,64 196,5 < 7 Bar 0,6892Water 220,6 374 < 3 Bar 0,03169R11 44,08 198 < 12 Bar 1,056R12 41,14 112 < 40 Bar 6,511R114 32,89 145,7 <20 Bar 2,132R123 36,68 183,7 < 12 0,9148R141b 42,49 204,2 < 10 Bar 0,7847R152a 45,2 113,3 < 40 Bar 5,972
Binary Power CyclesBinary Power Cycles
Thermodynamic Performance
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0 20 40 60
Pressure Bar
Cy
cle
Eff
icie
nc
y
R11
R12
R114
n-pentane
n-butane
Thermodynamic Performance
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0 20 40 60
Pressure Bar
Cy
cle
Eff
icie
nc
y
R11
R12
R114
n-pentane
n-butane
Working fluids performanceWorking fluids performance
Binary Power CyclesBinary Power Cycles
Optimization of the ORC n-pentane R11
η 0,1192 0,1496Q_Boiler 67768 65802 KWW_net 8080 9845 KWT_max 250 250 ºCT_min 38 38 ºCP_max 9,905 13,4 BarP_min 1,088 1,628 Bar
Optimization of the ORC n-pentane R11
η 0,1192 0,1496Q_Boiler 67768 65802 KWW_net 8080 9845 KWT_max 250 250 ºCT_min 38 38 ºCP_max 9,905 13,4 BarP_min 1,088 1,628 Bar
Binary Power CyclesBinary Power Cycles
Fluid Formula ODP GWPR11 CCl3F 1 1R12 CCl2F2 1 3,05R114 CClF2CClF2 0,74 4,15R123 CHCl2CF3 0,02 0,02R141b CH3CCl2F 0,11 0,17R152a CH3CHF2 0 0,03
Fluid Formula ODP GWPR11 CCl3F 1 1R12 CCl2F2 1 3,05R114 CClF2CClF2 0,74 4,15R123 CHCl2CF3 0,02 0,02R141b CH3CCl2F 0,11 0,17R152a CH3CHF2 0 0,03
Binary Power CyclesBinary Power Cycles
ORC Thermal effeciency
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0 10 20 30
Pressure Bar
Th
erm
al E
ffic
ien
cy
n-Butane
n-pentane
ORC Thermal effeciency
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0 10 20 30
Pressure Bar
Th
erm
al E
ffic
ien
cy
n-Butane
n-pentane
n-pentane n-butane thermal efficiencyn-pentane n-butane thermal efficiency
Binary Power CyclesBinary Power Cycles
ORC Net Work
0
5000
10000
15000
0 10 20 30
Pressure Bar
Net
Wo
rk K
W
n-Butane
n-Pentane
ORC Net Work
0
5000
10000
15000
0 10 20 30
Pressure Bar
Net
Wo
rk K
W
n-Butane
n-Pentane
n-pentane n-butane Net Workn-pentane n-butane Net Work
Binary Power CyclesBinary Power Cycles
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0 0,5 1
EES Vapeur
EES Liquide
Aspen Vapeur
Apen liquid
REFPROPVapeur
REFPROP0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0 0,5 1
EES Vapeur
EES Liquide
Aspen Vapeur
Apen liquid
REFPROPVapeur
REFPROP
Comparison of different correlation of NH3-H2OComparison of different correlation of NH3-H2O
Binary Power CyclesBinary Power Cycles
Variation of the enthalpy Ibrahim KleinVariation of the enthalpy Ibrahim Klein
Binary Power CyclesBinary Power Cycles
0100200300400500600700800900
0 5000 10000
HRGV
Water
NH3-H2O
0100200300400500600700800900
0 5000 10000
HRGV
Water
NH3-H2O
Comparison of Water NH3-H2O HRGVComparison of Water NH3-H2O HRGV
NH3-H2O has better performance the temperature difference between the heat source and the working fluid is small.
Binary Power CyclesBinary Power Cycles
NH3-H2O Rankine
00,020,040,06
0,080,1
0,12
0 50 100
Pressure Bar
Th
erm
al e
ffic
ien
cy
NH3-H2ORankine
NH3-H2O Rankine
00,020,040,06
0,080,1
0,12
0 50 100
Pressure Bar
Th
erm
al e
ffic
ien
cy
NH3-H2ORankine
Rankine using NH3-H2O thermal Rankine using NH3-H2O thermal efficiency variationefficiency variation
Binary Power CyclesBinary Power Cycles
NH3-H2O Rankine
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
0 50 100
Pressure Bar
Net
Wo
rk
NH3-H2ORankine
NH3-H2O Rankine
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
0 50 100
Pressure Bar
Net
Wo
rk
NH3-H2ORankine
Rankine using NH3-H2O Net workRankine using NH3-H2O Net work
Binary Power CyclesBinary Power Cycles
KSC34 Kalina CycleKSC34 Kalina Cycle
Binary Power CyclesBinary Power Cycles
KCS 34
0
0,02
0,04
0,06
0,08
0,1
0,4 0,6 0,8 1
Basic fluid
Th
erm
al e
ffec
ien
cy
KCS 34
KCS 34
0
0,02
0,04
0,06
0,08
0,1
0,4 0,6 0,8 1
Basic fluid
Th
erm
al e
ffec
ien
cy
KCS 34
KCS 34 Thermal efficiency KCS 34 Thermal efficiency variation variation
Binary Power CyclesBinary Power Cycles
KCS34
050
100150200250300350
0,4 0,6 0,8 1
Thermal effeciency
Net
Wo
rk
KCS34
KCS34
050
100150200250300350
0,4 0,6 0,8 1
Thermal effeciency
Net
Wo
rk
KCS34
Variation of thermal efficiency with Variation of thermal efficiency with the Net Work the Net Work
Binary Power CyclesBinary Power Cycles
KCS11 Kalina CycleKCS11 Kalina Cycle
Binary Power CyclesBinary Power Cycles
KCS11
0,11
0,115
0,12
0,125
0,13
0,135
20 30 40 50 60
Pressure
Th
erm
al e
ffec
ien
cy
KCS11
KCS11
0,11
0,115
0,12
0,125
0,13
0,135
20 30 40 50 60
Pressure
Th
erm
al e
ffec
ien
cy
KCS11
KCS11 thermal efficiency variation wKCS11 thermal efficiency variation w
Binary Power CyclesBinary Power Cycles
KCS11
0
100
200
300
400
500
20 30 40 50 60
Pressure Bar
Net
Wo
rk K
wKCS11
0
100
200
300
400
500
20 30 40 50 60
Pressure Bar
Net
Wo
rk K
w
KCS11 Net Work VariationKCS11 Net Work Variation
Binary Power CyclesBinary Power Cycles
Kalina Cycle as bottoming cycleKalina Cycle as bottoming cycle
Binary Power CyclesBinary Power Cycles
Comparison between Rankine and Kalina Cycle as bottoming cycle
Maximum power Rankine at 40,98 BarMaximum power Rankine at 40,98 Bar
Binary Power CyclesBinary Power Cycles
Comparison of thermal efficiencies:η = 0,3043 Rankine
η = 0,338 Kalina
Binary Power CyclesBinary Power Cycles
New Working Fluid For the NH3-H2O Power cycle
We will review the VLE data with the objective to identify the new working fluid with wide boiling temperature range.
Working fluid will be eliminated if they will be toxic or flammable.
We will use the classical equation of states to calculate the thermodynamic properties.
Binary Power CyclesBinary Power Cycles
Binary Power CyclesBinary Power Cycles
Binary Power CyclesBinary Power Cycles
Conclusion:
Our simulation of the ORC and the Kalina cycles have permit us to compare between the two power cycles.
The Ammonia-water has the advantage to boil at variable temperature which permit the fluid to match the heat source better than the steam for high pressure and temperature.
n-Butane have the better performance as working fluid in the ORC.
Binary Power CyclesBinary Power Cycles
Successful development of an alternative to the ammonia-water Kalina cycle will provide new possibilities for improving the cycle efficiency.
Identification of a binary mixture, with a wide boiling range that can be adjusted to various temperature heat sources may allow its use not only as working fluid in the primary cycle, but also in bottoming cycles.