cedar mountain survey results

38
Cedar Mountain Survey Results Account Executive: Jon Woehl Managing Director: Sarah Gass Executive Director: Mike Rich

Upload: levia

Post on 25-Feb-2016

27 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Cedar Mountain Survey Results. Account Executive : Jon Woehl Managing Director : Sarah Gass Executive Director : Mike Rich. Completion Rate. 1352 surveys mailed out 347 returned surveys 344 received in mail 3 completed via online Response rate of 26%. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Cedar MountainSurvey Results

Account Executive: Jon WoehlManaging Director: Sarah GassExecutive Director: Mike Rich

Page 2: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Completion Rate

• 1352 surveys mailed out– 347 returned surveys• 344 received in mail• 3 completed via online

• Response rate of 26%

Page 3: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Channels for information received88%

44%

17%10% 9%

2% 2%

Page 4: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Gender

Male58%

Fe-male42%

Page 5: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Age of Respondents

18-25 26-35 36-50 51-65 over 65

1%

7%

21%

33%

38%

Page 6: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Size of Household

1 2 3 to 5 6 or more

26%

41%

29%

4%

Page 7: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Years lived in Cedar Mountain School District

Less than 5 6 to 10 11 to 15 16 to 20 21 to 25 More than 25

9%5% 6% 8% 7%

65%

Page 8: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Number of school age children

0 1 2 to 3 4 to 5

72%

9%15%

4%

Page 9: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Current school-aged children

No school-a

ged ch

ildren

High Sc

hool

Cedar

Mtn. Elem

entar

y

Another sch

ool dist

rict

Other

St. M

ichae

l's Cath

olic Sch

ool

Home-sch

ooled

64%

18%12%

7% 5% 2% 1%

30%

Page 10: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Occupation of Respondents

Agricultural Producer

Retired Employed outside of Morgan or

Franklin

Employed in Morgan or

Franklin

Business Owner

38%36%

22%

14% 14%

Page 11: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Respondents by Resident Status

Residents who are Non-Agricultural Producers

52%Residents who are Agriculture Producers

27%

Non-Residents21%

Page 12: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Respondents’ Status

Other Residents52%

Agricultural Landowners48%

Page 13: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

DIFFERENCES IN PERCEPTIONS BY AGRICULTURAL LANDOWNERS AND

OTHER RESIDENTS

Page 14: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Average level of agreement regarding current school building

75% 72% 63% 62%

34%

56%66%

48% 55% 48%

Other Residents Agricultural Landowners

Page 15: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Average level of agreement regarding physical improvements to the Cedar Mountain School

A more usable school will benefit Franklin and Morgan com-

munities

Will enhance com-munity support

Attract new teachers and staff members

Attract new students Not enhance learning and teaching envi-

ronment

68%64%

56%53%

40%

54% 52%46%

40%

53%

Other Residents Agricultural Landowners

Page 16: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Level of agreement on the proposed changes will benefit students even though respondent

does not have school age children

Strongly Agree

Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree

Disagree Strongly Disagree

Does not Apply

22%

38%

11%8%

3%

18%18%

33%

18%

8%

15%

8%

Other Residents Agricultural Landowners60%

Page 17: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Factors to determine level of support toward proposed bond referendum

67%45%

28%8%

75%

37%24% 18%

Other Residents Agricultural Landowners

Page 18: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Average level of agreement regarding proposed bond referendum

There

was

ample i

nformation to

mak

e an inform

ed deci

sion

Community ca

n come t

o a co

ncensu

s

There

was

ample time t

o consid

er full im

pact of re

feren

dum

There

will b

e a re

asonable in

crease

in propert

y taxes

Cedar

Mountain co

mmunity is

capab

le of a

ffording bond

Improve

ments

proposed exceed th

e nee

ds of s

chool fa

cility

70% 65% 65% 63% 56%47%

57% 55% 53% 50% 46%59%

Other Residents Agricultural Landowners

Page 19: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Average level of agreement with upgrades to building structure are necessary

Other Resident Agricultural Landowner

75%

56%

Page 20: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Tax Rate per Acre According to District

Redwood Falls

Cedar Mountain

BOLD Wabasso GFW Springfield

$13.59

$5.84 $5.52 $5.37 $4.71

$2.96

Page 21: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

PERCEPTIONS OF VOTING RESIDENTS

Page 22: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Average level of agreement with upgrades to building structure are necessary based

on the school children attend79% 75% 72% 67% 66%

44%

Page 23: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Level of agreement with upgrades to building structure are necessary based on school children attend

Strongly Agree

Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree

Disagree Strongly Disagree

48%

30%

0%6%

16%

Cedar Mountian High School78%

Page 24: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Level of agreement with upgrades to building structure are necessary based on school children attend

Strongly Agree

Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree

Disagree Strongly Disagree

65%

23%

3% 3%6%

Cedar Mountian Elementary School88%

Page 25: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Level of agreement with upgrades to building structure are necessary based on school children attend

Strongly Agree

Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree

Disagree Strongly Disagree

8%

15%

46%

8%

23%

Another School District

23%

31%

Page 26: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Level of agreement with upgrades to building structure are necessary based on school children attend

Disagree and Strongly Disagree

57%

Agree and Strongly Agree43%

Another School District

Page 27: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Level of agreement with upgrades to building structure are necessary based on school children attend

Strongly Agree

Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree

Disagree Strongly Disagree

24%

46%

13%10%

7%

No School-Age Children70%

17%

Page 28: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Level of agreement with upgrades to building structure are necessary based on school children attend

Agree and Strongly Agree

80%

Disagree and Strongly Disagree

20%

No School-Age Children

Page 29: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Average level of agreement with upgrades to building structure are necessary based

on occupation90%

74% 71%64%

57%

Page 30: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Level of agreement with upgrades to building structure are necessary based on occupation of resident

Strongly Agree

Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree

Disagree Strongly Disagree

20%

34%

15% 17%15%

Agricultural Producers54%

32%

Page 31: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Level of agreement with upgrades to building structure are necessary based on occupation of resident

Agree and Strongly Agree72%

Disagree and Strongly Disagree

28%

Agricultural Producers

Page 32: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Level of agreement with upgrades to building structure are necessary based on occupation of resident

Strongly Agree

Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree

Disagree Strongly Disagree

67%

31%

0%2% 0%

Employed in Morgan or Franklin98%

Page 33: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Level of agreement with upgrades to building structure are necessary based on occupation of resident

Strongly Agree

Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree

Disagree Strongly Disagree

18%

46%

17%12%

7%

Retired64%

19%

Page 34: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Level of agreement with upgrades to building structure are necessary based on occupation of resident

Agree and Strongly Agree77%

Disagree and Strongly Disagree

23%

Retired

Page 35: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Conclusions

• Cost is the primary factor that will determine community members’ support for the proposed bond referendum.

• A high percentage of respondents, who are residents and non-agricultural producers, agreed that upgrades were necessary.

• More than 50% of Agricultural Landowners would agree that the proposed changes would benefit students even though respondents do not have school aged children.

Page 36: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Conclusions

• Respondents employed in Morgan or Franklin strongly agree that there is a need for upgrades to the current school facility. – Other occupation groups including Agricultural

Producers indicated they also agree.• Other Residents of the Cedar Mountain School

District agree more strongly that upgrades are necessary than Agricultural Landowners.

Page 37: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Conclusions

• Regarding the proposed bond referendum, other residents and Agricultural landowners agreed that there was ample information to make an informed decision and that the community can come to a consensus.

Page 38: Cedar Mountain Survey  Results

Concluding comments or questions?