criminal psychology chapters 15 & 16 death penalty influencing public policy talbot kellogg...
TRANSCRIPT
Criminal PsychologyCriminal PsychologyChapters 15 & 16Chapters 15 & 16
Death PenaltyDeath PenaltyInfluencing Public PolicyInfluencing Public Policy
TalbotTalbotKellogg Community CollegeKellogg Community College
Do they understand?Do they understand? 1992 – Scott Panetti.1992 – Scott Panetti.
Killed his mother-in-law and father-in-law.Killed his mother-in-law and father-in-law. Kept his wife and daughter hostage for the night.Kept his wife and daughter hostage for the night. Diagnosed with Schizoaffective disorder.Diagnosed with Schizoaffective disorder. Belief that the devil possessed their home.Belief that the devil possessed their home. Had stopped taking his medications.Had stopped taking his medications.
1992 - Ricky Ray Rector1992 - Ricky Ray Rector Killed a police officer.Killed a police officer. Turned gun on self, shooting himself in the head.Turned gun on self, shooting himself in the head. Functional level of a 5 year old. Functional level of a 5 year old.
Key Issues in This Case:Key Issues in This Case:
• • Hospitalized 14 times inHospitalized 14 times in
11 years due to the11 years due to the
symptoms of hissymptoms of his
paranoid schizophreniaparanoid schizophrenia
• • Allowed to representAllowed to represent
himself at trial, dressedhimself at trial, dressed
in a purple cowboy outfitin a purple cowboy outfit
• • Believes the state seeksBelieves the state seeks
to execute him in orderto execute him in order
to prevent him fromto prevent him from
preaching the gospel inpreaching the gospel in
prisonprison
• • U.S. Supreme CourtU.S. Supreme Court
blocked his executionblocked his execution
and orderedand ordered
reconsideration of hisreconsideration of his
competency to becompetency to be
executedexecuted
Why get involved?Why get involved?
Professional Bias Societal norms Personal Bias Competency & Competency for Execution Advise on the Theory of the Case
Death Qualified Juries Aggravating factors – elevate the punishment Mitigating factors – temper the punishment
Courts and the Death Penalty
Appellate Courts Inadequate representation Exculpatory evidence Typically unsympathetic
U.S. Supreme Court 1972 – outlawed the death penalty as it
qualified it as “cruel and unusual punishment”
Reinstated it four years later, satisfied that state inequities had been corrected.
Specific IssuesSpecific Issues ChildrenChildren Mentally retardedMentally retarded
Terry Washington – Texas, 1997Terry Washington – Texas, 1997
Issues of self control, judgment and Issues of self control, judgment and perspective are lacking in these perspective are lacking in these individuals.individuals.
Does the Death Penalty work?Does the Death Penalty work?
Decrease in crime or capital offenses?Decrease in crime or capital offenses? Conflicting dataConflicting data
Cost effective?Cost effective? Imprisonment for life?Imprisonment for life? Carrying out the death penalty?Carrying out the death penalty? $2,000,000 difference per case$2,000,000 difference per case