Comparison of Wastewater Treatment TechnologiesBusiness Development Manager
R.A. 6969 - Toxic Substances and Hazardous
and Nuclear Wastes
Management
Flow Equalization
Secondary ClarifierChlorine Contact
Chlorine Contact
Treated Wastewater
Sludge Holding
Secondary ClarifierChlorine Contact
MembraneChlorine Contact
Treated Wastewater
Sludge Holding
Year of study August 2020
Technologies considered
Solid Waste
BioCleaner Technology
Chlorine ContactTreated Wastewater
Low footprint 2 2 3 3 1
Compliance to DAO 2016-08 effluent
standards 2 1 2 3 3
Low energy consumption 2 2 2 1 3
Low chemical consumption 2 2 3 3 3
Ease of operations 2 1 1 2 3
>10 reference installations 3 3 1 1 1
Listed technology in WWTP journals
and handbook 3 3 3 3 0
Process stability 2 2 2 2 2
TOTAL 18 17 17 18 16
Legend:
SBR 413 56 30 2 Class C 0 30 5
MBBR 400 62 36 4 Class B 18 18 3
MBR 285 71 52 5 Class A 36 20 4
BioCleaner 932 72 21 1 Class B 18 3 1
Cost Comparison
Feasibility Study
Modern and innovative
Thank you for listening!