city of manassas, virginia architectural review board ...€¦ · roll call . ms. alten. the motion...

Archi tectura l Review BoardArchi tectura l Review Board MeetingOctober 09, 2018Page | 1

City of Manassas, VirginiaArchitectural Review Board Meeting

AGENDA

Architectural Review Board Meeting9027 Center Street

Manassas, VA 20110Second Floor Conference Room

Tuesday, October 09, 2018

Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance - 7:30 p.m.

Roll Call

1. Election of Officers

2. Approval of the Meeting Minutes

2.1 September 11, 2018 Draft Meeting MinutesSeptember 11, 2018 Draft Meeting Minutes

3. New Business

3.1 ARB #2019-079112 Main StreetRobert and Kathy SaylorsStaff Report and Attachments

4. Old Business

5. Other Business

5.1 FY18 ARB Annual ReportFY2018 Annual Report

5.2 Old Town Updates

1

https://legistarweb-production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/attachment/pdf/250116/9.11.18_Draft.pdf

https://legistarweb-production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/attachment/pdf/250094/StaffRpt.pdf

https://legistarweb-production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/attachment/pdf/250097/FY2018_Final_Annual_Report.pdf

Archi tectura l Review BoardArchi tectura l Review Board MeetingOctober 09, 2018Page | 2

Adjournment

2

DRAFT

MINUTES REGULAR MEETING CITY OF MANASSAS

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD

September 11, 2018 – 7:30 P.M. Members Present: William Rush, Chairman Jan Alten, Vice-Chairman

Myra Buchanan Brent (Alt) Members Absent: Debbie Haight

Nancy Hersch Ingram Fatima Pereira-Shepherd

Staff Present: Elizabeth Via-Gossman, Director of Community Development Donna J. Bellows, Boards and Commissions Clerk PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL AND DETERMINATION OF A QUORUM Clerk called the roll, and a quorum was determined. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – August 14, 2018 Ms. Brent motioned to approve the meeting minutes as submitted. Ms. Alten seconded the motion. The MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY BY VOICE VOTE. NEW BUSINESS ARB #2019-02 9208 Center Street Katerina’s Greek Cuisine (Applicant was late, and the Board proceeded to hear the case.) Ms. Via-Gossman stated that this case was deferred from last month and is back before the Board seeking approval for the installation of a projecting sign. The projecting sign will be constructed of 6mm Dibond measuring 2’ x 3’ in size (6 sq. ft.). It would include the business branding with both the business logo and name. It will be hung on a new black metal bracket on the brick entry feature located between the front elevation of the structure and Center Street.

3

DRAFT Architectural Review Board Minutes – September 11, 2018

Page 2 of 5

The bracket would be mounted to the west side of the entry feature, providing 8 feet of clearance between the sign and sidewalk below. Staff recommended approval of the application as submitted. ARB Discussion

• Chairman Rush stated that the sign appears to be located in the middle of the building. Ms. Via-Gossman verified that the sign will be located at the edge of the building – facing Grant Avenue.

Ms. Brent motioned to approve ARB #2019-02 as submitted, with the clarification that the sign be placed on the west side of the building. Ms. Alten seconded the motion. Roll Call

The MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. ARB #2019-04 9431 and 9451 West Street City of Manassas Ms. Via-Gossman stated that the City of Manassas is seeking approval for the installation of an accessory structure to cover bike racks located on the Train Station platform. The bike racks are located to the immediate east of the structure, between the Train Station and Battle Street. The proposed structure would be 9’11” tall and 9’x23’9” in size. The structure would be constructed/framed in metal and painted black. The design of the structure includes a center support column which mimics the two end support columns. The roof would include transparent panels between black support beams. Virginia Railway Express recommends the installation of an open concept and translucent shelter structure to address safety concerns. The roof design would be a gable/pitched roof. The request is only for the accessory structure, there are no proposed changes to the train station. While the bike racks do not require ARB approval, staff would note the proposed rack would likely be “U” shaped, consistent with those installed at the Pavilion and in front of City Hall. Staff recommended approval of the application as submitted. Applicant, Chloe Delhomme, had nothing further to add to the staff report. ARB Discussion

• Ms. Alten asked if there would be signage on the bike rack. Ms. Delhommne stated that there will not be a separate sign. Ms. Via-Gossman stated that the u-racks would

Ms. Brent Y Ms. Alten Y Chairman Rush Y

4


Page 3 of 5

be similar to the one at City Hall, which has the Manassas logo. • Chairman Rush inquired of the number of bikes that could be held by one rack. Ms.

Delhomme stated that the u-rack would hold two bikes. There will be four u-racks at the shelter for a total of 16 bikes.

Ms. Alten motioned to approve ARB #2019-04 as submitted. Chairman Rush seconded the motion. Roll Call

The MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. ARB #2019-05 9401 East Street NHM Inc./John Reid Ms. Via-Gossman stated that the applicant is seeking approval of both a projecting sign and freestanding sign. The proposed projecting sign would be made of a foam material on both sides, with a ¾” plywood backer. The color palette utilizes the established logo and branding of the business. The foam material would be reverse routed for the “C” and “21”, which would be painted “Relentless Gold” with an “Obsessed Gray” background. The sign is 20” in diameter (2.18 sq. ft.) and will be placed on an existing metal bracket. The proposed freestanding sign would be made of a Sintra material. The color palette utilizes the logo and branding of the business, with the same color scheme and logo as the projecting sign. (The applicant provided material and color samples at the meeting.) In addition, the sign would include the company name “Century 21”, “Redwood Realty” and “C21Redwood.com” text. The sign is approximately 48” x 36” (12 sq. ft.) in size and includes a 10” skirt along the bottom, providing a monument style design. The top of the sign would be approximately 4 feet above grade, requiring a minimum setback of approximately 2 feet from the East Street right-of-way (back of sidewalk). Staff recommended approval of the application as submitted. Applicant, John Reid, had nothing further to add to the staff report. ARB Discussion None Ms. Brent motioned to approve ARB #2019-05 as submitted. Chairman Rush seconded the motion.

Ms. Alten Y Chairman Rush Y Ms. Brent Y

5


Page 4 of 5

Roll Call

The MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. ARB #2019-06 9514 Main Street Tesla Energy Ops, Inc./Beth Vallandingham Ms. Via-Gossman stated that the applicant is seeking approval for the installation of solar panels on both the existing house and existing detached garage. The proposed solar panels would be flush mounted to the existing asphalt shingle roof. They would be placed on the southern exposure to ensure that the panels will be able to function with adequate sunlight. The top of the panels would provide about a 6” reveal above the existing roof surface. Ms. Via-Gossman stated that current guidelines state that solar collectors should be placed on non-character defining roofs or roofs of non-historic adjacent structures. However, the design guidelines were written in 1990 and solar technology has changed significantly over the last 25+ years. Therefore, staff’s analysis relies more heavily on more recent guidelines from the Secretary of the Interior (SOI) and industry standards:

• SOI Two: The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of the historic material or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided.

• SOI Nine: New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. New work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity pf the property and its environment.

Staff recommended approval of the application as submitted. Applicant, Beth Vallandingham, had nothing further to add to the staff report. ARB Discussion

• Ms. Alten stated that a previous case for solar panels located on the main portion of the house was denied by the ARB and could pose an issue. Ms. Via-Gossman stated that solar panels should be considered by the ARB for future reference. The Board agreed.

Chairman Rush motioned to approve ARB #2019-06 as submitted. Ms. Brent seconded the motion.

Ms. Brent Y Chairman Rush Y Ms. Alten Y

6


Page 5 of 5

Roll Call

The MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. OTHER BUSINESS FY2018 Draft Annual Report Ms. Via-Gossman informed the Board that the annual report will be going before the City Council in October or November. All updates/changes should be submitted to staff as soon as possible. The final report will be presented at the next regular meeting for signatures. Old Town Updates Ms. Via-Gossman spoke on concerns that the Board presented at last month’s meeting regarding the newly installed bathrooms on the Liberia House property. She stated that she was so focused on getting the appropriate brick for the restrooms, as well as getting the building up and running for the Manassas History Weekend, that she overlooked other elements of the originally approved application. She stated that, moving forward, the City will continue to work in harmony with the ARB. Ms. Alten asked if the parking lot would be paved. Ms. Via-Gossman stated that at this time, the parking lot is to remain gravel because there is no money for pavement, and there is still some work to be done to the site. Ms. Alten recommended that Centerfuse be moved to another location to allow retail use in that building. Ms. Via-Gossman stated that she would pass the idea on to Economic Development. Ms. Via-Gossman informed the Board that there will be a text amendment to the zoning ordinance which would increase the Architectural Review Board to potentially seven members. (A draft document was handed out at the meeting.) ADJOURNMENT Chairman Rush moved to adjourn the meeting. The MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. The meeting ended at 8:15 p.m. __________________________________ ___________________ William Rush, Chairman Date

Chairman Rush Y Ms. Brent Y Ms. Alten Y

7

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

8

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD

No. 2019-07

Applicant(s): Kathy and Jeff Saylors Site Owner(s): Kathy and Jeff Saylors Site Address: 9112 Main Street Tax Map No.:101-01-00-489 Site Location: Northwest side of Main Street, approximately 650 feet west of the

intersection of Sudley Road Current Zoning: R1 Parcel Size: 0.30 acres Age of Structure: 108 years Type of Structure: Residential Summary of Front Porch addition and rear bathroom addition Request:

Original Date Accepted for Review: September 12, 2018 Date of ARB Meeting: October 9, 2017

9

2 of 4

STAFF REPORT ARB Case: #2019-07 Applicant: Kathy and Jeff Saylors Address: 9112 Main Street REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval for the construction of a one-story porch along the front elevation of the structure. A small bathroom infill addition is proposed on the rear elevation of the structure on the second floor. PROPERTY INFORMATION Location – Northwest side of Main Street, approximately 650 feet west of the intersection of Sudley Road. Historical Significance – Set on an uncoursed stone foundation, the two-story colonial revival-style structure was constructed circa 1910. It is wood frame construction clad in vinyl siding. It is covered by a hipped roof sheathed in standing-seam metal. A hipped wood framed ell is located to the northwest of the main block. A small one-story one-bay roof portico features Tuscan columns. A one-story addition is located in the southwest elevation. Known as the Conner House, the home is ranked as a contributing structure to both the local and National Register historic districts and is listed on the City’s Landmark List. Surrounding Properties – 9112 Main Street is located in the northern residential end of Main Street. This portion of Main Street contains a mixture of contributing and non-contributing homes. However, within the contributing homes, several of on the City’s Landmark List, including 9115-Johnson Zimmerman House, 9114-Polen-Guy House, 9108-E.R. Conner House, and 9104-W.N. Lipscomb House. APPLICANT’S PROPOSAL The project includes two components. First is the replacement of the existing 1-bay portico on the front elevation with a 3-bay covered porch. The porch would be 8 feet in depth and 40 feet in length. It includes round columns and a standing-seam metal roof to match this existing structure. Due to the low floor, the porch floor would not be a raised wood platform, but instead a low patio covered in stone pavers - matching the existing entry. The proposed second-story rear addition would be installed over a single-story rear addition, representing an infill within the structure’s existing footprint. The location on the rear also limits the visibility of the addition. It would have a flat roof and include three new windows. It would be clad in vertical siding of a design consistent with the existing house.

CITY OF MANASSAS Department of Community Development

Elizabeth S. Via-Gossman, AICP, Director Phone: 703-257-8223 Fax: 703-257-5117

10

The proposed materials for the addition and porch include smooth Hardie plank siding and a standing seam metal roof to match the original stone flooring, 2/2 fiberglass composite windows with simulated divided light (including both interior and exterior grills, as well as spacer bar). Gutters are proposed to match existing gutters. STAFF ANALYSIS The applicable design guidelines for additions are found on pages 111-112 of the City of Manassas Historic District Handbook. The guidelines state that the size of an addition should be limited so that it does not visually overpower the existing building. Additions should be located on side or rear elevations that are not visible from the street. New design should be compatible with the size, scale, color, material, and character of the building and structure. Wherever possible, new additions should be differentiated from the existing building and should be done in such a manner that were it to be removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the building would be unimpaired. Front Porch While the alteration to the front elevation of a historic structure is often not in keeping with the design guidelines, the proposed porch design draws from historic photos of the home which show a 5-bay porch that was once located on the front elevation of the structure. The proposed porch is of a smaller mass with a reduced width. The scale is appropriate as to not overwhelm the front elevation. While the proposed porch is sensitive to this original design, it is not a replica. The original porch was a larger design/mass and wrapped the edges of the structure. The original design also had a raised wood platform. This porch functions more as a large portico or covered patio. The porch does maintain a symmetrical design and is balanced on the front elevation that is compatible with the structure. The materials are compatible to the home and the historic district. Bathroom Addition As recommended by the design guidelines, the proposed addition is located on the rear elevation, so it is not visible from the street. The new design is of an appropriate scale, as it provides an infill to the structure and does not result in an expansion of the footprint, nor does it increase the height of the structure. Windows provide fenestration to connect the addition to the existing structure. It would be clad in vertical siding of a design, consistent with the existing house. However, the addition is differentiated through the use of a flat roof, which also preserves the integrity of the existing roof lines. The additional is uses Hardie plank siding which differs from the structures existing non-original aluminum siding. While the use of a composite window on a historic structure is typically not supported for replacement windows, they are appropriate for additions. With the location of the addition to the rear of the structure, the windows will not be visible from the street. The use of the grills and spacer bar provide for a compatible historic design.

11

4 of 4

Review Criteria Pursuant to Section 130-406 (b), prior to approval of any certificate of appropriateness, the ARB shall determine if the following conditions have been adequately addressed:

CRITERIA APPLICATION Activity Proposed:

Front porch addition and rear addition.

(1) Whether the material, texture, color, height, scale, mass, and placement of the proposed addition, modification, or construction are visually and architecturally compatible with the site and the HOD.

The location of the additions maintain the architectural character and integrity of the front elevation and the structure overall. Proposed materials are compatible with the structure.

(2) The harmony of the proposed change in terms of overall proportion and the size and placement of elements such as entrances, windows, awnings, exterior stairs, and signs.

The design, scale and placement of the porch and rear addition have been designed to be compatible with, and minimize the impact on, the existing structure.

(3) The effect of the proposed change on the historic district neighborhood, setting, or streetscape.

Located behind the home, the rear addition is not visible from the street. The 1-story porch addition while highly visible is a representative of the structure’s original porch, respecting the existing architectural features of the structure.

(4) Whether the proposed method of construction, renovation, or restoration would have an adverse impact on the historic or architectural character of the structure or site, or on adjacent buildings or structures.

Located behind the home, the rear addition is not visible from the street. The 1-story porch addition, while highly visible, is representative of the structure’s original porch, respecting the existing architectural features of the structure.

(5) The Secretary of the Interior Standards for Historic Preservation, as may be relevant.

The new porch addition maintains the integrity of the front elevation and is sympathetic to the structure’s original porch.

(6) Any applicable provisions of the adopted design guidelines.

The proposed additions to the structure are in keeping with the design guidelines.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends APPROVAL of the application as submitted.

12

CITY OF

MANASSAS, VIRGINIA Community Development · 9027 Center Street, Man ass as, VA 20110 · 703-257-8223

ARB #: J..._~q-~'1

DA'l JEP I 2 2018 (Completed by Ci ty Staff)

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Application for Certificate of Appropriateness

Site Address: Q \ \J_ t\J\o.) {) (}- Manassas, VA 20110 Number Street Name

Tax Map No(s): __________ _ Zoning District: ________ _

Date Purchased: (IDCX1 ):Q-- Q,{) \ ?J. Nature of Proposed Work~~ease check all that apply.

Age of Structure: \Cl D le

0Signage 0Exterior Alteration ~Addition 0New Construction 0Demolition

Description of Proposed Work (use additional pa es ·

Q ~

OWNER (Leave blank if same as applicant)

Name (Please Print)

Address Company

\\\0 ro\~~ ~ cJtll D City State Zip Code Address

aD\ We 9 D l] C() ua \1 L'D~ CifO\ ----+--E-mail Address CJ City

Sl t::) \ :z:s~ x-State Zip Code

Fax # Pho~ Fax # Phone #

Sign~~ -E--m- a-ii_A_d_d_r-es_s ___________ _

I hereby certify that I have the authority to make the foregoing application, that the application and information provided herein is correct and that the construction will conform to the regulations in the Building Code, the Zoning Ordinance, or private building restrictions, if any, which may be imposed on the above property by deed.

13

Bathroom addition

The 2nd floor master bathroom addition with be built over the 1st floor kitchen.

Installation of 3 new windows will be 2/2 fiberglass composite with simulated divided light to include the interior and exterior grills as well as space bar. Windows will match other windows in back of house in style.

Trim will be hardie board and will be smooth in style and not include faux wood grain

Roof will be flat with a black rubber membrane

Current siding is aluminum, will use hardie board to match existing size and color

Gutters will match existing gutters in size and color

Attached: architectural drawing of bathroom addition

Front porch

Would like to have a front porch installed similar to the one the house once had (see photo). In keeping with the character of the house, we will have 4 round columns and stone flooring. The porch will extend the length of the original house and will be 8 feet deep.

Hardie board will be smooth in style and not include any faux wood grain.

The roof will be metal and match the existing roof in style and color.

Gutter on front porch will match existing gutters on the house

Attached: drawing of front porch house location survey picture of current front porch picture of columns used. picture of original porch

14

From K•ftyfrllllltorM • , , ....,.., "} ... ~11,2011 .8"..t 1 Pt.l . ...._._.

~~ ~~ C-DtuvY\fS;S

0\1"'\~(b,l\~ rvo(C ~

18

standing seam roof to

match existing roof

stone floor to match

existing porch & sidewalk

Permacast

Columns

30'

9'-11"

19

Location of Bathroom Addition: Existing Condition

20

( I )!

~

/

i I I Ill

OHOC': VA S'dSS'dN'dW l33~.1S Nl'dW U~6

3~N301S3~ 3N01\fll\l

/

1 . A'll , ,

~ ~ n

~ i I . . a

"I""'" .

( ! !

/

• I

~

g ... 0 z 0 () o w ~ II) !

~

"' ~~ :;;o..

"' ;:;:

QQ. -N 2 0 .... CN ct

~

fb (/")

21

4 euo ..... Ot _ ... :~~: ...

r \

\

c )

XXOBir

~

.~ > 0 ..,

~

onoz "'"' S"'SS"'N"'W 133~1S NI"'W zns

30N301S3~ S~01A\fS

}

l

z 0

~ ~ ...J LIJ a: <( ~ w : O:: l

~

-

22

NOTES: 1. FENCE LOCATIONS, IF SHO""', ARE

APPROXIMA 1£ ONLY AND DO NOT CEri lit T liS ro OWNER SHit'.

2. ACCORDING TO THE U.S. OEPARl\IENr OF HOUSING AND URBAN OE~LOPMENrs fl.OOO INSURANCE RAl£ MAP, THE HOUSE: SHOWN HEREON APPEARS TO BE IN ZONE: ·r: ..

.>. NO Tin.£ R£POAT FURNISHED. PLAT SUBJECT TO RESlRICTIONS AND EASEMENTS or RECORD.

'J': \

~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~

No 00l!:iC3

\ I I

,/.<;'.'!'.~'.;...• ."<:·.r

I '!''

~,

I

1

I

a..t'\

I ~.:~:·~t: I ~

/~()()/ f7

(IZ.OO

\ \

I

CURTIS W. ... BREA/0? F. TAVlQR

SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE

I HERESY CERTIF"Y lliAT lli[ POSinoNS OF" All lli[ ~~ EXISTING IMPROVEI.I[NTS HAVE BEEN CAR[f"Ull Y [SlABUSHE BY A TRANSIT TAPE SURvtY AND UNLESS OniERI'IISE SHOI'IN lliER[ ARE NO ENCROACIIMEN TS [llli(R WAY ACROSS THE

PROPERTY UNE . ... -X--i --r::::iptRTil£0 () SUiM"

SCHUOLS & TOWNSEND, P. C. 8 CIVIL ENGINEERING I I..ANO SURVfYWQ

9151 ,.,.,,,. ,. St M•N•us. V•. 21110 71H 'M-.Iti•J · MAlJ-N\11 · "Al' "ll ·-~

TAX WAP NUWBER: lf'JI-01·000- 489

OEID BOOK/PACE: :'O:?f'; / 8'78

CAS£ NAME: ;??o<G\C' /Q'~.- ORFT BY: '$

W0 1: 4 - 1' - 518 fll / l!fi PG I QiKO B"r. ~

23

Manassas City of Manassas

Reconnaissance Level Survey DHR ld# 155-0168 ·source Identification Tax Parcel: 10 1101 0014891 I I Other ld#: 155-0161..{)133 GPIN# 7796-50-9907

Property Name(s): ................. Conner House {Historic}, House, 9112 Main Street {Current}

Property Date: .••.•............•••...• circa 19 I 0

Address(s): .•......•..•..•••..........•.. 9 I I 2

County/Independent City: Manassas

City: ...................................... Manassas

State, Zip:............................. Virginia, 20108

USGS Quad Name................. MANASSAS

Surrounding Area: ••••.••...••••.• City

Resource Description Ownership Status: ........................ . Private

Main Street {Current}

Primary Resource Exterior Component Description:

Component

Chimneys

Chimneys

Foundation

Roof

Porch

Structural System

Windows

Windows

Comp Tme!Form

Interior

NIA

Solid

Hip

I -story, I -bay

Frame

Double-Hung

Fixed

National Register Eligibility Status

Property is Historic (50 years or older)

Property is associated with the Local Manassas Historic District

Contributing Property to Local Historic Landmarks List

Property is associated with the National Register Manassas Historic District [district}

Material Material Treatment

Brick Corbelled Cap

NIA NIA

Stone Uncoursed Block

Metal Standing-Seam

Wood Column, Tuscan

Vinyl Siding

Vinyl 6/6

Vinyl 20-light

Site Description:............. Facing southeast, this single dwelling is sited on a grassy level lot with landscaping, mature trees and shrubs, and it is fronted by foundation plantings. Immature trees and shrubs are also located on the property. A paved driveway is situated south of the dwelling off of Main Street.

WUZIT Count: 'R Resource Count:

Wuzit Tmes

Single Dwelling

Office

Individual Resource Information

Historic?

Historic

Historic

WUZJT·.................................... Single Dwelling

Est. Date of Construction: .. .

Primary Resource? ............. .

Architectural Style: ............. .

Interior Plan Type: ............ .

circa 1910

Yes

Colonial Revival

Unknown

NR Resource Tme

Building

Structure

Contributing Status

Contributing

Not Evaluated

Accessed? ........................... No

Number of Stories:........... 2

Condition: ......... ............. Good

Threats to Resource: ....... . None Known

Description: Set on an uncoursed stone block foundation, this two-story Colonial Revival-style building is a single dwelling. It is wood-frame construction clad in vinyl siding. It is covered by a hipped roof sheathed in standing-seam metal. A hipped wood-frame ell is located to the northwest of the main block. The roof features overhanging eaves and an interior corbelled cap chimney. A one-story, one-bay hipped roof portico features Tuscan columns. Fenestration consists of 616 double-hung windows, a 20-light fixed window, fixed wood shutters, and an off-center entry with a 3-light transom and I -light sidelights. A one-story screened-in porch addition is located on the northeast elevation. The porch is covered by a hipped roof. The porch features square posts and molded wood panels. A one-story addition is located on the southwest elevation. This addition is covered l?Y a hipped roof and features an exterior-end chimney. A shed roof carport has been constructed on the rear elevation.

24

Manassas

dividual Resource Information

City of Manassas Reconnaissance Level Survey DHR ld# 155-0168

WUZIT:............................... ..... Office

Est. Date ofConstmction: .. .

Primary Resource? ............. .

Architectural Style: ............. .

circa 1910

No

Other: Frame Vernacular

Accessed?........................... No

Number of Stories: .......... .

Condition: ...................... Good

Interior Plan Type: ............. Unknown Threats to Resource:........ None Known

Description: This one-story shed is wood frame construction clad in weatherboard siding. It is covered by a hipped roof. The shed has 6/6 double-hung wood windows. The hinged door is flanked by fixed shutters. This structure was not evaluated in the Manassas National Register District nomination.

Individual Resource Information WUZ/T: ................................... .

Est. Date ofConstructian: .. . Accessed ? .......................... .

Primary Resource? ............. . Number of Stories: .......... .

Architectural Style: ............. . Condition: ..................... .

Interior Plan Type: ............ . Threats to Resource: ....... .

Description:

Individual Resource Information WVZ/T: ............................... .... .

Est. Date ofConstmction: .. . Accessed? ... ....................... .


Architectural Style: ............. . Condition: ..................... .


Description:

Individual Resource Information WVZ/T: ..................... .............. .

Est. Date of Construction: .. . Accessed? .......................... .


Architectural Style: ............. . Condition: .................. ... .


Description:

25

Manassas

·metery Information

City of Manassas Reconnaissance Level Survey DHR Id# 155-0168

National Register Eligibility Information (Intensive Level Survey) Historic Context(s): ........................... Architecture/Community Planning, Domestic

Time Period(s): ............................. .... Reconstruction and Growth (1865 to 1914)

Sig nificance Statement:

Ownership Information Gluchowski, Paul F. & Victoria

Graphic Media Documentation Medium

Bl£ 35mm Photos Dig ital Photos

CRMEvent

The house at 9112 Main Street, constructed circa 1910, is representative of dwellings constructed in Manassas at the tum of the twentieth century. It is constructed of wood framing with a stone foundation. Characteristic of the Colonial Revival style are its two-story, side-hall plan, hipped roof, symmetrical fa~ade, and Colonial Revival-style portico. A good example of an earlytwentieth-century Colonial Revival-style dwelling in Manassas, this building is Ranked Contributing.

Photo Roll

EHT 27; EHT 28

EHT 27; EHT 28

NeKative Number

1-2;36

1-2;36

Photo Date

12/14/2005

12/14/2005

Reconnaissance Survey EJ: EHT Traceries, Inc. August 24, 2005

26

(

••• ·i-1

I - ;-- ---i-·· · 1-- -~

l ' •

i ! : --· ~

;_

. ,.

••• I

-+· ·-i- -1 i

' l -

.. . -~

- .. ! I ' j : . ~ ·- r --{·- -·r --~

'

) -~ --.... ~·

• I -~~ -.- ~ ···-<-···-:·-r-·-+·---: t i ! ! ~ i !

... • - · -t I

/

- .... -·

-l

. ' .,

l ;I

. '3:1..:: .. / ! I ' ' • : I

· - - ~· I •- • ' l

' I t 1

..... . .. ,. .. -

-r ··· I

). -- -~ I

- f

•••. ! •

-,

I --·t ; . -

. -:

!-1

1 ...

·'

. ---1-----

1 -..!-- -

·---}···- r -·i-

L--t ----. 1

· \./,) -<

' ~ ··I -~--~-

J

-~ ' )

I

_)

; --· .. ,.-:::.1..:~--

. ~ --

I'

i

.; (_ ( '~\ ..

I • I . • , ~)

~/N . t!UJ.u_i.t ,-···;·" ( /II, I '

- i . ' .. -l. ' --1'--·-·,··· '· .....;

! . I ' ,----!--! ......

-. -

,-1

-··\·

'.. .

' .

.I.

27

File no. 155-168 VIHGL\IA

IIISTOHIC LA~D~IAI{I~S CO.l\11\IISSI 0 N Nc~;.ttivc no(s) . 5175

SURVEY FOR\1 ~ 1 7tt~- .ro -<:r9o'7

JIJ'\!Oric name Mrs. Minnie Conner House Common name County/ Town /Ci ty Manassas Street address o r route number 9112 N. Main St., Manassas, Va . 22110 USGS Quad Manassas Date or period c l900 Original owner Architect/ builder/ craftsmen Original use Residence Present owner curtis Taylor Source of name Present owner add ress 9112 N. Main Street, Source of date Archi tectura1 evidence

Manassas, va. 22110 Stories 2 stories Presen t useResidence Foundation and wall const'n Stone foundation; frame wall Acreage 1 lot construction

Rooftype Metal-covered hip roof State condition of st ru cture and environs House and grounds are in good condition

State potential threats to stru cture Note any archaeological interest

Should be investigated for possible register potential? yes__ no __ Architectural description (Note significant features of plan, structural system and interior and exterior decoration , taking care to point out aspects not visible or clear from photographs. Explain nature and period of all a lterations and additions. List any outbui ldings and their approximate ages. cemeteries, etc.)

Interior inspected? Histo ri ca l sig nificance (Chain of title; individua ls, families, events, etc., associated with the property.)

28

Sourl'C:. and bihliogr:Jphy l'uhli:-.h i:d ~ourccs (I3ooks, :nticlcs, etc., with bibliographic data .)

PrimJry sources (~1Jnu script documentJry or gr:1phic material s: give loc:1tion .) Mrs. Minnie Conner on 1938 map of Manassas

Names and Jddresses of persons interviewed

Plan (Indicate locations of rooms, doorways, windows, alterations. etc.)

-- - - . . ·-1--- -.

f--- - - - -·- ·

0 - . ·--- ,--: :-- . - . . - ,.-- · -· ... . . - -- _l_;_ .•.

----

.. -·-,- ·----_____ .. ___ .. _____ _

- · -· ·---0

___!- - - - --

·-- -- --~·-

. .. : • 1 - -L .

--'I ·-- . - --- --- · - --;- !_ ____ · - - • - --·

__ ___ __;_~-- t-· ---- - -. ------- --· ---- ··---

------- -·- -- - - ---- - - -- - r---------

--- - - · _: __ I _ o

- . -- · . ! · -

------------ --·-·- · - ·---1------l- - - - ---- -- --- ·-- -- - - - - · -- · ---- --·------ -

1- - -'---·------- - · - ---- - ----·- - ---· - · - ·---·- · - - --·- 1-- -·--- - -

- - - . --- - ·- ------·- 1--- - --- - -· -~------ --- ------- - -------.. .. .. c. .. . - - - --- - -------- ---

-------·- -t- -__ _ .:_ _ ___ f--- - ------------ - - -- ----- - - ------ 0

-- ·-------- 1- ------- -- - - --- ---'---- ----- - - ---;-- ----- --·- ----- - -- - ---

--- -- ----·- --+---_._, - - - ---1--- _· ...;._ .' _...;_~--1

. -- -- -- ·-- .... - - · - ---·------· - ·-~ - -----+ ----...,.....-;----1 - - ----- - -----· ------ --------,-----------+-----.,----t

- - -- - - - - ---- ---- - --·- ---- ---- -- -------+ - - - -- · -- - ·--- · - ------- -·-- ----·--- - - ----· --- · . . -------- . - -- -- ·- - --- . . --- - ---+---:-----+---,-------t 0

----- --- · ·- - --------. ---·- - --- - - ·- - -·---

-- -- . ----- - - -- . - -~----=---..,-~f----'----·-;--:-___ . ------------------ --- ·- · ---- . -------- -·-

---'---- -- --;-· . - -· - --t------- ,---·---· ..!.-,.-

. - - · - ·-·- - -- ---- -----+ ----------- ----....,--- +-------------- J - - ----·-· --· - --------t--7--·-----t--->------t---,-- --,----'---!

I f---·---,----l-t--·---~ _;----1--------'--··+ ---,-- ---,-i ' I

~ ~ -= -----------~---- ----, ;--;----+------~--!--------' 1---·- ' I ----- -- ---,--·-___ _ _ _ .:__.,

----.---- ·- --------- - ----- - ·-------+----------~-- --·--.--- - - ----- - - - ---- ------t-- --- ---1 ------~--- ~ . ---~-~-------~~----~----~f---~-------i

Site plan (Locate and identify ou t buildings, dependencies and significant topographical features.)

. --

-·- -

r- --· . . - · '~ - · -i - - - · .

- - - -~- - ·-

... _____ ....__ __ --1 I

- ~- ------ -- -- ----1---i ·•- -~ -------'--t---!-·; : I I . ~-- ==-=-::~-=-~= ·-------- I o _,L_ : -=-..-::---: --=- ------------ ---~- ____ . ~---:--·-- -·- · --- .. . c-------- I '-;-

. -· ---- - - ----- - - ·-. -------·- - _ ____ o __ - -- ----:-o _ __; ____ +---7--·,-~~--t

- • ---- -- ----- - ; o ' I---·-+---'--- --- ·_ ---------- ·-- ·-·- ---- ----+--- -----'--

-· -----·- - ----...,,--:-1 - · -1-- ----·-------- ---- --. -·---· ---- . -!.-- ---

---- ----· ·- _____ ___.__- . ------- ------- ·- - · - ; - . --- -·--- -- . - ----- -- - - • - - • - • •• • ---- ----- - 'T • - -------- ---

-- ----· --: - ·- ·- ---- .. .. -- --- ------------!--~-:- -~- . _..:= ·-=--: -=--~-=-_;_·~--=~------ --=.=-:.~-:.:::-== =---=-=----== -- - ---------- ·-·---- - -·--- . - ---------- -

------. .,-- - ----

.. ---------- ..., - - ---- . ...: - --·-----~--

=~ ~-=-- .:....:-==~-- - ' .. :·= 0 -- ---·-- --..--~-:-----'- ------- ·--

- ·- . - - -----1- -------- .. ---- --- .. -- t--- ----- --- - ·- ;-f---- . ·------- . ---------- ~- ·- ·-- -- - ·- --- ------!- _..,. _

' ---· -- - ------ ------ --- - -'---1-- ---~

29

- • • • r~ ~ -

.. .. .... ~ , .... -.. ~.- ____ _ _ r 1 1 c2 _ ~ ~ ;tZ .

- ------~-u&_¥/_~ -------- --- -~~ 4

----------F-----~r----__ _____,,2_ - ,. ~ -~ j _ ,./

-'~YI-1 - ~l-_v_y(-- (

- -- --- -- -------·---------· ~---

- . ~~~~--?n --- - . ~--~1-- ( -~-~~--~-.------

------ -------- ----

___ l'r\.t1J_ - _ ~ ~-~

--~. ~:~-?~~-~~-:=--___ _:__-_--~~~ ·, - -------~-./[,¥-~~-------

--~ --1

30

Architectural Review Board

FY2018 ANNUAL REPORT

31

Table of Contents

Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 2

Responsibilities .................................................................................................................................. 2

Activities............................................................................................................................................. 2

A Look Ahead ..................................................................................................................................... 3

Additional Notes ................................................................................................................................ 4

Membership ....................................................................................................................................... 4

Attendance Report............................................................................................................................. 4

Attachment ........................................................................................................................................ 4

Board Members Biographies ............................................................................................................. 5

32

City of Manassas Architectural Review Board Annual Report Page 2

Introduction

The City of Manassas Architectural Review Board has established procedures to review and process applications for Certificate of Appropriateness pursuant to Section 130-405 of the Code of Manassas and suggest regulations and boundary lines adjustment of existing and proposed Historic Overlay Districts in accordance with Section 130-402 of the Code of Manassas. This report details the actions reviewed by the Architectural Review Board in FY18 reporting period (July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018) and outlines some actions to be undertaken in FY19.

Responsibilities

The Architectural Review Board offers advice to property owners and tenants on questions of historical preservation and restoration. The Board shall also cooperate with and enlist assistance from the Virginia Department of Historic Resources and the City Council to promote and preserve the historic structures within the overlay districts. The duties and responsibilities of the Architectural Review Board include:

• Issue or deny Certificate of Appropriateness for construction, reconstruction, substantial exterior alteration, and demolition or relocation within the Historic Overlay District.

• Assist and advise the City Council, the Planning Commission, other City departments and agencies, property owners and individuals in matters involving historic resources.

• Review and propose additional areas or structures to be included in or removed from an HOD or designated as a Historic Landmark.

• From time to time conduct, or cause to be conducted, a survey of historic resources. • Upon request of the City Council, Planning Commission, or interested citizens, conduct

studies deemed necessary to consider additional historic overlay districts, and means of preservation and utilization of historic assets in the City.

• Develop, adopt, and from time to time modify design guidelines for the City’s historic overlay districts, to be considered by the ARB in granting or denying Certificates of Appropriateness.

• Cooperate with, and enlist assistance from, the Virginia Department of Historic Resources, the National Trust for Historic Preservation, and other interested parties, both public and private, in its effort to preserve, restore, and conserve historic sites, landmarks, buildings, and structures within the City.

Activities The Architectural Review Board's focus in FY18 was consistency with its decisions on all applications in accordance with the Historic District Design Guidelines and to preserve and

33


protect the community’s history and historic structures. During the period of this report, the Board held twelve (12) regular meetings and two (2) worksessions. The case activity is as follows: In total, 35 applications were received in FY18 and 3 applications were carried over from FY17.

• 33 cases came before the Board for action o 12 were approved as submitted o 1 case was partially approved as submitted o 20 were approved with modifications

• 2 cases were withdrawn • 3 cases carried over to FY19

In the 20 cases that were approved with modifications, the Board diligently worked to meet the needs of the applicants under the Historic District Design Guidelines. While the majority of the applications that came before the Board continue to be for signs and minor structure modifications, the Board did review and approve several larger projects, including the proposed conversions of two structures to accommodate future restaurant spaces, the conversion of a historic church/meeting space into offices, and three single family home expansions. As directed by the City Council’s Land Use Committee in FY17, the Board prepared and submitted a report evaluating the creation of an additional historic district at Annaburg Manor (9201 Maple Street). In the report submitted to City Council, the Board recommended the creation of a Historic Overlay District. Finally, City Council may recall the properties located at 9512 and 9514 Liberty Street which was appealed to Council in 2016 after the Board denied a certificate of appropriateness for the demolition of these structures. With the change in ownership of these properties, the Board was able to approve applications for the renovation of these structures, as well as neighboring 9510 Liberty Street, which also came before the Board in FY18.

A Look Ahead In conclusion, the Board extends its appreciation to the Council for its continued support in the preservation of the City’s historic districts and looks forward to a successful year in FY19. The Board remains committed to exercising its jurisdiction on all matters related to application of the guidelines in the Historic District. Through our mutual efforts, a distinctive appearance is sustained in the three historic districts which instills a personal pride within our residents and has a positive impact on tourism and commercial interest.

34


Additional Notes The Community Development staff continued the annual mailing of the Historic District Notification postcards this fiscal year.

Membership

Member Term Expiration Jan Alten June 30, 2021 Myra Buchanan Brent (Alt) June 30, 2021 Debbie Haight June 30, 2018 Nancy Hersch Ingram June 30, 2021 Fatima Pereira-Shepherd June 30, 2018 William Rush June 30, 2018

Attendance Report

Board Members Meetings Present Absent

Jan Alten 14 13 1

Myra Buchanan Brent (Alt) 14 13 1 Debbie Haight 14 10 4 Nancy Hersch Ingram 14 12 2 Fatima Pereira Shepherd 14 10 4 William Rush 14 13 1

Attachment

1. Architectural Review Board Case List

35


Board Members Biographies

WILLIAM S. RUSH, CHAIRMAN TERM EXPIRES: JUNE 30, 2018 Mr. Rush was first appointed to the ARB in 2002. He was Vice-Chairman and later Chairman before his wife was assigned out of the Country. Upon their return, he again volunteered for and was appointed to the ARB in July 2014. He has resided in the City of Manassas since 2005 and has worked in the City since 1985. As a licensed architect, Mr. Rush was Vice-President of the design department for Gregory Construction Company for more than twenty years. He now has a private practice working primarily with automobile dealerships in this area. Mr. Rush and his wife are active in the Bull Run Unitarian Universalist Church in Historic Manassas. JAN ALTEN, Vice-Chair TERM EXPIRES: JUNE 30, 2021 Mrs. Alten was appointed to the ARB as an alternate member in February 2016 and was appointed as a regular member in early 2017. She has been a resident of the City of Manassas since June 1977. She has long been involved with the City as a volunteer in several organizations and on City citizen committees looking for ways to improve the quality of life in Manassas. In 2015, Mrs. Alten retired and closed her successful business, The Opera House Gourmet, located in Historic Manassas. She served as judge for the Virginia Governor’s Cup Wine Awards and the Eastern Seaboard Wine Competition for several years. The Opera House Gourmet won state-wide recognition twice when it was chosen as Virginia Wine Retailer of the Year. Mrs. Alten is currently on the Board of Directors at the Center for the Arts at the Candy Factory, The Manassas Ballet Theatre, and is a member of Manassas Historic Landmarks Preservation and the Old Town Business Association. In retirement, Mrs. Alten is a certified yoga teacher and a volunteer usher and supporter of the Hylton Performing Arts Center. DEBBIE HAIGHT, VICE-CHAIR TERM EXPIRES: JUNE 30, 2018 Ms. Haight was first appointed to the ARB in 2012 as an alternate member and was appointed as a regular member in 2015. She has been a resident of Manassas for over 50 years. She is married with two children and five grandchildren. She is Executive Director and CEO of Historic Manassas, Inc. and has been in this position since 2009. Ms. Haight is also a board member and department treasurer for the Occoquan-Woodbridge-Lorton Volunteer Fire Department.

NANCY HERSCH INGRAM TERM EXPIRES: JUNE 30, 2021 Mrs. Ingram was first appointed to the ARB upon its formation in 1987 and initially served until 1991, during which time she served as Vice-Chairman. She was reappointed to the ARB in 2004 and has served as a member continuously since then. During her initial tenure, she participated in the preparation of the Manassas Historic District Handbook, published in 1990, which formalized

36


guidelines for the rehabilitation of structures and the design of new construction in Manassas historic districts. A Master’s Degree in Fine Arts from American University, Washington D.C., informs her lifelong interest in architecture. She has directed the restoration of numerous historic properties in Virginia and elsewhere in the United States and consulted on major historic estates in the U.S. and Europe. In Manassas, her historic C.E. Nash House (1905) was the first structure in the City to be restored in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. The property was saved from demolition and restored in 1982, prior to the establishment of the ARB. With a lifelong commitment to the City, preserving its unique and historic sense of place remains a primary and ongoing interest of Ms. Hersch Ingram. FATIMA PEREIRA-SHEPHERD TERM EXPIRES: JUNE 30, 2018 Mrs. Pereira-Shepherd was appointed to the ARB in 2009. She has been a resident of Manassas for over 39 years and has served in many volunteer positions throughout the community. She has been a licensed Realtor® in Virginia since 2004 and received her broker’s license in 2010. She started her career with a competing local brokerage before joining Long & Foster in May 2011. At Long & Foster, Ms. Pereira-Shepherd excelled not only in real estate sales; she earned the position of sales manager at the company’s Manassas office in August 2012. She then was given the additional responsibility of sales manager at Long & Foster’s Gainesville office in June 2014. She was named as the managing broker of the Annandale office in March 2015. Ms. Pereira-Shepherd is a member of the Realtors® Association of Prince William (PWAR) and has served on its Board of Directors since 2011. She currently holds the position of vice president for the PWAR board, and she belongs to several of the association’s committees. She has also held several leadership positions on the local and state level of the Women’s Council of Realtors from 2010 to 2013. Ms. Pereira-Shepherd currently serves on several committees with the Virginia Association of Realtors and other charity organizations, and she was selected into the 2015 Virginia Leadership Academy. MYRA BUCHANAN BRENT TERM EXPIRES: JUNE 30, 2021 Mrs. Myra B. Brent was appointed to the ARB in 2017 as an alternate member. She was born and raised in the City of Manassas and has resided in the City for fifty-two years. Mrs. Brent has served in many public service positions including: Chief Election Official, City of Manassas, and Prince William County; Board of Directors/Lay Member, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Virginia; Board Member/First Vice Chair, American Red Cross Prince William County Chapter; Board of Directors, Jubilee Association of Maryland Inc.; Board of Directors/Historian, Hammond Institute of Music and Fine Arts; and Board of Directors, Hammond Scholarship Foundation. She worked for IBM for 25 years as a Personnel Administrator, Employee Relations Advisor, Manager of Employee Data and Records, and HR Advisor, retiring in 1993. She worked for American Express as an Assistant to the Director of Field Service Operations and as a Field Office Administrator from 1993 to 1996.

37


She worked at Lockheed Martin as a Staff Administrator retiring in 2002, and worked for NeighborCare Long Term Care Pharmacy until March 2005. Mrs. Brent is a Jennie Dean High School graduate and attended Franklin School of Science and Arts, Philadelphia, Pa., and Sherwood Institute, where she studied Medical Terminology and Physiology. She is a licensed Pharmacy Technician and a Certified Pharmacy Technician (CPhT). Mrs. Brent is retired, and she and her husband, Robert, have enjoyed fifty-two years together and have two children.

Sincerely,

_____________________________ _____________________________ William Rush, Chairman Nancy Hersch Ingram

_____________________________ _____________________________ Jan Alten, Vice Chair Fatima Pereira-Shepherd _____________________________ _____________________________ Debbie Haight Myra Buchanan Bren

38

ARB CASE LIST July 2018 – June 2019

ARB # APPLICATION DATE APPLICANT ADDRESS PROJECT/

PROPOSAL ACTION/DATE


2017-16 11/23/2016 Manassas Arms LLC / Jay du Von & Jessica Pfeiffer

9522 Fairview Avenue and 8812 Wesley Avenue

New construction -townhouses/single-

family homes

Worksession on 12/13/2016 Carried over to FY2019

2017-31 4/13/2017 Bull Run Unitarian Universalist Church 9404 Main Street Replace Windows Approved 7/11/2017

2017-36 6/19/2017 Rob Posch 9325 Battle Street

Replace siding, windows, doors,

modify rear addition, add deck

Approved 8/8/2017 w/mods

2018-01 8/17/2017 C.P. Leopold/New City Fellowship 9358 Main Street Projecting sign and

wall sign Approved 9/12/2017

2018-02 8/21/2017 Michael Wood 9389 Forestwood Lane Two-story, side porch

and rear deck additions


2018-03 8/21/2017 Andrew Cummins 9006 Center Street Projecting sign Approved 9/12/2017 2018-04 9/18/2017 Holly D. VandenHeuvel 9411 Main Street Projecting sign Approved 10/10/2017 w/mods 2018-05 10/20/2017 John F. Heltzel 9403 Battle Street Convert to restaurant Approved 4/10/2018 w/mods 2018-06 10/20/2017 Steve Whetzel 9502 Fairview Avenue Replace all windows Withdrawn 2018-07 10/20/2017 Lisa Marie McTavish 8953 Center Street Wall sign Approved 11/14/2017 2018-08 11/17/2017 Kim A. Beasley 9320 West Street Replace Windows Approved 12/12/2017 w/mods 2018-09 12/15/2017 Denise McCall 9409-9411 Battle Street New fence Approved 1/9/2018 w/mods 2018-10 12/19/2017 Dynamic Construction LLC 9510 Liberty Street Exterior alterations Approved 1/9/2018 w/mods 2018-11 1/11/2018 Creative Brush 8951 Center Street Signage Approved 2/13/2018 2018-12 1/16/2018 Light Works 9411 Battle Street Signage Approved 2/13/2018 w/mod 2018-13 1/16/2018 Loveless Porter Architects 9000 Center Street Exterior alterations Approved 3/13/2018 w/mods 2018-14 1/18/2018 Battle Street Bistro 9402 Battle Street Signage/Exterior Alt Approved 2/13/2018 2018-15 1/19/2018 Philadelphia Tavern 9413 Main Street Awning Approved 2/13/2018 w/mod

2018-2000 2/21/2018 George Marlette 9522 Main Street Roof, windows and porch railing Approved 2/28/2018 w/mods

2018-2001 2/16/2018 CP Leopold 9413 Battle Street Projecting sign Approved 3/13/2018

2018-2002 2/16/2018 James Smith 9119 Church Street (9451 West Street)

Projecting sign and mural Approved 3/13/2018 w/mods

2018-2003 2/16/2018 Lisa A.K. Ortiz 9133 Grant Avenue Exterior alterations Approved 3/13/2018 w/mod

2018-2004 2/16/12018 Brett Eagle 9502 Fairview Avenue Window

modifications and fencing


39

ARB CASE LIST July 2018 – June 2019

ARB # APPLICATION DATE APPLICANT ADDRESS PROJECT/

PROPOSAL ACTION/DATE


2018-2005 2/16/2018 Mitch Reddington 9324 Battle Street Exterior alterations Approved 3/13/2018 w/mods 2018-2006 2/16/2018 Michael Wilhoit 9131 Grant Avenue Exterior alterations Approved 3/13/2018 w/mods 2018-2007 2/15/2018 Amy Domenech 9082 Center Street Projecting sign Approved 4/10/2018 w/mod 2018-2008 3/16/2018 Dawood Hamati 9514 Liberty Street Exterior alterations Approved 4/10/2018 w/mods 2018-2009 4/12/2018 David Daughterty 8902 Center Street Fence Approved 5/8/2018 2018-2010 4/13/2018 Katherine Colburn 9327 Main Street Signage Approved 5/8/2018 2018-2011 4/13/2018 Victor Montes 8696 Liberia Avenue New addition Approved 5/8/2018 w/mods 2018-2012 4/13/2018 James and Cheryl Dorerty 9512 Liberia Avenue Exterior alterations Approved 5/8/2018 w/mods 2018-2013 4/13,2018 Bob Anderson 9309 Center Street Signage Approved 5/8/2018 2018-2014 5/18/2018 John Hornberger 9412 Main Street Signage/Awnings Approved 6/12/2018 w/mod 2018-2015 5/18/2018 Chris Sellers 9413 West Street Awning Approved 6/12/2018 2018-2016 6/1/2018 Mark Rowe 9435 Main Street Signage Approved 6/12/2018

2018-2017 6/13/2018 John Snider 9103 Grant Avenue

New roof over front stoop, replace

covering on stoop, replace front door

and trim

Carried over to FY2019

2018-2018 6/15/2018 Steve Fay 8846 Mathis Avenue Wall and monument

sign and exterior paint

Carried over to FY2019

2018-2019 6/21/2018 Chau Ton 9516 Main Street Porch addition Carried over to FY2019

40

city of manassas, virginia architectural review board ...€¦ · roll call . ms. alten. the motion...

Documents