Transcript
Page 1: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge

Lisa Koeman & Dr Vaiva Kalnikaitė

Page 2: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

HCI background !PhD student at UCL (ICRI Cities): public visualisations of local data

Dr Vaiva KalnikaitėLisa Koeman

HCI background !Founder of Dovetailed Senior Visiting Fellow at UCL (ICRI Cities)

Page 3: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Public visualisations

Page 4: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

0

25

50

75

100

April May June July

Page 5: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

0

25

50

75

100

April May June July

Page 6: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Nuage Vert

Page 7: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Candy Chang

Page 8: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Simon Heijden

Page 9: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 10: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Digital Slingshot

Page 11: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Neighbourhood Scoreboards

Page 12: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Mégaphone

Page 13: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Tidy Street

Page 14: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 15: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 16: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 17: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 18: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 19: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 20: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 21: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Aim: provoke discussion and reflection on different topics relating to the Mill Road community

Page 22: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 23: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 24: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 25: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 26: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 27: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 28: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 29: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 30: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 31: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 32: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

UBI-Hotspot Tidy Street

Come to Your Census

Page 33: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

UBI-Hotspot Tidy Street

Come to Your Census

Page 34: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

UBI-Hotspot Tidy Street

Come to Your Census

Page 35: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

UBI-Hotspot Tidy Street

Come to Your Census

Page 36: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 37: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 38: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

NEIGHBOURLINESS

COMMUNITY FEELING

HAPPINESS

SAFETY

LOCAL SHOPPING

STREET BUZZ

SOCIAL TIES

Page 39: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 40: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 41: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 42: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 43: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

“It has obviously been a really good talking point. People have been really interested in what is going on. I have heard some rumours that it is more positive on the other side of the bridge [Romsey] than it is from over here…”

Page 44: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 45: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

“So many people have been asking about it [the visualisation]. In fact, a guy just popped in and said ‘I just ! want to see what today’s question is’”

Page 46: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 47: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

“It being so temporary made it feel even more special, I found myself going to Mill Road more often”.

Page 48: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 49: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 50: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 51: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 52: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 53: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

What have we learnt?

Page 54: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Lessons for engaging a community

Use unobtrusive technology playfully

1

Page 55: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Lessons for engaging a community

Distribute input devices and visualisations

2

Page 56: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Lessons for engaging a community

Exploit the power of relative data

3

Page 57: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Lessons for engaging a community

Live data is not always best: slowly unfolding can match the rhythm of the community more

4

Page 58: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Lessons for engaging a community

Design displays with a finite lifetime

5

Page 59: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Lessons for engaging a community

1) Use unobtrusive technology playfully 2) Distribute technology & visualisations 3) Focus on relative data 4) Unfold data slowly 5) Design displays with finite lifetime

Page 60: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

What’s next?

Page 61: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Source: Mood Building Project

Page 62: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

VoxBox

Page 63: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Thank you!

Lisa Koeman, ICRI Cities, University College London Vaiva Kalnikaitė, Dovetailed / ICRI Cities, University College London Yvonne Rogers, ICRI Cities / UCLIC, University College London !!This work is funded by the Intel Collaborative Research Institute on Cities (ICRI Cities)


Top Related