district assessment report 2005-2006 school year

34
District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year

Upload: ezra-kennedy

Post on 18-Jan-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Alphabet Soup of Testing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Proficiency Levels Student Subgroups Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) AYP Increments Status Reports District Factor Group (DFG)

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year

District Assessment Report

2005-2006 School Year

Page 2: District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year

Testing Calendar

• October: HSPA Retest • March: NJASK 3, 4, 5, 6, 7; GEPA, HSPA• May: AP

Page 3: District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year

Alphabet Soup of Testing

• No Child Left Behind (NCLB)• Proficiency Levels• Student Subgroups• Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)• AYP Increments• Status Reports• District Factor Group (DFG)

Page 4: District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year

Proficiency Levels

• Partially Proficient (scale score 100-199) • Proficient (scale score 200-249)• Advanced Proficient (scale score 250-300)

Page 5: District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year

Student Subgroups• Total Students• Native American/Alaskan Native• Asian/Pacific Islander• African American• Hispanic• White• Limited English Proficiency• Economically Disadvantaged• Students with Disabilities• Other

Page 6: District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year

Adequate Yearly Progress

• To make AYP, each school and district must meet 40 indicators:

• 95% Participation for 10 student subgroups in Language Arts Literacy (LAL) and Mathematics

• Meet or Exceed Proficiency: The 10 student subgroups must meet the State's measurable AYP goals regarding the percentage of students scoring proficient or better.

Page 7: District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year

Increments for Demonstrating AYPContent Area

Grade 2002-2003

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2013-2014

LAL 4 68 68 75 75 75 82 82 82 91 91 91 100

8 58 58 66 66 66 76 76 76 87 87 87 100

12 73 73 79 79 79 85 85 85 92 92 92 100

Math 4 53 53 62 62 62 73 73 73 85 85 85 100

8 39 39 49 49 49 62 62 62 79 79 79 100

12 55 55 64 64 64 74 74 74 86 86 86 100

Page 8: District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year
Page 9: District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year

What is the District Factor Group?• Districts are grouped by socio-economic factors.

• Our DFG is GH (76 other GH districts statewide).

• Other Bergen County GH districts include Emerson, Fair Lawn, Hillsdale, Leonia, Midland Park, Northvale, Paramus, Rutherford, Teaneck, and Waldwick.

Page 10: District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year

NJASK 3 LAL Percent Achieving Proficient/Advanced Proficient

82.488.8

52.8

89.694.8

61.2

88.3

95.7

55.8

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Total Students General Education Special Education

New J erseyDFGWestwood Regional

Page 11: District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year

NJASK 3 Math

86.890.6

70.9

9295

77.5

89.795.2

67.5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Total Students General Education Special Education

New J erseyDFGWestwood Regional

Page 12: District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year

NJASK 4 LAL

80

87

48.8

88.193.3

59.5

94.298.1

75.8

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Total Students General Education Special Education

New J erseyDFGWestwood Regional

Page 13: District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year

NJASK 4 Math

82.387.7

59.5

88.692.8

67.3

93.1 95.4

81.8

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Total Students General Education Special Education

New J erseyDFGWestwood Regional

Page 14: District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year

NJASK 4 Science

82.386.5

69

89.9 92.6

77.9

96.3 98

87.8

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Total Students General Education Special Education

New J erseyDFGWestwood Regional

Page 15: District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year

NJASK 5 LAL

85.992.4

58.2

91.197

69.6

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Total Students General Education Special Education

New J erseyDFGWestwood Regional

Page 16: District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year

NJASK 5 Math

81.788.4

53.9

84.1

98.2

43.5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Total Students General Education Special Education

New J erseyDFGWestwood Regional

Page 17: District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year

NJASK 6 LAL

75

83.3

37.5

87.2

98.2

46.5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Total Students General Education Special Education

New J erseyDFGWestwood Regional

Page 18: District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year

NJASK 6 Math

70.8

78.9

33.4

77.2

91.4

25.6

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Total Students General Education Special Education

New J erseyDFGWestwood Regional

Page 19: District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year

NJASK 7 LAL

80.3

88.2

44.9

91.797.7

69.1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Total Students General Education Special Education

New J erseyDFGWestwood Regional

Page 20: District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year

NJASK 7 Math

64.3

72.5

26.9

68.6

79.3

25.6

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Total Students General Education Special Education

New J erseyDFGWestwood Regional

Page 21: District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year

GEPA LAL

74.2

84

32.7

85.9

93.1

47.1

87.3

96

64.3

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Total Students General Education Special Education

New J erseyDFGWestwood Regional

Page 22: District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year

GEPA Math

64.5

73.7

25

77.3

84.8

36.6

73.3

86.2

31

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Total Students General Education Special Education

New J erseyDFGWestwood Regional

Page 23: District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year

GEPA Science

79

86.5

49.8

88.893.8

63.4

92.5 95.4

85.7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Total Students General Education Special Education

New J erseyDFGWestwood Regional

Page 24: District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year

HSPA LAL

83.5

92.1

44.9

9197

58.6

93.597.4

75

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Total Students General Education Special Education

New J erseyDFGWestwood Regional

Page 25: District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year

HSPA Math

75.9

84.9

31.6

86

93.4

43.2

90.2

97.4

50

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Total Students General Education Special Education

New J erseyDFGWestwood Regional

Page 26: District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year

Class of 2007 Percent Achieving Proficient/Advanced Proficient in Language Arts Literacy

81.8

92

40

93.597.4

75

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Total Students General Students Special Education

GEPA 2003 LALHSPA 2006 LAL

Page 27: District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year

Class of 2007 Percent Achieving Proficient/Advanced Proficient in Math GEPA & HSPA

76.3

88.9

19.4

90.2

97.4

50

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Total Students General Students Special Education

GEPA 2003 LALHSPA 2006 LAL

Page 28: District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year

Mean SAT Scores for Class of 2006

503 518 497

1761

496 515 496

1804

482 526 493

1819

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

Critical Reading Mathematics Writing Total

U.S.

N.J.

Westw ood

Top 10% of Westw ood HS Class of 2006 had a mean SAT total of 1819 w hich w as higher than both the national and state means.

Class of 2006 Participation Rates48% of U.S. graduates took the SAT82% of N.J. graduates took the SAT78% of Westw ood graduates took the SAT

Page 29: District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year

Advanced Placement

• Westwood Regional High School offers 12 AP courses.

• Scores of 3, 4, or 5 on AP tests are comparable to an A or B in college. Such scores will generally result in some advantage at the college a student attends.

Page 30: District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year

What does that advantage look like?

1. Receive college credit for a particular AP course.

2. Be granted an exemption by the college or university from entry-level courses.

3. Gain tuition savings – up to a year of credit may be given to students with qualifying grades.

4. Have greater flexibility in scheduling and more opportunity to take electives.

5. Gain eligibility for honors and other special programs open to students who have received AP recognition.

Page 31: District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year

Advanced Placement Trends

May # of test takers

# of tests Number of tests scored at 4 or 5

Number of tests scored at 3

Percent of tests equivalent to a college A or B

2002 58 121 52 33 70 %

2003 72 108 25 22 44 %

2004 107 156 26 33 38 %

2005 88 117 17 28 39 %

2006 74 112 35 33 61%

Page 32: District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year

2006 Advanced Placement Scholars

AP Scholars with Distinction AP Scholars with Honor AP Scholars

Rimida PanzerAnil Fermin

Alina Easterbrook Gabrielle CanaieDouglas GiombarreseWalter JosephKirsten KuizemaJessica NelsonKenneth BarneyElina Kremen

AP Scholar with Distinction—average grade of 3.5 on all AP exams taken and grades of 3.0 or higher on five or more exams.

AP Scholar with Honor—average grade of 3.25 on all AP exams taken and grades of 3.0 or higher on four or more of these exams.

AP Scholar—grades of 3 or higher on three or more of the exams.

Page 33: District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year

What Do We Do With The Information?

• District One-Year & Multi-Year Action Plans• Principals’ PIPs• Building-Level Objectives• Teachers’ PIPs• Professional Development for Staff• Practice SAT/ACT

Page 34: District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year

Questions?