bmj paediatrics open is committed to open peer review. as ...€¦ · bronchiolitis and try to...
TRANSCRIPT
BMJ Paediatrics Open is committed to open peer review. As part of this commitment we make the peer review history of every article we publish publicly available. When an article is published we post the peer reviewers’ comments and the authors’ responses online. We also post the versions of the paper that were used during peer review. These are the versions that the peer review comments apply to. The versions of the paper that follow are the versions that were submitted during the peer review process. They are not the versions of record or the final published versions. They should not be cited or distributed as the published version of this manuscript. BMJ Paediatrics Open is an open access journal and the full, final, typeset and author-corrected version of record of the manuscript is available on our site with no access controls, subscription charges or pay-per-view fees (http://bmjpaedsopen.bmj.com). If you have any questions on BMJ Paediatrics Open’s open peer review process please email
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
Breastfeeding disruption during hospitalization for
bronchiolitis in children, pilot study
Journal: BMJ Paediatrics Open
Manuscript ID bmjpo-2017-000158
Article Type: Original article
Date Submitted by the Author: 13-Jun-2017
Complete List of Authors: heilbronner, claire; Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris, Roy, Emeline; Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris Hadchouel, Alice; Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris Jebali, Sabrine; Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris Smii, Siwar; Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris Masson, Alexandra; Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris
Renolleau, Sylvain ; Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris Rigourd, Virginie; Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris
Keywords: General Paediatrics, Nursing Care, Nutrition, Respiratory
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open on July 14, 2020 by guest. P
rotected by copyright.http://bm
jpaedsopen.bmj.com
/bm
jpo: first published as 10.1136/bmjpo-2017-000158 on 28 S
eptember 2017. D
ownloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
1
Breastfeeding disruption during hospitalization for bronchiolitis in children, pilot study
Claire Heilbronner 1, Emeline Roy
2, Alice Hadchouel
3, Sabrine Jebali
4, Siwar Smii
4,
Alexandra Masson1, Sylvain Renolleau
1, Virginie Rigourd
4
Affiliations: 1 Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, AP-HP, Necker Hospital for Sick Children, Paris, France 2 Pediatric Department, AP-HP, Necker Hospital for Sick Children, Paris, France 3 Pediatric Pulmonology Department, AP-HP, Necker Hospital for Sick Children, Paris, France 4 Region Ile de France Human milk bank, AP-HP, Necker Hospital for Sick Children, Paris, France
Address correspondence to:
Dr Claire Heilbronner Pediatric Intensive Care Unit AP-HP, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, 149 rue de Sèvres, Paris, 75015 France e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +33.1.71.19.64.61; Fax: Tel: +33.1.44.49.42.17
Abbreviations: PICU: Pediatric intensive Care Unit
Word count: 2481 Key words: Bronchiolitis, breastfeeding, unwanted weaning
Page 1 of 14
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
2
ABSTRACT
Background
Being hospitalized for an acute bronchiolitis might be a situation at risk of unwanted weaning
off breastfeeding for several reasons (respiratory distress, use of enteral or parenteral feeding,
mothers’ tiredness, etc..) yet it has never been really evaluated and quantified.
Methods
We conducted a pilot study to evaluate breastfeeding disruption during hospitalization for
bronchiolitis and try to identify its determining factors.
This is a prospective study during one epidemic season of bronchiolitis in a tertiary care
hospital. All patients aged 6 months or younger hospitalized with acute bronchiolitis and
receiving at least partial breastfeeding were eligible for the study. Patients discharged at home
whose parents accepted to be contacted by phone were included.
Results
Eighty four patients were included in the study. Length of hospital stay was 3 days (1; 34) and
27 patients (32%) spent some time in PICU.
Forty three mothers (51%) stated that their breastfeeding had been modified by the
hospitalization (17 stopped, 12 switched to partial breastfeeding and 14 reduced without
stopping). Mothers stated that the causes of breastfeeding disturbance were lack of support
and advices (63%), followed by severity of child’s respiratory disease (32%), logistic hospital
difficulties (30%) and personal organization issues (9.3%). Lengh of stay, need for ventilatory
support or nutritional support was not statistically different between groups.
Conclusion
Bronchiolitis is a high risk event for breastfeeding disruption.
Correct advices and support could be a determining factor and further studies should focus on
preventive interventions
Page 2 of 14
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
3
What is already known on this topic Breastfeeding might be perturbed during hospitalization for bronchiolitis. This issue has not been quantified and no data can support any intervention. What this study adds There is a high rate of breastfeeding disruption during hospitalization for bronchiolitis. Respiratory severity of the bronchiolitis is not determining, supporting mother is. This study gives clues for some possible therapeutic interventions in the future.
INTRODUCTION
Breastfeeding is a well-documented protective factor against respiratory diseases in
children.[1–3]. Exclusive breastfeeding should therefore be promoted and international
guidelines recommend to maintain it at least until the age of 6 months [4, 5].
Breastfeeding though is not always easy [6] . A recent survey estimated that 75% of infants
were breastfed in maternity wards in France (including partial breastfeeding) but only 40% of
children were still partially breastfed after 3 months [7, 8].
Children’s health might influence breastfeeding continuation (quality of suctioning, short
breathing in respiratory or cardiologic diseases, mother/ child separation, mother’s fatigue,
formula introduction).Given the fact that most children are healthy, it is likely that the impact
of childs’ disease on breastfeeding might not be perceivable in big cohorts who focus more on
social or economic factors.
In France, each year, about 500000 toddlers are affected with acute bronchiolitis [9]. Among
children consulting at the emergency room, about 50% of children under 6 months (and 62%
under 3 months) require hospitalization [10] and 10 to 15% spend some time in PICU for
respiratory support [11].
Being hospitalized for an acute bronchiolitis might be a situation at risk of unwanted weaning
off breastfeeding for several reasons:
-dyspnea, suctioning difficulties or even swallowing difficulties can occur
Page 3 of 14
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
4
-enteral or parenteral feeding can be necessary, sometimes with formula milk
-mothers might not always be able to stay with their child continuously in hospital (either
because of hospital accommodation or because of family situation, working issues…)
-mothers might get stressed and tired, sleep badly, eat or drink less than usual or irregularly
-breast milk expression might not always be easy in hospital by lack of material or caregiving
attention
-caregivers might have different attitudes and contradictory advices towards breastfeeding
Only Lapillone and al. mention breastfeeding disturbance among the potential impacts of an
hospitalization for bronchiolitis [12, 13]. No study has been published to specifically measure
breastfeeding disruption during hospitalization for bronchiolitis although the high number of
patients concerned makes it a potentially important health issue.
With no study available, no intervention can be proposed in national or international
guidelines on bronchiolitis.
We conducted a pilot study to try to measure the risk of breastfeeding being impaired during a
hospitalization for bronchiolitis in children previously breastfed and to try to identify
children, mother or hospital factors that might participate in poor breastfeeding outcome.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The Bronchilact study is a single centre prospective observational study conducted from
October 1st 2015 to February 15th 2016 at Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital in Paris (tertiary
care) in all wards attending to patients with acute bronchiolitis (pediatric ward, pediatric
pulmonology ward and PICU (pediatric intensive care unit)).
Bronchiolitis was defined on the basis of history and physical examination as rhinorrhoea,
cough, tachypnea, wheezing, increased respiratory effort expressed by grunting, nasal flaring,
and intercostal and/or subcostal retractions [14]. Apneic bronchiolitis in neonates were also
Page 4 of 14
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
5
included. Hospital admission was decided by emergency ward’s attending physicians. PICU
admission was decided according to intensivist’s assessment.
Were eligible for the study
-all infants under 6month on admission
-with acute bronchiolitis and no other serious condition
-breastfed (at least partially) on admission
-discharged at home
We included all patients whose parents spoke French and accepted to be contacted by phone
to answer a standardized survey.
We did not include parents that could not be reached on their phone. Patients could not be
included twice in the event of recurrent bronchiolitis during the study period.
The primary outcome was unwanted weaning from breastfeeding, either total or partial
attributed to hospitalization for bronchiolitis.
The secondary aim of the study was to identify patients or conditions of hospital stay at risk
of breastfeeding’s disruption.
Standard care was given accordingly to both French and US latest guidelines [9, 14] .
Data collection included : growth evaluation (birth weight, growth, weight on admission and
at discharge), social background, tobacco exposure, length of stay (LOS), ICU requirements,
length of oxygen or ventilatory support requirement, enteral or parenteral nutritional support,
room accommodation during hospitalization, breastfeeding help and material (breast pump,
freezer) available during hospital stay, total or partial weaning from breastfeeding at discharge
or in the fortnight following discharge, mother’s opinion on the cause of the weaning,
mother’s opinion and satisfaction about breastfeeding support during hospitalization,
patient/nurse ratio, breastfeeding experts among caregivers.
Statistical analysis:
Page 5 of 14
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
6
Data are expressed as median values (with minimum and maximum value) for continuous
variables, and number and/or frequency (%) for binary or categorical data.
For qualitative variables we used Student test
For comparison of non-parametric means, Wilcoxon’s test was used if necessary for
quantitative criteria while χ2 and Fisher’s exact test was used to compare qualitative criteria.
P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Analyses were performed with Biostat TGV software ®.
The study was approved by the ethical board (CER_SFP 2015_009_2). Legal guardians
received written information about the study either given hand to hand during their hospital
stay or sent by mail if they could not be seen during hospital stay.
RESULTS
During the study period 332 patients under 6 months were hospitalized at our hospital for 345
episodes of bronchiolitis. Among these, only 144 patients were breastfed, totally (N=107,
74%) or partially (N=37, 26%). Four were not included because they did not speak any
French and 56 did not answer their phone despite several calls at different times of the day, 84
patients (58% of breastfed patients) could to be included in the study. The median delay for
phone contact was 3 months (0.5; 6).
Among eligible patients, no significant difference could be observed concerning LOS, need
for PICU, respiratory support, nutritional support between included (n=84) and non-included
patients (n=60).
Bronchiolitis description (n=84)
Median LOS for all breastfed patients was 3 days (1; 34), 27 patients (32%) patients spent
some time in PICU (median length in PICU: 3 days (1; 26). One patient (1%) needed invasive
ventilation for 10 days, 18 (21%) received either NIV or high flow oxygen for 3 days (1; 9),
Page 6 of 14
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
7
34 patients (40%) received standard oxygen for 3 days (1; 7), and 34 patients (40%) received
no respiratory support during hospitalization. No patient died of bronchiolitis during the study
period. Regarding feeding difficulties, 45 (53%) patients received nutritional support, either
by enteral feeding (n=38, 45%) or parenteral nutrition (n=5, 6%) or both (n=2, 2%).
Socioeconomic background (n=84)
Most breastfeeding mothers (96%) did not smoke and lived as a couple (98%). Concerning
occupation, 2% of mothers were working at the time of hospitalization, 52% were on
maternity break, 18% were on a parental education break and 28% were housewives.
Breastfeeding during hospitalization (n=84)
Sixty five patients (77%) were exclusively breastfed before, the others received both breast
milk and formula milk. Forty-three mothers (51%) stated that their breastfeeding had been
modified by the hospitalization of their child, either moderately (N=19, 23%) or totally (N=
17, 20.5%).
Among those 43 mothers
-17 (group 1) stopped breastfeeding
-12 (group 2) switched from total breastfeeding to partial breastfeeding
-14 (group 3) reduced breastfeeding without stopping or switching.
Remaining mothers (41/84, 49%) stated to have kept breastfeeding as before or that their
breastfeeding modification was not because of the hospitalization but was a personal choice
or a planned weaning (group 4).
Daily growth rate before hospitalization and type of breastfeeding before hospitalisation (as
described in table 1) did not significantly differ between groups 1+2+3 and 4.
No statistically significant difference either was observed between patients of groups 1+2+3
and group 4 regarding medical severity of the bronchiolitis evaluated by LOS, oxygen
Page 7 of 14
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
8
requirement or need for respiratory support, enteral or parenteral feeding during
hospitalization, growth evaluation on admission, PICU admission (table 1).
When asked about the causes of their breastfeeding difficulties, mothers of group 1, 2 or 3
answered
-63%: lack of support and advices
-32%: severity of child’s respiratory disease
-30%: logistics issues (difficulties to draw breast milk, availability of breast pumps, room
accommodation and bedding for mothers, introduction of formula milk or baby bottle)
-9.3%: personal and family organisation issues due to hospitalization (sitting the siblings, long
journey home).
All children were in single rooms and all mothers could sleep in the same room as their child.
Patient/nurse ratio was 3/1 in ICU and 6 or 7/1 in paediatric ward and pulmonology ward.
Each ward had several breastfeeding experts among doctors or nurses.
Data about prior experience with breastfeeding was available for 63 breastfeeding mothers.
Mothers in the study had a median number of children of 2 (1; 5) and had an experience of
cumulated breastfeeding for their children of 8 month (0.9; 36). No difference was observed
between groups 1+2+3 and 4 regarding cumulated length of previous breastfeeding for the
elder children.
DISCUSSION
We observed in our study a high rate of breastfeeding on admission compared to
epidemiologic surveys [7, 8] but also a very high rate of breastfeeding disturbance during
hospitalization for bronchiolitis as previously suggested in a large multicentre study [12, 13].
The hospitalization of infants for bronchiolitis in our survey generated undesired weaning
from breastfeeding, a transition to mixed breastfeeding or even partial changes that may affect
Page 8 of 14
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
9
the nutritional balance suitable for infants and alter their protection against further respiratory
events [3, 21] .
Our study is subject to possible biases, the most important is that it is single centred
Several local particularities could have influenced the results in our hospital:
-It is possible that a high number of nurses could help to better support breastfeeding mothers
since it is a time-consuming activity, probably even more in an epidemic period with high
workload. The nurse to patient ratio seemed correct in our wards but we could not find much
data about optimal ratio in the literature.
-It is possible that breastfeeding knowledge or involvement is not optimal among our
caregivers despite the fact that all the nurses in our hospital are specifically trained for
paediatrics. Hence the results in our study gives a baseline information about what happens
for breastfeeding during bronchiolitis with no or minimal support from caregivers.
-Room accommodation could be considered non optimal in our hospital but we believe that it
would be similar or possibly even worse in some other settings since our hospital is a
referring and teaching hospital with most paediatric wards hosted in a new building
inaugurated in 2013, and with all patients being bedded in single rooms with possible sleeping
accommodation for parents.
Another possible bias is the long time period between hospitalization and survey that could
have altered the quality of answers from the mothers, but Lapillonne et al. in their study
concluded that interrogation as far as 6 months after hospitalization can be considered as
relevant to evaluate burden of hospitalization [12]. Moreover, this delay has helped not to
include transitory modifications after hospitalization and to only collect data on persistent
alterations of breastfeeding.
Page 9 of 14
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
10
The last potential bias is that a significant amount of patients could not be reached on the
phone. If we consider that all eligible mothers that we could not include in this survey
continued their breastfeeding with no disturbance (which is unlikely), we still have 30%
(43/144) of mothers whose breastfeeding was either stopped or altered.
Despite these considerations, Bronchilact is the first study to really highlight the effect of
hospitalization for acute bronchiolitis for children under 6 months on breastfeeding, and to
question the various factors involved.
Exclusive breastfeeding was not a protective factor in our study and we even observed a non
significant tendency to the opposite (and a tendency for children with altered breastfeeding to
be younger). It is possible that very young infants about 10-15 days old are more frequently
exclusively breastfed but are also those whose breastfeeding is the more fragile and we should
probably be more supportive for the mothers of those very young infants.
We expected to find severity of respiratory disease as the first risk factor (on medical charts or
mother’s survey) for breastfeeding discontinuation but only 32% of mothers pointed out the
severity of disease as one of the causes for unwanted weaning. It is possible that the delay
between discharge and phone call could have altered mothers perception of respiratory
diseases’ severity but objective evaluation of respiratory distress on medical charts (LOS,
PICU requirements, respiratory and nutritional support) was also not significantly different
between groups.
It is possible that most severe patients with long PICU stay and invasive ventilation should be
more impacted but our population was not powerfull enough to evaluate this since intubation
rate for bronchiolitis has dramatically fallen in the last few years with NIV development. It is
important to notice that breastfeeding disturbance observed in our patients occurred despite a
short LOS (median 3 days) and despite a good outcome of this acute but rather benign
Page 10 of 14
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
11
respiratory disease. It is possible that caregivers underestimate the possible impact of such a
short stay on breastfeeding, and that they might think that breastfeeding will necessarily go
back to normal after discharge but our study highlights a different outcome.
Lack of support from caregivers was the first factor pointed out by mothers after discharge. It
is possible that this lack of support might be less important in other hospitals, especially in
countries where breastfeeding is better supported. Yet, although relying mostly on mothers
recall and perception, this information is still very important as it is a modifiable factor for
further practice. If other studies confirm the results of our survey, it could lead to
recommendations of therapeutic interventions to prevent unwanted weaning during
bronchiolitis, especially in younger infants for witch breastfeeding is still precarious.
Our data encourages us to endorse preventive measures in all wards hosting patients with
bronchiolitis (even if children stay in hospital for a very short length of time) especially to
support mothers during hospitalization.
We only studied bronchiolitis in hospital but it is possible that children who do not require
hospitalization might also have altered breastfeeding; this should be evaluated in another
prospective study involving outpatient’s caregivers.
CONCLUSION
Breastfeeding is a key part of the 1000 days period for proper development of the child. It will
also participate in the prevention of relapse of other respiratory infections and re
hospitalization
With no intervention, bronchiolitis in a breastfed infant is a high risk event with about half of
mothers of hospitalized children either stopping or diminishing their breastfeeding during
hospitalization.
Page 11 of 14
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
12
These results should encourage caregivers to evaluate breastfeeding’s alterations in their own
patients and to take in consideration that these alterations may not be transitory.
Correct advice and support at this critical time could be a determining factor of
breastfeeding’s continuation and further studies should focus on interventions to prevent
unwanted weaning.
S.Jebali and S. Smii both received a grand from the Regional Agency for Health (ARS IDF)
but have no other conflict of interest to disclose
The other authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to
disclose.
No external funding was received for this study
REFERENCES
1. Kaur A, Singh K, Pannu MS, Singh P, Sehgal N, Kaur R. The Effect of Exclusive
Breastfeeding on Hospital Stay and Morbidity due to Various Diseases in Infants under 6 Months of Age: A Prospective Observational Study. Int J Pediatr. 2016;2016:7647054. doi:10.1155/2016/7647054.
2. Howie PW, Forsyth JS, Ogston SA, Clark A, Florey CD. Protective effect of breast feeding against infection. BMJ. 1990;300(6716):11-16.
3. Ajetunmobi OM, Whyte B, Chalmers J, Tappin DM, Wolfson L, Fleming M, MacDonald A, Wood R, Stockton DL. Breastfeeding is Associated with Reduced Childhood Hospitalization: Evidence from a Scottish Birth Cohort (1997-2009). J
Pediatr. 2015;166(3):620-625.e4. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.11.013.
4. Kramer MS, Kakuma R. Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding. In: The Cochrane Collaboration, ed. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2002. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD003517. Accessed September 27, 2016.
5. World Health Organization. Infant and Young Child Feeding: Model Chapter for
Textbooks for Medical Students and Allied Health Professionals.; 2009. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK148965/. Accessed September 27, 2016.
6. Cattaneo A, Yngve A, Koletzko B, Guzman LR, Promotion of Breastfeeding in Europe project. Protection, promotion and support of breast-feeding in Europe: current situation. Public Health Nutr. 2005;8(1):39-46.
Page 12 of 14
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
13
7. Salanave B, de Launay C, Bouder-Berquier J, Castetbon K. Durée de l’allaitement maternel en France (Épifane 2012-2013). Bull Epidémiol Hebd. 2014;2014(27):450-457.
8. Kersuzan C, Gojard S, Tichit C, Thierry X, Wagner S, Nicklaus S, Geay B, Charles M-A, Lioret S, de Lauzin-Guillain B. Prévalence de l’allaitement à la maternité selon les caractéristiques des parents et les conditions de l’accouchement. Résultats de l’enquête elfe maternité, France métropolitaine, 2011. Bull Epidémiol Hebd. 2014;2014(27):440-449.
9. [Consensus conference on the management of infant bronchiolitis. Paris, France, 21 September 2000. Proceedings]. Arch Pédiatrie Organe Off Sociéte Fr Pédiatrie. 2001;8 Suppl 1:1s-196s.
10. Che D, Caillère N, Josseran L. [Surveillance and epidemiology of infant bronchiolitis in France]. Arch Pédiatrie Organe Off Sociéte Fr Pédiatrie. 2008;15(3):327-328. doi:10.1016/j.arcped.2007.11.014.
11. Fortin N, Gras-Le Guen C, Picherot G, Guérin P, Moreau-Klein A, Coste-Burel M, Surer N, Rozé J-C, Hubert B. aractéristiques des épidémies de bronchiolite dans l’agglomération nantaise, 2007-2012: apport de différentes sources de données. Bull
Epidémiol Hebd. 2014;2014(3-4):58-64.
12. Lapillonne A, Regnault A, Gournay V, Gouyon J-B, Benmedjahed K, Anghelescu D, Arnould B, Moriette G. Development of a questionnaire to assess the impact on parents of their infant’s bronchiolitis hospitalization. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:272. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-272.
13. Lapillonne A, Regnault A, Gournay V, Gouyon J-B, Gilet H, Anghelescu D, Miloradovich T, Arnould B, Moriette G. Impact on parents of bronchiolitis hospitalization of full-term, preterm and congenital heart disease infants. BMC Pediatr. 2012;12:171. doi:10.1186/1471-2431-12-171.
14. Ralston SL, Lieberthal AS, Meissner HC, Alverson BK, Baley JE, Gadomski AM, Johnson DW, Light MJ, Maraqa NF, Mendonca EA, Phelan KJ, Zorc JJ, Stanko-Lopp D, Brown MA, Nathanson I, Rosenblum E, Sayles S, Hernandez-Cancio S. Clinical Practice Guideline: The Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Bronchiolitis. PEDIATRICS. 2014;134(5):e1474-e1502. doi:10.1542/peds.2014-2742.
15. Bhutta ZA, Ahmed T, Black RE, Cousens S, Dewey K, Giugliani E, Haider BA, Kirkwood B, Morris SS, Sachdev H, Shekar M. What works? Interventions for maternal and child undernutrition and survival. The Lancet. 2008;371(9610):417-440. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61693-6.
16. Cunha AJLA da, Leite ÁJM, Almeida IS de. The pediatrician’s role in the first thousand days of the child: the pursuit of healthy nutrition and development. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2015;91(6 Suppl 1):S44-51. doi:10.1016/j.jped.2015.07.002.
17. Lanari M, Prinelli F, Adorni F, Di Santo S, Faldella G, Silvestri M, Musicco M, Italian Neonatology Study Group on RSV Infections. Maternal milk protects infants against bronchiolitis during the first year of life. Results from an Italian cohort of newborns. Early Hum Dev. 2013;89 Suppl 1:S51-57. doi:10.1016/S0378-3782(13)70016-1.
Page 13 of 14
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
14
18. Wright AL, Bauer M, Naylor A, Sutcliffe E, Clark L. Increasing Breastfeeding Rates to Reduce Infant Illness at the Community Level. PEDIATRICS. 1998;101(5):837-844. doi:10.1542/peds.101.5.837.
19. Cushing AH, Samet JM, Lambert WE, Skipper BJ, Hunt WC, Young SA, McLaren LC. Breastfeeding reduces risk of respiratory illness in infants. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;147(9):863-870.
20. Dornelles CTL, Piva JP, Marostica PJC. Nutritional status, breastfeeding, and evolution of Infants with acute viral bronchiolitis. J Health Popul Nutr. 2007;25(3):336-343.
21. Turck D, Vidailhet M, Bocquet A, Bresson J-L, Briend A, Chouraqui J-P, Darmaun D, Dupont C, Frelut M-L, Girardet J-P, Goulet O, Hankard R, Rieu D, Simeoni U. Allaitement maternel: les bénéfices pour la santé de l’enfant et de sa mère. Arch
Pédiatrie. 2013;20:S29-S48. doi:10.1016/S0929-693X(13)72251-6.
Table 1 : Baseline and evolution comparison between groups Modified breastfeeding
(group 1,2 and 3) Non modified breastfeeding
(group 4) p
Birth weight (g)*
3330 (1010 ; 4160) 3180 (1050 ; 4695) NS
Gestationnal age (GW)*
38 (26 ; 39) 37 (25 ; 40) NS
Mean growth before hospitalisation (g/d)*
26 (-10 ; 112) 30 (0 ; 213) NS
Exclusive breastfeeding before hospitalisation**
35 (81%) 30 (73%) NS
Age on admission (d)*
34 (3 ; 166) 50 (16 ; 159) NS, p=0.06
Length of stay (d)*
3 (1 ; 34) 3 (1 ; 14) NS
Length of ICU (d)*
3 (1 ; 26) 4 (1 ; 14) NS
Length of ventilation (d)*
3 (1 ; 9) 3 (1 ; 6) NS
Length of oxygen requirement (d)*
3 (1 ; 7) 3 (1 ; 5) NS
Enteral or parenteral nutrition**
25 (58%) 19 (46%) NS
Length of nutritionnal support (d)*
2 (1 ;6) 2 (1 ; 13 NS
* Median (minimum, maximum)** n (%) NS: non-significant, g : gram, GW : gestational weeks, d : day, ICU: intensive care unit
Page 14 of 14
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
Breastfeeding disruption during hospitalization for
bronchiolitis in children, pilot study
Journal: BMJ Paediatrics Open
Manuscript ID bmjpo-2017-000158.R1
Article Type: Original article
Date Submitted by the Author: 21-Jun-2017
Complete List of Authors: Heilbronner, Claire; Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris, Roy, Emeline; Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris Hadchouel, Alice; Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris Jebali, Sabrine; Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris Smii, Siwar; Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris Masson, Alexandra; Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris
Renolleau, Sylvain ; Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris Rigourd, Virginie; Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris
Keywords: General Paediatrics, Nursing Care, Nutrition, Respiratory
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open on July 14, 2020 by guest. P
rotected by copyright.http://bm
jpaedsopen.bmj.com
/bm
jpo: first published as 10.1136/bmjpo-2017-000158 on 28 S
eptember 2017. D
ownloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
1
Breastfeeding disruption during hospitalization for bronchiolitis in children, pilot study
Claire Heilbronner 1, Emeline Roy
2, Alice Hadchouel
3, Sabrine Jebali
4, Siwar Smii
4,
Alexandra Masson1, Sylvain Renolleau
1, Virginie Rigourd
4
Affiliations: 1 Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, AP-HP, Necker Hospital for Sick Children, Paris, France 2 Pediatric Department, AP-HP, Necker Hospital for Sick Children, Paris, France 3 Pediatric Pulmonology Department, AP-HP, Necker Hospital for Sick Children, Paris, France 4 Region Ile de France Human milk bank, AP-HP, Necker Hospital for Sick Children, Paris, France
Address correspondence to:
Dr Claire Heilbronner Pediatric Intensive Care Unit AP-HP, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, 149 rue de Sèvres, Paris, 75015 France e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +33.1.71.19.64.61; Fax: Tel: +33.1.44.49.42.17
Abbreviations:
PICU: Pediatric intensive Care Unit
Word count: 2481
Key words: Bronchiolitis, breastfeeding, unwanted weaning
Page 1 of 16
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
2
ABSTRACT
Background
Being hospitalized for an acute bronchiolitis might be a situation at risk of unwanted weaning
off breastfeeding for several reasons (respiratory distress, use of enteral or parenteral feeding,
mothers’ tiredness, etc..) yet it has never been really evaluated and quantified.
Methods
We conducted a pilot study to evaluate breastfeeding disruption during hospitalization for
bronchiolitis and try to identify its determining factors.
This is a prospective study during one epidemic season of bronchiolitis in a tertiary care
hospital. All patients aged 6 months or younger hospitalized with acute bronchiolitis and
receiving at least partial breastfeeding were eligible for the study. Patients discharged at home
whose parents accepted to be contacted by phone were included.
Results
Eighty four patients were included in the study. Length of hospital stay was 3 days (1; 34) and
27 patients (32%) spent some time in PICU.
Forty three mothers (51%) stated that their breastfeeding had been modified by the
hospitalization (17 stopped, 12 switched to partial breastfeeding and 14 reduced without
stopping). Mothers stated that the causes of breastfeeding disturbance were lack of support
and advices (63%), followed by severity of child’s respiratory disease (32%), logistic hospital
difficulties (30%) and personal organization issues (9.3%). Lengh of stay, need for ventilatory
support or nutritional support was not statistically different between groups.
Conclusion
Bronchiolitis is a high risk event for breastfeeding disruption.
Correct advices and support could be a determining factor and further studies should focus on
preventive interventions
Page 2 of 16
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
3
What is already known on this topic Breastfeeding might be perturbed during hospitalization for bronchiolitis. This issue has not been quantified and no data can support any intervention. What this study adds There is a high rate of breastfeeding disruption during hospitalization for bronchiolitis. Respiratory severity of the bronchiolitis is not determining, supporting mother is. This study gives clues for some possible therapeutic interventions in the future.
INTRODUCTION
Breastfeeding is a well-documented protective factor against respiratory diseases in
children.[1–3] Exclusive breastfeeding should therefore be promoted and international
guidelines recommend to maintain it at least until the age of 6 months.[1,2]
Breastfeeding though is not always easy.[3] A recent survey estimated that 75% of infants
were breastfed in maternity wards in France (including partial breastfeeding) but only 40% of
children were still partially breastfed after 3 months.[4,5]
Children’s health might influence breastfeeding continuation (quality of suctioning, short
breathing in respiratory or cardiologic diseases, mother/ child separation, mother’s fatigue,
formula introduction). Given the fact that most children are healthy, it is likely that the impact
of childs’ disease on breastfeeding might not be perceivable in big cohorts who focus more on
social or economic factors.
In France, each year, about 500000 toddlers are affected with acute bronchiolitis.[6] Among
children consulting at the emergency room, about 50% of children under 6 months (and 62%
under 3 months) require hospitalization[7] and 10 to 15% spend some time in PICU for
respiratory support.[8]
Being hospitalized for an acute bronchiolitis might be a situation at risk of unwanted weaning
off breastfeeding for several reasons:
-dyspnea, suctioning difficulties or even swallowing difficulties can occur
Page 3 of 16
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
4
-enteral or parenteral feeding can be necessary, sometimes with formula milk
-mothers might not always be able to stay with their child continuously in hospital (either
because of hospital accommodation or because of family situation, working issues…)
-mothers might get stressed and tired, sleep badly, eat or drink less than usual or irregularly
-breast milk expression might not always be easy in hospital by lack of material or caregiving
attention
-caregivers might have different attitudes and contradictory advices towards breastfeeding
Only Lapillone and al. mention breastfeeding disturbance among the potential impacts of an
hospitalization for bronchiolitis.[9,10] No study has been published to specifically measure
breastfeeding disruption during hospitalization for bronchiolitis although the high number of
patients concerned makes it a potentially important health issue.
With no study available, no intervention can be proposed in national or international
guidelines on bronchiolitis.
We conducted a pilot study to try to measure the risk of breastfeeding being impaired during a
hospitalization for bronchiolitis in children previously breastfed and to try to identify
children, mother or hospital factors that might participate in poor breastfeeding outcome.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This study is a single centre prospective observational study conducted from October 1st 2015
to February 15th 2016 at Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital in Paris (tertiary care) in all wards
attending to patients with acute bronchiolitis (pediatric ward, pediatric pulmonology ward and
PICU (pediatric intensive care unit)).
Bronchiolitis was defined on the basis of history and physical examination as rhinorrhoea,
cough, tachypnea, wheezing, increased respiratory effort expressed by grunting, nasal flaring,
and intercostal and/or subcostal retractions.[11] Apneic bronchiolitis in neonates were also
Page 4 of 16
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
5
included. Hospital admission was decided by emergency ward’s attending physicians. PICU
admission was decided according to intensivist’s assessment.
Were eligible for the study
-all infants under 6month on admission
-with acute bronchiolitis and no other serious condition
-breastfed (at least partially) on admission
-discharged at home
We included all patients whose parents spoke French and accepted to be contacted by phone
to answer a standardized survey.
We did not include parents that could not be reached on their phone. Patients could not be
included twice in the event of recurrent bronchiolitis during the study period.
The primary outcome was unwanted weaning from breastfeeding, either total or partial
attributed to hospitalization for bronchiolitis.
The secondary aim of the study was to identify patients or conditions of hospital stay at risk
of breastfeeding’s disruption.
Standard care was given accordingly to both French and US latest guidelines.[6,11]
Data collection included : growth evaluation (birth weight, growth, weight on admission and
at discharge), social background, tobacco exposure, length of stay (LOS), ICU requirements,
length of oxygen or ventilatory support requirement, enteral or parenteral nutritional support,
room accommodation during hospitalization, breastfeeding help and material (breast pump,
freezer) available during hospital stay, total or partial weaning from breastfeeding at discharge
or in the fortnight following discharge, mother’s opinion on the cause of the weaning,
mother’s opinion and satisfaction about breastfeeding support during hospitalization,
patient/nurse ratio, breastfeeding experts among caregivers.
Statistical analysis:
Page 5 of 16
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
6
Data are expressed as median values (with minimum and maximum value) for continuous
variables, and number and/or frequency (%) for binary or categorical data.
For qualitative variables we used Student test
For comparison of non-parametric means, Wilcoxon’s test was used if necessary for
quantitative criteria while χ2 and Fisher’s exact test was used to compare qualitative criteria.
P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Analyses were performed with Biostat TGV software ®.
The study was approved by the ethical board (CER_SFP 2015_009_2). Legal guardians
received written information about the study either given hand to hand during their hospital
stay or sent by mail if they could not be seen during hospital stay.
RESULTS
During the study period 332 patients under 6 months were hospitalized at our hospital for 345
episodes of bronchiolitis (see figure 1). Among these, only 144 patients were breastfed, totally
(N=107, 74%) or partially (N=37, 26%). Four were not included because they did not speak
any French and 56 did not answer their phone despite several calls at different times of the
day, 84 patients (58% of breastfed patients) could to be included in the study. The median
delay for phone contact was 3 months (0.5; 6).
Among eligible patients, no significant difference could be observed concerning LOS, need
for PICU, respiratory support, nutritional support between included (n=84) and non-included
patients (n=60).
Bronchiolitis description (n=84)
Median LOS for all breastfed patients was 3 days (1; 34), 27 patients (32%) patients spent
some time in PICU (median length in PICU: 3 days (1; 26). One patient (1%) needed invasive
ventilation for 10 days, 18 (21%) received either NIV or high flow oxygen for 3 days (1; 9),
Page 6 of 16
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
7
34 patients (40%) received standard oxygen for 3 days (1; 7), and 34 patients (40%) received
no respiratory support during hospitalization. No patient died of bronchiolitis during the study
period. Regarding feeding difficulties, 45 (53%) patients received nutritional support, either
by enteral feeding (n=38, 45%) or parenteral nutrition (n=5, 6%) or both (n=2, 2%).
Socioeconomic background (n=84)
Most breastfeeding mothers (96%) did not smoke and lived as a couple (98%). Concerning
occupation, 2% of mothers were working at the time of hospitalization, 52% were on
maternity break, 18% were on a parental education break and 28% were housewives.
Breastfeeding during hospitalization (n=84)
Sixty five patients (77%) were exclusively breastfed before, the others received both breast
milk and formula milk. Forty-three mothers (51%) stated that their breastfeeding had been
modified by the hospitalization of their child, either moderately (N=19, 23%) or totally (N=
17, 20.5%).
Among those 43 mothers
-17 (group 1) stopped breastfeeding
-12 (group 2) switched from total breastfeeding to partial breastfeeding
-14 (group 3) reduced breastfeeding without stopping or switching.
Remaining mothers (41/84, 49%) stated to have kept breastfeeding as before or that their
breastfeeding modification was not because of the hospitalization but was a personal choice
or a planned weaning (group 4).
Daily growth rate before hospitalization and type of breastfeeding before hospitalisation (as
described in table 1) did not significantly differ between groups 1+2+3 and 4.
No statistically significant difference either was observed between patients of groups 1+2+3
and group 4 regarding medical severity of the bronchiolitis evaluated by LOS, oxygen
Page 7 of 16
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
8
requirement or need for respiratory support, enteral or parenteral feeding during
hospitalization, growth evaluation on admission, PICU admission (table 1).
When asked about the causes of their breastfeeding difficulties, mothers of group 1, 2 or 3
answered
-63%: lack of support and advices
-32%: severity of child’s respiratory disease
-30%: logistics issues (difficulties to draw breast milk, availability of breast pumps, room
accommodation and bedding for mothers, introduction of formula milk or baby bottle)
-9.3%: personal and family organisation issues due to hospitalization (sitting the siblings, long
journey home).
All children were in single rooms and all mothers could sleep in the same room as their child.
Patient/nurse ratio was 3/1 in ICU and 6 or 7/1 in paediatric ward and pulmonology ward.
Each ward had several breastfeeding experts among doctors or nurses.
Data about prior experience with breastfeeding was available for 63 breastfeeding mothers.
Mothers in the study had a median number of children of 2 (1; 5) and had an experience of
cumulated breastfeeding for their children of 8 month (0.9; 36). No difference was observed
between groups 1+2+3 and 4 regarding cumulated length of previous breastfeeding for the
elder children.
DISCUSSION
We observed in our study a high rate of breastfeeding on admission compared to
epidemiologic surveys.[4,5] but also a very high rate of breastfeeding disturbance during
hospitalization for bronchiolitis as previously suggested in a large multicentre study.[9,10]
The hospitalization of infants for bronchiolitis in our survey generated undesired weaning
from breastfeeding, a transition to mixed breastfeeding or even partial changes that may affect
Page 8 of 16
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
9
the nutritional balance suitable for infants and alter their protection against further respiratory
events.[12,13]
Our study is subject to possible biases, the most important is that it is single centred
Several local particularities could have influenced the results in our hospital:
-It is possible that a high number of nurses could help to better support breastfeeding mothers
since it is a time-consuming activity, probably even more in an epidemic period with high
workload. The nurse to patient ratio seemed correct in our wards but we could not find much
data about optimal ratio in the literature.
-It is possible that breastfeeding knowledge or involvement is not optimal among our
caregivers despite the fact that all the nurses in our hospital are specifically trained for
paediatrics. Hence the results in our study gives a baseline information about what happens
for breastfeeding during bronchiolitis with no or minimal support from caregivers.
-Room accommodation could be considered non optimal in our hospital but we believe that it
would be similar or possibly even worse in some other settings since our hospital is a
referring and teaching hospital with most paediatric wards hosted in a new building
inaugurated in 2013, and with all patients being bedded in single rooms with possible sleeping
accommodation for parents.
Another possible bias is the long time period between hospitalization and survey that could
have altered the quality of answers from the mothers, but Lapillonne et al. in their study
concluded that interrogation as far as 6 months after hospitalization can be considered as
relevant to evaluate burden of hospitalization.[9] Moreover, this delay has helped not to
include transitory modifications after hospitalization and to only collect data on persistent
alterations of breastfeeding.
Page 9 of 16
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
10
The last potential bias is that a significant amount of patients could not be reached on the
phone. If we consider that all eligible mothers that we could not include in this survey
continued their breastfeeding with no disturbance (which is unlikely), we still have 30%
(43/144) of mothers whose breastfeeding was either stopped or altered.
Despite these considerations, this is the first study to really highlight the effect of
hospitalization for acute bronchiolitis for children under 6 months on breastfeeding, and to
question the various factors involved.
Exclusive breastfeeding was not a protective factor in our study and we even observed a non-
significant tendency to the opposite (and a tendency for children with altered breastfeeding to
be younger). It is possible that very young infants about 10-15 days old are more frequently
exclusively breastfed but are also those whose breastfeeding is the more fragile and we should
probably be more supportive for the mothers of those very young infants.
We expected to find severity of respiratory disease as the first risk factor (on medical charts or
mother’s survey) for breastfeeding discontinuation but only 32% of mothers pointed out the
severity of disease as one of the causes for unwanted weaning. It is possible that the delay
between discharge and phone call could have altered mothers perception of respiratory
diseases’ severity but objective evaluation of respiratory distress on medical charts (LOS,
PICU requirements, respiratory and nutritional support) was also not significantly different
between groups.
It is possible that most severe patients with long PICU stay and invasive ventilation should be
more impacted but our population was not powerfull enough to evaluate this since intubation
rate for bronchiolitis has dramatically fallen in the last few years with NIV development. It is
important to notice that breastfeeding disturbance observed in our patients occurred despite a
short LOS (median 3 days) and despite a good outcome of this acute but rather benign
Page 10 of 16
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
11
respiratory disease. It is possible that caregivers underestimate the possible impact of such a
short stay on breastfeeding, and that they might think that breastfeeding will necessarily go
back to normal after discharge but our study highlights a different outcome.
Lack of support from caregivers was the first factor pointed out by mothers after discharge. It
is possible that this lack of support might be less important in other hospitals, especially in
countries where breastfeeding is better supported. Yet, although relying mostly on mothers
recall and perception, this information is still very important as it is a modifiable factor for
further practice. If other studies confirm the results of our survey, it could lead to
recommendations of therapeutic interventions to prevent unwanted weaning during
bronchiolitis, especially in younger infants for witch breastfeeding is still precarious.
Our data encourages us to endorse preventive measures in all wards hosting patients with
bronchiolitis (even if children stay in hospital for a very short length of time) especially to
support mothers during hospitalization.
We only studied bronchiolitis in hospital but it is possible that children who do not require
hospitalization might also have altered breastfeeding; this should be evaluated in another
prospective study involving outpatient’s caregivers.
CONCLUSION
Breastfeeding is a key part of the 1000 days period for proper development of the child. It will
also participate in the prevention of relapse of other respiratory infections and re
hospitalization
With no intervention, bronchiolitis in a breastfed infant is a high risk event with about half of
mothers of hospitalized children either stopping or diminishing their breastfeeding during
hospitalization.
Page 11 of 16
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
12
These results should encourage caregivers to evaluate breastfeeding’s alterations in their own
patients and to take in consideration that these alterations may not be transitory.
Correct advice and support at this critical time could be a determining factor of
breastfeeding’s continuation and further studies should focus on interventions to prevent
unwanted weaning.
S.Jebali and S. Smii both received a grand from the Regional Agency for Health (ARS IDF)
but have no other conflict of interest to disclose
The other authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to
disclose.
No external funding was received for this study
REFERENCES
1 Kramer MS, Kakuma R. Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding. In: The Cochrane
Collaboration, ed. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Chichester, UK: : John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2002. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD003517 (accessed 27 Sep 2016).
2 World Health Organization. Infant and young child feeding: model chapter for textbooks for medical students and allied health professionals. 2009. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK148965/ (accessed 27 Sep 2016).
3 Cattaneo A, Yngve A, Koletzko B, et al. Protection, promotion and support of breast-feeding in Europe: current situation. Public Health Nutr 2005;8:39–46.
4 Salanave B, de Launay C, Bouder-Berquier J, et al. Durée de l’allaitement maternel en France (Épifane 2012-2013). Bull Epidémiol Hebd 2014;2014:450–7.
5 Kersuzan C, Gojard S, Tichit C, et al. Prévalence de l’allaitement à la maternité selon les caractéristiques des parents et les conditions de l’accouchement. Résultats de l’enquête elfe maternité, France métropolitaine, 2011. Bull Epidémiol Hebd 2014;2014:440–9.
6 [Consensus conference on the management of infant bronchiolitis. Paris, France, 21 September 2000. Proceedings]. Arch Pédiatrie Organe Off Sociéte Fr Pédiatrie 2001;8 Suppl 1:1s–196s.
Page 12 of 16
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
13
7 Che D, Caillère N, Josseran L. [Surveillance and epidemiology of infant bronchiolitis in France]. Arch Pédiatrie Organe Off Sociéte Fr Pédiatrie 2008;15:327–8. doi:10.1016/j.arcped.2007.11.014
8 Fortin N, Gras-Le Guen C, Picherot G, et al. aractéristiques des épidémies de bronchiolite dans l’agglomération nantaise, 2007-2012: apport de différentes sources de données. Bull Epidémiol Hebd 2014;2014:58–64.
9 Lapillonne A, Regnault A, Gournay V, et al. Development of a questionnaire to assess the impact on parents of their infant’s bronchiolitis hospitalization. BMC Health Serv Res 2013;13:272. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-272
10 Lapillonne A, Regnault A, Gournay V, et al. Impact on parents of bronchiolitis hospitalization of full-term, preterm and congenital heart disease infants. BMC Pediatr 2012;12:171. doi:10.1186/1471-2431-12-171
11 Ralston SL, Lieberthal AS, Meissner HC, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline: The Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Bronchiolitis. PEDIATRICS 2014;134:e1474–502. doi:10.1542/peds.2014-2742
12 Turck D, Vidailhet M, Bocquet A, et al. Allaitement maternel : les bénéfices pour la santé de l’enfant et de sa mère. Arch Pédiatrie 2013;20:S29–48. doi:10.1016/S0929-693X(13)72251-6
13 Ajetunmobi OM, Whyte B, Chalmers J, et al. Breastfeeding is Associated with Reduced Childhood Hospitalization: Evidence from a Scottish Birth Cohort (1997-2009). J Pediatr 2015;166:620–625.e4. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.11.013
Table 1 : Baseline and evolution comparison between groups Modified breastfeeding
(group 1,2 and 3) Non modified breastfeeding
(group 4) p
Birth weight (g)*
3330 (1010 ; 4160) 3180 (1050 ; 4695) NS
Gestationnal age (GW)*
38 (26 ; 39) 37 (25 ; 40) NS
Mean growth before hospitalisation (g/d)*
26 (-10 ; 112) 30 (0 ; 213) NS
Exclusive breastfeeding before hospitalisation**
35 (81%) 30 (73%) NS
Age on admission (d)*
34 (3 ; 166) 50 (16 ; 159) NS, p=0.06
Length of stay (d)*
3 (1 ; 34) 3 (1 ; 14) NS
Length of ICU (d)*
3 (1 ; 26) 4 (1 ; 14) NS
Length of ventilation (d)*
3 (1 ; 9) 3 (1 ; 6) NS
Length of oxygen requirement (d)*
3 (1 ; 7) 3 (1 ; 5) NS
Enteral or parenteral nutrition**
25 (58%) 19 (46%) NS
Length of nutritionnal support (d)*
2 (1 ;6) 2 (1 ; 13 NS
* Median (minimum, maximum)** n (%)
Page 13 of 16
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
14
NS: non-significant, g : gram, GW : gestational weeks, d : day, ICU: intensive care unit
Page 14 of 16
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
Page 15 of 16
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
Name of the patient……………………………………. Date of the call : …./…./……….
What was your occupation before pregnancy?
Including (name of the patient), how many children do you have? N=
How many children did you breastfeed before (name of the patient) ? N=
How long did you breastfeed the elders ? Cumulated length (month)=....
Do you live as a couple with the father? Yes No
Do you smoke ? Yes No
When did you go back to work/ when will you go back to work? Date …./…./……….
no going back to work scheduled
If you did not get back to work yet, what type of break are you on? Maternity break Unemployment
Parental education break Home mum
other ..............................
Before the bronchiolitis started, did you? totally breastfeed partially breastfeed
Would you describe your breastfeeding as easy ? From 1(not at all) to 5 (totally) =……
Before the hospitalization, had you ever used a breast pump ? Yes No
Did (name of the patient) have a single room in hospital ? Yes No only in some wards
Was there a bed available for you in (name of the patient)’s room? Yes No only in some wards
If there was no bed, was there an armchair or any other sleeping
accommodation?
Yes No only in some wards
Was there an armchair for breastfeeding in the room? Yes No only in some wards
Was there a written document about breastfeeding available for you during
hospitalization ?
Yes No only in some wards
Was there a breast pump available for you during hospitalization ? Yes No only in some wards
Did you feel supported with your breastfeeding during hospitalization ? From 1(not at all) to 5 (totally) =……
Did you have difficulties in breastfeeding during hospitalization ? From 1(not at all) to 5 (totally) =……
Do you feel hospitalization might have interfered with your breastfeeding ? From 1(not at all) to 5 (totally) =……
How was your breastfeeding just after hospitalization? Exclusive / partial / stopped
For mothers who stopped during hospitalization :
Was it your intention to stop your breastfeeding at that moment?
From 1(not at all) to 5 (totally) =……
Was your breastfeeding modified by hospitalization ? Yes No
If so, what was modified ?
Length ? exclusivness ?
other...................................................
What do you feel were the reasons for this modification ? (multiple answers
possible)
-severity of the bronchiolitis ?
-lack of support?
-personal organisation issues?
-logistic issues (breast pump, bedding, etc...)
in hospital ward?
Other?..............................................................
Page 16 of 16
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
Breastfeeding disruption during hospitalization for
bronchiolitis in children, preliminary study
Journal: BMJ Paediatrics Open
Manuscript ID bmjpo-2017-000158.R2
Article Type: Original article
Date Submitted by the Author: 23-Aug-2017
Complete List of Authors: Heilbronner, Claire; Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris, Roy, Emeline; Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris Hadchouel, Alice; Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris Jebali, Sabrine; Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris Smii, Siwar; Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris Masson, Alexandra; Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris
Renolleau, Sylvain ; Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris Rigourd, Virginie; Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris
Keywords: General Paediatrics, Nursing Care, Nutrition, Respiratory
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open on July 14, 2020 by guest. P
rotected by copyright.http://bm
jpaedsopen.bmj.com
/bm
jpo: first published as 10.1136/bmjpo-2017-000158 on 28 S
eptember 2017. D
ownloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
1
Breastfeeding disruption during hospitalization for bronchiolitis in children,
preliminary study
Claire Heilbronner 1, Emeline Roy
2, Alice Hadchouel
3, Sabrine Jebali
4, Siwar Smii
4,
Alexandra Masson1, Sylvain Renolleau
1, Virginie Rigourd
4
Affiliations: 1 Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, AP-HP, Necker Hospital for Sick Children, Paris, France 2 Pediatric Department, AP-HP, Necker Hospital for Sick Children, Paris, France 3 Pediatric Pulmonology Department, AP-HP, Necker Hospital for Sick Children, Paris, France 4 Region Ile de France Human milk bank, AP-HP, Necker Hospital for Sick Children, Paris, France
Address correspondence to:
Dr Claire Heilbronner Pediatric Intensive Care Unit AP-HP, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, 149 rue de Sèvres, Paris, 75015 France e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +33.1.71.19.64.61; Fax: Tel: +33.1.44.49.42.17
Abbreviations:
PICU: Pediatric intensive Care Unit
Word count: 2542
Key words: Bronchiolitis, breastfeeding, unwanted weaning
Page 1 of 17
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
2
ABSTRACT
Background
Being hospitalized for an acute bronchiolitis might be a situation at risk of unwanted weaning
off breastfeeding for several reasons (respiratory distress, use of enteral or parenteral feeding,
mothers’ tiredness, etc..) yet it has never been really evaluated and quantified.
Methods
We conducted this preliminary study to evaluate breastfeeding disruption during
hospitalization for bronchiolitis and try to identify its determining factors for future
interventions.
This is across sectional study during one epidemic season of bronchiolitis in a tertiary care
hospital. All patients aged 6 months or younger hospitalized with acute bronchiolitis and
receiving at least partial breastfeeding were eligible for the study. Patients discharged at home
whose parents accepted to be contacted for a phone survey were included.
Results
Eighty four patients were included in the study. Length of hospital stay was 3 days (1; 34) and
27 patients spent some time in PICU.
Forty three mothers stated that their breastfeeding had been modified by the hospitalization
(17 stopped, 12 switched to partial breastfeeding and 14 reduced without stopping). Mothers
stated that the causes of breastfeeding disturbance were lack of support and advices (n=27)
followed by child’s respiratory disease (n=14), logistic hospital difficulties (n=13) and
personal organization issues (n=4). Lengh of stay, need for ventilatory support or nutritional
support was not statistically different between groups.
Conclusion
Bronchiolitis is a hazardous situation for breastfeeding.
Page 2 of 17
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
3
Correct advices and support could be a determining factor and further studies should focus on
preventive interventions.
What is already known on this topic Breastfeeding may be affected during hospitalization for bronchiolitis. This issue has not been quantified and no data can support any intervention. What this study adds There is a high rate of breastfeeding disruption during hospitalization for bronchiolitis. Lack of support for breastfeeding was a major problem.
INTRODUCTION
Breastfeeding is a well-documented protective factor against respiratory diseases in
children.[1–3] Exclusive breastfeeding should therefore be promoted and international
guidelines recommend to maintain it at least until the age of 6 months.[1,2]
Breastfeeding though is not always easy.[3] A recent survey estimated that 75% of infants
were breastfed in maternity wards in France (including partial breastfeeding) but only 40% of
children were still partially breastfed after 3 months.[4,5]
Children’s health might influence breastfeeding continuation (quality of sucking, short
breathing in respiratory or cardiologic diseases, mother/ child separation, mother’s fatigue,
formula introduction).
In France, each year, about 500000 toddlers are affected with acute bronchiolitis.[6] Among
children consulting at the emergency room, about 50% of children under 6 months (and 62%
under 3 months) require hospitalization[7] and 10 to 15% spend some time in PICU for
respiratory support.[8]
Being hospitalized for an acute bronchiolitis might be a situation at risk of unwanted weaning
off breastfeeding for several reasons:
-dyspnea, sucking difficulties or even swallowing difficulties can occur
Page 3 of 17
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
4
-enteral or parenteral feeding can be necessary, sometimes with formula milk
-mothers might not always be able to stay with their child continuously in hospital (either
because of hospital accommodation or because of family situation, working issues…)
-mothers might get stressed and tired, sleep badly, eat or drink less than usual or irregularly
-breast milk expression might not always be easy in hospital by lack of material or caregiving
attention
-caregivers might have different attitudes towards breastfeeding and may give contradictory
advices. Only Lapillone and al. mention breastfeeding disturbance among the potential
impacts of an hospitalization for bronchiolitis.[9,10] No study has been published to
specifically measure breastfeeding disruption during hospitalization for bronchiolitis although
the high number of patients concerned makes it a potentially important health issue.
With no study available, no intervention can be proposed in national or international
guidelines on bronchiolitis.
We conducted this preliminary study to try to measure the chance of breastfeeding being
impaired during a hospitalization for bronchiolitis in children previously breastfed and to try
to identify children, mother or hospital factors that might be associated with poor
breastfeeding outcome for future intervention.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This study is a single centre prospective observational study conducted from October 1st 2015
to February 15th 2016 at Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital in Paris (tertiary care) in all wards
attending to patients with acute bronchiolitis (pediatric ward, pediatric pulmonology ward and
pediatric intensive care unit (PICU)).
Bronchiolitis was defined on the basis of history and physical examination as rhinorrhoea,
cough, tachypnea, wheezing, increased respiratory effort expressed by grunting, nasal flaring,
Page 4 of 17
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
5
and intercostal and/or subcostal retractions.[11] Apneic bronchiolitis in neonates were also
included. Hospital admission was decided by emergency ward’s attending physicians. PICU
admission was decided according to intensivist’s assessment. Standard care was given
accordingly to both French and US latest guidelines.[6,11]
Study design:
Were eligible for the study
-all infants under 6month on admission
-with acute bronchiolitis and no other serious condition
-breastfed (at least partially) on admission
-discharged at home
All parents signed a consent form on admission allowing extraction of data from medical
charts. The parents were also informed about this study during hospitalization if possible (pre-
inclusion) or received information either by mail or by e-mail when reached on the phone for
the survey itself.
We included all patients whose parents spoke French, had been informed about the study and
accepted to answer a standardized survey on the phone after discharge.
We did not include parents that could not be reached on their phone. Patients could not be
included twice in the event of recurrent bronchiolitis during the study period.
We made the hypothesis that bronchiolitis would be associated with alterations of
breastfeeding and that severity of bronchiolitis would be associated with unwanted weaning.
We also aimed at identifying patients or hospital conditions at risk of breastfeeding disruption
and that might be targeted in future interventions.
Data collection included
-data collected from the caregivers (both paramedical and medical staff): patient/nurse ratio,
existence of breastfeeding experts among caregivers
Page 5 of 17
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
6
-data extracted from the charts: growth evaluation (birth weight, growth, weight on admission
and at discharge), length of stay (LOS), PICU requirements, length of oxygen or ventilatory
support requirement, enteral or parenteral nutritional support, room accommodation during
hospitalization
-answers from the survey (see supplementary file) concerning past and present occupation and
familial situation (basic social background) that could be relevant to explain weaning from
breastfeeding, tobacco exposure, breastfeeding help and material (breast pump, freezer)
available during hospital stay
-answers from the survey (see supplementary file) concerning total or partial weaning from
breastfeeding at discharge or in the fortnight following discharge, mother’s opinion on the
cause of the weaning (severity of the bronchiolitis, lack of support, personal organisation
issues and/or logistic issues in hospital ward), mother’s opinion and satisfaction about
breastfeeding support during hospitalization.
When the mothers did not have sufficient time to answer all the questions on the phone, the
questions about occupation, familial situation and tobacco exposure were skipped from the
survey.
The study was approved by the ethical board of the French Pediatric Society (CER_SFP
2015_009_2).
Statistical analysis:
Data are expressed as median values (with minimum and maximum value) for continuous
variables, and number for binary or categorical data.
For qualitative (categorical) variables we used Student test. For comparison of non-parametric
means, Wilcoxon’s test was used if necessary for quantitative (numerical) criteria while χ2
and Fisher’s exact test was used to compare qualitative criteria. P values < 0.05 were
considered statistically significant.
Page 6 of 17
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
7
Analyses were performed with Biostat TGV software ®.
RESULTS
During the study period 332 patients under 6 months were hospitalized at our hospital for 345
episodes of bronchiolitis (see figure 1). Among these, only 144 patients were breastfed, totally
(n=107) or partially (n=37). Four were not included because they did not speak any French
and 56 did not answer their phone despite several calls at different times of the day, 84
patients could be included in the study. The median delay for phone contact was 3 months
(0.5; 6).
Among eligible patients, no significant difference could be observed concerning LOS, need
for PICU, respiratory support, nutritional support between included (n=84) and non-included
patients (n=60).
Bronchiolitis description (n=84)
Median LOS for all breastfed patients was 3 days (1; 34), 27 patients spent some time in
PICU (median length in PICU: 3 days (1; 26)). One patient needed invasive ventilation for 10
days, 18 received either Non Invasive Ventilation (NIV) or high flow oxygen for 3 days (1;
9), 34 patients received standard oxygen for 3 days (1; 7), and 34 patients received no
respiratory support during hospitalization. No patient died of bronchiolitis during the study
period. Regarding feeding difficulties, 45 patients received nutritional support, either by
enteral feeding (n=38) or parenteral nutrition (n=5) or both (n=2).
Socioeconomic background (n=54)
Answers about socio-economical background were available for 54/84 patients. Most
breastfeeding mothers (n=52) did not smoke and lived as a couple (n=53). Concerning
occupation, 1 mother was working at the time of hospitalization, 28 were on maternity break,
10 were on a parental education break and 15 were housewives.
Page 7 of 17
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
8
Breastfeeding during hospitalization (n=84)
Sixty five patients were exclusively breastfed before, the others received both breast milk and
formula milk. Forty-three mothers stated that their breastfeeding had been modified by the
hospitalization of their child, either moderately (n=19) or totally (n= 17).
Among those 43 mothers
-17 stopped breastfeeding
-12 switched from total breastfeeding to partial breastfeeding
-14 reduced breastfeeding without stopping or switching.
Remaining mothers (41/84) stated to have kept breastfeeding as before or that their
breastfeeding modification was not because of the hospitalization but was a personal choice
or a planned weaning.
Daily growth rate before hospitalization and type of breastfeeding before hospitalisation (as
described in table 1) did not significantly differ between the mothers who reduced or stopped
breastfeeding compared to those who continued to breastfeed normally.
No statistically significant difference either was observed regarding medical severity of the
bronchiolitis evaluated by LOS, oxygen requirement or need for respiratory support, enteral
or parenteral feeding during hospitalization, growth evaluation on admission, PICU admission
(table 1).
When asked about the causes of their breastfeeding difficulties, mothers who reduced
breastfeeding answered
-n=27: lack of support and advices
-n=14: severity of child’s respiratory disease
-n=13: logistics issues (difficulties to draw breast milk, availability of breast pumps, room
accommodation and bedding for mothers, introduction of formula milk or baby bottle)
Page 8 of 17
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
9
-n=4: personal and family organisation issues due to hospitalization (sitting the siblings, long
journey home).
All children were in single rooms and all mothers could sleep in the same room as their child.
Patient/nurse ratio was 3/1 in ICU and 6 or 7/1 in paediatric ward and pulmonology ward.
Each ward had several breastfeeding experts among doctors or nurses.
Data about prior experience with breastfeeding was available for 63 breastfeeding mothers.
Mothers in the study had a median number of children of 2 (1; 5) and had an experience of
cumulated breastfeeding for their children of 8 month (0.9; 36). No difference was observed
regarding cumulated length of previous breastfeeding for the elder children.
DISCUSSION
We observed in our study a high rate of breastfeeding on admission compared to
epidemiologic surveys[4,5] but also a very high rate of breastfeeding disturbance during
hospitalization for bronchiolitis as previously suggested in a large multicentre study.[9,10]
The hospitalization of infants for bronchiolitis in our survey generated undesired weaning
from breastfeeding, a transition to mixed breastfeeding or even partial changes that may affect
the nutritional balance suitable for infants and alter their protection against further respiratory
events.[12,13]
Our study is subject to possible biases, the most important is that it is single centred
Several local particularities could have influenced the results in our hospital:
-It is possible that a high number of nurses could help to better support breastfeeding mothers
since it is a time-consuming activity, probably even more in an epidemic period with high
workload. The nurse to patient ratio seemed correct in our wards but we could not find much
data about optimal ratio in the literature.
Page 9 of 17
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
10
-It is possible that breastfeeding knowledge or involvement is not optimal among our
caregivers despite the fact that all the nurses in our hospital are specifically trained for
paediatrics. Hence the results in our study gives a baseline information about what happens
for breastfeeding during bronchiolitis with no or minimal support from caregivers.
-Room accommodation could be considered non optimal in our hospital but we believe that it
would be similar or possibly even worse in some other settings since our hospital is a
referring and teaching hospital with most paediatric wards hosted in a new building
inaugurated in 2013, and with all patients being bedded in single rooms with possible sleeping
accommodation for parents.
Another possible bias is the long time period between hospitalization and survey that could
have altered the quality of answers from the mothers, but Lapillonne et al. in their study
concluded that interrogation as far as 6 months after hospitalization can be considered as
relevant to evaluate burden of hospitalization.[9] Moreover, this delay has helped not to
include transitory modifications after hospitalization and to only collect data on persistent
alterations of breastfeeding.
The last potential bias is that a significant amount of patients could not be reached on the
phone. If we consider that all eligible mothers that we could not include in this survey
continued their breastfeeding with no disturbance (which is unlikely), we still have 43/144
mothers whose breastfeeding was either stopped or altered.
Despite these considerations, this is the first study to really highlight the effect of
hospitalization for acute bronchiolitis for children under 6 months on breastfeeding, and to
question the various factors involved.
Exclusive breastfeeding was not a protective factor in our study and we even observed a non-
significant tendency to the opposite (and a tendency for children with altered breastfeeding to
Page 10 of 17
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
11
be younger). It is possible that very young infants about 10-15 days old are more frequently
exclusively breastfed but are also those whose breastfeeding is the more fragile and we should
probably be more supportive for the mothers of those very young infants.
We expected to find severity of respiratory disease as the first factor (on medical charts or
mother’s survey) for breastfeeding discontinuation but only 32% of mothers pointed out the
severity of disease as one of the causes for unwanted weaning. It is possible that the delay
between discharge and phone call could have altered mother’s perception of the respiratory
distress of their child and its impact on breastfeeding. It is also possible that some guilty
feelings about weaning from breastfeeding might have influenced the mother’s answers
towards answers a little less incriminating for them (like child’s respiratory condition and lack
of support), but objective evaluation of respiratory distress on medical charts (LOS, PICU
requirements, respiratory and nutritional support) was also not significantly different between
groups. It is possible that most severe patients with long PICU stay and invasive ventilation
should be more impacted but our population was not powerfull enough to evaluate this since
intubation rate for bronchiolitis has dramatically fallen in the last few years with NIV
development. It is important to notice that breastfeeding disturbance observed in our patients
occurred despite a short LOS (median 3 days) and despite a good outcome of this acute but
rather benign respiratory disease. It is possible that caregivers underestimate the possible
impact of such a short stay on breastfeeding, and that they might think that breastfeeding will
necessarily go back to normal after discharge but our study highlights a different outcome.
Lack of support from caregivers was the first factor pointed out by mothers after discharge. It
is possible that this lack of support might be less important in other hospitals, especially in
countries where breastfeeding is better supported. Yet, although relying mostly on mothers
recall and perception, this information is still very important as it is a modifiable factor for
further practice. If other studies confirm the results of our survey, it could lead to
Page 11 of 17
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
12
recommendations of therapeutic interventions to prevent unwanted weaning during
bronchiolitis, especially in younger infants for witch breastfeeding is still precarious.
Our data encourages us to endorse preventive measures in all wards hosting patients with
bronchiolitis (even if children stay in hospital for a very short length of time) especially to
support mothers during hospitalization.
We only studied bronchiolitis in hospital but it is possible that children who do not require
hospitalization might also have altered breastfeeding; this should be evaluated in another
prospective study involving outpatient’s caregivers.
CONCLUSION
With no intervention, bronchiolitis in a breastfed infant is a hazardous situation for
breastfeeding with about half of mothers of hospitalized children either stopping or
diminishing their breastfeeding during hospitalization.
These results should encourage caregivers to evaluate breastfeeding’s alterations in their own
patients and to take in consideration that these alterations may not be transitory.
Correct advice and support at this critical time could be a determining factor of
breastfeeding’s continuation and further studies should focus on interventions to prevent
unwanted weaning.
S.Jebali and S. Smii both received a grand from the Regional Agency for Health (ARS IDF)
but have no other conflict of interest to disclose
The other authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to
disclose.
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or
not-for-profit sectors
Page 12 of 17
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
13
Authors contribution
Dr Heilbronner conceptualized and designed the study, drafted the initial manuscript,
analysed the data, reviewed and revised the manuscript and approved the final manuscript as
submitted.
Dr Roy, Dr Hadchouel, Dr Masson and Dr Renolleau participated in patient’s selection and
data collection, reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as
submitted
Ms Smii and Ms Jebali managed patient’s selection and interrogation, critically reviewed the
manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted.
Dr Rigourd helped conceptualize and design the study, coordinated and supervised data
collection, reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as
submitted
REFERENCES
1 Kramer MS, Kakuma R. Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding. In: The Cochrane
Collaboration, ed. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Chichester, UK: : John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2002. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD003517 (accessed 27 Sep 2016).
2 World Health Organization. Infant and young child feeding: model chapter for textbooks for medical students and allied health professionals. 2009. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK148965/ (accessed 27 Sep 2016).
3 Cattaneo A, Yngve A, Koletzko B, et al. Protection, promotion and support of breast-feeding in Europe: current situation. Public Health Nutr 2005;8:39–46.
4 Salanave B, de Launay C, Bouder-Berquier J, et al. Durée de l’allaitement maternel en France (Épifane 2012-2013). Bull Epidémiol Hebd 2014;2014:450–7.
5 Kersuzan C, Gojard S, Tichit C, et al. Prévalence de l’allaitement à la maternité selon les caractéristiques des parents et les conditions de l’accouchement. Résultats de l’enquête elfe maternité, France métropolitaine, 2011. Bull Epidémiol Hebd 2014;2014:440–9.
6 [Consensus conference on the management of infant bronchiolitis. Paris, France, 21 September 2000. Proceedings]. Arch Pédiatrie Organe Off Sociéte Fr Pédiatrie 2001;8 Suppl 1:1s–196s.
Page 13 of 17
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
14
7 Che D, Caillère N, Josseran L. [Surveillance and epidemiology of infant bronchiolitis in France]. Arch Pédiatrie Organe Off Sociéte Fr Pédiatrie 2008;15:327–8. doi:10.1016/j.arcped.2007.11.014
8 Fortin N, Gras-Le Guen C, Picherot G, et al. aractéristiques des épidémies de bronchiolite dans l’agglomération nantaise, 2007-2012: apport de différentes sources de données. Bull Epidémiol Hebd 2014;2014:58–64.
9 Lapillonne A, Regnault A, Gournay V, et al. Development of a questionnaire to assess the impact on parents of their infant’s bronchiolitis hospitalization. BMC Health Serv Res 2013;13:272. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-272
10 Lapillonne A, Regnault A, Gournay V, et al. Impact on parents of bronchiolitis hospitalization of full-term, preterm and congenital heart disease infants. BMC Pediatr 2012;12:171. doi:10.1186/1471-2431-12-171
11 Ralston SL, Lieberthal AS, Meissner HC, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline: The Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Bronchiolitis. PEDIATRICS 2014;134:e1474–502. doi:10.1542/peds.2014-2742
12 Turck D, Vidailhet M, Bocquet A, et al. Allaitement maternel : les bénéfices pour la santé de l’enfant et de sa mère. Arch Pédiatrie 2013;20:S29–48. doi:10.1016/S0929-693X(13)72251-6
13 Ajetunmobi OM, Whyte B, Chalmers J, et al. Breastfeeding is Associated with Reduced Childhood Hospitalization: Evidence from a Scottish Birth Cohort (1997-2009). J Pediatr 2015;166:620–625.e4. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.11.013
Table 1 : Baseline and evolution comparison between groups Modified breastfeeding
(n=43) Non modified breastfeeding
(n=41) p
Birth weight (g)*
3330 (1010 ; 4160) 3180 (1050 ; 4695) NS
Gestationnal age (GW)*
38 (26 ; 39) 37 (25 ; 40) NS
Mean growth before hospitalisation (g/d)*
26 (-10 ; 112) 30 (0 ; 213) NS
Exclusive breastfeeding before hospitalisation**
35 30 NS
Age on admission (d)*
34 (3 ; 166) 50 (16 ; 159) NS, p=0.06
Length of stay (d)*
3 (1 ; 34) 3 (1 ; 14) NS
Length of PICU (d)*
3 (1 ; 26) 4 (1 ; 14) NS
Length of ventilation (d)*
3 (1 ; 9) 3 (1 ; 6) NS
Length of oxygen requirement (d)*
3 (1 ; 7) 3 (1 ; 5) NS
Enteral or parenteral nutrition**
25 19 NS
Length of nutritionnal support (d)*
2 (1 ;6) 2 (1 ; 13 NS
* Median (minimum, maximum)** n
Page 14 of 17
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
15
NS: non-significant, g : gram, GW : gestational weeks, d : day, PICU: pediatric intensive care unit
Page 15 of 17
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
Page 16 of 17
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
Name of the patient……………………………………. Date of the call : …./…./……….
What was your occupation before pregnancy?
Including (name of the patient), how many children do you have? N=
How many children did you breastfeed before (name of the patient) ? N=
How long did you breastfeed the elders ? Cumulated length (month)=....
Do you live as a couple with the father? Yes No
Do you smoke ? Yes No
When did you go back to work/ when will you go back to work? Date …./…./……….
no going back to work scheduled
If you did not get back to work yet, what type of break are you on? Maternity break Unemployment
Parental education break Home mum
other ..............................
Before the bronchiolitis started, did you? totally breastfeed partially breastfeed
Would you describe your breastfeeding as easy ? From 1(not at all) to 5 (totally) =……
Before the hospitalization, had you ever used a breast pump ? Yes No
Did (name of the patient) have a single room in hospital ? Yes No only in some wards
Was there a bed available for you in (name of the patient)’s room? Yes No only in some wards
If there was no bed, was there an armchair or any other sleeping
accommodation?
Yes No only in some wards
Was there an armchair for breastfeeding in the room? Yes No only in some wards
Was there a written document about breastfeeding available for you during
hospitalization ?
Yes No only in some wards
Was there a breast pump available for you during hospitalization ? Yes No only in some wards
Did you feel supported with your breastfeeding during hospitalization ? From 1(not at all) to 5 (totally) =……
Did you have difficulties in breastfeeding during hospitalization ? From 1(not at all) to 5 (totally) =……
Do you feel hospitalization might have interfered with your breastfeeding ? From 1(not at all) to 5 (totally) =……
How was your breastfeeding just after hospitalization? Exclusive / partial / stopped
For mothers who stopped during hospitalization :
Was it your intention to stop your breastfeeding at that moment?
From 1(not at all) to 5 (totally) =……
Was your breastfeeding modified by hospitalization ? Yes No
If so, what was modified ?
Length ? exclusivness ?
other...................................................
What do you feel were the reasons for this modification ? (multiple answers
possible)
-severity of the bronchiolitis ?
-lack of support?
-personal organisation issues?
-logistic issues (breast pump, bedding, etc...)
in hospital ward?
Other?..............................................................
Page 17 of 17
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
Breastfeeding disruption during hospitalization for
bronchiolitis in children, telephone survey
Journal: BMJ Paediatrics Open
Manuscript ID bmjpo-2017-000158.R3
Article Type: Original article
Date Submitted by the Author: 07-Sep-2017
Complete List of Authors: Heilbronner, Claire; Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris, Roy, Emeline; Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris Hadchouel, Alice; Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris Jebali, Sabrine; Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris Smii, Siwar; Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris Masson, Alexandra; Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris
Renolleau, Sylvain ; Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris Rigourd, Virginie; Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris
Keywords: General Paediatrics, Nursing Care, Nutrition, Respiratory
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open on July 14, 2020 by guest. P
rotected by copyright.http://bm
jpaedsopen.bmj.com
/bm
jpo: first published as 10.1136/bmjpo-2017-000158 on 28 S
eptember 2017. D
ownloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
1
Breastfeeding disruption during hospitalization for bronchiolitis in children, telephone
survey
Claire Heilbronner 1, Emeline Roy
2, AliceHadchouel
3, Sabrine Jebali
4, Siwar Smii
4,
Alexandra Masson1, Sylvain Renolleau
1, VirginieRigourd
4
Affiliations: 1 Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, AP-HP, Necker Hospital-Sick Children, Paris, France 2 Pediatric Department, AP-HP, Necker Hospital -Sick Children, Paris, France 3 Pediatric Pulmonology Department, AP-HP, Necker Hospital -Sick Children, Paris, France 4 Region Ile de France Human milk bank, AP-HP, Necker Hospital -Sick Children, Paris, France
Address correspondence to:
Dr Claire Heilbronner Pediatric Intensive Care Unit AP-HP, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, 149 rue de Sèvres, Paris, 75015 France e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +33.1.71.19.64.61; Fax: Tel: +33.1.44.49.42.17
Abbreviations:
PICU: Pediatric intensive Care Unit
Word count:2421
Key words: Bronchiolitis, breastfeeding, unwanted weaning
Page 1 of 17
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
2
ABSTRACT
Background
Hospitalization for an acute bronchiolitis might lead to unwanted weaning off breastfeeding
for several reasons (respiratory distress, use of enteral or parenteral feeding, mothers’
tiredness, etc..) yet it has never been really evaluated nor quantified.
Methods
We conducted this telephone survey to evaluate breastfeeding disruption during
hospitalization for bronchiolitis and try to identify its determining factors for future
interventions.
This cross sectional study extends over one epidemic season of bronchiolitis in a tertiary care
hospital. All patients aged 6 months or younger hospitalized with acute bronchiolitis and
receiving at least partial breastfeeding were eligible for the study (n=144). Patients discharged
home whose parents accepted to be contacted for a phone survey were included. Parents were
contacted 3 month (range 0.5-6) after discharge.
Results
Eighty four patients were included in the study. Median length of hospital stay was 3 days (1;
34) and 27 patients spent some time in PICU.
Forty three mothers stated that hospitalization modified their breastfeeding (17 stopped, 12
switched to partial breastfeeding and 14 reduced without stopping). Mothers stated that the
causes of breastfeeding disturbance were lack of support and advices (n=27) followed by
child’s respiratory disease (n=14), logistic hospital difficulties (n=13) and personal
organization issues (n=4).
Conclusion
Admission to hospital with bronchiolitis may adversely affect breastfeeding.
Page 2 of 17
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
3
Correct advices and support could be a determining factor and further studies should focus on
preventive interventions.
What is already known on this topic Breastfeeding may be affected during hospitalization for bronchiolitis. This issue has not been quantified and no data can support any intervention. What this study adds There is a high rate of breastfeeding disruption during hospitalization for bronchiolitis. Lack of support for breastfeeding was a major problem.
INTRODUCTION
Breastfeeding is a well-documented protective factor against respiratory diseases in
children.[1–3] Exclusive breastfeeding should therefore be promoted and international
guidelines recommend to maintain it at least until the age of 6 months.[1,2]
Breastfeeding though is not always easy.[3] A recent survey estimated that 75% of infants
were breastfed in maternity wards in France (including partial breastfeeding) but only 40% of
children were still partially breastfed after 3 months.[4,5]
Children’s health might influence breastfeeding continuation (quality of sucking, short
breathing in respiratory or cardiologic diseases, mother/ child separation, mother’s fatigue,
formula introduction).
In France, about 500000 infants are affected with acute bronchiolitis each year.[6] Among
children consulting at the emergency room, about 50% of children under 6 months (and 62%
under 3 months) require hospitalization[7] and 10 to 15% spend some time in PICU for
respiratory support.[8]
Hospitalization for an acute bronchiolitis might lead to unwanted weaning off breastfeeding
for several reasons:
-dyspnea, sucking difficulties or even swallowing difficulties can occur
Page 3 of 17
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
4
-enteral or parenteral feeding can be necessary, sometimes with formula milk
-mothers might not always be able to stay continuously with their child in hospital (either
because of hospital accommodation or because of family situation, working issues…)
-mothers might get stressed and tired, sleep badly, eat or drink less than usual or irregularly
-breast milk expression might not always be easy in hospital by lack of material or caregiving
attention
-caregivers might have different attitudes towards breastfeeding and may give contradictory
advices.
Only Lapillone and al. mention breastfeeding disturbance among the potential impacts of an
hospitalization for bronchiolitis.[9,10] No study has been published to specifically measure
breastfeeding disruption during hospitalization for bronchiolitis although the high number of
patients affected makes it a potentially important health issue.
With no study available, no intervention can be proposed in national or international
guidelines on bronchiolitis.
We conducted this preliminary study to try to measure the chance of breastfeeding being
impaired during a hospitalization for bronchiolitis in children previously breastfed and to try
to identify children, mother or hospital factors that might be associated with poor
breastfeeding outcome for future intervention.
Our hospital participates in many actions to promote breastfeeding but it hasn’t the “Baby
Friendly Initiative” accreditation.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This study is a single centre telephone survey conducted from October 1st 2015 to February
15th 2016 at Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital in Paris (tertiary care) in all wards attending to
Page 4 of 17
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
5
patients with acute bronchiolitis (pediatric ward,pediatric pulmonology ward and pediatric
intensive care unit (PICU)).
Bronchiolitis was defined on the basis of history and physical examination as rhinorrhoea,
cough, tachypnea, wheezing, increased respiratory effort expressed by grunting, nasal flaring,
and intercostal and/or subcostal retractions.[11] Apneic bronchiolitis in neonates were also
included. Hospital admission was decided by emergency ward’s attending physicians. PICU
admission was decided according to intensivist’s assessment. Standard care was given
accordingly to both French and US latest guidelines.[6,11]
Study design:
Were eligible for the study
-all infants under 6month on admission
-with acute bronchiolitis and no other serious condition
-breastfed (at least partially) on admission
-discharged home
All parents signed a consent form on admission allowing extraction of data from medical
charts. Parents were also informed about this study during hospitalization if possible (pre-
inclusion) or received information either by mail or by e-mail when reached on the phone for
the survey itself.
We included all patients whose parents spoke French, had been informed about the study and
accepted to answer a standardized survey on the phone after discharge. Parents were
contacted 3 month (range 0.5-6) after discharge.
We did not include parents that could not be reached on their phone. Patients could not be
included twice in the event of recurrent bronchiolitis during the study period.
We made the hypothesis that bronchiolitis would be associated with alterations of
breastfeeding and that severity of bronchiolitis would be associated with unwanted weaning.
Page 5 of 17
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
6
We also aimed at identifying patients or hospital conditions at risk of breastfeeding disruption
and that might be targeted in future interventions.
Data collection included
-data collected from the caregivers (both paramedical and medical staff): patient/nurse ratio,
existence of breastfeeding experts among caregivers
-data extracted from the charts: growth evaluation (birth weight, growth, weight on admission
and at discharge), length of stay, PICU requirements, length of oxygen or ventilatory support
requirement, enteral or parenteral nutritional support, room accommodation during
hospitalization
-answers from the survey (see supplementary file) concerning past and present occupation and
family situation (basic social background) that could be relevant to explain weaning off
breastfeeding, tobacco exposure, breastfeeding help and material (breast pump, freezer)
available during hospital stay
-answers from the survey (see supplementary file) concerning total or partial weaning off
breastfeeding at discharge or in the fortnight following discharge, mother’s opinion on the
cause of the weaning (severity of the bronchiolitis, lack of support, personal organization
issues and/or logistic issues in hospital ward), mother’s opinion and satisfaction about
breastfeeding support during hospitalization.
When the mothers did not have sufficient time to answer all the questions on the phone, the
questions about occupation, familial situation and tobacco exposure were skipped from the
survey.
The study was approved by the ethical board of the French Pediatric Society (CER_SFP
2015_009_2).
Statistical analysis:
Page 6 of 17
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
7
Data are expressed as median values (with minimum and maximum values) for continuous
variables, and number for binary or categorical data.
Student test was used for qualitative (categorical) variables. For comparison of non-
parametric means, Wilcoxon’s test was used if necessary for quantitative (numerical) criteria
while χ2 and Fisher’s exact test was used to compare qualitative criteria. P values < 0.05 were
considered statistically significant.
Analyses were performed with Biostat TGV software ®.
RESULTS
During the study period 332 patients under 6 months were hospitalized at our hospital for 345
episodes of bronchiolitis (see figure 1). Among these, 144 patients were breastfed, totally
(n=107) or partially (n=37). Four were not included because they did not speak any French
and 56 did not answer their phone despite several calls at different times of the day, 84
patients could be included in the study. The median delay for phone contact was 3 months
(0.5;6).
Among eligible patients, no significant difference could be observed regarding length of stay,
need for PICU, respiratory support, nutritional support between included (n=84) and non-
included patients (n=60).
Bronchiolitis description (n=84)
Median length of stay for all breastfed patients was 3 days(1; 34), 27 patients spent some time
in PICU (median length in PICU: 3 days (1;26)). One patient needed invasive ventilation for
10 days, 18 received either Non Invasive Ventilation (NIV) or high flow oxygen for 3 days
(1; 9), 34 patients received standard oxygen for 3 days (1;7), and 34 patients received no
respiratory support during hospitalization. No patient died of bronchiolitis during the study
Page 7 of 17
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
8
period. Regarding feeding difficulties, 45 patients received nutritional support, either by
enteral feeding (n=38) or parenteral nutrition (n=5) or both (n=2).
Socioeconomic background (n=54)
Answers about socio-economical background were available for 54/84 patients. Most
breastfeeding mothers (n=52) did not smoke and lived as a couple (n=53). Concerning
occupation, 1 mother was working at the time of hospitalization, 28 were on maternity leave,
10 were on a parental education leave and 15 were housewives.
Breastfeeding during hospitalization (n=84)
Sixty five patients were exclusively breastfed before, the others received both breast milk and
formula milk. Forty-three mothers stated that their breastfeeding had been modified by the
hospitalization of their child, either moderately (n=19) or totally (n= 17).
Among those 43 mothers
-17stopped breastfeeding
-12 switched from total breastfeeding to partial breastfeeding
-14 reduced breastfeeding without stopping or switching.
Remaining mothers (41/84) stated that they kept breastfeeding as before, or that their
breastfeeding modification was not due to hospitalization but was a personal choice or a
planned weaning.
Daily growth rate before hospitalization and type of breastfeeding before hospitalisation (as
described in table 1) did not significantly differ between mothers who reduced or stopped
breastfeeding and those who continued to breastfeed normally.
The patients whose breastfeeding was affected had a tendency to be younger (p=0.06).
No statistically significant difference was observed regarding medical severity of the
bronchiolitis evaluated by length of stay, oxygen requirement or need for respiratory support,
Page 8 of 17
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
9
enteral or parenteral feeding during hospitalization, growth evaluation on admission, PICU
admission (table 1).
When asked about the causes of their breastfeeding difficulties, mothers who reduced
breastfeeding mentioned
-n=27: lack of support and advices
-n=14:severity of child’s respiratory disease
-n=13: logistics issues (difficulties to draw breast milk, availability of breast pumps, room
accommodation and bedding for mothers, introduction of formula milk or baby bottle)
-n=4: personal and family organization issues due to hospitalization (sitting the siblings, long
journey home).
All children were in single rooms and all mothers could sleep in the same room as their child.
Patient/nurse ratio was 3/1 in ICU and6 or 7/1 in paediatric ward and pulmonology ward.
Each ward had several breastfeeding experts among doctors or nurses.
Data about prior experience with breastfeeding was available for 63 breastfeeding mothers.
Mothers in the study had a median number of children of 2 (1;5) and had an experience of
cumulated breastfeeding for their children of 8 month (0.9; 36). No difference was observed
between groups regarding cumulated length of previous breastfeeding for the elder children.
DISCUSSION
Our study showed a high rate of breastfeeding on admission compared to epidemiologic
surveys[4,5] but also a very high rate of breastfeeding disturbance during hospitalization for
bronchiolitis as previously suggested in a large multicentre study.[9,10] Hospitalization of
infants for bronchiolitis in our survey lead to undesired weaning off breastfeeding, transition
to mixed breastfeeding or even partial changes that may affect the nutritional balance suitable
for infants and alter their protection against further respiratory events.[12,13]
Page 9 of 17
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
10
Our study is subject to possible biases, the most important is that it is single centred
Several local particularities could have influenced the results in our hospital:
-Increasing the number of nurses might help to better support breastfeeding mothers since it is
a time-consuming activity, probably even more in an epidemic period with high workload.
The nurse to patient ratio seemed correct in our wards but we could not find much data about
optimal ratio in the literature.
-It is possible that breastfeeding knowledge or involvement is not optimal among our
caregivers despite the fact that all the nurses in our hospital are specifically trained for
paediatrics. Hence the results in our study give baseline information about what happens to
breastfeeding during bronchiolitis with no or minimal support from caregivers.
-Room accommodation could be considered non optimal in our hospital but we believe that it
would be similar or possibly even worse in some other settings since our hospital is a
referring and teaching hospital with most paediatric wards hosted in a new building
inaugurated in 2013, and with all patients being bedded in single rooms with possible sleeping
accommodation for parents.
The long time period between hospitalization and survey is another possible bias for it could
have altered the quality of answers from the mothers, but Lapillonne et al. concluded in their
study that interrogation as far as 6 months after hospitalization can be considered as relevant
to evaluate burden of hospitalization.[9] Moreover, this delay has helped not to include
transitory modifications after hospitalization and to only collect data on persistent alterations
of breastfeeding.
The last potential bias is that a significant amount of patients could not be reached on the
phone. If we consider that all eligible mothers that we could not include in this survey
continued their breastfeeding with no disturbance (which is unlikely), we still have 43/144
mothers whose breastfeeding was either stopped or altered.
Page 10 of 17
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
11
Exclusive breastfeeding was not a protective factor in our study and we even noticed a non-
significant tendency to the opposite (and a tendency for children with altered breastfeeding to
be younger). It is possible that very young infants about 10-15 days old are more frequently
exclusively breastfed but are also those whose breastfeeding is the more fragile. We should
probably be more supportive for the mothers of those very young infants.
We expected to find severity of respiratory disease as the first factor for breastfeeding
discontinuation but only 32% of mothers pointed out the severity of disease as one of the
causes for unwanted weaning. It is possible that the delay between discharge and phone call
could have altered mother’s perception, or that some guilty feelings about weaning off
breastfeeding might have influenced the answers, but objective evaluation of respiratory
distress on medical charts (length of stay, PICU requirements, respiratory and nutritional
support) did not differ between groups. It is possible that most severe patients with long PICU
stay and invasive ventilation should be more impacted but our study was not powerful enough
to evaluate this. It is important to notice that breastfeeding disturbance observed in our
patients occurred despite a short length of stay (median 3 days) and despite a good outcome of
this acute but rather benign respiratory disease. Caregivers might be underestimating the
possible impact of such a short stay on breastfeeding and think that it will go back to normal
after discharge but this is not what we observed in our patients.
Lack of support from caregivers was the first factor pointed out by mothers after discharge. It
is possible that this lack of support might be less important in other hospitals, especially in
countries where breastfeeding is better supported. Yet, although relying mostly on mothers
recall and perception, this information is still very important as it is modifiable for further
practice. If other studies confirm the results of our survey, it could lead to recommendations
of therapeutic interventions to prevent unwanted weaning during bronchiolitis, especially in
younger infants for which breastfeeding is still precarious.
Page 11 of 17
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
12
Our data encourages us to endorse preventive measures in all wards hosting patients with
bronchiolitis (even if children stay in hospital for a very short length of time)especially to
support mothers during hospitalization.
We only studied bronchiolitis in hospital but it is possible that children who do not require
hospitalization might also suffer from altered breastfeeding; this should be evaluated in
another prospective study involving outpatient’s caregivers.
CONCLUSION
With no intervention, bronchiolitis in a breastfed infant is a hazardous situation for
breastfeeding with about half of mothers of hospitalized children either stopping or
diminishing their breastfeeding during hospitalization.
These results should encourage caregivers to evaluate breastfeeding’s alterations in their own
patients and to take in consideration that these alterations may not be transitory.
Correct advice and support at this critical time could be a determining factor of
breastfeeding’s continuation and further studies should focus on interventions to prevent
unwanted weaning.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank for her English editing Mrs Guillemette Roy, UGET
Translations, Paris, France
S.Jebali and S. Smii both received a grant from the Regional Agency for Health (ARS IDF)
but have no other conflict of interest to disclose.
The other authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to
disclose.
Page 12 of 17
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
13
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or
not-for-profit sectors.
Authors contribution
Dr Heilbronner conceptualized and designed the study, drafted the initial manuscript,
analysed the data, reviewed and revised the manuscript and approved the final manuscript as
submitted.
Dr Roy, Dr Hadchouel, Dr Masson and Dr Renolleau participated in patients’ selection and
data collection, reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as
submitted.
Ms Smii and Ms Jebali managed patient’s selection and interrogation, critically reviewed the
manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted.
Dr Rigourd helped conceptualize and design the study, coordinated and supervised data
collection, reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as
submitted.
REFERENCES
1 Kramer MS, Kakuma R. Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding. In: The Cochrane
Collaboration, ed. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Chichester, UK: : John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2002. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD003517 (accessed 27 Sep 2016).
2 World Health Organization. Infant and young child feeding: model chapter for textbooks for medical students and allied health professionals. 2009. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK148965/ (accessed 27 Sep 2016).
3 Cattaneo A, Yngve A, Koletzko B, et al. Protection, promotion and support of breast-feeding in Europe: current situation. Public HealthNutr 2005;8:39–46.
4 Salanave B, de Launay C, Bouder-Berquier J, et al. Durée de l’allaitement maternel en France (Épifane 2012-2013). Bull EpidémiolHebd 2014;2014:450–7.
5 Kersuzan C, Gojard S, Tichit C, et al.Prévalence de l’allaitement à la maternité selon les caractéristiques des parents et les conditions de l’accouchement. Résultats de l’enquête elfe maternité, France métropolitaine, 2011. Bull EpidémiolHebd 2014;2014:440–9.
Page 13 of 17
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
14
6 [Consensus conference on the management of infant bronchiolitis. Paris, France, 21 September 2000. Proceedings]. Arch PédiatrieOrgane Off Sociéte Fr Pédiatrie 2001;8 Suppl 1:1s–196s.
7 Che D, Caillère N, Josseran L. [Surveillance and epidemiology of infant bronchiolitis in France]. Arch PédiatrieOrgane Off Sociéte Fr Pédiatrie 2008;15:327–8. doi:10.1016/j.arcped.2007.11.014
8 Fortin N, Gras-Le Guen C, Picherot G, et al.aractéristiques des épidémies de bronchiolite dans l’agglomération nantaise, 2007-2012: apport de différentes sources de données. Bull EpidémiolHebd 2014;2014:58–64.
9 Lapillonne A, Regnault A, Gournay V, et al. Development of a questionnaire to assess the impact on parents of their infant’s bronchiolitis hospitalization. BMC Health Serv Res 2013;13:272. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-272
10 Lapillonne A, Regnault A, Gournay V, et al. Impact on parents of bronchiolitis hospitalization of full-term, preterm and congenital heart disease infants. BMC Pediatr 2012;12:171. doi:10.1186/1471-2431-12-171
11 Ralston SL, Lieberthal AS, Meissner HC, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline: The Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Bronchiolitis. PEDIATRICS 2014;134:e1474–502. doi:10.1542/peds.2014-2742
12 Turck D, Vidailhet M, Bocquet A, et al. Allaitement maternel : les bénéfices pour la santé de l’enfant et de sa mère. Arch Pédiatrie 2013;20:S29–48. doi:10.1016/S0929-693X(13)72251-6
13 Ajetunmobi OM, Whyte B, Chalmers J, et al. Breastfeeding is Associated with Reduced Childhood Hospitalization: Evidence from a Scottish Birth Cohort (1997-2009). J Pediatr 2015;166:620–625.e4. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.11.013
Table 1 : Baseline and evolution comparison between groups Modified breastfeeding
(n=43) Non modified breastfeeding
(n=41) Birth weight (g)*
3330 (1010 ; 4160) 3180 (1050 ; 4695)
Gestationnal age (GW)*
38 (26 ; 39) 37 (25 ; 40)
Mean growth before hospitalisation (g/d)*
26 (-10 ; 112) 30 (0 ; 213)
Exclusive breastfeeding before hospitalisation**
35 30
Age on admission (d)*
34 (3 ; 166) 50 (16 ; 159)
Length of stay (d)*
3 (1 ; 34) 3 (1 ; 14)
Length of PICU (d)*
3 (1 ; 26) 4 (1 ; 14)
Length of ventilation (d)*
3 (1 ; 9) 3 (1 ; 6)
Length of oxygen requirement (d)*
3 (1 ; 7) 3 (1 ; 5)
Page 14 of 17
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
15
Enteral or parenteral nutrition**
25 19
Length of nutritionnal support (d)*
2 (1 ;6) 2 (1 ; 13
* Median (minimum, maximum)** n NS: non-significant, g : gram, GW : gestational weeks, d : day, PICU:pediatric intensive care unit
Page 15 of 17
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
Page 16 of 17
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
Confidential: For Review O
nly
Name of the patient……………………………………. Date of the call : …./…./……….
What was your occupation before pregnancy?
Including (name of the patient), how many children do you have? N=
How many children did you breastfeed before (name of the patient) ? N=
How long did you breastfeed the elders ? Cumulated length (month)=....
Do you live as a couple with the father? Yes No
Do you smoke ? Yes No
When did you go back to work/ when will you go back to work? Date …./…./……….
no going back to work scheduled
If you did not get back to work yet, what type of break are you on? Maternity break Unemployment
Parental education break Home mum
other ..............................
Before the bronchiolitis started, did you? totally breastfeed partially breastfeed
Would you describe your breastfeeding as easy ? From 1(not at all) to 5 (totally) =……
Before the hospitalization, had you ever used a breast pump ? Yes No
Did (name of the patient) have a single room in hospital ? Yes No only in some wards
Was there a bed available for you in (name of the patient)’s room? Yes No only in some wards
If there was no bed, was there an armchair or any other sleeping
accommodation?
Yes No only in some wards
Was there an armchair for breastfeeding in the room? Yes No only in some wards
Was there a written document about breastfeeding available for you during
hospitalization ?
Yes No only in some wards
Was there a breast pump available for you during hospitalization ? Yes No only in some wards
Did you feel supported with your breastfeeding during hospitalization ? From 1(not at all) to 5 (totally) =……
Did you have difficulties in breastfeeding during hospitalization ? From 1(not at all) to 5 (totally) =……
Do you feel hospitalization might have interfered with your breastfeeding ? From 1(not at all) to 5 (totally) =……
How was your breastfeeding just after hospitalization? Exclusive / partial / stopped
For mothers who stopped during hospitalization :
Was it your intention to stop your breastfeeding at that moment?
From 1(not at all) to 5 (totally) =……
Was your breastfeeding modified by hospitalization ? Yes No
If so, what was modified ?
Length ? exclusivness ?
other...................................................
What do you feel were the reasons for this modification ? (multiple answers
possible)
-severity of the bronchiolitis ?
-lack of support?
-personal organisation issues?
-logistic issues (breast pump, bedding, etc...)
in hospital ward?
Other?..............................................................
Page 17 of 17
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmjpo
BMJ Paediatrics Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on July 14, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjpaedsopen.bm
j.com/
bmjpo: first published as 10.1136/bm
jpo-2017-000158 on 28 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from