curriculum based measurement: reading and written language susan m. loftus, ph.d. university of...

52
Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

Upload: anabel-watkins

Post on 27-Dec-2015

222 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language

Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D.

University of Rhode Island

Page 2: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

Agenda

Introduction What is CBM? How do we administer/score/interpret CBM? How does CBM fit into an RTI model? How do we use results of CBM to make

instructional decisions?

Page 3: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

Scientific Knowledge Base

There is an extensive scientific knowledge base in beginning reading

Converging evidence suggests that: Teaching Reading is Urgent Teaching Reading is Complex Almost Every Child Can Learn to Read

What do we know and what guidance can we gain from scientifically based reading

research?

Page 4: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

Teaching Reading is Urgent

According to the results of the 2007 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), approximately 40% of third graders are performing below a “basic” level in reading.

Students performing below a “basic” level are not able to demonstrate an understanding of the literal meaning of grade level text, identify main ideas, make inferences, or relate what they read to personal experiences

Page 5: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

Teaching Reading is Urgent

“No time is as precious or as fleeting as the first years of formal schooling. Research consistently shows that children who get off to a good start in reading rarely stumble. Those who fall behind tend to stay behind for the rest of their academic lives.”

(Burns, Griffin, & Snow, 1999, p. 61)

Page 6: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

Scientific Knowledge Base

There is an extensive scientific knowledge base in beginning reading

Converging evidence suggests that: Teaching Reading is Urgent Teaching Reading is Complex Almost Every Child Can Learn to Read

What do we know and what guidance can we gain from scientifically based reading

research?

Page 7: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

Teaching Reading is Complex

To every complex problem, there is a simple solution…

that doesn’t workMark Twain

that doesn’t work

Teaching Reading is Rocket Science!(Louisa Moats)

Page 8: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

Vocabulary

Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Alphabetic Principle

Fluency

Reading in an Alphabetic Writing

Big Ideas in Beginning Reading

Complex Alphabetic Code

Page 9: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

Scientific Knowledge Base

There is an extensive scientific knowledge base in beginning reading

Converging evidence suggests that:

Teaching Reading is Urgent Teaching Reading is Complex Almost Every Child Can Learn to Read

What do we know and what guidance can we gain from scientifically based reading

research?

Page 10: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

Teaching Every Child to Read

The results of well designed and carefully controlled school-based studies suggest that at least 95% of the total student population can attain average reading abilities with the implementation of effective and comprehensive instruction & intervention.

Results of School-Based Studies

Torgesen, Florida Center for Reading Research, 2004

Page 11: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

What is Curriculum

Based Measurement?

Page 12: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

Curriculum Based Measurement A method used to find out how students are

progressing in academic areas Screen all students 3 times per year Progress monitor students who are at-risk Provide information to teachers that will

inform instructional changes Quick and easy to administer

Page 13: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

What is good about CBM?

• Short 1-minute assessments of critical early literacy skills

• Administered to all children three times a year• Administered to students experiencing reading

difficulties more often• Measures change across grades

Kindergarten and 1st grade assess pre-reading skills 1st – 8th grade assess reading connected text

• DIBELS and Aimsweb can be used in combination with an on-line data management systems that helps to organize, display, and interpret student data

Page 14: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

What is good about CBM? Short reliable and valid indicators of skills highly associated with early reading success

Provide “vital signs” of growth and development that are predictive of later reading proficiency

Allows early identification of students who need instructional support

Instructionally relevant: Provide timely feedback to schools and teachers to enable responsive instruction

Simple, quick, cost effective measures that are easily repeatable for continuous progress monitoring

Page 15: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

What is good about CBM? Can answer questions about achievement at the individual, classroom, and school-wide level. Which children in my class/grade/school are at risk for future

reading difficulties? Which students have similar instructional needs and will form

appropriate groups for instruction? As a whole, how are our kindergarten/first/ second/third grade

students doing? Compared to last year? Is our reading program meeting the needs of students in

kindergarten/first/second/third grade? Are our reading interventions helping at risk students catch

up?

Page 16: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

CBM: Reading

DIBELS (http://dibels.uoregon.edu) Aimsweb (http://aimsweb.com) Intervention Central

(www.interventioncentral.com) National Center for Student Progress

Monitoring (www.studentprogress.org)

Page 17: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

Counting the number of correct words while a student reads aloud from grade-level text for 1 minute.

“Because oral reading fluency reflects the complex orchestration of many different reading skills, it can be used in an elegant and reliable way to characterize overall reading expertise.”

(Fuchs, Fuchs, Hosp, & Jenkins, 2002)

Measures of oral reading fluency are highly correlated with reading comprehension in the primary grades.

Oral Reading Fluency

CBM: Curriculum Based Measurement

Page 18: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

“Fluency represents a level of expertise beyond word recognition accuracy... skilled readers read words accurately, rapidly, and efficiently.” (National Reading Panel, 2000)

“Slow, effortful reading is a labor-intensive process that only fitfully results in understanding.” (National Reading Panel, 2000)

“If a reader has to spend too much time and energy figuring out what the words are, she will be unable to concentrate on what the words mean.” (Coyne, Kame’enui, & Simmons, 2001)

Oral Reading Fluency

Page 19: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

Relationship between ORF & Comprehension

Oral reading fluency is highly correlated and predictive of standardized tests of reading comprehension and state-wide high stakes assessments.A student who is actively constructing meaning while reading will be more fluent than if she is not comprehending.

Page 20: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

Relationship between ORF & Comprehension

The ability to read fluently is necessary but not sufficient for higher level comprehension.

Page 21: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

A student who does not read fluentlyEven if she has good understanding, she will have

difficulty with reading comprehensionIf she also has difficulty with understanding, she will

have even more difficulty with reading comprehension

A student that does read fluentlyIf she has good understanding, her reading

comprehension will be goodIf she has difficulty with understanding, she will

have difficulty with reading comprehension

Oral Reading Fluency

Page 22: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

AIMSWEB Curriculum Based Measures

Letter Naming Fluency Letter Sound Fluency Phonemic Segmentation Fluency Nonsense Word Fluency Oral Reading Fluency Reading Maze Written Expression

Page 23: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

K-Fall

K-Winter

K-Spring

1st-Fall

1st-Winter

1st-Spring

2nd-Fall

2nd-Winter

2nd-Spring

LNF LNF LNF LNF

LSF LSF LSF

PSF PSF PSF PSF

NWF NWF NWF NWF

ORF ORF ORF ORF ORF

Aimsweb Measurement Sequence

Page 24: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

Letter Naming Fluency (LNF)

When is it measured? Kindergarten – First Grade

What does it look like?What does it measure?

Students’ ability to name letters quickly and accurately

What does it tell us? LNF is an indicator of risk status and early experiences with literacy

Page 25: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

Letter Sound Fluency (LSF)

When is it measured? Kindergarten – First Grade

What does it look like?What does it measure?

Students’ ability to name sounds of letters quickly and accurately

What does it tell us? LSF is an indicator of risk status and early experiences with literacy

Page 26: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

Phoneme Segmentation Fluency (PSF)

When is it measured? Kindergarten – First Grade

What does it look like?What does it measure?

Students’ ability to break orally presented words into sounds quickly and accurately (phonemic awareness)

What does it tell us? Students’ phonemic awareness is an indicator of their ability to manipulate the sounds in language and is related to the ease with which they can learn letter-sounds and decode unknown words.

Page 27: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

Nonsense Word Fluency (NWF)

When is it measured? Kindergarten – First Grade

What does it look like?What does it measure?

Students’ ability to identify letter-sound correspondences and decode regular CVC non-words.

What does it tell us? Students who can decode quickly and accurately are able to use our alphabetic system to read and spell words.

Page 28: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

Oral Reading Fluency (ORF)

When is it measured? First Grade – Eighth Grade

What does it look like?What does it measure?

Students’ ability to read grade level connected text quickly and accurately.

What does it tell us? Oral reading fluency is a valid and reliable measure of overall reading competence

Page 29: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

Practice Exercise 1

Page 30: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

Practice Exercise 1: Answer Key

This student read 72 WRC/8 Errors

Page 31: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

Reading Maze

When is it measured? First Grade – Eighth Grade

What does it look like?What does it measure?

Supplemental measure of reading comprehension

What does it tell us? If comprehension problems are suspected this measure can help to assess the student’s level of risk

Page 32: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

Written Expression

When is it measured? First Grade – Eighth Grade

What does it look like?What does it measure?

The ability to communicate thoughts and ideas in writing

What does it tell us? You can score students’ responses for Total Words Written (TWW), Correct Writing Sequences (CWS), and Words Spelled Correctly (WSC).

Page 33: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

How do we Interpret CBM data?

Established/Low-Risk/Benchmark Students are likely to achieve subsequent literacy goals if provided with effective instruction.

Emerging/Some-Risk/Strategic Unable to predict whether students will achieve subsequent literacy goals.

Deficient/At-Risk/Intensive Students are unlikely to achieve subsequent literacy goals unless provided with intensive intervention.

Page 34: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

Class-Level Report: Class List

How is Student Performance Displayed?

Page 35: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

How does CBM fit into an RTI model?

Page 36: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

Primary Prevention:Instruction with

Core Reading Program For All Students

Secondary Prevention:Supplemental

Instruction for Students at Some Risk

Tertiary Prevention:Specialized, IndividualizedIntervention for Students at

High Risk

~80% of Students

~15%

~5%

CONTINUUM OFSCHOOL-WIDE

BEGINNING READING SUPPORT

Page 37: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

~40% of Students

~35%

~25%

Students Meeting Grade Level Reading Goals:

Low risk

Students Performing Below Grade Level Reading Goals:

At Risk

Students Performing Significantly Below Grade

Level Reading Goals:High Risk

School ASchool A

Page 38: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

How do we use CBM data to make instructional decisions?

Page 39: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

Assessment

Curriculum/Instruction

Page 40: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

Assessment & Instruction

Instruction without assessment is aimless

“It’s like driving a car at night without any headlights.”

Page 41: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

Assessment & Instruction

“Weighing cows won’t make ‘em fatter.”

Assessment data must:Answer important questionsEnable informed instructional decision making

Assessment without instruction is worthless.

Page 42: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

A School-wide Approach

Alterable Components Content Instructional Design Programs/Materials Interventionist/ Interventionist Expertise Grouping Dosage Scheduling

20%Intervention Options

Page 43: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

A School-wide Approach

Content Reading

Comprehension, vocabulary, Phonemic Awareness, Phonics, Fluency

Content becomes increasingly targeted

20%

intensity/resources

Intervention Options

Page 44: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

A School-wide Approach

Instructional Design Re-teaching of skills/strategies Review and practice of skills/strategies Features of effective instruction

Explicit instruction Scaffolded instruction Opportunities to practice with high quality feedback

20%

intensity/resources

Intervention Options

Page 45: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

A School-wide Approach

Program/Materials “Double dose” of core materials Intervention component of core materials School designed strategies/activities Highly scripted/systematic program

20%

intensity/resources

Intervention Options

Page 46: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

A School-wide Approach

Interventionist Student Volunteer Paraprofessional Classroom Teacher Specialist

Interventionist Expertise Amount of training with intervention Experience implementing intervention Student success Availability of coaching/support

20%

intensity/resources

Intervention Options

Page 47: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

A School-wide Approach

Grouping Size of intervention group

10 students, 4 students, one-on-one Within class grouping Across class grouping Across grade grouping

20%

intensity/resources

Intervention Options

Page 48: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

A School-wide Approach

Dosage How much time per day? How many days per week? How many weeks?

Scheduling When will intervention take place? Where will intervention take place?

20%

intensity/resources

Intervention Options

Page 49: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

A School-wide Approach

Intervention Implementation

Continuum of scheduling, grouping, and delivery alternatives are coordinated at a school-wide level to best leverage personnel, expertise, materials, and resources

20%Intervention Options

Page 50: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

A School-wide Approach

Intervention Programs/Materials

Evidence based Consistent & Coordinated

No intervention “silos” Implemented with fidelity and quality

20%Intervention Options

Page 51: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

Additional Resources

National Center on RTI http://www.rti4success.org

Florida Center for Reading Research

http://fcrr.org/ What Works Clearinghouse

http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/

Page 52: Curriculum Based Measurement: Reading and Written Language Susan M. Loftus, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island

Thank you!

Contact Information:

Susan Loftus

[email protected]