detailed project report (dpr) -...
TRANSCRIPT
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 1 -
[Year]
PIA:- Social Forestry Bhavnagar
Division
Dist:- Bhavnagar
[Pick the date]
Detailed Project Report : 1 Kaniyad
SLNA:- Gujarat State
Watershed
Management Agency
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 2 -
Contents
Table no.1: Basic Project Information .................................................................................................................................................................................. 6
Table no.2: Weightage of the projec ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 10
Table no.3: Watershed Information .................................................................................................................................................................................... 10
Table no.4: Developmental Programmes Running in the Project Area ........................................................................................................................... 12
Table no. 5: Previous Watershed Programmes in the Project Area ................................................................................................................................. 13
Table no. 6: PIA ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15
Table no. 7: Staff at PIA Level .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 16
Table no. 8: Land Use Pattern .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 18
Table no. 9: Soil Type and Topography .............................................................................................................................................................................. 19
Table no. 10: Flood and Drought Condition ....................................................................................................................................................................... 19
Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity Ingress) ................................................................................................................................................. 20
Table no. 11.3: Water logging Conditions .......................................................................................................................................................................... 20
Table no. 12: Climatic conditions ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 21
Table no. 13: Physiography and Relief ............................................................................................................................................................................... 21
Table no. 14: Land Ownership Details ................................................................................................................................................................................ 22
Table no. 15: Agriculture ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 22
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 3 -
Table no. 16: Irrigation ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 23
Table no. 17: Crop Details .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 23
Table no. 18: Livestock ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 25
Table no. 19: Drinking Water .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 25
Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources ...................................................................................................................................................... 26
Table no. 21: Demographic Information ............................................................................................................................................................................ 26
Table no. 22: Literacy Rate .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 27
Table no. 23: Migration Details ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 27
Table no. 24: Poverty ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 28
Table no. 25: Village Infrastructure ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 28
Table no. 26: Facilities / HH Assets .................................................................................................................................................................................... 29
Table no. 27: Income ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 29
Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR .......................................................................................................................................................................... 30
Table no. 29: Livelihood Pattern (Occupational Distribution) ......................................................................................................................................... 30
Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP Projects ............................................................................................................................. 33
Table no. 31: Watershed Committee Details ........................................................................................................................................................................ 35
Table no. 31 B: Watershed Committee Details – Bodi ....................................................................................................................................................... 36
Table no. 31 C: Watershed Committee Details - Kaniyad ................................................................................................................................................. 37
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 4 -
Table No. 32 A: SHG Detail – Babarkot ............................................................................................................................................................................... 40
Table no. 32 B: SHG Detail - Bodi ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 41
Table No. 32 C: SHG Detail-Kaniyad .................................................................................................................................................................................... 41
Table No. 32 D: SHG Detail : Limboda ................................................................................................................................................................................. 42
Table No. 32 E SHG Detail : Limboda .................................................................................................................................................................................. 42
Table No. 33 A: UG Detail- Babarkot .................................................................................................................................................................................. 43
Table No. 33 B: UG Detail- Bodi .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 43
Table No. 33 C: UG Detail - Kaniyad .................................................................................................................................................................................... 43
Table No. 33 D: UG Detail – Limboda .................................................................................................................................................................................. 44
Table No. 33 E : UG Detail- Piparadi ................................................................................................................................................................................... 44
Table no.34 A- Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) ......................................................................................................................... 47
Table No. 35: Details of Activities of Preparatory Phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) .......................................................................................... 48
Table no.36 A : Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ........................................................... 49
Table no.36 : Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) .............................................................. 51
Table No. 37.: Activities Related to Recharging Ground Water Resources in the Project Areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ............................ 52
Table no. 38 ctivities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas ( 10 % Estimate) ................................................................... 53
Table No.40: Details of Engineering Structures in Watershed Works*- .......................................................................................................................... 55
Table No.42: Details of Allied / Other Activities ................................................................................................................................................................ 58
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 5 -
Table No.43: Details of Activities in the CPRs in the Project Areas .................................................................................................................................. 65
Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution ........................................................................................................................................................................ 66
Table No. 45: Capacity Building Plan .................................................................................................................................................................................. 67
Table No.46: Information, Education and Communication Activities ............................................................................................................................. 68
Table No. 47: Budget at a Glance for the Project ............................................................................................................................................................... 68
Table No. 48: Village-wise - Component-wise Budget Available under IWMP ............................................................................................................... 69
Table No.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with Other Schemes ............................................................................................................................... 70
Table No. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP Projects ...................................................................................................................................... 72
Table No. 52: Employment in Project Area: ....................................................................................................................................................................... 73
Table No. 53: Details of Seasonal Migration from Project Area ....................................................................................................................................... 73
Table No. 54: Details of Average Ground-Water-Table Depth in the Project Areas (in meters) ................................................................................... 74
Table No. 55: Status of Drinking Water .............................................................................................................................................................................. 74
Table No. 56: Details of Kharif Crop Area and Yield in the Project Areas ............................................................................................................................. 75
Table No. 57: Area under Horticulture ............................................................................................................................................................................... 76
Table No. 58: Forest/Vegetative Cover ............................................................................................................................................................................. 76
Table No. 59: Details of Livestock in the Project Areas ..................................................................................................................................................... 77
Table no. 60: Backward-Forward Linkages ....................................................................................................................................................................... 77
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 6 -
Chapter – 1
Project Background
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 7 -
Table no.1: Basic Project Information
The project is situated in Botad Taluka of Bhavnagar District. The project comprises five villages Kaniyad, Limboda, Piparadi, Bodi,
Babarkot . Total Geographical Area of the cluster is 5269.40 Ha. & the proposed Project Area is 5269.40 Ha.. Total project cost is Rs 632.33 Lacs.
The biggest village is Kaniyad, so project cluster is identified with its name. District Watershed Development Unit, Bhavnagar is appointed as
Project Managing Authority and Deputy Conservator of Forests, Social Forestry, Bhavnagar Division, Bhavnagar is appointed as Project
Implementing Agency for this project.
All the Five villages are well connected with pucca road. Main communities in the villages are Patel, Koli, Kshtriya, Devipujak, Maldhari &
Harijan . People of these villages are primarily dependent on rain-fed agriculture, agriculture based labour and animal husbandry. There are
streams named Bhadar and Goma River in the project area.
Table no. 1A: Area Proposed to be Treated
Sr.
No.
Name of the
project
Villages Gram
Panchayats Taluka District
Area of the
project
Area
proposed to
be treated
Total
project
cost
PIA Name Census code
1 IWMP – 1
Babarkot 140010096950000 Babarkot
Botad Bhavnagar
1437.8 1437.8 172.53 Forest
Extension
Dept
Bhavnagar
2 Bodi 140010096880000 Bodi 939.30 439.30 52.72
3 Kaniyad 140010096940000 Kaniyad 2064.1 1564.10 187.69
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 8 -
4 Limboda 140010096840000 Limboda 942.80 942.80 113.14
5 Piparadi 1400100890000 Piparadi 885.4 885.40 106.25
Total 6269.4 5269.4 632.33
Prioritization of the Project
Prioritization of micro watershed has been done by considering socio-economic as well as physical parameters. Watershed
Development Program is prioritized on the basis of thirteen parameters namely Poverty Index, Percentage of SC/ST, Actual Wages, Percentage
of Small and Marginal Farmers, Ground Water Status, Moisture Index, Area under Rain-fed Agriculture, Drinking Water Situation in the Area,
Percentage of Degraded Land, Productivity Potential of the Land, Continuity of Another Watershed that has already Developed/Treated, Cluster
Approach for Plain or Hilly Terrain. Based on 13 parameters priority map has been prepared by BISAG, Gandhinagar which provides technical
support for watershed projects in Gujarat state and a composite ranking is given to Kaniyad Watershed Project as given in table no. 2. Cluster
approach was followed taking into consideration four micro-watersheds covering a total area of 5269.4 Ha. Thus a cumulative score of 632.33
Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed
S. No.
Criteria Maximum
Score Ranges & Scores
I Poverty index (% of poor to population)
10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20 % (2.5)
Ii % of SC/ ST population 10 More than 40 % (10) 20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20 % (3) Iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are
significantly lower than minimum wages (5)
Actual wages are equal to or higher than minimum wages (0)
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 9 -
Iv % of small and marginal farmers
10 More than 80 % (10) 50 to 80 % (5) Less than 50 % (3)
V Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0)
Vi Moisture index/ DPAP/ DDP Block
15 -66.7 & below (15) DDP Block
-33.3 to -66.6 (10) DPAP Block
0 to -33.2 (0) Non DPAP/ DDP Block
Vii Area under rain-fed agriculture
15 More than 90 % (15) 80 to 90 % (10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70 % (Reject)
viii Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic village (7.5) Partially covered (5) Fully covered (0)
Ix Degraded land 15 High – above 20 % (15) Medium – 10 to 20 % (10)
Low- less than 10 % of TGA (5)
X Productivity potential of the land
15 Lands with low production & where productivity can be significantly enhanced with reasonable efforts (15)
Lands with moderate production & where productivity can be enhanced with reasonable efforts (10)
Lands with high production & where productivity can be marginally enhanced with reasonable efforts (5)
Xi Contiguity to another watershed that has already been developed/ treated
10 Contiguous to previously treated watershed & contiguity within the micro watersheds in the project (10)
Contiguity within the microwatersheds in the project but non contiguous to previously treated watershed (5)
Neither contiguous to previously treated watershed nor contiguity within the micro watersheds in the project (0)
Xii Cluster approach in the plains (more than one contiguous micro-watersheds in the project)
15 Above 6 micro-watersheds in cluster (15)
4 to 6 micro watersheds in cluster (10)
2 to 4 micro watersheds in cluster (5)
xiii Cluster approach in the hills (more than one contiguous micro-watersheds in the project)
15 Above 5 micro-watersheds in cluster (15)
3 to 5 micro watersheds in cluster (10)
2 to 3 micro watersheds in cluster (5)
Total 150 150 90 41 2.5
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 10 -
Table no.2: Weightage of the project
Project
name
Project
type
Weightage
IWMP –
1 Other
I Ii Iii Iv V Vi Vii Viii ix X Xi xii Xiii Total
7.5 5 5 5 3 15 5 5 5 5 15 15 0 90.5
Project type: Hilly/Desert/Other
Table no.3: Watershed Information
Name of the
project
No. Of
watersheds to
be treated
Watershed code Watershed
regime/type/order
IWMP 1 5 5G2C6m1a, 5G2C6m1b, 5G2C9c1g, 5G2C9c1h, 5G2C9a2d Other
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 11 -
IWMP – 1 (Kaniyad) Bhavnagar
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 12 -
Other Rural Development Program:
The villages have been benefited by various schemes of rural development. Currently MGNREGA, Indira Awas Yojana, Sardar Awas
Yojana & Total Sanitation Campaign are running in the villages. This is the first watershed project in these Villages.
i. MGNREGS: (MNREGA) is an Indian job guarantee scheme, enacted by legislation on August 25, 2005. The scheme provides a legal guarantee
for one hundred days of employment in every financial year to adult members of any rural household willing to do public work-related
unskilled manual work at the statutory minimum wage of Rs.100 per day. Earthen bunds, Desilting and Afforestation activity has been carried
out in the villages under MGNREGA.
ii. Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC): Individual toilets are constructed under TSC programme. All remaining households will be covered
under the scheme.
iii. Awas Yojana: Houses for people under poverty line (BPL) have been constructed under Indira Awas Yojana (IAY) & Saradar Awas
Yojana(SAY).
Table no.4: Developmental Programmes Running in the Project Area
Sr.
no.
Name of the
programme/scheme
Sponsoring
agency
Objectives of the
programme/scheme
Year of
commencement
Villages
covered
Estimated
number of
beneficiaries
1 Saradar Avas Rural Dev. Dept. Housing 1998-99 5 493
2 M G N R E G A Rural Dev. Dept. Employment 2008-09 5 1351
3 Indira Avas Rural Dev. Dept. Housing 1990-92 5 242
4 T S C Rural Dev. Dept. Construct Toilet 2007-08 5 985
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 13 -
Pre IWMP Project in Project Area
Integrated Wasteland Development Program is in implementation phase in Kaniyad & Bodi village out of total 2 villages. No other
villages are benefited by Watershed Project till now. Only 1000 ha out of total area of kaniyad & Bodi village were planned to be treated.
Table no. 5: Previous Watershed Programmes in the Project Area
Sr.
No.
Project
name
Year
start-ed
Name
of
village
No. of
micro
water
-shed
Water-
shed
codes
Area
under
treat-
ment
Funding
source
Nodal
agency PIA
Total
cost
Expenditure
incurred up
to start of
IWMP
%
financial
completi
on
%
physical
complet
ion
1 IWDP 2004-05 Kaniyad
1 5G2C6k1a 500 GOI/GOG DWDU TALUKA
PANCHAYAT 30.0 15.00 50 50
2
State
Waters
hed
2000-01 Bodi 1 5G2C9c1b 500 GOI/GOG DWDU GLDC 20.00 20.00 100 100
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 14 -
Chapter – 2
Project Implementation Agency
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 15 -
Project Implementing Agency
Project Implementing Agency (PIA) is being selected by an appropriate mechanism by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA). PIAs would be
responsible for implementation of watershed project. These PIAs may include relevant line departments, autonomous organizations under
State/Central Governments, Government Institutes/Research Bodies, Intermediates, Panchayats, Voluntary Organizations (VOs). The PIA of
IWMP – 1 Kaniyad Watershed Project is Social Forestry Division, Bhavnagar Division, Bhavnagar.
District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU)
The organization and its objectives:
The District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU), Bhavnagar is a district level nodal agency and was established where area is more
than 25000Ha for the smooth implementation of watershed projects in the district. The District Development Officer (DDO) is the chairman of
the DWDU. The DWDU have dedicated and experience staffs compromising one Project Manager (deputation from Gujarat Forest Department)
a Technical Expert (on contract basis) and Multidisciplinary team of Agriculture Expert, Community Mobilization Expert, Civil Engineer,
Computer Operator, Surveyor and Accountant are recruited.
The objectives of DWDU are supervising, planning, implementing, documenting and promoting watershed development projects and
related development activities in the district, also DWDU will work as PIA for IWMP projects.
Table no. 6: PIA
Sr. No. Names of project Details of PIA
1
Kaniyad : IWMP-1
i. Type of organization Government of Gujarat
ii. Name of organization Forest Department Social Forestry,
iii. Designation & Address Annexy Building, F-8, Bahumali Bhavan - Bhavnagar
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 16 -
iv. Telephone 0278-2428350
v. Fax 0278-2428350
vi. E-mail fo-sf@bav
Each PIA has put in position a dedicated watershed development team (WDT) with the approval of DWDU. The WDTs are hired on
contract for 11 months. The composition of the WDT will be indicated in the contract/ MOU. No program funds for DPR and watershed works
under any circumstances should be released to either the PIA or Watershed Committee (WC) unless the composition of the WDT has been
clearly indicated in the MOU/ contract and the team members are fully in place. Three WDTs viz. agriculture, Civil Engineering & social
mobilization - institutional building experts have been recruited. For assistance in office work Accountant, data entry operator, surveyor &
messenger have been recruited.
Table no. 7: Staff at PIA Level
Sr.
No. Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job assigned
Monthly
remuneration
1 Shri N.A.Chaudhari M Dy. C.F. B.sc 33 Overall Supervision Govt. Employee
2 Shri D.G.Joshi M Nodal Officer / R.F.O. B.Com. Implementation Govt. Employee
3 Gohil Ganpatsinh M. 30 M WDT Agri. BRS / MSW 5 Years 3 Months
Agril. Expert 10,000/-
4 Patel Mayank H. 30 M Surveyor Surveyer 3 Years Technical Surveying 6,000/-
5 Pandya Rakesh K. 29 M Data Operater B.A. / B.Ed. 4 Years 5 Months
Data Entry 6,000/-
6 Jogadiya Haresh K. 32 M Massanger 12 Pass 3 Years Office Routine Work 3,000/-
7 Bhavnaben J. 37 F WDT. Co. BRS 3 Years-4 Month
Community Mobilization
8000/-
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 17 -
Chapter – 3
Basic Information of the Project
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 18 -
Basic Information of Botad Taluka
Botad is one of the fastest growing town in Gujarat with a modest voter population of more than 1.75 lakh. However, the amenities that this city
boasts of and its location (Ahmedabad-170 km / Bhavnagar-90 / Rajkot-120 / Surendranagar-90 - all district centers) can make many cities feel envy.
As of 2001 India census, Botad had a population of 100,059. Males constitute 53% of the population and females 47%. Botad has an average literacy
rate of 64%, higher than the national average of 59.5%; with male literacy of 71% and female literacy of 55%. 15% of the population is under 6 years of age.
Botad has a tropical wet and dry climate, with hot, dry summers from mid-March to mid-June, the wet monsoon season from mid-June to October,
when the city receives 620 mm of rain on average. The months from November to February are mild, the average temperature being around 20°C, with low
humidity. Thunderstorms are another important part of the Botad weather in the months of June and July. Fog is one of the major phenomena of Botad
climate during winter. During summer time, the temperature ranges between 24°C and 42°C. In the months of winter, Botad temperature varies between
10°C and 22°C.
Table no. 8: Land Use Pattern
S. No. Names of
village
Geographical Area
of the village Forest Area
Land under
agricultural use
Rain-fed
area
Permanent
pastures
Wasteland
Cultivable Non-
cultivable
1 Babarkot 1437.80 38.82 920.19 1150.2 0 186.91 129.4
2 Bodi 439.3 11.86 281.15 351.4 0 57.11 39.54
3 Kaniyad 1564.1 42.23 1001.02 1251.3 0 203.33 140.77
4 Limboda 942.80 25.46 603.39 75.2 0 122.56 84.85
5 Piparadi 885.4 23.91 566.66 708.03 0 115.1 79.69
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 19 -
As Bhavnagar district is a part of Saurashtra region, the major type of soil is Vertisols. It may form residually from weathered
limestone or basalt. These soils are generally developed from parent materials that are rich in alkaline earth cations (Ca and Mg). The
weathering of these rocks produces black cotton soil type clay. Normally Waste lands the soils where weathering is not completed.
Table no. 9: Soil Type and Topography
S. No.
Name of the Agro-
climatic zone covers
project area
Area in
Ha.
Names of the
villages
Major soil types
Topography a)Type b) Area in Ha.
1 North Saurashtra 5269.40
Babarkot
Shallow Medium Black
1447.8
Plain and Undulating
Bodi 939.04
Kaniyad 2064.01
Limboda 942.80
Piparadi 885.4
# Flat, undulating, moderate slope, Steep slope
Table no. 10: Flood and Drought Condition
Sr. No. Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence)
1 Babarkot once in a 10 year Once in a 3 year
2 Bodi once in a 10 year Once in a 3 year
3 Kaniyad once in a 10 year Once in a 3 year
4 Limboda once in a 10 year Once in a 3 year
5 Piparadi once in a 10 year Once in a 3 year
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 20 -
Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity Ingress)
Name of the Village Survey Number Soil pH Type of Salinity
(Inherent/Ingress)
IWMP-1 200, 109, 103, 102,48/5, 1/1, 278/2, 245/1, 264/6, 101/3, 135/9 7.0 TO 8.20 Natural
Table no. 11.3: Water logging Conditions
Name of the Village Survey Number Reasons
Babarkot Nil Nil
Bodi 126p1, 140p2, 139p1, 138, 104p1, 142 Rain for Water logging
Kaniyad 183p7, 183p8, 264p2, 191p1, 196p2 Rain for Water logging
Limboda 180, 180p1, 180p2, 180p3, 81, 78, 15p1, 15p2 Rain for Water logging
Piparadi 36p1, 35, 14, 33p1, 78, 83, 79, 100, 165p2 Rain for Water logging
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 21 -
Table no. 12: Climatic conditions
Table no. 13: Physiography and Relief
Project name Elevation Slope range (%) Major streams
IWMP 1 35 0 to 5% Gama River, Sukhbhadar,
Year Rain fall
Mm
Average temperature (degree C)
Summer Average temperature (deg C) Winter
Max Min Max Min
2005 702 45 33.04 19.02 16.00
2006 501 44.10 31.07 26.02 15.15
2007 901 42.08 29..55 26.05 19.60
2008 735 45.10 32.45 21.00 18.97
2009 294 46.5 30.20 24.15 18.57
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 22 -
Table no. 14: Land Ownership Details
Sl
no Village
Total owned land HHs giving land
on lease
HHs taking
land on lease Gen OBC SC ST
1 Babarkot 26 372 44 - - -
2 Bodi - 415 13 - - -
3 Kaniyad 50 644 18 - - -
4 Limboda - 338 22 - - -
5 Piparadi 200 159 26 - - -
Table no. 15: Agriculture
Sl no Village Net sown area
One time Two times Three times
1 Babarkot 920.19 450 -
2 Bodi 779.6 367 115
3 Kaniyad 1001.02 560 -
4 Limboda 796.60 385 87
5 Piparadi 770 342 72
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 23 -
Table no. 16: Irrigation
Sl
no Village
Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam / Pond Source 3 : Well
Availability
months
Net area
( Hac.) Gross area
Availability
months Net area Gross area
Availability
months
Net area
(Hac.)
Gross
area
1 Babarkot 3 365 920.19 - - - 3 225 920.19
2 Bodi 3 281 439.3 - - - 3 100 439.3
3 Kaniyad - - - - - - 4 560 1564.1
4 Limboda 3 603.39 942.80 - - - 3 276 942.80
5 Piparadi - - - - - - 2 to 4 432.3 885.4
Table no. 17: Crop Details
Sr
no Village
Kharif (Monsoon)
Crop 1 Cotton Crop 2 Jowar/Millet Crop 3 Sesame
Area Ha. Production
Ton
Productivity
Kg Area Ha.
Production
Productivity
Area Ha. Production Productivity
1 Babarkot 650 31200 1080 220 10800 2040 150 1800 480
2 Bodi 536 28944 1200 80 7200 1800 163 1956 360
3 Kaniyad 960 35150 1800 500 45000 2160 96 1152 360
4 Limboda 664 31832 1200 100 9000 6000 32 384 480
5 Piparadi 575 24150 1560 100 9000 2040 95 1140 2400
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 24 -
Sr.
No.
Village
Rabi (Winter)
Crop 1 Cumin Crop 2 Crop 3
Area Ha. Production
Ton
Productivity
Area Ha.
Production
Ton
Productivity
Ton Area Ha.
Production
Ton
Productivity
Ton
1 Babarkot - - - - - - - - -
2 Bodi 40 240 360 - - - - -
3 Kaniyad 166 996 360 - - - - - -
4 Limboda - - - - - - - - -
5 Piparadi - - - - - - - - -
As the area does not enjoy assured irrigation facility, Rabi crop can’t be grown in whole agricultural land. Other than agricultural food crops farmers
use to grow animal fodder in some part out of total land. As water shortage is a big issue no crop can be taken in summer. Overall only one or two crops are
taken in year. As no Irrigation facility is available no one grow anything in summer.
Sr.
No. Village Zaid (Summer)
Crop 1 Crop 2 Crop 3
Area Ha. Production
Ton
Productivity
Ton Area Ha.
Production
Ton
Productivity
Ton Area Ha.
Production
Ton
Productivity
Ton
1 Babarkot 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 25 -
2 Bodi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Kaniyad 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 Limboda 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 Piparadi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table no. 18: Livestock
Sr. No. Village Buffalo Cow Total Milk (Buffalo Cow)
/Year Goat Sheep Bullock Hen Others
No milk No Milk No Milk
1 Babarkot 77 460 77 308 768 44 66 3 108 - 172
2 Bodi 393 1600 807 2800 4400 702 622 556 98 - 314
3 Kaniyad 799 3600 789 3156 6756 106 159 - 50 - 194
4 Limboda 381 1714 593 2372 4087 413 619 111 100 - 786
5 Piparadi 415 1700 412 1400 3100 702 622 1072 210 - 372
Table no. 19: Drinking Water
Sr. No. Village Ground water table (mt) Source of drinking water Availability in months Quality
1 Babarkot 30 to 45 Narmada Pipe line 8th Months -
2 Bodi 30 to 45 Narmada Pipe line 10th Months -
3 Kaniyad 30 to 45 Well & Narmada Pipe line
Only Narmada Pipe line 8th Months -
4 Limboda 30 to 45
Well & Narmada Pipe line Only Narmada Pipe line 9th Months -
5 Piparadi 30 to 45 Well & Narmada Pipe line
Only Narmada Pipe line 10th Months -
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 26 -
Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources
Sr.
No.
Names of
project
CPR
Particulars
Total Area (ha)
Area owned/ In possession of Area available for treatment (ha)
Pvt. Persons
Govt.
(Specify
dept.)
PRI
Any other
(Pl.
Specify)
Pvt.
persons
Govt.
(Specify
deptt.)
PRI Any other
(Pl. Specify)
1
IWMP- 1
Kaniyad
Wasteland/ degraded land - 937.4 - - - - - -
Pastures - 382.30 - - - - - -
Forest - 142.28 - - - - - -
Table no. 21: Demographic Information
Sr.
No. Village Population SC ST
Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female %
1 Babarkot 984 517 467 30 18 12 3% - - - -
2 Bodi 2261 1158 1103 130 67 63 5.74% - - - -
3 Kaniyad 5311 2762 2548 107 57 50 2% - - - -
4 Limboda 1683 891 792 69 32 37 4% - - - -
5 Piparadi 1906 980 926 335 167 168 17.57% - - - -
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 27 -
Table no. 22: Literacy Rate
Sr. No. Village Literacy Literacy %
above age 14
Literacy %
below age 14 Total % Male % Female %
1 Babarkot 984 53.34 270 66.34 101 40.15 - -
2 Bodi 2261 44.43 610 64.65 208 8.3 - -
3 Kaniyad 5311 39.67 1250 57.71 406 20.22 - -
4 Limboda 1683 50.91 513 72.00 161 26.31 - -
5 Piparadi 1906 64.04 624 79.90 395 47.61 - -
Table no. 23: Migration Details
Sr.
No. Village
Total
population
Migration Migration by months Main reason for
migration
Income during
migration / month Total Male Female Up to 3
months
3-6
months
More than 6
months
1 Babarkot 984 100 70 30 - - Y Better employment, low
productivity of land 5000
2 Bodi 2261 75 45 30 - Y -
Better employment, low
productivity of land 5000
3 Kaniyad 5311 7 20 10 - Y -
Better employment, low
productivity of land 5000
4
Limboda 1683 70 40 30 - Y -
Better employment, low
productivity of land 4000
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 28 -
5 Piparadi 1906 65 35 30 Y - -
Better employment, low
productivity of land 5000
Table no. 24: Poverty
Sr.
No. Village Total Household
BPL % of BPL HH Total Land less HH
% of land less
HH 0-16 16-20 Total
1 Babarkot 147 48 59 107 72% 72 48%
2 Bodi 346 34 36 70 20% 84 24%
3 Kaniyad 653 29 179 208 31% 122 18%
4 Limboda 364 17 36 53 14% 53 14%
5 Piparadi 397 114 183 297 74% 93 23%
Table no. 25: Village Infrastructure
Sr.
No. Village
Pucca
road to
the
village
(Y/N)
Schools
Colleges
(Number)
Post
Office
(Distance)
Km.
Banks
(Number)
Distance
from
nearest
market
yard
Km.
Milk
collection
centre
(Number)
Milk
cooperative
(Number)
Other
cooperatives
/ CBIs
(Number)
Any other
institution LP UP HS
1 Babarkot Y 1 1 1 0 1.00 0 0 0 0 1 -
2 Bodi Y 1 1 0 0 0.00 0 7 0 0 1 -
3 Kaniyad Y 1 1 0 0 0.00 0 15 1 0 1 -
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 29 -
4 Limboda Y 1 1 0 0 5.00 0 12 1 0 1 -
5 Piparadi Y 1 1 0 0 0.00 0 15 1 0 1 -
Table no. 26: Facilities / HH Assets
Sr.
No. Village
HHs with
electricity
HHs with
safety
latrines
HHs with phones HHs with vehicle HHs with
TV set
HHs with
cooking
gas
HHs with
Drinking
water
HHs
with
freeze Land line Mobile 2-wheeler 4-wheeler
1 Babarkot 147 95 17 57 18 10 107 27 147 22
2 Bodi 346 265 21 185 46 12 273 37 346 33
3 Kaniyad 653 473 70 370 73 8 512 113 653 57
4 Limboda 364 255 13 197 24 7 174 8 364 32
5 Piparadi 397 285 37 257 33 17 293 47 397 39
Table no. 27: Income
Sr. No. Village Agriculture Animal husbandry Casual labour Others Total
1 Babarkot 300.00 37.00
1.17 2.00 340.17
2 Bodi 293.00 42.00
1.17 2.00 338.17
3 Kaniyad 300.00 16.2
4.00 1.00 159.2
4 Limboda 264.00
42.00 1.32 1.64 308.96
5 Piparadi 227.00 43.00
2.20 1.35 273.55
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 30 -
Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR
Sr. No. Village Benefit type 1 Woodlot Benefit type 2
Animal
fodder
Benefit type
3 Others Total
income % sells Income % sells Income % sells Income
1 Babarkot -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2 Bodi -- -- -- -- -- -- --
3 Kaniyad -- -- -- -- -- -- --
4 Limboda -- -- -- -- -- -- --
5 Piparadi -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Table no. 29: Livelihood Pattern (Occupational Distribution)
Sr.
No. Village
Total
workforce Agriculture
Animal
husbandry
(AH)
Agriculture +
AH
Casual
labour Services Handicraft Others
1 Babarkot 147 92 82 174 12 7 2 44
2 Bodi 346 278 200 478 65 5 3 8
3 Kaniyad 653 600 357 957 40 10 3 47
4 Limboda 364 328 183 511 28 13 12 9
5 Piparadi 397 280 180 460 22 18 12 17
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 31 -
Watershed Activities
Watershed management as a strategy has been adopted by Government of India especially in the rain-fed regions of semi-arid tropics.
These regions are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development, low literacy and high
incidence of migration. Several studies have identified that there is a dire need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with watershed
development. The common guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation watershed development.
4.1. Scientific Planning:
i) Cluster Approach
This envisages a broader vision of Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro-watershed. The Kaniyad Project
consists of Five micro- watersheds namely 5G2C6m1a, 5G2C6m1b, 5G2C9c1g, 5G2C9c1h & 5G2C9a2d as their respective codes.
ii) Base line Survey
To access the impact of any watershed development programme a detailed baseline survey has to be conducted. This acts a benchmark
for any intervention during and post implementation of any development programme. A detailed baseline survey was undertaken which
involved household census survey, Bio-physical survey and Village level data collection from Talati –cum mantri. Household census survey
includes a detailed questionnaire which was been filled by visiting each and every household in the village. This gave in the details of the
demographic profile of the village, the literacy percentage, SC/ST population, number of BPL household, cattle population, net-consumption
rate in the village, average milk production of the cattle and various schemes running and their benefits.
Bio-physical survey was undertaken to identify various natural resources available in the village. It included the soil typology, well in the area,
crop taken in the field, Cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field.
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 32 -
iii) Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)
The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the stakeholders towards the
programme. This has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities and their local and Indigenous Technological Knowledge
(ITK) while planning for any activity. Participatory approach provides a new path for planning, implementing, monitoring and post- withdrawal
activities with a complete accountability of the stakeholders. Various PRA techniques like resource mapping, social mapping, and season
calendars were used to understand the physical and social orientation of the village in general and watershed in specific. These tools put the
villagers in ease than the complicated questionnaires. Various tools like Matrix ranking, Venn Diagram were used to identify various local
vegetations (apt for afforestation), Fodders crops , various institution and their significance in the life of the farmers
iv) Use of GIS and Remote sensing for planning
Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed development.
a) Prioritization
Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geo-
morphological, Soil, BPL Population, SC/ST population, Ground water Status, Drinking water situation Slope percent. These were all given
proper weightage according to the DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas.
b) Planning
A action plan matrix was formulated by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) taking into account various features like the slope percent, soil
Depth, Soil Texture, Soil Erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agricultural land. Global Positioning System (GPS) was used to
identify each and every water conservation structures available in the project area. This was used to create a map.
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 33 -
c) Hydrological modeling
Hydrology modeling technique was used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, Flow accumulation. This model
overlaid over cadastral map to calculate the catchment area of each structures like the check dam etc. This has helped to remove the human
error which generally occurs while calculating the catchment area of a check dam.
Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP Projects
S.
No. Scientific criteria/ inputs used
Whether scientific criteria was
used
(A) Planning
Cluster approach √
Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of the Institute √
Baseline survey √
Hydro-geological survey √
Contour mapping
Participatory Net Planning (PNP) √
Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-off cover √
Ridge to Valley treatment √
Online IT connectivity between -
(1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP √
(2) DRDA and SLNA √
(3) SLNA and DoLR √
Availability of GIS layers
1. Cadastral map √
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 34 -
2. Village boundaries √
3. Drainage √
4. Soil (Soil nutrient status)
5. Land use √
6. Ground water status √
7. Watershed boundaries √
8. Activity √
Crop simulation models#
Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high speed soil
nutrient analysis
Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)# √
Weather Station
(B) Inputs
1. Bio-pesticides √
2. Organic manures √
3. Vermi compost √
4. Bio-fertilizer √
5. Water saving devices √
6. Mechanized tools/ implements √
7. Bio-fencing √
8. Nutrient budgeting √
9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers √
Any other (please specify)
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 35 -
#NDVI - Ratio of the differences of the response of vegetation in the near infrared & red regions of the electromagnetic spectrum
Table no. 31: Watershed Committee Details
It is a Committee that is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the watershed project with technical support of WDT in the
village. This Committee is registered under Society Registration Act 1860. The Gram Sabha of the village selects the Chairman of the
Watershed Committee with Secretary who will be a paid functionary.
WDT Member is also a Member of Watershed Committee. There will be a separate bank account for Watershed Project Fund.
Money can be debited by joint signatures of the Nodal Officer (PIA representative) & the President or the Secretary of Watershed
Committee. The Watershed Committee has a pivotal role to play during and after the Project Implementation Period. Details of the
Committees formed in the Project Villages are as below:
# Only the letter assigned, as below, needs to be typed, except for `J’, where the type may be specifically mentioned.
A. PNP and PRA B. Planning C. Maintenance of Accounts D. Signing of cheques and making payments E. Supervision of construction activities F. Cost Estimation G. Verification & Measurement H. Record of labour employed I. Social Audit J. Any other (please specify).
Table no. 31 A: Watershed Committee Details - Babarkot
Sr.
No. Name
Date of
Registration
as a Society Designation M/F SC ST SF MF LF
Land
-less UG
SH
G GP
Any
other
Edu.
qualifi-
cation
Functio
n/s
assigned
#
1 Kanubhai Hathibhai President M Y Y Y Yes 8
2 Shivrajbhai Lakhubhai Secretary M - Y - - Y - Y - Yes - S.Y.B.A. -
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 36 -
3 Kanuben Baldevbhai
Member F Y - - - - Y - - - - Uneduca
ted -
4 Kuvarben Manjibhai Member F - Y -
- - Y Y - - -
Uneduca
ted -
5 Shardaben Laghubhai Member F - Y - - - Y - - - Uneduca
ted -
6 Shantuben Laghubhai Member F - Y - - - Y Y - - Uneduca
ted -
7 Vajabhai Talshibhai Member M Y - - - Y Y - - - 10 -
8 Pratapbhai Bojaiya Member M - Y - - - Y Y - - - 5 -
9 Khimdas Asharambhai Member M - Y Y - - -- Y - - - 8 -
10 Nodal Officer PIA M - - - - - - - -- - Y - -
11 Project Leader WDT M - - - - - - - - - Y - -
Table no. 31 B: Watershed Committee Details – Bodi
Sr.
No. Names of WCs
Date of Registratio
n as a society
Designation
M/F
SC ST SF MF LF Land-less
UG SHG
GP Any
other
Edu. qualifi-cation
Function/s assigned#
1 Pratapbhai Antubhai President M Y Y Y 10 2 Rajubhai Mashrubhai Secretary M Y Y Y 12
3 Shantibhai Ranchhodbhai
Member M Y Y Y Y 7
4 Valjibhai Ravjibhai Member M Y Y Y Y An
Educational
5 Narayanbhai Ramabhai Member M Y Y Y 4
6 Rajuben Chaturbhai Member F Y Y Y An
Educati
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 37 -
onal
7 Rajuben Hakabhai Member F Y Y Y An
Educational
8 Labhuben Ramjubhai Member F Y Y Y 4
9 Madhuben Mohanbhai Member F Y Y Y 10
10 Nodal Officer PIA M Y
11 Project Leader WDT M Y
Table no. 31 C: Watershed Committee Details - Kaniyad
Sr.
No. Names of WCs
Date of
Registratio
n as a
Society
Designatio
n
M/
F SC ST SF MF LF
Land
-less UG
SH
G GP
Any
other
Edu.
qualifi-
cation
Function/
s
assigned#
1 Bhupatbhai Chikabhai President M Y Y Y 6
2 Manubhai Boghabhai Secretary M Y Y Y Y 5
3 Polabhai Sagrambhai Member M Y Y Y Y 2
4 Vallabhbhai Jerambhai Member M Y
Y Y 2
5 Vipulbhai Kanabhai Member M Y Y Y Y 2
6 Sureshbhai Rukhadbhai Member M Y Y Y T.Y.B.A.
7 Labhuben Bijalbhai Member F Y Y Y Y An
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 38 -
Educati
onal
8 Gauvriben Kanubhai Member F Y Y Y 2
9 Savitaben Dilipbhai Member F Y Y Y 4
10 Nodal Officer PIA M Y
11 Project Leader WDT M Y
Table no. 31 D: Watershed Committee Details – Limboda
Sr.
No
.
Names of WCs
Date of
Registratio
n as a
Society)
Designati
on
M
/
F
SC ST SF MF LF Land
-less UG
SH
G GP
Any
other
Educa-
tional
qualifi-
cation
Function
/s
assigned
#
1 Iswarbhai Bachubhai President M Y Y Y 10
2 Mirabhai Mohanbhai Secretary M Y Y Y 5
3 Polabhai Hirabhai Member M Y Y Y 5
4 Kalubhai Talshibhai Member M Y Y Y 7
5 Madhuben Velabhai Member M Y Y 7
6 Champaben Dayalbhai Member F Y Y Y
7 Manjuben Sadulbhai Member F Y Y Y
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 39 -
8 Panchabhai Lagharabhai Member M Y Y Y 5
9 Jilubhai Dadbhai Member M Y Y Y 5
10 Nodal Officer PIA M Y
11 Project Leader WDT M Y
Table no. 31 D: Watershed Committee Details – Piparadi
Sr.
No. Names of WCs
Date of Registratio
n as a society
Designation
M/F
SC ST SF MF LF Land-less
UG SHG
GP Any
other
Edu. qualifi-cation
Function/s assigned#
1 Arvindbhai Motibhai Agola
President M
(Gen.)
Y Y 6
2 Shivrajbhai Babubhai Secretary M Y Y Y 6
3 Velabhai Bhikhabhai Member M Y Y Y Y Uneduc
ated
4 Bhikhabhai Raghavbhai Member M
(Gen.)
Y Y 6
5 Gitaben Dhanabhai Member F Y Y Y 10
6 Madhuben Shamjibhai Member F Y Y Y Uneduc
ated
7 Kanuben Harshadbhai Member F
(Ge Y Y 7
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 40 -
n.) 8 Becharbhai Bhikhabhai Member M Y Y Y T.Y.B.A.
9 Bhavanbhai Girdharbhai
Member M
(Gen.)
Y Y 5
10 Madhubhai Gordhanbhai
Member M Y Y Y Uneduc
ated
11 Gitaben Shaileshbhai Member F Y Y Y 8
12 Nodal Officer PIA M Y
13 Project Leader WDT M Y
SHG Formation Self Help Groups are formed of weaker section of the society. Community Mobilizer will play an important role in this activity.
The Watershed Committee shall constitute SHGs in the watershed area with the help of WDT from amongst poor, small and marginal farmer
households, landless/asset less poor agricultural laborers, women, shepherds and SC/ST persons. These Groups shall be homogenous groups
having common identity and interest who are dependent on the watershed area for their livelihood. Each Self Help Group will be provided with
a revolving fund of an amount to be decided by DWDU.
Table No. 32 A: SHG Detail – Babarkot
Sr. No.
Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each
category No. of BPL in each
category With only Men
With only Women
With both
Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total
1 - 4 - 4 (i) Landless - 28 28 - 8 8 - 24 24
(ii) SF - 9 9 - 2 2 - - - (iii) MF - 4 4 - 1 1 - - -
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 41 -
(iv) LF - 3 3 - - - - - -
Total - 4 - 4 - 44 44 - 11 11 - 24 24
Table no. 32 B: SHG Detail - Bodi
S. No.
Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each
category No. of BPL in each
category With only Men
With only Women
With both
Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total
1 - 4 - 4
(i) Landless - 15 15 - 8 8 - 5 5
(ii) SF - 12 12 - 1 1 - 2 2
(iii) MF - 14 14 - 1 1 - 3 3
(iv) LF - 3 3 - - - - -
Total - 4 - 4 - 44 44 - 10 10 - 10 10
Table No. 32 C: SHG Detail-Kaniyad
S. No.
Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each
category No. of BPL in each
category With only Men
With only Women
With both
Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total
1 - 4 - 4
(i) Landless - 14 14 - 10 10 - 13 13
(ii) SF - 18 18 - 3 3 - - - (iii) MF - 12 12 - 2 2 - - - (iv) LF - - - - - - - - -
Total - 4 - 4 - 44 44 - 15 15 - 13 13
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 42 -
Table No. 32 D: SHG Detail : Limboda
S. No.
Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each
category No. of BPL in each
category With only Men
With only Women
With both
Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total
1 - 4 - 4
(i) Landless - 32 32 - 7 7 - 5 5
(ii) SF - 8 8 - 3 3 - - - (iii) MF - 4 4 - 2 2 - - - (iv) LF - - - - - - - - -
Total - 4 - 4 - 44 44 - 12 12 - 5 5
Table No. 32 E SHG Detail : Limboda
S. No.
Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each
category No. of BPL in each
category With only Men
With only Women
With both
Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total
1 - 4 - 4
(i) Landless - 17 17 - 9 9 - 8 8
(ii) SF - 12 12 - 4 4 - - - (iii) MF - 9 9 - 2 2 - - - (iv) LF - 6 6 - - - - - -
Total - 4 - 4 - 44 44 - 15 15 - 8 8
User Groups
The Watershed Committee (WC) shall also constitute User Groups in the watershed area with the help of WDT. These are homogenous
groups of persons most affected by each work/ activity and shall include those having land holdings within the watershed areas. Each User
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 43 -
Group shall consist of those who are likely to derive direct benefits from a particular watershed work or activity. The Watershed Committee
(WC) with the help of the WDT shall facilitate resource-use agreements among the User Groups based on the principles of equity and
sustainability.
Table No. 33 A: UG Detail- Babarkot
S. No. Total no. of UGs No. of members
No. of SC/ST in each category
No. of BPL in each category
Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total
1 14 - 4 18
(i) Landless 25 10 35 13 3 16 12 7 19
(ii) SF 20 5 25 4 2 6 - - -
(iii) MF 17 3 20 - - - - - -
(iv) LF 6 4 10 - - - - - -
Total 14 - 4 18 68 22 90 17 5 22 12 7 19
Table No. 33 B: UG Detail- Bodi
S. No. Total no. of UGs No. of members
No. of SC/ST in each category
No. of BPL in each category
Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total
1 14 - 4 18
(i) Landless 20 10 30 8 4 12 10 5 15
(ii) SF 40 15 55 5 3 8 5 3 8
(iii) MF 24 10 34 7 3 10 7 3 10
(iv) LF 4 3 7 - - - - - -
Total 14 - 4 18 88 38 126 20 10 30 22 11 33
Table No. 33 C: UG Detail - Kaniyad
S. No. Total no. of UGs No. of members
No. of SC/ST in each category
No. of BPL in each category
Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total
1 12 - 4 16 (i) Landless 25 10 35 8 3 11 7 8 15
(ii) SF 36 18 54 3 1 4 - - -
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 44 -
(iii) MF 18 13 31 4 1 5 - - -
(iv) LF 5 3 8 - - - - - -
Total 12 - 4 16 84 44 128 15 5 20 7 8 15
Table No. 33 D: UG Detail – Limboda
S. No. Total no. of UGs No. of members
No. of SC/ST in each category
No. of BPL in each category
Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total
1 26 - 4 30
(i) Landless 58 38 93 14 4 18 8 3 11
(ii) SF 20 10 30 2 1 3 - - -
(iii) MF 15 8 23 4 - 4 - - -
(iv) LF 4 - 4 - - - - - - Total 26 - 4 30 97 53 150 20 5 25 8 3 11
Table No. 33 E: UG Detail- Piparadi
S. No. Total no. of UGs No. of members
No. of SC/ST in each category
No. of BPL in each category
Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total
1 20 - 4 24
(i) Landless 45 25 70 12 5 17 16 14 30
(ii) SF 25 10 35 8 2 10 17 3 20
(iii) MF 15 5 20 3 - 3 8 2 10
(iv) LF 16 3 19 - - - - - - Total 20 - 4 24 101 46 144 23 7 30 41 19 60
Entry Point Activity:
Entry Point Activity is an important work for Project Implementation Agency (PIA), which will help them to establish relationship with village
people and step in to the village. So Entry Point Activity should be selected very carefully which will give benefit to all village people. Success of any
project depends on involvement of local community. Villagers are the important stake holders who will be directly benefited from the project. Entry
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 45 -
Point Activity is done during first phase of the Project. It is done to solve immediate problem of the village and create good impression & feeling so the
villager support the Watershed Project & it can be run successfully.
Improved Crematoria
As per the Hindu tradition after death the mortal remains of a human are confined to the holy fire "The Agni". Traditionally wood and dung cakes are
used to cremate the dead body. In a traditional arrangement adopted for cremation normally about 250 to 300 kilos of wood besides a few kilos of dung
cakes are consumed per dead body - meaning each dead body needs about 5 to 6 times its weight of wood for its cremation. As a result annually lakhs of tons
of wood is destroyed for this inevitable activity. It is estimated that in Gujarat annually over 2 lakhs trees are being cut down for providing wood for
cremation alone.
The Improved Crematoria developed in Gujarat exhibited a potential of saving about 40 to 50% of wood consumed for cremation. The activity, which
earlier required about 250 to 300 kilos, could now be accomplished with 140 to 160 kilos only. Hence a saving of 100 to 150 kilos of wood per cremation.
The solution is a simple pre-fabricated cremation bed against the traditional method in which the pyre is set directly on the floor.
PROMOTION OF EFFICIENT WOOD CREMATORIA IN GUJARAT
The Forest Department, Govt. of Gujarat and Gujarat Energy Development Agency have been promoting use of improved designs of Wood-based
Efficient Crematoria in Gujarat since last two decades. The two designs are pre-fabricated cradle-like iron structures designed to provide proper aeration for
efficient combustion.
DESIGN & TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 46 -
The design being propagated by GEDA is built up of cast iron and mild-steel components and weighs about 430 kilos. The Forest design is fully caste
weighing around 750 to 800 kilos.
As shown in the sketch it is a cast iron cradle made up of cast iron (CI) sidebars and fire bars, supported by a heavy mild-steel (MS) frame structure.
The sidebars and fire bars are secured by heady duty bolts & nuts. The overall dimension of the crematoria is 1950 mm X 905 mm X 820 mm. Weight of cast
iron components is used is about 325 to 330 kilos and that of mild-steel is about 100 to 110 kilos. The total structure is laid on a PCC floor and can be either
grouted or secured using foundation bolts. The components of the crematoria are as listed below:
1.Side bars/plates CI 12 nos.
2.Fire bar/plates CI 8 nos.
3.Vertical Supports MS 6 nos.
4.Horizon. Supports MS 2 nos.
5.Nut/bolt sets MS 88 nos.
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 47 -
Table no.34 A- Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)
S. No. Names of Villages Amount earmarked for EPA Entry Point Activities
planned Estimated cost
Expected outcome
1 BABARKOT 6.90 Lac
Check dam Repairing 1.00 - Bathroom For Ladies 1.40 - Roof water Harvesting Structure in school
0.30 -
Animal Water Trough – 2 3.02 Improved Crematoria 1.18 -
2 BODI 2.11 Lac. Pond Repairing 1.00 - Animal Water Trough -1 1.11 -
3 KANIYAD 7.51 Lac.
Bathroom For Ladies 1.50 - Check Wall 2.00 - Improved Crematoria 0.18 - Roof water Harvesting Structure in school
0.31 -
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 48 -
Animal Water Trough – 2 3.02 - RO Plants 0.50
4 LIMBODA 4.53 Lac.
Animal Water Trough – 2 2.50 Pond Repairing 1.43 Roof water Harvesting Structure in school
0.30
Improved Crematoria 0.30
5
PIPARADI
4.25 Lac
Check dam Repairing 0.80 Animal Water Trough – 1 1.55 Pond Repairing 1.25 Roof water Harvesting Structure
0.30
Improved Crematoria 0.35
Table No. 35: Details of Activities of Preparatory Phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)
Sr.
No. Name of villages
Initiation of
village level
institution
Capacity
building IEC activities
Baseline
survey
Hydro-geological
survey
Identifying
technical
support
agencies
Report
Preparation
&
Stationary
Estimated
Cost (Rs. in
lakh)
1 Babarkot 0.24 0.35 0.24 0.30 0.20 0.20 0.20 1.73
2 Bodi 0.5 0.8 0.5 0.10 0.7 0.5 0.10 0.50
3 Kaniyad 0.24 0.35 0.24 0.40 0.25 0.20 0.20 1.88
4 Limboda 0.20 0.16 0.18 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.19 1.13
5 Piparadi 0.20 0.16 0.13 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.17 1.06
#One of the following may be entered in columns: (i) Completed (ii) in progress (iii) just started (iv) not started
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 49 -
Surface Water Storage Structure
Check dams
Check dams are constructed across small streams having slope the selected should have sufficient thickness of permeable bed or
weathered formation to facilitate recharge of stored water within short span of time. The water stored in these structures is mostly confined to
stream course and the height is normally less than 2m and excess water is allowed to flow over the wall in order to avoid scouring from excess
runoff water cushions are provided at downstream side. To harness the maximum run off in the stream series of such check dams are to be
constructed to have recharge on regional scale in project villages.
Table no.36 A : Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)
S. No.
Village name Type of structures
Proposed target Augmentation/ repair of existing
structures Construction of new structures Total target
No.
Area to be
irrigated (ha)
Storage capacity
Estimated cost
No.
Area to be
irrigated (ha)
Storage capacity
Estimated cost
Area to be
irrigated (ha)
Storage capacity
Estimated cost
Babarkot
(i) Tank - - - - - - - - - -
(ii) Pond - - - - - - - - - -
(iii ) Lake - - - - - - - - - -
(iv) Check dam - - - 14 448 Hac. 128 mcft. 46.52 Lac. 448 Hac. 128 mcft 46.52 Lac.
(v) Percolation tank - - - - - - - - - -
(vi) Channel - - - - - - - - - -
(vii) Any others (Please specify)
- - - - - - - - - -
BODI
(i) Tank - - - - - - - - - -
(ii) Pond - - - - - - - - - -
(iii ) Lake - - - - - - - - - -
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 50 -
(iv) Check dam - - - 5 8.72 Hac. 22 mcft. 8.46 Lac. 8.72 Hac. 22 mcft 8.46 Lac.
(v) Percolation tank - - - - - - - - - -
(vi) Channel - - - - - - - - - -
(vii) Any others (Please specify)
- - - - - - - - - -
KANIYAD
(i) Tank - - - - - - - - - -
(ii) Pond - - - - - - - - - -
(iii ) Lake - - - - - - - - - -
(iv) Check dam - - - 20 640 Hac. 185 mcft. 49.12 Lac. 640 Hac. 185 mcft 49.12 Lac.
(v) Percolation tank - - - - - - - - - -
(vi) Channel - - - - - - - - - -
(vii) Any others (Please specify)
- - - - - - - - - -
LIMBODA
(i) Tank
(ii) Pond
(iii ) Lake
(iv) Check dam - - - 17 274 Hac. 110 mcft. 32.87 Lac. 274 Hac. 110 mcft. 32.87 Lac.
(v) Percolation tank
(vi) Channel
(vii) Any others (Please specify)
PIPARADI
(i) Tank
(ii) Pond
(iii ) Lake
(iv) Check dam 6 110 Hac. 47.50 Mts.
13.31 110 Hac. 47.50 Mts.
13.31
(v) Percolation tank
(vi) Channel
(vii) Any others (Please specify)
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 51 -
Table no.36 : Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)
S. No.
Village name Type of structures
Proposed target Augmentation/ repair of existing
structures Construction of new structures Total target
No.
Area to be
irrigated (ha)
Storage capacity
Estimated cost
No.
Area to be
irrigated (ha)
Storage capacity
Estimated cost
Area to be
irrigated (ha)
Storage capacity
Estimated cost
1 IWMP-1
(i) Tank
(ii) Pond
(iii ) Lake
(iv) Check dam 62 1418.22
Hac. 492.50
mts 150.28 Lac.
1418.22 Ha.
492.50 mts
150.28 Lac.
(v) Percolation tank
(vii) Any others (Please specify)
Sub Total 62 1418.22 492.50 150.28 1418.22 492.50 150.28
Well Recharge Structure
As 80% of Irrigation done trough ground water, recharging of ground water is very important aspect. Artificial Recharge Of Groundwater through Dugwell is
centrally sponsored scheme. NABARD is providing subsidy of Rs 4200 to small & Marginal Farmers while Rs 2100 Large Farmers. This Scheme is being implemented
in Botad Taluka. So Cluster village people also harness benefit of the scheme.
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 52 -
Table No. 37.: Activities Related to Recharging Ground Water Resources in the Project Areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)
S. No. Name of Villages Type of structures
Proposed target
Augmentation/ repair of
existing recharging structures
Construction of new recharging
structures Total target
No.
Area to be
irrigated
(ha)
Estimated
cost No.
Area to be
irrigated
(ha)
Estimated
cost
Area to be
irrigated
(ha)
Estimated
cost
1 Babarkot (i)Open wells 20 60 1.64 60 1.64
Total for the village
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 53 -
2 Bodi (i)Open wells 10 30 0.82 30 0.82
Total for the village
3 Kaniyad (i)Open wells 30 90 2.46 90 2.46
Total for the village
4 Limboda (i)Open wells 20 60 1.64 60 1.64
Total for the village
5 Piparadi (i)Open wells 20 60 1.64 60 1.64
Total for the village
Total
Table no. 38 ctivities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas ( 10 % Estimate)
S. No. Names of Villages
Major activities of the SHGs
Name of activity No. of SHGs involved Average annual income from
activity per SHG
1 BABARKOT
Horticultural Nursery 2 Group, 1.25 Cutlery Imitation 2 Group 1.50 Cattle Food 1 Group 1.00 Mandap Service 1 Group 1.50
2 BODI
Horticultural Nursery 1 Group 1.15 Cattle Food 1 Group 0.90 Cutlery Imitation 1 Group 1.25 Mandap Service 1 Group 1.00
3 KANIYAD Cattle Food 1 Group, 1.10 Horticultural Nursery 2 Group 1.50 Cutlery Imitation 2 Group 1.20
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 54 -
Dimond Polishing 2 Group 2.00
4 LIMBODA
Horticultural Nursery 1 Group, 1.25 Cutlery Imitation 1 Group, 1.60 Mandap Service 1 Group 1.40 Senting Group 1 Group 1.00
5 PIPARADI Cutlery Imitation 2 Group 1.20 Flor Maill 1 Group 0.80 Diamond Polishing 1 Group, 2.00
Table No. 39: Other Activities of Watershed Works Phase – Proposed Target
S. No.
Name of villages
Ridge area treatment
Drainage line treatment
Nursery raising
Land development
Crop demonstrations
Pasture development
Fishery development
Non-conventional
energy
Any other (please specify)
Total Estimated cost (Rs. In
lakhs) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) 1 Babarkot 19 53.77 91 11.77 65.54 2 Bodi 5 8.46 58 7.00 15.46 3 Kaniyad 20 48.42 125 25.20 73.62 4 Lomboda 17 32.87 96 10.20 13.50 56.57 5 Piparadi 6 13.31 238 20.08 13.73 6.00 53.12 264.31
(a) Quantity in MKS system has to be entered (b) Cost incurred (Rs. in lakhs)
Farm bund
Farm bunds are constructed on agricultural land with the aim of arresting soil erosion and improving the soil moisture profile. Ideally, bunds on
farms should be made on the contour line. But this creates several problems for farmers. Contour bunds divide the field into irregular sections. In such a
situation, it becomes inconvenient to bullocks for operations such as ploughing and line-sowing.
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 55 -
Table No.40: Details of Engineering Structures in Watershed Works*-
Sr.
No.
Village
Name Name of Structures
Type of Treatment Type of Land Executing
Agency Target
(i)
Ridge
area
(R)
(ii)
Drainage
line
(D)
(iii)
Land
dev. (L)
(i)
Pri-vate
(ii)
Community
(iii)
Others
(pl.
specify)
(i) UG
(ii)SHG
(iii) Others
(pl.
specify)
No. of
units
(No./
cu.m./
rmt)
Estimated cost (Rs. in lakh) Expected
month &
year of
completion
(mm/yyyy)
M W O T
1 Babarkot
Field Bund 76 4.07 *
Field Outlet 26 3.81 *
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 56 -
Land Levelling 25 3.00
Any Others
2 Bodi
Field Bund 127 3.90
Land Levelling 20 2.00
Any Others
3 Kaniyad
Field Bund 220 14.26
Field Outlet 10 2.00
Land Levelling 50 5.00
Any Others
4 Limboda
Field Bund 41 6.06
Land Levelling 20 1.00
Any Others
5 Piparadi
Field Bund 138 10.56
Field Outlet 49 4.88
Land Levelling 20 2.00
Any Others
(M – Materials, W- wages, O- others, T – Total)
Table No. 41.1: Details of Activities Connected with Vegetative Cover in Watershed Works
Sr.
No.
Name of
Village
Name of structure/
work
Type of
treatment Type of land
Executing
agency Target
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 57 -
(iii) Land
dev. (L)
(i)
Privat
e
(ii)
Community
(iii)
Others
(pl.
specify)
(i) UG
(ii)SHG
(iii) Others
(pl. specify)
Area
(ha)
No.
of
plant
s
Estimated
cost
(Rs. in lakh)
Expected
month & year
of completion
(mm/ yyyy)
1 Babarkot
Afforestation L 4.00 6000 12.00
Wire Fencing L P C 5 Km. - 5.00
Gram Vatika L 0.16 550 1.00
Well Recharge
Structure L P C 20 20 1.62
Pasture Dev. L 2.00 - 2.00
2 Bodi
Afforestation L 2.00 3000 6.00
Wire Fencing L P C 4 Km. - 2.00
Gram Vatika L 0.16 550 1.00
Well Recharge
Structure L P C 25 25 2.00
Pasture Dev. L 5.00 - 1.00
3 Kaniyad
Afforestation L 4.00 6000 12.01
Wire Fencing L P C 5 Km. - 5.00
Gram Vatika L 0.16 550 1.00
Well Recharge
Structure L P C 30 30 2.46
Pasture Dev. L 4.00 - 3.00
4 Limboda Afforestation L 2.00 3000 6.00
Wire Fencing L P C 5 Km. - 5.00
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 58 -
Gram Vatika L 0.16 550 1.00
Well Recharge
Structure L P C 20 20 1.64
Pasture Dev. L 3.00 - 3.00
5 Piparadi
Afforestation L 8.00 6000 12.73
Wire Fencing L P C 5 Km. - 5.00
Gram Vatika L 0.16 550 1.00
Well Recharge
Structure L P C 20 20 1.64
Pasture Dev. L 2.00 - 2.00
Table No.42: Details of Allied / Other Activities
For Micro Enterprise & Production System
Sr.
No.
Name of
village Name of activity
Type of land Executing
agency Target
(i) Private (ii)
Community
(iii) Others
(pl.
specify)
(i) UG
(ii)SHG
(iii) Others (pl.
specify)
Estimated
cost
(Rs. in
lakh)
Expected
month & year
of completion
(mm/yyyy)
1
Babarkot
Crop demonstration- 10 - - WC/Others 7.50 *
Cattle camp- All Villegers - - WC 3.00 *
Chaff cutter 200 - - WC 2.00 *
Electrical Pump 20 WC 0.50 *
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 59 -
Cotton Clamp 200 WC 1.00 *
Organic Furtilizer & Seed Shop
1 - - wc 1.00 *
Cotton Processing Machine 1 - - WC 1.50 *
Well Cleanning Divece 1 - - WC 1.00 *
Horticultural Plants 200 - - WC 1.26 *
Revolving fund 5 Group - - WC 0.70 *
For Asset less People
Nursery(Cottan, Vegitable, Horticulutre)
3 Groups SHG 5.00 *
Imitation 2 Groups SHG 1.00 *
Vermi compost 5 Person WC 2.00 *
Sewing Machine 5 Person WC 1.00 *
Cattle Food 1 Groups SHG 2.47 *
Animal husbandry 3 UG UG 2.00 *
Mandap Service 1 Groups SHG 1.00 *
Diamond polishing UG UG 1.00 *
Gobar Gas Plants 30 Person WC 3.00 *
Senting UG UG 1.00 *
Hand trolley 18 Persons WC 0.50 *
2 Bodi
Crop Demonstration 5 - - WC 2.50 *
Cattle Camp-3 10 - - WC 0.75 *
Horticultural Plants 150 - - WC 1.00 *
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 60 -
Revolving Fund 5 Groups - - WC 0.70 *
For Asset less People
Nursery(Cottan, Vegitable, Horticulutre)
3 Groups SHG 2.50 *
Imitation 1 Groups SHG 0.25 *
Mandap Service 1 Groups SHG 1.00 *
Senting Group UG UG 0.50 *
Gobar Gas Plants Personal UG 0.35 *
Sowing Machine 1 WC 0.50 *
Well Cleaning Divice 1 WC 0.82 *
Chaff Cutter 25 UG 0.25
3
Kaniyad
Crop Demonstration 5 - - WC 7.50 *
Cattle Camp 4 - - WC 3.00 *
Horticultural Plants 400 - - WC 2.26 *
Revolving Fund 5 - - WC 0.70 *
Chaff Cutter 400 - - WC 2.00 *
Cotton Clamp 200 Personal WC 1.00 *
For Asset less People
Cattle Food 1 UG, 1 Groups UG/ SHG 2.47 *
Nursery(Cottan, Vegitable, Horticulutre
3 Groups SHG 5.00 *
Imitation 2 Groups SHG 1.00 *
Vermi Compost 5 persons WC 3.00 *
Animal Husbandry 2 UG UG 2.00 *
Mandap Service 2 UG, UG 1.00 *
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 61 -
Diamond Polishing SHG SHG 1.50 *
Gobar Gas Plants 30 Person UG 3.00 *
Electical Pump UG UG 0.50 *
Sewing Machine 10 Persons WC 1.00 *
Well Cleaning Divice 1 WC 1.50 *
Drip Irrigation 5 WC 0.25 *
Cotton processing Machine 1 WC 1.50 *
Organic Fertilizer & Seed Shop
1 WC 1.49 *
Senting Group UG UG 1.00 *
Hand trolley 21 Persons WC 0.50 *
4 Limboda
Crop Demonstration 5 - - WC 5.00 *
Cattle Camp-5 5 - - WC 2.00 *
Horticultural Plants 100 - - WC 2.00 *
Revolving Fund 5 Groups - - WC 0.70 *
Chap Cutter 400 - - WC 0.50 *
Agarbati Udyog SHG SHG 0.25 *
Cotton Clamp 200 Persons UG 1.00 *
For Asset less People
Cattle Food 1 UG UG 1.73 *
Nursery(Cottan, Vegitable, Horticulutre
1 Groups SHG 4.00 *
Cutlery Imitation 1 Groups SHG 0.34 *
Vermi compost 5 persons WC 1.00 *
Animal Husbandry 2 UG UG 1.50 *
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 62 -
Mandap Service 1 Groups SHG 0.50 *
Medicine Pump UG UG 0.50 *
Sewing Machine 5 Persons WC 0.50 *
Drip Irrigationg 1 WC 1.00 *
Cotton Prossesing Machine 1 wC 1.50 *
Well Cleaning Device 1 WC 1.00 *
Senting Group 1 Groups SHG 1.00 *
5 Piparadi Crop Demonstration 2 - - WC 3.00 *
Cattle Camp-10 10 - - WC 2.00 *
Horticultural Plants 100 - - WC 1.00 *
Revolving Fund 5 Groups - - WC 0.70 *
Chaff Cutter UG - - UG 0.50 *
Cotton Clamp 100 Persons UG 1.00 *
Agarabati Udyog SHG SHG 0.50 *
For Asset less People
Cattle Food UG UG 1.73 *
Nursery(Cottan, Vegitable, Horticulutre
2 UG UG 3.00 *
Cutlery Imitation 2 Groups SHG 0.50 *
Vermi compose 10 Persons WC 2.00 *
Animal Husbandry UG UG 2.00 *
Mandap Service UG UG 1.00 *
Gobar Gas Plants 4 Persons UG 1.00 *
Medicine Pump UG UG 0.50 *
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 63 -
Sewing Machine 10 Persons WC 0.50 *
Senting Group UG UG 1.00 *
Cotton Prossessing Machine 1 WC 1.50 *
Well Cleaning Machine 1 WC 1.00 *
Note: Remaining amount will be taken as people’s contribution towards their benefit
BCR Analysis For Animal Husbandry
Fixed Cost Cost of milch animals 90,000
Cost Of sheds 85000
Insurance Cost 3000
Milk Cans 3000
Weighing Scale 2000
Miscellaneous 15000
Total 198,000
Variable Cost
Fodder cost (10x5x3x365) 82125
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 64 -
Conc. Feed (4.5 kg/day/animal for 30 days)
25000
Total 107125
Grand Total 305,125
Life Of Project 7 yrs 7
Average Annual Cost 28285.7
Total Annual Cost 135411
Income Selling of Milk (10 litx3 Nos x210 days @ 35 Rs/lt 220500
Selling cowdung 14400
Total 234900
B/C Ratio 1.734722
Financial Analysis for Mandap Services
Sr. No. Item Number/Quantity Cost
1 Bamboos 400 16000
2 Cotton cloths to tie on floor (20X30) 600 sq. m. 20000
3 Jute carpet on ground 600 sq. m. 8900
4 Bed, pillow, bed sheet 50 pairs 25000
5 Utensils for cooking food for 300 people 75000
6 Wedding decorated set 1 set 7500
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 65 -
7 Wedding chair 1 set 4000
8 Folding ladder 2 1800
9 Hand operated cart 1 5000
10 Tube lights 40 Nos. 8000
11 Decorative light 4500
12 ceiling and pedestal fan 10 10000
13 Wear & Tear 10000
Total 195700
1 Project Life (Years) 7
2 Average Annual Cost 27957
3 Avarage Annual Income ( 50 days per year) 150000
4 BCR 5.37
Table No.43: Details of Activities in the CPRs in the Project Areas
Sr. No. Name(s) of the
villages CPR particulars Activity proposed
Target
Target area under the
activity (ha)
Estimated expenditure
(Rs.)
Expected no. of
beneficiaries
1 Babarkot
Gam Tal Gram Vatika 0.16 1.00 All Villagers
Waste Land Afforestation 4.00 12.73 All Villagers
Pasture Land Pasture Development 5.00 2.00 All Villagers
2 Bodi
Gam Tal Gram Vatika 0.16 1.00 All Villagers
Waste Land Afforestation 2.00 6.00 All Villagers
Pasture Land Pasture Development 5.00 1.00 All Villagers
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 66 -
3 Kaniyad
Gam Tal Gram Vatika 0.16 1.00 All Villagers
Waste Land Afforestation 4.00 12.73 All Villagers
Pasture Land Pasture Development 5.00 1.50 All Villagers
4 Limboda
Gam Tal Gram Vatika 0.16 1.00 All Villagers
Waste Land Afforestation 2.00 6.00 All Villagers
Pasture Land Pasture Development 5.00 1.50 All Villagers
5 Piparadi
Gam Tal Gram Vatika 0.16 1.00 All Villagers
Waste Land Afforestation 4.00 12.73 All Villagers
Pasture Land Pasture Development 5.00 1.00 All Villagers
Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution
Capacity building is a continuous process. As a stake holder of Watershed Program should know how to use preserved natural resources, use of
assets created under watershed program in sustainable manner, so all the stake holders including PIA, WDT, WC, SHG ,UG & village community needs to be
trained for that. Various NGOs & Government Institutes are ready to do this work. But at grass root level Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK) has to deliver well as
they have one of the best extension wing. KVK situated in Bhimadad village of GadhadaTaluka, which is located in the project area. SPIPA & DSC will train
PIA & WDT for proper implementation of program, while BIAF & VRTI will work for animal Husbandry & Community Mobilization.
Sr.
No.
Name of the
Training
Institute
Full Address with
contact no., website
Type of
Institute#
Area(s) of
speciali-
zation$
Accreditation
details
Trainings
Reference Year No. of trainings
assigned
No. of trainees
to be trained
Development
Support Centre Ahmedabad NGO
Capacity
Building Society Reg. Act 2010-2013 20 10
BISAG Gandhinagar Space GIS, Remote GoG 2010-2013 8 10
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 67 -
Application Sensing
VRTI – Kutch Bhavnagar NGO Capacity
Building Society Reg. Act 2010-2014 30 500
BIAF Vadodara NGO Animal
Husbandry Society Reg. Act 2010-2013 10 250
SPIPA Ahmedabad State Govt. Administration GoG 2010-2014 10 10
KVK Sanosara –
Bhavnagar
Research
Institute Agriculture GoI 2010-2014 30 500
# Central govt. Dept./ State govt. Dept./ Autonomous Body/ Research Institutes/ Universities/ Others (pl. specify)
$ Capacity Building/ Agriculture/ Horticulture/ Animal Husbandry/ Pisciculture/ Remote Sensing/ Water conservation/ Ground water/ Forestry/
livelihoods/ entrepreneurship development/ others (pl. specify)
Table No. 45: Capacity Building Plan
Sr. No. State Project Stakeholders Total no. of
persons
No. of persons to be
trained
No. of training
programmes Estimated cost
1 Gujarat
DWDU Members 5 5 8 2.50
PIA 2 2 10 2.00
WDT 5 5 10 4.50
UGs 106 106 10 6.00
SHGs 20 20 20 7.74
WCs 11 11 5 5.00
GPs 7 7 1 0.88
Community 10000 1500 10 3.00
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 68 -
Others
(Pl. specify)
Total 10156 10156 20312 31.62
Table No.46: Information, Education and Communication Activities
Sr. No. Activity Executing agency Estimated expenditure (Rs.) Outcome
(may quantify, wherever possible)
1 Agriculture and Animal
Extention KVK 2.00 -
BUDGET
Table No. 47: Budget at a Glance for the Project
Sr. No. Budget Component Cost Requirement
1 Administrative Costs 63.22
2 Monitoring 6.33
3 Evaluation 6.33
4 Entry Point Activity 25.30
5 Institution and Capacity Building 31.62
6 Detailed Project Report 6.33
7 Watershed Development Works 316.17
8 Livelihood Activities for Asset-less 63.22
9 Production Systems and Micro-Enterprises 82.20
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 69 -
10 Consolidation Phase 31.62
TOTAL 632.34
Table No. 48: Village-wise - Component-wise Budget Available under IWMP
Sr.
No. Village
Activity
EPA Institution
and CB
DPR Watershed
development
Work
Livelihood
for asset
less
Production
system and
Microenterprises
Consolidation Total
1 Babarkot 6.90 8.63 1.73 86.27 17.25 22.43 8.63
2 Bodi 2.11 2.64 0.53 26.36 5.27 6.85 2.64
3 Kaniyad 7.51 9.38 1.88 93.85 18.77 24.40 9.38
4 Limboda 4.53 5.66 1.13 56.57 11.31 14.71 5.66
5 Piparadi 4.25 5.31 1.06 53.12 10.62 13.81 5.31
Total 25.3 31.62 6.33 316.17 63.22 82.2 31.62
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 70 -
Table No. 49: Village-wise Gap in Funds Requirement
Sr.
No.
Village Total cost
requirement
Total funds available under
IWMP
Gap in funds
requirement
1 Babarkot 183.91 172.54 11.37
2 Bodi 57.87 52.72 5.15
3 Kaniyad 203.12 187.69 15.43
4 Limboda 123.79 113.14 10.65
5 Piparadi 111.89 106.25 5.64
Total 675.26 632.34 42.92
Table No.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with Other Schemes
Sr. No. Village Activity to be
carried out
Fund made
available to IWMP
due to convergence
(Rs. in lakh)
Scheme with which
convergence took
place
Reference no. of
activity/ task/
structure in DPR
Level at which
decision for
convergence was
taken
1 Babarkot
Afforstration 0.73 Forest Dep. Dist. Level
Field Bund 3.89 MGNREGA Taluka Level
Nursury ( Cotton,
Vagitable,
Horticulture)
1.00 Forest
Dist. Level
Horticuture Plants 0.74 Horticulture Dep. Dist. Level
Drip Irrigation 4.75 GGRC State Level
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 71 -
Roof Water
Harvesting
Structure
0.26 Wasmo Wasmo
2 Bodi Field Bund 2.00 MGNREGA Taluka Level
Wire Fencing 2.00 MGNREGA Taluka Level
Cattal Camp & Arti.
Insimitation
0.75 Animal Hus. Dist. Level
Gobar Gas Plants 0.40 Animal Hus. Dist . Level
3 Kaniyad
Fuild Bund 8.94 MGNREGA Taluka Level
Nursury ( Cotton,
Vagitable,
Horticulture)
1.00 Forest
Dist. Level
Horticuture Plants 0.74 Horticulture Dep. Dist. Level
Drip Irrigation 4.75 GGRC State Level
4
Limboda
Roof Water
Harvesting
Structure
0.26 Wasmo Wasmo
Drip Irrigation 3.00 GGRC State Level
Animal Husbondary 0.50 Horticulture Dep. Dist. Level
Field Bund 4.14 MGNREGA Taluka Level
Land Leveling 1.00 MGNREGA Taluka Level
Mandap Decoration 1.00 SGSY Taluka Level
Imitation Jwelery 0.75 SGSY Taluka Level
5 Piparadi Mandap Decoration 1.00 SGSY Taluka Level
Fuild Bund 5.64 MGNREGA Taluka Level
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 72 -
Table No. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP Projects
S. No.
Name of
Private Sector
Partner
Agency
Type of agreement signed Financial contribution
Partnership
Interventions
Expected
Outcomes Comments
a)MoU b)Contract c) Any other
(pl. specify) IWMP
Private
sector
---NIL---
OUTCOMES
The villages already get benefit of MGNREGA. However IWMP project has special fund allocation for asset-less people as well as micro-enterprise &
production system, which enable village community towards sustainable source of income i.e. self employment. The project will not only ensure
employment but also promote micro-enterprise which will create various sources of income other than agriculture & also make agriculture more profitable.
Priority will be given to weaker section of the society i.e. women, BPL & SC/ST. However no ST population resides in the project area.
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 73 -
Table No. 52: Employment in Project Area:
Sr.
No.
Names of
Villages
Wage employment Self employment
No. of man days No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries
SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others* Women Total
1 Babarkot 510 0 11353 6524 11863 30 0 668 384 698 6 0 134 84 140
2 Bodi 2210 0 25359 15163 27569 130 0 1492 892 1622 26 0 298 195 324
3 Kaniyad 1819 0 61928 35061 63747 107 0 3643 2062 3750 21 0 729 450 750
4 Limboda 1173 0 19147 11223 20320 69 0 1126 660 1195 14 0 225 144 239
5 Piparadi 5695 0 18695 13414 24390 335 0 1100 789 1435 67 0 220 172 287
* Asset-less villagers
Table No. 53: Details of Seasonal Migration from Project Area
Sr. No. Names of villages No. of persons migrating No. of days per year of migration
Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project Expected post project
1 Babarkot 100 25 6 Months 2 Months
2 Bodi 75 30 3 to 6 Months 3 Months
3 Kaniyad 30 7 3 to 6 Months 3 Months
4 Limboda 70 35 3 to 6 Months 3 Months
5 Piparadi 65 25 3 Months 2 Months
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 74 -
Table No. 54: Details of Average Ground-Water-Table Depth in the Project Areas (in meters)
Sr. No. Names of Villages Sources Pre-Project level(m) Expected Increase/decrease
(Post- Project)(m)
1 Babarkot Open Well, Bore Well
30 to 45 5 (Increase)
2 Bodi Open Well, Bore Well
30 to 45 7 (Increase)
3 Kaniyad Open Well, Bore Well
30 to 45 5 (Increase)
4 Limboda Open Well, Bore Well
30 to 45 8 (Increase)
5 Piparadi Open Well, Bore Well
30 to 45 6 (Increase)
Table No. 55: Status of Drinking Water
Sr. No. Names of Villages
Availability of drinking water
(no. of months in a year)
Quality of drinking water
Comments
Pre-project Expected Post
project Pre-project
Expected Post-
project
1 Babarkot 8 to 10 12 Months Impure Potable
2 Bodi 8 to 10 12 Months Impure Potable
3 Kaniyad 8 to 10 12 Months Impure Potable
4 Limboda 8 to 10 12 Months Impure Potable
5 Piparadi 8 to 10 12 Months Impure Potable
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 75 -
Table No. 56: Details of Kharif Crop Area and Yield in the Project Areas
Name of village Name of crops
Pre-project Expected Post-project
Area
(ha) Average Yield (Qtl) per ha.
Area
(ha)
Average Yield per
ha (qtl)
Babarkot Cottan 650.00 228.00 600.00 187.20
Bodi Cottan 536.00 167.24 470.00 146.64
Kaniyad Cottan 960.00 299.52 880.00 274.56
Limboda Cottan 664.00 207.16 590.00 184.08
Piparadi Cottan 575.00 179.40 475.00 148.20
Project total 3385.00 1081.32 3015 940.68
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 76 -
Table No. 57: Area under Horticulture
Sr. No. Name of Village Existing area under horticulture (ha) Area under horticulture proposed to be
covered through IWMP
1 Babarkot - 7
2 Bodi - 5
3 Kaniyad - 12
4 Limboda - 17
5 Piparadi - 15
Table No. 58: Forest/Vegetative Cover
Sr. No. Name of Village Existing area under tree cover (ha) Area under tree cover proposed
1 Babarkot 38.82 10
2 Bodi 11.86 8
3 Kaniyad 42.23 10
4 Limboda 25.46 8
5 Piparadi 23.19 10
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 77 -
Table No. 59: Details of Livestock in the Project Areas
(for fluids please mention in liters, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.)
S. No. Name of
Village Type of Animal
Pre-Project Expected Post-project Remarks
No. Yield Income No. Yield Income
1 Babarkot Milking-Animals 172 688 20640 190 1140 39900
2 Bodi Milking-Animals 607 2428 72840 649 3894 136290
3 Kaniyad Milking-Animals 794 3176 95280 830 4980 174300
4 Limboda Milking-Animals 487 1948 58440 941 5646 197610
5 Piparadi Milking-Animals 414 1656 49680 450 2700 94500
Table no. 60: Backward-Forward Linkages
S. No. Project Type of Marketing Facility Pre-project (no.) During the project (no.) Post-project (no.)
IWMP-1
Backward linkages For Animal Husbandry
Fodder Development 0 5 10
Animal feed Storage 0 2 5
Cattle Camp 0 25 25
Financial Support for Animal Husbandry 0 10 10
Forward Linkages for Animal Husbandry
Milk Production 4 5 10
Milk Collection Centre 1 5 5
Milk Processing 0 4 8
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 78 -
Market Linkage 0 5 5
Backward Linkage For Agriculture
Vermi Compost 0 25 50
Nurseries 0 5 5
Farm Machineries 2 5
Water supply
Seed Supply 0 3 3
Credit institutions 1 2 5
Forward linkages For Agriculture
Harvesting/threshing machinery
Agro and other Industries 1 7 8
Market Link up 0 4 8
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 79 -
Maps
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 80 -
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 81 -
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 82 -
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 83 -
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 84 -
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 85 -
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 86 -
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 87 -
Action Plan Maps
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 88 -
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 89 -
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 90 -
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 91 -
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar
- 92 -