“design and development of a marine current energy
TRANSCRIPT
“ DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF A
MARINE CURRENT ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEM USING
HYBRID VERTICAL AXIS TURBINE ”
MD. JAHANGIR ALAMMASTER OF ENGINEERING
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND APPLIED SCIENCE
MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND (MUN)
ST.JOHN’S, NL, A1B3X5, CANADA.
Agenda
� Ocean Currents
� Marine Current Energy Conversion System
� Thesis Objective
� Prototype Design
� Flume Tank Test and Test Results
� Experimental Energy Conversion System
� Conclusions
Agenda
1
Ocean/Marine Currents
Horizontal movement of the Ocean water known as Ocean
currents.
Mainly three types-
I. Tidal Currents
II. Wind driven Currents
III. Gradient (Density) Currents
Estimated total power = 5,000 GW
Power density may be up to 15kW/m2
Fig: Labrador Current
Ocean Currents
2
Tidal Currents
� Vertical rise and fall of the water
known as Tides
� Due to the gravitational attraction
of the moon and sun
� Tidal Cycle of 12.5 Hours
Fig: Tides (due to Gravitational Attraction)
Ocean Currents
3
Gulf Stream +THC or Great Conveyor Belt
Ocean Currents
4
North Atlantic current (Near St. John’s)
0.07Near Bottom
0.11280
0.13245
0.14620
Average Water Flow (m/s)Water Depth (m)
Table: Ocean Current Speeds (for different depths)
at different areas of St. John’s, NL
Ocean Currents
5
Marine Current Energy Conversion System
Electrical Conversion
Figure: Marine Current Energy Conversion System (MCECS)
Turbine Gearbox Generator
Power Electronic
Converter Battery
Mechanical Conversion
6
MCECS
� Design and Development of a low cut-in speed
turbine for SEAformatics pods.
� System testing in a deep sea condition.
� Design and Development of Signal Condition
circuits for the generated power.
� Maximum Power Point Tracker development for
the designed conversion system.
Thesis Objective(As a part of ONSFI Project)
7
Ocean Current Turbines
Types of Turbine:
(According to OREG)
I. Vertical Axis Turbines
II. Horizontal Axis Turbines
III. Reciprocating Hydrofoils
Fig. I: Vertical Axis Fig. II: Horizontal Axis
Fig. III: Reciprocating Hydrofoils
Turbines
8
Commercial Application
Fig: Vertical axis (Blue Energy)
Fig: Horizontal axis (MCT Ltd.)
Fig: Reciprocating Hydrofoil
(Engineering Business Ltd.)
Turbines
** High cut-in speed
9
** Turbine Rotation
Vertical Axis Turbines
Vertical-axis turbines are a type of turbine
where the main rotor shaft runs vertically.
Types:
1. Savonius Type (Drag Type)
2. Darrieus Type (Lift Type)
I. Egg Beater Type
II. H-Type
Gorlov, Squirrel cage etc.
[ Turbine rotation is irrespective to the direction
of fluid flow]
(1) Savonius type
(2) Darrieus type
i. H-Typei. Egg Beater Type
Turbines
10
Comparison
Savonius Type:
Adv.: High Starting Torque
Dis.: Low Tip Speed Ratio (TSR ≈<1), Low Efficiency
Darrieus Type:
Adv.: High TSR (>1), High Efficiency
Dis.: Low start-up characteristics
TSR (λ) = (Blade Tip Speed/ Water Speed)= (ωR/V)
Turbines
11
Advantages of a Hybrid Turbine Design
� Flexibility to meet specific design criteria
� Knowledge of conventional rotors
� Simple in structure
� Easy to build
Turbines
12
Prototype Design
Possible Combinations
Fig: Type A Fig: Type B
14
Prototype Design
Selected Prototype
Fig: Hybrid Model (CAD View) Fig: Hybrid Model (Final product)
Prototype Design
15Solidity Ratio: ((No. of Blades * Chord Length)/Rotor dia.)
Design Equations & Parameters
( )dPsdPss
3)CA-A(CAVρ0.5P +×××=
Mechanical Power Output
of Hybrid Turbine,
V
ωRd=λ
Tip Speed Ratio (TSR),
(I)
(II)
Prototype Design
NACA 0015
4
0.40
1m
1m
1m2
100mm
Airfoil Section
Number of Blades
Solidity Ratio [3]
Rotor diameter (Dd)
Rotor Height (Hd)
Swept area (Ad)
Chord length (C)
Darrieus Rotor
400mm
130mm
20mm
200mm
0.298
0.08m2
Rotor Height (Hs)
Nominal diameter of the
paddles (di)
Diameter of the shaft (a)
Rotor diameter (Ds)
Overlap ratio (β)
Swept area (As)
Savonius Rotor
Solidity Ratio: ((No. of Blades * Chord Length)/Rotor dia.)16
Working Principle (Hydrodynamics)
Counter clock
VRα
ωRd
V= Water Speed
X
Y
900
00
2700
1800
α
ө
V
2cos21V
RV λθλ ++=
+= −
λθ
θα
cos
sintan 1
17
Prototype Design
Flume Tank
Fig: Flume Tank (MI)
8m wide x 4m deep x 22.25m long
Flume Tank Test
18Fig: Turbine With Frame
Test Setup
Flume Tank Test
19
Gear-tooth
Sensor
Gear-tooth
Load CellMagnetic Particle
Brake
Torque Arm
Submerged
Turbine
Fig: Submerged Turbine
Fig: Torque and Speed Measurement
Fig: DAQ board and Data Collection Terminal
Test results
Savonius Test Results
Fig: Two-Stage Savonius
Test Results
21
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 10
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
2.2
Water Speed,V (m/s)
Po
wer
ou
tpu
t, P
(W
)
Fig: Power (P) vs. Water Speed (V)
H-Darrieus Test Results
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.60
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Water Speed,V (m/s)
Po
wer
ou
tpu
t, P
(W
att
)
Fig: Power (P) vs. Water Speed (V)
Test Results
22
2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3 3.10
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
0.1
0.11
0.12
0.13
0.14
TSR
Po
wer
Co
eff
icie
nt
(Cp
)
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
V ( m / s )
H-Darrieus Test Results
Fig: Power Coefficient vs. TSR (λ) for H-Darrieus
Maximum Cp = 0.1248 @ 0.6m/s, when, TSR = 2.67
Maximum TSR = 3.09 @0.4m/s, when Cp = 0.012
Test Results
23
Hybrid Test Results (P vs. V)
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.80
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
Water Speed,V (m/s)
Po
wer
ou
tpu
t, P
(W
att
)
Hybrid
Savonius
Darrieus
Fig: Power (P) vs. Water Speed (V) for Hybrid Turbine
Test Results
24
VIDEO
Hybrid Test Results (P vs. ω)
1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.50
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
Turbine Speed (rad/s)
Po
wer
(W
att
)
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
V ( m / s)
Fig: Power vs. Turbine Speed (ω) for Hybrid Turbine
Test Results
25
Hybrid Test Results (CP vs. λ)
2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3 3.10
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
TSR
Po
wer
Co
eff
icie
nt
(Cp
)
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
V ( m / s )
Fig: Power Coefficient vs. TSR (λ) for Hybrid Turbine
Maximum Cp = 0.1484 @ 0.6m/s, when, TSR = 2.6794
Maximum TSR = 3.1114 @0.5m/s, when Cp = 0.0539
Test Results
26
Experimental Energy Conversion System
Experimental Energy Conversion System
Experimental Conversion System
28
Fig: Experimental Energy Conversion System (MPPT based)
Dummy
Load
Hybrid
Turbine
PM
Generator
Rectifier
DC/DC
Converter BatteryBattery
Charger
User Interface
RS232 Communication
MicrocontrollerPower and Voltage
Calculation & PWM Duty
Cycle Calculation
Current and Voltage
SensingPWM
Control
Signal
LCD Display
Maximum Power Point Tracker (MPPT)
v
PMPP
1
24
0
3
0
+>0>00→4
-<0>03→0
->0<02→0
+<0<00→1
ActiondvdPCase
Experimental Conversion System
MPPT Control
SourceSwitch Mode
Power Supply
MPPT
Algorithm
LoadPIN POUT
Fig. Basic MPPT control blocks
Fig. MPPT Actions (Graphical View of P & O)
Fig. MPPT Actions
29
MPPT Algorithm (Perturbation & Observation)
Experimental Conversion System
Fig: MPPT Flow Chart
30
Experimental Conversion System
Detailed Circuit Diagram
31
� Low cost microcontroller based
� Less complexity
� Easily extendable
� Minimize the size due to less components
Main features
32
Experimental Conversion System
Boost Converter
Microcontroller with
RS232 and LCD Display
Current
Sensor
LOAD
Dummy
Load
Battery 12 V
DC Supply
Laboratory Setup
Experimental Conversion System
33
Test Result (Boost Converter)
Experimental Conversion System
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100
3
6
9
12
15
18
21
24
27
30
Input Voltage, Vin (V)
Ou
tpu
t V
olt
ag
e,
Vo
ut
(V)
Theoretical
Experimental
Fig: Vout vs. Vin
222 µH MUR815
Diode
IRL 520
MOSFET (Logic level)1300 µF
Fig: Boost Converter
34
Test Result (MPPT)
Experimental Conversion System
** 5 Volt/Div
Vout
PWM Signal
Fig: Oscilloscope shots of PWM Signal and Vout
D)-(1
V V in
out= )( D-1II
inout=&
35
Conclusions
Conclusions
Thesis Contribution
� A simple, low cut-in speed, high TSR, lift type hybrid turbine
has been designed.
� Designed turbine has been built, tested and analyzed in a
real world situation.
� A low cost microcontroller based experimental energy
conversion system has been built and tested.
� A MPPT control algorithm has been tested for the design
conversion system.
37
Future Work and Suggestions
� More water speed data should be collected at other areas of St.John’s.
� A CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) analysis should be done before
the actual design and test.
� To get a higher torque at a comparatively low TSR, cambered airfoil (for
example, NACA 4415) can be used.
� A low speed DC PMG can be used to avoid gearbox and rectifier losses.
� More sophisticated MPPT algorithm and digital filtering can be
introduced in the control system.
Conclusions
38
Acknowledgements
Supervisor:
Dr. M. Tariq Iqbal
SEAformatics Group:
Dr. Vlastimil Masek
Dr. Michael Hinchey
Andrew Cook
Paul Bishop
Brian Pretty
Nahidul Islam Khan
Sanjida Moury
39
Publications
� “Design and Development of Hybrid Vertical Axis Turbine”
presented at 22nd CCECE’09, St.John’s, NL, Canada, 03-06
May, 2009, pp.1178-1183.
� “A Low Cut-in Speed Marine Current Turbine” submitted to
Journal of Ocean Technology, 2009.
40
T h a n k s