CALENDAR ITEM

30· 03/26/87 W 23549 PRC 7063 ,. Lane

~ 11.

s 1 APPROVAL OF A GENERAL LEASE - PUBLIC AGENCY USE

APPLICANT: City of Pittsburg 2020 Railroad Auenue Pittsburg, Calift?rn:ia 9456'5

AREA, TYPE LAND AND LOCATION: Two pa~cels totalling 8.281 acres of tide and submerged landr located in the Sacramen~o Riuer near New York Slough at Pittsburg, Contra Costa

LAND USE:

County. ·Construction of an earthen br~akwater ouer laid uri.th a ¥ishing pier. riprap placement and marina expansion. Oredge a maximum of 35,000 cubi~ yard~ of minerals other than oil, q~s and geothermal. and di~pose.of on public land.

TERMS OF PROPOSED PERMIT~ · · Initial period: 20 years beginning April 1.

1987.

CONSIDERATION,: The public use and benefit~ uiith the State reseruing the right at any time to set a monetary rental if the commission finds such action to~~ in the Stat~•s best interest and/or if reuenue ex~eeds costs.

J?-4lty: No royalt~ shall be for ~ateriaq ~laced neld for public use benefit.

•

charged on lands and

BASIS FOR CONSIOERATJ:OH: Pursuant tQ 2 Cal. Adm. CQde 2003.

(PAGES 116-116.16) (ADOEn 03/2b/87) -1~

CAUNOAIPAGE L~----·0

Ja.' MINUTE PAGE 9 t -rl

CALENDAR ITEM NO. 3-0 {CONT'Q.l

APPLIC~NT STATUS: Applicant is dwner and permittee of up1and.

PREREQUIS~~E CONDITIONS, FEES AND EXPENSES: Filing fee and procEssin~ costs have been­receiu.ad.

STATUTORY AND OTHER REFERENCES:

AB 884:

A. P.R.C.: Div. 6, P&rts land 2; Diu. 13.

B. Cal. Adm. Code: Title 2, Oiu. 3; Title 14, Diu. 6.

01/14/83.

OTHER PERTINENT ~~FORM~T!ON: 1. Marina expansion and a breakwater super

im?osed with a fishing pier to be constructed on ungranted tide and sutmerged lands is proposed by the-~ity of Pi~tsburg as part of a project to redeuelop the

1/

City. - An existing public marina is situate within lands granted to Pitts.burg by -~ Statutes of 1937, Chapter 21~. ~he City is negotiating a lease for use of 1.895 acre

(ADDED 03/20/87)

of State-owned land leased to Pacific Gas and Electric Company (P.G.&E.) under PRC 4~ upon which the project ~ill in£ri~e. The City holds a letter of permission but is ~ttempting to resolve details relatiue to mitigation for presumed killing of fish released by P.G.&E. at the site. The terms of the State lease require the appl~cant t~ complete n~~~tiations and submit the executed contract \, ~~re Commission Tor approval as a c~ndition of lease continuance.

Project financing is a $7 million 10~9 term ?oan from Cal Boa~ing.

Stringent conditions were placed on the United Stat~s Army Corps of Engineers' permit to minimize disturbance CT the enui.ronment during construction of the break112ter. Materials used in constructing it will consist of 200.000 cubi~ yards of ~arthen fill dr~dged from-the Marina basin

-2-CAUNDAR PA&E

MINL'TE PAGE

t CALENDAR ITEM NO.~~,,() (CON!'D)

to attain -9.0 feet MLLW ar.d 30.000 cubic yards of riprap pla~ i~oard and outboard of the embankment. Thirty aays preceding placement, the applican~ $ha11_submit and receiue written authorization ~ro~ the Executiue Officer for the proposed ripr-ap plan. Upon co~pletion, the City shall plant n~tiue uegetation, monitor growth for fiue years and replace any failures.

~f the 300 berths planned for the ·total projec,t. ?s open berths will lie within the proposed lease area.

The annual rental ualue of the site is estimated to be $18,632.

2. A Negatiue Declaration wa~ p.repared and adopted for th±s ~roject by the City of Pi ttsbt:rg. The State Lands Commission·' s staFf has reuiew.ed such document and belieues that it complies "With the ~equir~~ents of ·the CEQA. ·

3. Lessor h~reby consents to Lesse~•s subletting of all or any portion of the lease prenrises for be~thing or mooring purposes in conj_unction with normal commercial marina sub1easing practices for terms of one year ~r les$.

3. This ac~iuity inuolues lands which haue NOT been identified as possessing si9ni,ficant enuironmental ualues pursuant to P.R.C. 6370, et seq. Howeuer. the Commissio~ has declared that a11 tide and submerged lands are "significant" bg nature of their public ownership (as opposed to 11enuironmental significant"). Since such declaration of significance is not based upon the requirements and criteria of P.R.C. 6370. et seq .• use classifications for such lands ha\Te not been designa,ted. Theref'ore. the fi.nding of the project'1 s consistenc~ with the use classi~ication~s required ~Y 2 Cal. Adm. Code 2954 is not applicab~~-

CAtENDAR !ACE 11 6 • 2 MINUTfPACli 9 ·1 6 (ADDED 03/20/87) -3-

' CALENDAR ITEM NO. 30c (CO-..l! .. 01

APPROUA~S OBTAINED: United State\ AMllY Corps of £f~n•ers. Department o( loatin9 and wa~1,.,...,t, United States Fish and Wild11;;fe se•-v1c~. Regional Nater Quality Control l~&rd, City of Pittsburg Plannin' co.,.ission, •net United States Enuiron .. ntal Protection A9ency.

EXHIBITS: h. land Description. B. Location Map, C. Negative Declaration.

IT IS kfCOMMENDED THAT THE COMMISSION:

l. FIND THAT A NEGAT1~~ DECLARATION ~AS PRcPARED AND ADOP ~o FOR THIS PROJ'ECT BY THE CITY OF P1

_ TTSBURG AND THAT THE COMMISSION HAS REVIEWED AND CONSIO£RED. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED THEREIN.

2. DETERMINE T~AT THE PROJECT, AS APPROVED, HILL NOT HAVE A SIG~IFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT.

3. FIND THAT THE SIGNIFICANT EN~IRONMENTAL VALUES ORIGINALLY IDENTIFIED PURSUANT TO ~.~.C. 5370, ET SEQ., ARE NOT WITHIN THE PROJECT SITE AND WILL NOT SE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJ'ECT.

4. AUTHORIZE DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY TO THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER TO ACCEPT AND APPROVE A PROJECT RIPRAP PLAC~MENT ·PLAN.

5. DETERMINE THAT APPROVAL OF THE LEASE IS SUBJECT TO THE COMMISSIONtS APPROVAL OF A LEASE BETWcE~ PACIFIC GAS ANO ELECTRIC COMPANY (PRC 4444) AND CITY OF -PITTSBURG ~THlN SIX MONTHS OF APRIL 1, 1987 FOR L~NOS ENCUMBERED av· S~ID LEASE.

6. AUT-HORIZE ISSUANCE TO CITY OF PITTSBURG 1CF A 20-YEAR GENERAL LEASE - PUBLIC AGENCY USE BEGINNING ~PRil l, 1~87: IM CONSIDERATION OF THE PUBLIC USE AND BENEFIT, WITH THE STATE RESERVING THE RIGHT AT ANY TIME TO SET A ·MO~ETARY RENTAL If THE COMMISSION FINDS SIJCH ,ACTION TO SE lN THf STATE'S BEST INTEREST; ANO/OR IF REVENUE-EXCEEDS COSTS: fOR CONS1:RUCTION ANO MAINTENANCE OF A CoMBINATION BRE~KWATER AND FISHING PIER AND· MARINA EXPANSION: DREDGE A MAX~MUM VOLUME OF 35,000 CUB~C VAROS OF MAT.ERIAL (TO BE 'DISPOSED ON PUBLIC LANDS) ON THE LAND DESCRIBED· ·ON EXHIBIT "~" ATTACHED AND BY REFERE~CE M~DE A PART HEREQf.

(ADDED 03/20/87) .,,,.4-CAl£NDAA PAGE

MINUTEPAGf

'6 .3

•

BmtBIT •A•

• 231~t

Two paEcols of tide and suba~cqed land tµ th• s,era .. ato •i~•r. vicinitl'· of Pittsburq·. contra Costa county. C&lifocaia. dtiscribed as follows=

PARCEL 1

B!!GIHNING at Station 6 as shown on t:.he aap entitl·•cl ~Plat of the North Property Line of P.G.&!!.•. filed for record in Book 19. Page 33. Licensed ~nd surv~ys. ~ontra Costa County Records~ thence fro• aai« point of :beginttinq alonq said proper~Y line M 72022•01• w. 473.90 feet: thence leaving said line • 17037•21• s. 319.06 feet: thence H 3so2s•11• w 129.tt f••~. tbeace N 45056 1 11• E 137.31 feet: thence s 7zo22•01• s. 566.'65 feet: thenct.i s 17037•se• w. l.411<>2• feet: th0nce ~ a9047•57• tii. s2.so feet: thence s 17037 1 se• w. 355.18 feet to ~be point of be•iaalM9.

PARCE~ 2

BEGINNING at Stati1n 5 as shown oa tb• ... ea~icl .. "Plat of the North Prnpe.tty Lin• of P.c.n.•. -f.!1 .. for reco.cd in Book l.9. Page 33. ·t.ieeas_. .,. .. SUrftf•. contra Costa county ~e~oEds: thence froa ••l• fOlat of beginning along said pro~erty liae S 12022•01• •• l.89.ae feet: thence ·1eavin9 s&i4 property llae N 17037'28• E 319.06 feet; thence M 1102s•i1• w. J,29. 99 f~t: thence s 45056•11 • 1f 4t6., 47 ffft to a point on ·~laid propecty line: th•nc• alot19 ••1• property ):ine s aeos2•32• E. lSt.lt f .. t to t .. point of beqinninq.

This description is based on the C&llfornia Coor4iaate •r•tea of 1927. zone 3.

DD O!' DBSClllPTIOlf '41

Plll'llED 'URCH 9. 1987 • BY BOUlfDUY SDVIC&S UllIT. 11. t. .. i~Klt. SUP!!RVISOR.

0373b

CAlENOAR PACI

MINURPAGE

EXHIBIT w 23649

"B"

....

EXHIBIT 11C" w 23649

I .. Karina Ei:pansicn•Phas~ JJJ Contr•~t. 8!-•01 ;;.rch I, 198$ SCH '8411lC06

1. Project Description and Location: Thi• ia a 't!it.y initiat.ed prosioul to construct a nev buin for >00 new. open anUor cmrere4 boat berths for remational boats locat.ed on approiti-tel!i 20 acns on uie shonliae of iwm\'•lay where tM aacr-nto tiver an4 llev 'Yorlc S10la9h •r9e. Stie .. jorUy o~ ~ p;opoaal will !:le located on the forMr Mcint•it~ Scrttilge Tnat­aent Met.

,,_ profOSal ~1Ulles •xc-aU.on to a depth of -11 fHt ••• level. creatift9 26,000 Cilb.t.c 7ud.t of aatarial. IW.Uble disposal' situ 1ri the Pitti1?H.ir9 area have been found for all axcavatlcn ~•rial. ·

Other upecta of the proj•ct incl~i ll construction et to0:: ilOO foot coebin~tioc fisbift9 piac and bnU..atar. 2) COl\st!'ISC:tion of a 400 apace d"Y~clc and boat npair facility, 3J ?roYicion for t6 puking spaces, 4J o:mstin:ction cf public -11Na,.. around tbe·~in. 5) Cl:metruction of rest~, 6) blocation of a portion of Jtivemev Pad:.

2. l'indh\9z The Coeaunlty Development Director hss deten:ined that th• project described above will iv.it.lave a si~nificant effect on tb• envir0Nme11t for the followin~ reasons:

3. ~tateaent of' Reasons to SUPf9.~~ i:be Findin5 (Hitiqaticn ~easuresJ J.. Glmltral Planl!:'-"14 ~ CC!f•tihiUt; ~ project is C'Cnsbtent vith the General i11-1 designation of racreat!.onal ~rcial and th• surrounc!in9 land is vacant nsi­damial vt\lch is proposed to !la developed with water criented r•!:jid•ntial deYalOPMnts.

-=P.~ Tr&ffic/Cir=l.ati°'1s 1'be projac:t is ~expected to ,.narate a signific!Lftt uount , of U'affic. 'nw cxistin9 dcwnto!m ci::c:ulatiOft proviClaa access froa Jtailrcad Awnua

m4 ~r Streat. Mcia for ra!lftl&d. trade sr.i-ration FO:i•ct• on these roa4a !la,,. bet.~ approwd aind will :1ag>ron accessibility of t.'le project •

•

~ irJIP!Cttu '!be pn>jac:t will increan AOiM levels in th• area oci a tppoe-~~ is d~1!l'9 .c::onstriM:t!cn. · 'ft\i• can bl mi~9ata~ by nquirin9 truclcs c"arryit.9 11atarial~' t:!le fill site to operate batwe.n tha·1'our& of 8:00 •·•· and 5sOO p.a •• Mon4ay throuqt\.

cid&y. • .

o. ~ l!(!!lctU TbC' vates: cSi•char<Je f:oa tha project is not e:cpected t.o UIPact t:ha . '111'1~-:Y of veter ~auaa the auspancled particles and silt will be contained in settlj~g joni~. '1'h4I City intenda ~ file a report of·vaate discliar9e with the .. ,iond Water Qlaa1f.ey Control Soud, as required, for the disposal of-5urplus vater contained in tlla i:a"'..'tllnf pcmda.

z. l!£!C'~:!. ~ ~ ltesourc-.cs '!'tie project is pro?i>sed on th• forMr llOnta&- Sava~ '!'reataotn~ Flant site so there 1~ no natural V99etation er unique ~hysi~al f•aturec on the zite. 'I'. ~ l!fip!~..ss Air quality, seiaair., hydrologic .and other impacts aire mt ~idend •19nificant for this proposal. .

•• ~i~:

A precise description of the project and an •nvirc~ental analysis of Ui· p0tential effects of the subject- proposal my be rev1ev9d at th~ Pitt.abur9 COl!llUnity Development Depart1tent-Plannin9 Division, 'S Ci,,ic Avenue, Pittsburg, CA. 94565.

s. APS:'al Proecdure:

'fhe deters::ina~ion of the Co11111uni~y Dev•lOPIN!nt Director .. y be appeale$l. by any ~rao~7 not later ~an the unth (10th) 43y fo11Qflng the abOV• 4ate. The appeal ehall be filed with th•

Ci<y Clerk, 2020 bilr .. 4 ,. ... ~~~·::R~

• ABRAHAN, A.!.C.I'. 6 ~ity Dewalopaent Director • CDP 012

. -

CAU:NDAK PACE

MINUTE PAGE

116 .6

920

1. Background

CITY OF PITTSBURG COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENi' DEPARTMENT

lMITI~ STUDY .Clfl"CKLIST

1. Bame of Proponent City of Pittsburg ------~--------------------------------

i... Address and Phone Number of Proponent -(-fiS> 439-4920

~ Civic Avenue, Post Office Box 1518, Pittsburg, CA 94565-1518

3. -~~te of Checklitst Submi.ssion February 13, 1985

4. Agency Requiring Checklist ___ c_i_t~y.__o_f __ P_i_t_t_sb_u_r_s""'-----------

s. Kame of Proposal, if applicable z.iari~a Expansion Phase III

I. Brief Descri~tion of Proposal (see attached)

: II. Environmental Iinpacu- . "!" a

(Explanations of all •y4!s• and •maybe• answers are req1,1ired . W on f.J.ttached sheets.)

l. Earth- Will the proposal result iD:

b.

Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures?

Disruptions, dlsplacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil:?

c. Change in topography or ground surf ace relief features?

d .. ~he destruction, covering or ~if ication of uny unique geologic or physica:t 'features?

e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or of·f the site?

YES MAYBE- MO

x

. .lL

x

e x

CAlENOAR PAGE 11 6 • 7

9,.....,

-1- A_UF•UTE PAGE _ L 1 ......._~~-=======:::J

. e

Y£5 MAYBE 110

f • Alteration of the 4ir~ction or rate of flow of .. CJroun4 waters? _ _ .

J•

Change in the qua~titY of 9roun4 waters, either through direct aaaition• or t.h~ougb inter­ception of ~n aquifer by cuts or excavaticms? -

b. substantia'l zetniction in 'the a1ll0unt of wate~ otherwise available for public water --• supplies? Exposure of people o~ pro~rty ~o water related ba:aras such as flooding or ti•al waves? --- --Change in the c;uali~Y of ground water. --

4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:

a.

- - . Change in the diversity of s~cies, ot._numl:?er cf.~ny species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, .and aquatic· plants)? ; ;: .... --

c.

Reclu~tion of tbe-:lumber-S-Of any ~nique, .rare ?r endange~ed species of plants?

Introduction of new"species of plants into an area. or ~n a barrier to the normal. replen­ishment of existing speci~s?

a. Reduction in acreage of any ~gricultural crop? ·

·6. Anirnal Life. result in:

Will the proposal .

a. Change in·tbe diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals, including rep­tiles, fish and.shellfish, benthic organism~, or insects?

------·

--

x -

x --

x -

x_

x

x --

x

CALENDAR PAGE

MINU"fE PAGE

116.8 c ,, " ~ ' ...

-3-

YES MAYBE 110

):f. ~ecluctic;n of ·the -number• of any unique, ra~e or en4angere4 species of ani'INi!~?

c. Introc!uc~ion of new specie• of piul• ·into an:area, or result in a bar~ier t.o-the 1ftigr•~ion or 110vement of animala?

a. oeterio~ation to ..xi~ting fish or vi14life habitat?

- -

-----

6. Roi•t!,· Will the proposal result t"n:

7.

a. Incr•ases in existing noise levels?

b. Exposure of people t.o severe noise ~evel•?

Light an~ 'Gl'are. Will the proposal produce new light o~ glare? .. _

x - -- --

9. Lar.d use. Will the proposal result In a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? -

9. Natural Resources. Will the propos~l result in:

a. xncrease in •he rate of use of :~y natural resources? -

b. substantial depletion of any non­renewable natural resource? -

c. contribute toward the depletion of prime class soils. -

a. contaminate or contribute tQWard the contamination of natural resou~ces.

if\• Risk of Upset. Does the proposal lnvoi ve a risk cf. an explosion .-or th".: rele1.1se of hazardous substances (ineluding, but no~. limited to~ oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset

·-conditions? -

x

x -x -

·-x -x_

x

x -x -

x

CALENDAR PAGE --4-

MINUTE PACE

•

-

-

YES MAYBE 1'0

f. Changes ~n deposition or erosion of beach aanaa, or change• in sil~tion, deposition or erosion which .. Y 904if y t:he channel of a river or at.ream or the bec5 of the ocean or any 'bay, inlet or

2.

3.

lake? - -CJ.

sxp:>aure of people or property to gttelogical bezards such a• eaarthqu•k••· 1anc!a114en, aua-alic5es. ground failure, or siJlilar bftzarc!s? - -

ur. 11111 the proposal result in:

-a. substantial air emi'ssion• or

deterioration of ambiont air quality? - -

)). 'the creation of objeetionable oaors? - -

c. Alter~tion of air movement, aoiature or temperature, or any change in ~\imate, either locally or regionally? - -

Will tbe pr"!posal result in: water. a. Cb.Angeli i.n currents; or the

course or direction of water movements. in either aarin~ or fresh waters? --changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and :amount of surface runoff?

c. Alterations to the course of fl!"' of flood vaters? ·

' a. Change in the amount of aurface water in any water 1>04y?

e. Discharge into surface waters

- -----

x --or in any alt~ration gf surface water quality, including, but not limited to temperature6 dissolved o~~en -or turbi~ity? ___

- =-

x - -

x -x -~ ~

x -x

CALEl'il)AR PAGE

MINUTE PAGE

116. 10

924

•

11·

. .. Population. Will tile pr:>rsal ihc locatiem, diat.ribut.ion, or cremt.~ a deraand for addi~ional housing?

alter

-12• · Housing. Mill t:he proposal af feet:

existing housing, or create a denanc1 for additional nouaing?

13- 'l'ranspor·tation/Cizculation. Will the proposal result In:

... Generr·".ion of sabstanti11l a:11!i­tiona: ·11'!'icular -movement?

. -b. Effec\: _. ~·=· existing parking

facil~~ies, or demfina for.new parking?

c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems?

d. Alteration= t.o present patterns of circulation or JnOvement of people and/or goods?

.,. e. Alterations to waterborne, raii

or air traffic? ·

f. Increase in t.ra~f~c hazardous to motor vehicles, bicycli~ts or· pedg.•trians?

l~ .. Pul>lic Servi~es. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or alterea governmental services in any of the following areas:

a. Fire protection?

Police Drote~tion? . -Co Schools?

a. Parks or oth2r recreationa·l facilities? ....!__

e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ·-

£. Other government.ll services?

............ .. ....

CALENDAR PAtiE

MINUTE PAGE

x

x - -x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

11 6.11

925

.e

e

~ES W'YBE

1!; znerCJx.· Will the p~oposal result

in:

•• use of substantial amounts of

·- fuel or energy? -b.

substantial increase in aeman4 upon exi~ting source• of energy, or require the aevelopllt!nt of new sources of energy? - -

• Vt~1it1••· Will the proposal resul~ 16 "in s\ibstantial alteration• to the folloving

utilities: :

power or natural gas? -•• communication• syst.-? -b ..

-----c. water?

4. sewer or sept?-c tank•?

e. stona water drainage?

f.· Solid waste ana disposal?

1 '7 • Hurnan Heal th. Will th<: proposal result in: .. . ... a. Creat1on of any health hazard

or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)?

---

----=-

b. Exposure of people to .mtential health hazards?

18~-Energy Conservati~-· Will_ the propos~l conserve energy, and contribute toward reduced· levels of energy consumption,

a. I>Oes the project take adv~btage ·of ._ su..:h rota~ion?

b. Does the project cast a shadow that JnaY intcrf ere with solar access.

c. Does the project incorporat&­solar access provisions.

---

'·

-

-

x -

x

x

x -x ---x. --

x

x

• x

x

x

d. Does the project provide for energy andits. CALENDAR PAGE

e. Does the project provide for solar heating of pools, and hot

YES HAYBE HO

x

Aesthetics. Nill the proposal result. In the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open t.o the public, or will the proposal result 1n the creation of an aestbe~ically offensive site open to public view? - --R9creation. ·Will t.he p~oposal result ln ~n impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational oppoJ:i ;uni ties?

•

!rcbeolj'ical/Bistoric~l. Will the proposa result in an'irteration of a significant archeological or historical site" structure, object or building?

22 •· '.!i5an·aatory Findings of ·significance.

....

•• Does the project·ttave t:he potential to degrade the qu•,!!~f of the environment. subil~n~ially re?duce the habitat 0£ e-ri8b"or wildlife species, cau~e a~~lfh or wildlife population to drlSff"l>elow self­sustaini!lg 1~~~~~ t:hreaten to eliminate a pl~nt~or animal commu­nity, reduce t:he . .Purnber or restrict the range of a rare or endanger~d plant or animal 01" eliminate important examples of the aajor periods of ca1if ornia history or prehistory?

: b. Does the project have the po­

tential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long­term, environmental goals? (A

· short-term impact on ~e envi..: :r--~nment is one Whish OCCl~rs in a relntively brief defi~~tive period of time while long-term impacts will ·endure well into the futurei-1

c. Does the projec~ have impact.s which are individu~lly limited, bu~ cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where ~he impact on each resource is relatively sma1-1, but where the effect of the total of these impacts on th~ environment is significant).

x

x

x

• x

CA!.fNOAR PAGE JJ, p . 13

~UNUTE PAqE •• 9 2 7

a. Doe~ the proj~;- :1'•~' envi-.roruaental e,.tf·~- JiJ vbich vill c~u~• •ub•t~nti•l aaver•• effect• on human be~ng•, ei th~~ ~irectlY or ~nairectly?

1i11. Deteraination l'l'O· be cccaplete4 by the Lea4 Agency)

x

on ~· ba•i'a of this initial evaluation:

x t find tbat the propo•e4 project COIJLD Rm have a - •iCJl!ific:ant effect on the enviromnent. anil • JIEGA'l'IVZ - ozCL;\RATION will be prepare~.

•

_ I find that although the proposed project could ]lave .. si<Jfti,ficant effect on the envi:ronJ'm>t• there will not ~ aignif icOnt effect ~ ~is calli> because th• lllittgatiOn ..,aaure• desc:ribe4 on an attache4 sheet

- l1ave been a44e4 to the project. A ~'l'IVB oB(:LllltA'l'lOll will 6e prepare4; · 1 find the propose4 project llAY haV~ ·• signiUCant

- effect °"''th" environment, and an ENVIJtONMEN'1'i\L - IMPAC'l' JdWORT io required.

I f~Aii that the proposed project ,,,.y have • aignif icant - ef;te<it on the environment and it ha• been deteJ:ained• ~at the fo11o;ling previousiy prepared znviro.;...nt•l

xapact J1ePOrt\•) will adequately aescrib•n (a) the general environmental setting of tbe project. (b) the ai<Jl\ific:ant enviro,,,..ntal iJllpacts of the project: and (c) alternative• and 11iti9ation ..,asure• related to

..,

D ~-­ih.e

each aiCJl'ificant effect.

For '.rbe Pla~1inCJ Di vision. - '

CALENDAR PACI

MINUTE 'AGE

11 6-14

~rze

Cmr.t'JU\C'l' 85•01 MARINA UPANSION,• PHASE 111

INITIAL STUDY CHECJtLlST BXP~'l'ION OF ALL

•ns• AND ·MAYBE· ANSWERS

1. b. 1.'h• project will c!isplace appr0,ximately 260,000 cubic y~r4• of material, which will be atore4 at the st. Peter Martyr Park •ite (which i• currently undeveloped). The ~terial will form a bOrrov site for City projects, and as a fill for the park.

l. c. ~- topography of the park site will change, but it i• ino~'expected to impact the site.

3: d. 'l'he Marina Basin will add approximately twenty acre fee~ of Inland waterways.

6. ~. The project ~11 r&i•e noine lev~l• in the area on a temporary ba•i~ (during construction). Trucks ca~rying fill ma.terials, to the park aite w~ll use Montezuma s~reet. Impacts are not expect.ea tQ be siqaif ieant:, •• properti:e• to the east ·~~ vacant and belong, to the Jtedevelopment Agency, .whieh also ha• plar.• to acquire the properties to A: the weat"for :i:oaa widening purpoGes under a separate . ~ contr~ct.

13. b. The project will create a demand for more parking, but the plan will prqvide eighty-six (86) ,parking spaces.

14. d.5 'fhe project ffill increa&e recreational facilities. for the •· region. Scro: maintGillance vi~l be ~•qui.rec!, lf4ich ~~l

,be ,,~videtl by the City, financed by berthing, fee•.

-.

CALENDAR PAGE

MINUTf PAGE

• THC CJT\' C0\1NC1L or THr ClTY or r1TTSDUHG:

ln the matter of: Certifying the Negative D@claration ) for the Pittsburg Marina Exvan~ion ) RESOL'UTY~N NO.. 8S-69SO ~~~e Ill ·• )

1n accordance with Government Code sec~ion 65402, the Pitts­burg Planning commission ~dopted Resolution .No. 4032 finding that t:hti proposed marina facility and fishing pier are consistent ~ith the Land uee Element of the Gt>neral Plan;· c.ind

On the ba~;is of an initial study, a N4!!9ati ve Declaration has . .oeen prepared finding that the project will.riot have a significant ef·fect on the envi'ronment: nnd

Tfi~ Neqative Declaration was sent through th' State Clearing­house for comments from responsible a~encies; and

~ reviaw period end~e un A~ril s, 1985 and the project has been revised in response to conce~ns and conunents ine1·uding ,possi-ble impacts so that al'.J. impact$ are mitigated; and

The Planning commission reco~imend~d, in Resolution No. 4032, tbat the City council certify the Negative oeelaration.

'!'liEREl-·oRE, the City ~eunci1 of the City' ·o....· P!,:.~tsburg resolves:

That all of the inform~tion contained within the Negative · · · Declaration has been reviewed and considered and therefore, the City Council certifies the Negative DeclaratiQn as being completed in compliance with CEQA, State a~d City GUidelines.

Passed anQ adoptAd by the City cquncil of the City of Pitts-burg at a §a) zesml~:..:-- meet~ng held on the 15th day of laPril , 198~ b~ tLe following vote:

AYE~: councilmembers curr.iP., oa• .. 7is,, Erickson, Rives ' Mayor Parent.

NAYS: Nonie-. ~SENT: None. ABSTAINED: None.

-ATTEST:

Page 1 of 1

CAL5NP41l PAGI

MINUTE JAQl

.16

920