cares draft recommendations

90
Welcome Please introduce yourself to others at your table Put on a name tag Complete the information on the sign-in sheet

Upload: cottleville

Post on 18-Nov-2014

390 views

Category:

News & Politics


2 download

DESCRIPTION

CARES meeting 6 presentation where draft recommendations were presented.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CARES Draft Recommendations

WelcomePlease introduce yourself to others at your table

Put on a name tag

Complete the information on the sign-in sheet

Page 2: CARES Draft Recommendations

The CARES Process

CARES Charge

Page 3: CARES Draft Recommendations

CARES Open HousesDate Time Station Address

Tuesday, Nov. 29 4 – 8 p.m. Station #3 6310 Weldon Spring Rd.

Wednesday, Nov. 30 4 – 8 p.m. Station #4 4340 Towers Rd.

Saturday, Dec. 3 11 a.m. – 5 p.m. Station #1 1385 Motherhead Rd.

Sunday, Dec. 4 Noon - 4 p.m. Station #2 4065 Old Hwy. 94 South

Page 4: CARES Draft Recommendations

Board Presentationo December 13

o 7 p.m.

o Station #1o 1385 Motherhead Rd.

Page 5: CARES Draft Recommendations

Sign-in Sheet

Page 6: CARES Draft Recommendations

I Have a Question!

• Fill Out Form

• Call:

• 636-447-6655

• Email:• [email protected]

• Ask During Small Group Work Time

Page 7: CARES Draft Recommendations

CARES Onlineo www.CARESforCFPD.com

o Like us on Facebookowww.Facebook.com/CottlevilleFire

Page 8: CARES Draft Recommendations

CARES Draft Recommendations

Page 9: CARES Draft Recommendations

Purpose

The Chargeo Make recommendations in response to the following questions:

o What are the key challenges and opportunities facing the Cottleville Fire Protection District today and tomorrow?

o What are the best ways to address these challenges and make the most of these opportunities?

o What level of service does the community expect from the Cottleville Fire Protection District now and in the future?

o What resources in the areas of facilities, staffing, equipment, finances and communications are needed?

o What do we need to do to secure these resources?

Page 10: CARES Draft Recommendations

Key Information Learned

Page 11: CARES Draft Recommendations

About the District

Page 12: CARES Draft Recommendations

About the District

Diverse Service Areao Four Stationso Covers 38 Square Miles

o St. Peterso O’Fallono Weldon Springo Cottlevilleo Dardenne Prairieo Unicorp. St. Charles

County

Page 13: CARES Draft Recommendations

About the District

Diverse Service Areao 40,000 Residentso 100,000 Daytime

Populationo Residentialo Heavy Industrialo Retailo Hotelso Highways

Page 14: CARES Draft Recommendations

About the District

Growing Population

1980 1990 2000 2010 20200

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

400,000

450,000

144,107

212,751

283,883

360,485

412,435

St. Charles County Population Growth

Projected

150% Population Increase from 1980- 2010

Page 15: CARES Draft Recommendations

About the District

Multi-Discipline Emergency Response Organizationo Fire Suppression

o Hazardous Materials

o Emergency Medical Services

o Homeland Security

o Code Enforcement

o Public Safety Education

o Emergency Planning

Page 16: CARES Draft Recommendations

About the District

Demand for Service

1986 20110

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

400

2,700

Emergency Calls

Page 17: CARES Draft Recommendations

About the District

How Our Service Area ComparesFire District/Department

Resident Population Square Miles

Central County 80,000 85

St. Charles City 65,000 21

O’Fallon 80,000 67

Cottleville 40,000 (100,000 daytime) 38

Wentzville 60,500 88

Page 18: CARES Draft Recommendations

Staffing

Page 19: CARES Draft Recommendations

Staffing

Organizational Structure

Page 20: CARES Draft Recommendations

Firefighters

Page 21: CARES Draft Recommendations

Staffing

NFPA Response Standardso NFPA Standards:

o 4 – 5 firefighters per truck

o 15 – 17 firefighters on the scene within 8 minutes

o 12 CFPD firefighters available on an average day

o All firefighters and equipment sent to the scene.

o Other area districts must respond to all other calls as part of mutual aid

o Results in longer response times

Minimum Staffing

Full Staffing02468

1012141618

CottlevilleNFPA Standard

Page 22: CARES Draft Recommendations

Staffing

Four Person Crews Are Safer

5 Firefighter Crew

Demonstrated a highly coordinated, effective attack on the fire and search and rescue operations

4 Firefighter Crew

Capable of performing satisfactorily in controlling the fire and affecting the rescue operation

3 Firefighter Crew

Could not accomplish all the required tasks within a given time span

*Dallas Staffing Study Conclusions

Page 23: CARES Draft Recommendations

Staffing

Four Person Crews Are Safer

Reviewed 136 emergency incidents involving 1,938 firefighters-Austin Fire Department Study

4 & 5 Person Crews 3 Person Crews

5.3%

7.7%

Injury Rate Per 100 Firefighters

46% Difference

Page 24: CARES Draft Recommendations

Operational Leadership Staffing

Page 25: CARES Draft Recommendations

Staffing

District Operationso Budgetingo Legalo Pensiono Personnel/Benefitso Trainingo Incident Commando Emergency Operationso Vehicle Maintenance

o Facilities Maintenanceo Equipment Maintenanceo Computer Networko Reportingo Public Fire Educationo Public Informationo Community Liaisono Plan Reviewo Inspections

Page 26: CARES Draft Recommendations

Staffing

Role of Battalion Chiefso Provide Leadership, Serve As Safety Officer At An Incident

o Third In Command Of District

o Assist With General District Operations

o Training Planning, Implementation

o Pre-incident Planning

o Public Education, Community Outreach

o Fire Prevention Activities

o Emergency Operations Center

o Disaster Preparedness Planning

o District Mapping

o Mentoring

o Succession Planning

o Technology

Page 27: CARES Draft Recommendations

Staffing

Battalion Chiefs

Cottleville Central County O'Fallon St. Charles Wentzville0

1

2

3

4

0

3 3 3 3

Page 28: CARES Draft Recommendations

Staffing

Operations & Leadership

Central County

O'Fallon St. Charles City Wentzville Cottleville0123456789

10

8 9 86

3

Page 29: CARES Draft Recommendations

Staffing

How CFPD Compares

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

51 5042 36

Recommended Staffing Levels

Page 30: CARES Draft Recommendations

Staffing

Key Findingso CFPD does not meet ISO or NFPA staffing

recommendations

o Staffing directly impacts residential and commercial insurance rates

o Concern for providing safe, effective emergency response

o Limited organizational leadership positions presents challenges

Page 31: CARES Draft Recommendations

Training

Page 32: CARES Draft Recommendations

Training

Certification & Education o Cottleville Firefighters Hold:

o State Certifications In:o Emergency Medical Care

o Fire Investigation

o Apparatus Operator

o Fire Inspection

o Fire Service Instructor

o Fire Officer

o Degrees Ranging From:o Associates to Masters in Business Administration

Page 33: CARES Draft Recommendations

Training

Re-Certification RequirementsArea Hours Frequency

EMT 100 5 Years

Paramedic 144 5 Years

Instructor 24 3 Years

Investigator 30 3 Years

Inspector 30 3 Years

Page 34: CARES Draft Recommendations

Training

Annual Training Hours Comparison

Cottleville Central County O'Fallon Wentzville0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

7,96310,064

12,653

25,047

ISO Recommended 10,500 Hours

Page 35: CARES Draft Recommendations

Training

Training Leadership

Full-Time Training Officer

Cottleville No

Central County Yes

O’Fallon Yes

Wentzville Yes

Page 36: CARES Draft Recommendations

Training

Area Training Budgets

Cottleville O'Fallon Central County Wentzville$0

$20,000

$40,000

$60,000

$80,000

$100,000

$120,000

$74,900

$90,280$101,000

$107,000

Page 37: CARES Draft Recommendations

Training

Key Findingso Do not meet NFPA training standards

o Officer training does not meet standards

o Driver training is short 12-hours per year

o Do not currently conduct recommended two night drills

o Currently lack annual proficiency training at all levels

o Average 5+ hours short per month per person of the 20 hrs required

Page 38: CARES Draft Recommendations

Equipment

Page 39: CARES Draft Recommendations

Equipment

FleetNumber

of PiecesEquipment Age Target Replacement

Date

4 2004 Rescue Pumpers 7 years 2014 (phased)

1 2006 100’ Aerial Platform 5 years 2018

1 1997 Brush Truck 14 years

1 2009 International POD Urban Search and Rescue Truck (Paid for by federal government as a federal resource)

2 years

1 2001 Utility Pick-up 10 years

3 Staff - Command Vehicles (2003, 2005, 2008)

3 – 9 years

1 2003 Inspection vehicle 8 years

o Recommended Replacement Every 10-12 Yearso NFPA, OSHA, Apparatus Manufacturers Association Generational

Cycle, 5 Years

Page 40: CARES Draft Recommendations

Equipment

Annual Maintenance & Fuel Cost

Average Car Rescue Pumper Ladder Truck$0

$5,000$10,000$15,000$20,000$25,000$30,000$35,000$40,000$45,000

$7,967

$20,000

$39,000

Chart Title

Page 41: CARES Draft Recommendations

EquipmentFleet Maintenance Cost Reduction Measures o Purchase batteries and lights direct

o Install batteries and lights in house

o Purchase brake parts direct, and keep in stock

o Mobile service comes to the station

o Cuts down time from two days to 3 hours

Page 42: CARES Draft Recommendations

Equipment

Additional EquipmentReplacement

CostNFPA Life

SpanAge of CFPD’s

Equipment

Jaws of Life $30,000 10 years 6 years

Self Contained Breathing Apparatuses and Associated Equipment

$250,000 10 years 14 Years

Thermal Imaging Cameras $8,000 5 years 5 years

Computer Servers $18,000 5 years 2 years

o Aging Equipment More Costly To Repairo Difficult If Not Impossible To Find Parts To Make Repairso Keep Up With Changing Standards And Technology

Page 43: CARES Draft Recommendations

Equipment

Basic Firefighter GearEquipment Cost

Standard Issue Helmet $255

Nomex Hood $38

Bunker Coat and Pants $2,100

Boots $300

Gloves $50

S.C.B.A. Face Piece $225

TOTAL $2,968

Page 44: CARES Draft Recommendations

Equipment

Firefighter Gear Standards o Firefighter Gear Must Meet NFPA 1971 and

1500 Standards

o Gear Must Be Replaced Every 10 Years

o Average Cottleville Gear 2 Years Oldo Developing phased replacement plan

Page 45: CARES Draft Recommendations

Equipment

Key Informationo Maintenance must be paid from general revenue

and is increasingly expensive

o CFPD does not have the equipment to respond to water or all terrain emergencies

o Equipment is rapidly aging

o Some equipment does not meet national standards

Page 46: CARES Draft Recommendations

Facilties

Page 47: CARES Draft Recommendations

Facilities

Challengeso Station #1

o Entrance from Highway N not possible due to safety concerns

o Driveway needs to be reengineered

o Structural cracking

o Station #2

o Back ramp and retaining wall need to be updated

o Station #3

o Basement flooding

Page 48: CARES Draft Recommendations

Facilities

Maintenance Costso Funding for general maintenance not available

o General maintenance must come from general revenue, not bond funding

Page 49: CARES Draft Recommendations

Programs

Page 50: CARES Draft Recommendations

Programs

Community Outreach

Residents NOT Reached

96%

Residents Reached

4%

Total Residents: 40,000Residents Reached: 1,579

Page 51: CARES Draft Recommendations

Programs

Public Safety Educationo Fire extinguisher training program

o Limited due to staff shortages

o In school programs

o No longer have a presence due to staffing shortages and in school requirements

o Station tours provided on a regular basis

o School fire drills every October

Page 52: CARES Draft Recommendations

Finance

Page 53: CARES Draft Recommendations

Finance

Operating Fund Historyo $0.75 initially approved by voters in 1986

o Measures taken to continue service levelo Staff reductions

oWage freezes

o Program eliminations

oMaintenance and equipment cuts

Page 54: CARES Draft Recommendations

Finance

CFPD Financial Historyo 2002 • 5-Year Balanced Budget Plan

o Pay cuts

o Elimination of all non-essential spending

o Training, public safety education, staff, capital expenditures

o New budget procedures

o Cuts and programs have not been restored

Page 55: CARES Draft Recommendations

Finance

CFPD Financial Historyo Results of 2002 Budget Plan

o Improved fiscal responsibility

o Spending controls

oReserve fund implemented

o Inclusive budget planning

oMulti-year firefighter agreements

Page 56: CARES Draft Recommendations

Finance

Expenses

Personnel Related89%

Equipment 5%Training/Professional Devel-

opment1%

Administrative 5%

Page 57: CARES Draft Recommendations

Finance

Expenses

*St. Charles County Sher-iff's Dept.

**FH School District ***St. Charles County Ambulance Dist.

Cottleville FPD88%

89%

90%

89% 89%

90%

89%

% of Budget Utilized for Personnel Costs

Source:*County Finance Director**FHSD 2011-2012 Budget*** SCCAD Finance Director

Page 58: CARES Draft Recommendations

Finance

Revenue

Local Property Tax96%

Interest Income 0.2%

Fire Prevention & Code Enforcement

Fees 2%

Page 59: CARES Draft Recommendations

Finance

2011 Tax Rate $0.6275

General Operating80%

Debt Service14%

Pension5%

Page 60: CARES Draft Recommendations

Finance

Fundso General Operating

o $0.5048o Pays for day-to-day activitieso Salaries & Benefitso Fuelo Maintenanceo Professional Development &

Trainingo Utilitieso Insurance

o Debt Service o $0.0342o New construction, building

renovations, apparatus, equipmento Principal and interest

payments are made each yearo Money must remain in debt service

fund

o Pensiono $0.0885o Revenue used to fund employees

pension fundo Money must remain in pension

fund

Page 61: CARES Draft Recommendations

FinanceImpact of Hancock On Operating Tax Rate

1986 Rate 2011 Rate$0.00

$0.10

$0.20

$0.30

$0.40

$0.50

$0.60

$0.70

$0.80 $0.75

$0.51

Page 62: CARES Draft Recommendations

FinanceTax on a $100,000 Home

1986 2011$0.00

$20.00

$40.00

$60.00

$80.00

$100.00

$120.00

$140.00

$160.00$142.50

$96.90Rate$0.75

Rate$0.51

Calculating The Annual Tax Amount

Assessed Valuation x Tax Rate100

Assessed Value = 19% x Home Value

Page 63: CARES Draft Recommendations

FinanceAssessed Valuation And Revenue

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

-10.0%

-5.0%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

Assessed Valuation GrowthRevenue GrowthPe

rcen

tag

Gro

wth

Despite changes in assessed valuation, and area growth, revenue remains flat

Page 64: CARES Draft Recommendations

Finance

Property Tax Revenue

2008 2009 2010 2011$0

$1,000,000

$2,000,000

$3,000,000

$4,000,000

$5,000,000

$6,000,000

$7,000,000

$8,000,000$7,306,718

$5,625,510 $5,757,251 $5,657,587

Real Estate and Personal Property Tax Represent the Majority of Budgeted Revenue

Page 65: CARES Draft Recommendations

Finance7-Year Budget Projection

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

$(1,500,000.00)

$(1,000,000.00)

$(500,000.00)

$-

$500,000.00

$1,000,000.00

$1,500,000.00

Budget Surplus (Deficit) Reserve Fund Balance

Page 66: CARES Draft Recommendations

FinanceProjected Revenue vs. Expenses

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017$5,000,000

$5,500,000

$6,000,000

$6,500,000

$7,000,000

$7,500,000

RevenueExpenses

Page 67: CARES Draft Recommendations

Finance

Key Informationo The District’s revenue growth is limited by the Hancock

Amendment

o The main source of District revenue is local property tax

o Revenue is remaining flat, while expenses continue to rise

o The District has not had a change in the tax-rate in 25 years

o The District’s reserve funds are rapidly being depleted

Page 68: CARES Draft Recommendations

Statements of Recommendation

Page 69: CARES Draft Recommendations

Staffing

Page 70: CARES Draft Recommendations

Staffingo Provide for staffing a minimum of four

firefighters on the ladder truck to meet national safety standards.

o Work toward staffing a minimum of four firefighters on each pumper truck to meet national safety standards.

Page 71: CARES Draft Recommendations

Staffingo Implement a firefighter staffing structure that includes a

battalion chief on each shift to assist with the increased demand for service. o In addition to being leaders in the area of incident response, battalion

chiefs should be responsible for assisting with training, technology, equipment, facilities maintenance, homeland security planning, and public safety education programs.

o Recruit and retain quality firefighters by providing compensation that is comparable to local averages.

Page 72: CARES Draft Recommendations

Training

Page 73: CARES Draft Recommendations

Trainingo Meet national training standards set by the Insurance

Services Office (ISO) and the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) in order to keep pace with constantly evolving changes and demands for service.

o Acquire a full-time training officer to develop and implement a quality training and safety program that will directly impact the level of service provided to the community.

Page 74: CARES Draft Recommendations

Trainingo Explore opportunities to partner in training

efforts with other emergency response agencies to reduce costs and expand training opportunities.

o Recruit and retain quality firefighters by providing quality training that meets national standards.

Page 75: CARES Draft Recommendations

Facilities

Page 76: CARES Draft Recommendations

Facilitieso Ensure that all facilities meet the emergency

services needs of the community.

o Create a master facility plan to guide facility maintenance and updating.

o Restore the capital projects fund to allow for proactive maintenance of current facilities.

Page 77: CARES Draft Recommendations

Communications and Community Involvement

Page 78: CARES Draft Recommendations

Communications and Community Involvement

o Continue to actively involve the community in planning for the future of the Cottleville Fire Protection District.

o Remain transparent and open in communicating about the operations, finances and state of the District to the community.

o Create and implement a public safety education program for students, residents and those who work within the District.

Page 79: CARES Draft Recommendations

Equipment

Page 80: CARES Draft Recommendations

Equipmento Implement, and properly fund, an equipment

maintenance and replacement schedule to phase out aging, out-of-date equipment.o This schedule should include all levels of equipment and gear

including trucks, emergency medical equipment and firefighter gear.

o Work toward meeting national standards for equipment replacement.

Page 81: CARES Draft Recommendations

Equipmento Ensure the District has the appropriate equipment to

meet the changing needs of the community.

o Maintain up-to-date, functioning equipment, and replace all equipment within its life cycle to ensure it is fully operational when needed to keep the community and firefighters safe.

o Ensure all current equipment can safely meet the needs of the community.

Page 82: CARES Draft Recommendations

Finance

Page 83: CARES Draft Recommendations

Financeo Remain fiscally responsible and maintain a

balanced budget while continuing to provide quality emergency services to the community.

o Implement the CARES recommendations over a financially responsible span of time.

Page 84: CARES Draft Recommendations

Implementation

Page 85: CARES Draft Recommendations

Implementation Plano To implement the CARES Statements of

Recommendation it is recommended that a general fund increase be placed on the April 2011 ballot

Page 86: CARES Draft Recommendations

Implementation Plano Options for Implementation

oOption A: 24-cents

oOption B: 27-cents

oOption C: 30-cents

Page 87: CARES Draft Recommendations

Small Group Work Activity

Page 88: CARES Draft Recommendations

Select Recorder & Spokesperson

o Recorder Responsibilitieso Complete the requested information on your

group’s worksheet

o Spokesperson Responsibilitieso Facilitate Discussion

o Keep Group Focused/On Task

o Report Group’s Information

Page 89: CARES Draft Recommendations

Complete the Worksheet o Make sure the information recorded on the

worksheet reflects consensus of the group

o Monitor progress to complete the worksheet in allotted time

o Only the group recorder’s worksheet will be collected

Page 90: CARES Draft Recommendations

Small Group Work Activityo Task #1: Come to consensus on any comments or suggestions that

you believe would strengthen the recommendations

o Task #2: Come to consensus regarding any additional Statements of Recommendation that should be included in the final report document

o Task #3: In tonight's presentation three possible options were presented to address the challenges facing the Cottleville Fire Protection District. Discuss these options and come to a consensus regarding your group's preferred option

o Task #4: What would you add, delete or modify to strengthen your preferred option circled above in Task #3