data presentation february 5, 2008 are we improving? was 2007 better than 2006?
TRANSCRIPT
DATA PRESENTATIONFebruary 5, 2008
ARE WE IMPROVING?
WAS 2007 BETTER THAN 2006?
CMT Math Proficient 2006 & 2007
2314
1336
618
253
806
325
2326
1309
590
306
814
337
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Overall White Black Hispanic F/R SPED
Math 2006 Math 2007
CMT Math Proficient Percentage
74
82
5860 60
28
76
84
62 63 62
31
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Overall White Black Hispanic F/R SPED
Math 2006 Math 2007
CMT Reading 2006 & 2007
2315
1340
619
250
808
324
2316
1309
589
300
812
333
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Overall White Black Hispanic F/R SPED
Reading 2006 Reading 2007
CMT Reading Percentages
62
73
42
4644
15
65
76
46
4947
16
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Overall White Black Hispanic F/R SPED
Reading 2006 Reading 2007
CMT 2006 TO 2007
• Twenty-nine (29) fewer White students• Twenty-nine(29) fewer Black students• Fifty-two (52) more Hispanic students• Math Achievement improved by 2%• Reading Achievement improved by 3%• Black students improved the most in Math
and Reading – 4%• All Subgroups improved in both areas
CAPT Numbers Math 2006 & 2007
346
207
89 88
33
19
323
192
8393
30
13
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Overall White Black F/R Hispanic SPED
Math 2006 Math 2007
Percentages at Proficient CAPT Math 2006 & 2007
70
81
44
49
58
19
64
77
4042 42
13
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Overall White Black F/R Hispanic SPED
Math 2006 Math 2007
CAPT Reading 2006 & 2007
342
207
86 86
32
14
325
194
8495
29
11
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Overall White Black F/R Hispanic SPED
Reading 2006 Reading 2007
Percentages at Proficient CAPT Reading 2006 & 2007
75
84
5754
60
14
71
82
5053
58
11
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Overall White Black F/R Hispanic SPED
Reading 2006 Reading 2007
CAPT 2006 TO 2007
• Overall number of students declined slightly for all subgroups except F/R
• Math Achievement declined by 6%
• Math Achievement by Hispanic students declined by 16%
• Reading Achievement declined by 4%
• Reading Achievement by Black students declined by 7%
CMT 2007 - Matched Data -NCLB Improvement
55
99
116117
129127
62
30
11
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Math Reading Writing
# Declined # Improved # Impr. Overall
Percentages CMT 2007 - Matched Data - NCLB Improvement
3.10%
5.60%
6.60%6.70%
7.40%7.20%
3.50%
1.70%
0.63%
0.00%
1.00%
2.00%
3.00%
4.00%
5.00%
6.00%
7.00%
8.00%
9.00%
10.00%
Math Reading Writing
% Declined % Improved % Impr. Overall
Matched Data ComparisonPercent of Students at Proficient
• Greatest Improvement in Math – 3.5%
• Reading Improvement – 1.7%
• Least Improvement in Writing - .63%
• Matched Data shows pattern of improvement only slightly better than decline
• What do these patterns of improvement and decline tell us?
72.4
77.7
0
77.8
83.3
0
73.377.1
0
73.769.2
0
74.176.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Overall
Proficient - Math Overall Percentage
Grade 3 / 2006
Grade 4 / 2007
Grade 4 / 2006
Grade 5 / 2007
Grade 5 / 2006
Grade 6 / 2007
Grade 6 / 2006
Grade 7 / 2007
Grade 7 / 2006
Grade 8 / 2007
Proficient Math Grades 3 & 4
72.4
85.2
56.2
50
57.2
30.8
77.7
89
63.9
54.2
61.9
44
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Overall White Black Hispanic F/R SPED
Grade 3 / 2006 Grade 4 / 2007
Proficient Math Grades 4 & 5
77.8
85.3
61.163.8
65.7
44.9
83.3
89
68
80.4
69.7
36.2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Overall White Black Hispanic F/R SPED
Grade 4 / 2006 Grade 5 / 2007
Proficient Math Grades 5 & 6
73.3
81.1
56
59.6 59.1
32.8
77.1
83.4
64.662.5
67.7
28.3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Overall White Black Hispanic F/R SPED
Grade 5 / 2006 Grade 6 / 2007
Proficient Math Grades 6 & 7
73.7
80.4
58.6
69.8
57.7
28
69.2
78.8
51.653.2
46.3
22.4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Overall White Black Hispanic F/R SPED
Grade 6 / 2006 Grade 7 / 2007
Proficient Math Grades 7 & 8
74.1
80.1
58.2
62.9 62.9
20.7
76.5
81.9
64.465.7
64.2
26.8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Overall White Black Hispanic F/R SPED
Grade 7 / 2006 Grade 8 / 2007
Math Proficiency Matched Data
• Improvement at all grade levels except grade 7
• SPED students in grades 5 and 6 declined• Percentage of improvement declines at
middle grades• Greatest improvement at all grades
(except grade 7) by Black students• Greatest decline at grade 7 by Hispanic
and F/R students
Proficient Reading Overall
61.9
66.7
0
7168.9
0
59.3
65.9
0
64.362.2
0
64.4 64
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Overall
Grade 3, 2006
Grade 4, 2007
Grade 4, 2006
Grade 5, 2007
Grade 5, 2006
Grade 6, 2007
Grade 6, 2006
Grade 7, 2007
Grade 7, 2006
Grade 8, 2007
Proficient Reading Grade 3 & 4
61.9
73.6
47.5
39.1
43.1
11.5
66.7
76.1
51.954.2
51
12
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Overall White Black Hispanic F/R SPED
Grade 3, 2006 Grade 4, 2007
Proficient Reading Grade 4 & 5
71
81.7
48.4
56.5
51.1
20.4
68.9
80.5
45.4
52.9
45.5
17
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Overall White Black Hispanic F/R SPED
Grade 4, 2006 Grade 5, 2007
Proficient Reading Grade 5 & 6
59.3
71.7
33
39.2 39.6
15.3
65.9
77.5
48.8
43.8
53.7
19.2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Overall White Black Hispanic F/R SPED
Grade 5, 2006 Grade 6, 2007
Proficient Reading Grade 6 & 7
64.3
74.6
45.9
55.8
47.7
18
62.2
75.5
37.9
51.1
40.5
18.4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Overall White Black Hispanic F/R SPED
Grade 6, 2006 Grade 7, 2007
Proficient Reading Grade 7 & 8
64.4
72.2
41.8
54.5
51.8
14.3
64
70.5
44.4
62.5
45.8
17
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Overall White Black Hispanic F/R SPED
Grade 7, 2006 Grade 8, 2007
Reading Proficiency Matched Data
• Improved achievement by grades 4 and 6• Greatest improvement by grade 6• Achievement declined for grades 5, 7, and 8• All subgroups improved in grades 4 and 6• Grade 5 all subgroups declined with greatest
decline by F/R students• Grade 7 all subgroups declined except White
and SPED students• Grade 8 subgroups declined except Black,
Hispanic and SPED students
Proficient Writing Overall
81.579.4
0
82.5
87.8
0
84.1
76.7
0
74.7
70.2
0
71.1
77.9
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Overall
Grade 3, 2006
Grade 4, 2007
Grade 4, 2006
Grade 5, 2007
Grade 5, 2006
Grade 6, 2007
Grade 6, 2006
Grade 7, 2007
Grade 7, 2006
Grade 8, 2007
Proficient Writing Grade 3 & 4
81.5
87.8
72.9
68.9 68.3
29.2
79.4
87.2
67.368.8 68.5
32
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Overall White Black Hispanic F/R SPED
Grade 3, 2006 Grade 4, 2007
Proficient Writing Grade 4 & 5
82.5
88
67.4
76.6
68.7
26.1
87.8
92.7
78.180.4
75.8
38.3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Overall White Black Hispanic F/R SPED
Grade 4, 2006 Grade 5, 2007
Proficient Writing Grade 5 & 6
84.1
88.5
71.3
82.7
76
44.8
76.7
82
64.6 6664.5
35.8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Overall White Black Hispanic F/R SPED
Grade 5, 2006 Grade 6, 2007
Proficient Writing Grade 6 & 7
74.7
81.6
58.2
79.1
60
21.6
70.2
78.7
56.8 57.4
52.5
22.9
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Overall White Black Hispanic F/R SPED
Grade 6, 2006 Grade 7, 2007
WWr
Proficient Writing Grade 7 & 8
71.1
76.3
52.6
64.7 63.7
18.9
77.9
82.2
68.566.7
68.9
30.2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Overall White Black Hispanic F/R SPED
Grade 7, 2006 Grade 8, 2007
Writing Proficiency Matched Data
• Improvement in achievement for grades 5 and 8 – greatest improvement by Black students
• Decline in achievement for grades 4, 6 and 7 – greatest decline by Hispanic and F/R students
• Grades 5 and 8 improved in Writing but declined in Reading
• Grades 4 and 6 declined in Writing but improved in Reading
• Grade 7 declined in all three areas
Matched Data – Overall Improvement
• Greatest Improvement in Math – 15.4%
• Improvement in Reading and Writing very close – 4.4% and 3.9%
• Pattern of improvement and decline most significant in Reading and Writing
CMT 2007 - Matched Data - Overall Improvement
208
301
402
478
378
470
1068 1075
882
270
77 68
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Math Reading Writing
# Declined # Improved Stayed the Same # Impr. Overall
Math CMT Overall Improvement
% Declined, 11.9%
% Improved, 27.3%
Stayed the Same, 60.8%
% Declined % Improved Stayed the Same
Reading CMT 2007 Overall Improvement
% Declined, 17.20%
% Improved, 21.60%
Stayed the Same, 61.200%
% Declined % Improved Stayed the Same
Writing CMT 2007 Overall Improvement
% Declined, 22.90%
% Improved, 26.80%
Stayed the Same, 50.300%
% Declined % Improved Stayed the Same
Goal Math Overall
49.6
58.3
52.5
63.1
49.9
55.5
45.446.4
47.7
53.1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Overall
Grade 3, 2006
Grade 4, 2007
Grade 4, 2006
Grade 5, 2007
Grade 5, 2006
Grade 6, 2007
Grade 6, 2006
Grade 7, 2007
Grade 7, 2006
Grade 8, 2007
Goal Math Grade 3 & 4
49.6
62
33.9
27.329.5
19.2
58.3
70.6
40.7
35.4
40.8
24
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Overall White Black Hispanic F/R SPED
Grade 3, 2006 Grade 4, 2007
Goal Math Grade 4 & 5
52.5
61.1
28.4
46.8
33.6
12.2
63.1
72.4
41.2
52.9
45.5
17
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Overall White Black Hispanic F/R SPED
Grade 4, 2006 Grade 5, 2007
Goal Math Grade 5 & 6
49.9
59.3
3128.8 28.9
8.6
55.5
67.3
32.9 33.335.5
7.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Overall White Black Hispanic F/R SPED
Grade 5, 2006 Grade 6, 2007
Goal Math Grade 6 & 7
45.4
57.7
26.1
20.9
26.9
8
46.4
60.3
25.3
21.3
24.8
6.1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Overall White Black Hispanic F/R SPED
Grade 6, 2006 Grade 7, 2007
Goal Math Grade 7 & 8
47.7
55
24.5
42.9
24.1
5.2
53.1
60.8
30
51.4
40.8
12.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Overall White Black Hispanic F/R SPED
Grade 7, 2006 Grade 8, 2007
Math Goal Matched Data
• Overall Improvement at all grade levels• Greatest Improvement at Grade 5• Least Improvement at Grade 7• All subgroups improved at grades 4, 5 and
8• Grade 6 all subgroups improved except
SPED• Grade 7 Black, F/R, and SPED students
declined
Goal Reading Overall
46.7
50.8
0
55.857
0
46.3
53.4
0
48.847
0
5250.7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Overall
Grade 3, 2006
Grade 4, 2007
Grade 4, 2006
Grade 5, 2007
Grade 5, 2006
Grade 6, 2007
Grade 6, 2006
Grade 7, 2007
Grade 7, 2006
Grade 8, 2007
Goal Reading Grade 3 & 4
46.7
61.6
29.2
21.7
26.3
7.7
50.8
61
3735.4
39.5
4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Overall White Black Hispanic F/R SPED
Grade 3, 2006 Grade 4, 2007
Goal Reading Grade 4 & 5
55.8
67.1
30.5
39.1
31.6
12.2
57
69.1
30.9
39.2
31.1
8.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Overall White Black Hispanic F/R SPED
Grade 4, 2006 Grade 5, 2007
Goal Reading Grade 5 & 6
46.3
60.7
15
27.5
20.8
8.5
53.4
66.7
30.529.2
36.6
11.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Overall White Black Hispanic F/R SPED
Grade 5, 2006 Grade 6, 2007
Goal Reading Grade 6 & 7
48.8
60.3
29.7
32.6
36
10
47
60.9
24.2
29.8
26.4
14.3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Overall White Black Hispanic F/R SPED
Grade 6, 2006 Grade 7, 2007
Goal Reading Grade 7 & 8
52
59.6
31.6
42.4
29.8
5.4
50.7
59
28.9
40.6
31.7
9.4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Overall White Black Hispanic F/R SPED
Grade 7, 2006 Grade 8, 2007
Reading Goal Matched Data
• Improved Achievement for grades 4, 5 and 6
• Decline in achievement for grades 7 and 8
• All subgroups improved for grade 6
• Grade 4 – White and SPED students declined
• Grade 5 – F/R and SPED students declined
• Grade 7 – White and SPED students improved
• Grade 8 – F/R and SPED students improved
Goal Writing Overall
59.5
56.8
0
64.3 64.7
0
54.1
46.6
0
51.1
47.7
0
43
56
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Overall
Grade 3, 2006
Grade 4, 2007
Grade 4, 2006
Grade 5, 2007
Grade 5, 2006
Grade 6, 2007
Grade 6, 2006
Grade 7, 2007
Grade 7, 2006
Grade 8, 2007
Goal Writing Grade 3 & 4
59.5
69.5
50.8
33.3
44.5
14.6
56.8
67
44.9
33.3
38.4
10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Overall White Black Hispanic F/R SPED
Grade 3, 2006 Grade 4, 2007
Goal Writing Grade 4 & 5
64.3
75.6
41.1
46.8 47
17.4
64.7
74
43.8
51
43.9
12.8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Overall White Black Hispanic F/R SPED
Grade 4, 2006 Grade 5, 2007
Goal Writing Grade 5 & 6
54.1
62.1
34.7
44.2
32.7
12.1
46.6
55.6
29.3
31.929.8
11.3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Overall White Black Hispanic F/R SPED
Grade 5, 2006 Grade 6, 2007
Goal Writing Grade 6 & 7
51.1
61.1
30.9
46.5
30
7.8
47.7
58.5
30.5 29.827.5
2.1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Overall White Black Hispanic F/R SPED
Grade 6, 2006 Grade 7, 2007
Goal Writing Grade 7 & 8
43
49.1
24.7
41.2
28.3
3.8
56
62.7
37.1
48.5
42.9
7.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Overall White Black Hispanic F/R SPED
Grade 7, 2006 Grade 8, 2007
Writing Goal Matched Data
• Improved Achievement in grades 5 and 8
• Grade 5 – White, F/R, and SPED students declined
• Grade 8 – All subgroups improved
• All Subgroups in grades 4, 6 and 7 declined
CONCLUSIONS
• Same Class comparisons show improvement overall in Math, Reading and Writing at both Proficiency and Goal
• Grade 7 students declined overall except improvement for students at Goal in Math
• No grade levels showed consistent improvement in all areas
• No subgroups showed consistent improvement in all areas
CAMBRIDGE DATADoes it Match Achievement Data?
• Should improve instruction for Minority and SPED students
• Should make better use of Performance Data• Learning, Teaching, Curriculum, Assessment
are In Need of Improvement• Instruction throughout the district is too varied• Utilize data more effectively to identify precisely
what, why, and how students will learn
• Teachers vary in their knowledge about using data to differentiate instruction
• Use data consistently in all classes to determine the content of instruction so that it matches the needs of all students
• Use data to help identify weaknesses in instruction and learning
• In lessons where teaching is inadequate the teachers do not plan sufficiently well to ensure that work is accurately matched to the needs of the students
• Transfer the good, differentiated instructional practice in reading to all curriculum areas
• Improve further the use of data to identify students who should be doing better
• The principal and faculty use various ways of disaggregating data so that individual and group needs can be quickly identified and addressed
• Involve students in their own learning by explaining their next steps and how to achieve them
• Teams review student work and examine disaggregated data to ensure that appropriate support is in place for students, staff and parents.
• Instruction is whole class driven, with little to no differentiation noted
• Use data more effectively to make adjustments to instruction and plan interventions that match students’ needs
• Take action to improve staff expectations to close the achievement gap
• Refine the use of data to set challenging targets for different groups of students and individuals