engaging a divided urban community with public visualisations and voting technology: a case study in...

63
Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge Lisa Koeman & Dr Vaiva Kalnikaitė

Post on 18-Oct-2014

142 views

Category:

Design


1 download

DESCRIPTION

In an ideal world, members of an urban community would be cohesive and equal. However, in reality many communities have to cope with socioeconomic differences that can cause tensions. In our case study, we challenged a community’s perceptions and the reality of one such divide demarcated by a railway bridge in their street. We designed and deployed a novel combination of interactive voting technology, placed inside shops, and public visualisations of the gathered data. These visualisations were created with chalk graffiti and located on the doorstep of all participating shops. This novel combination elicited unspoken views, opinions and attitudes about aspects of the community. Our findings show how this low-tech and playful approach of gathering and visualising local data not only successfully provoked discussions amongst community members, but also evoked curiosity and challenged peoples’ perceptions of the community they live in. In our talk, we will describe the design process, implementation and in-the-wild evaluation of our approach to designing urban technology and discuss the merits of using it as a mirror for a community to look at itself. We will conclude by providing a set of design recommendations for the creation and deployment of interactive voting technology and public visualisations in urban communities.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge

Lisa Koeman & Dr Vaiva Kalnikaitė

Page 2: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

HCI background !PhD student at UCL (ICRI Cities): public visualisations of local data

Dr Vaiva KalnikaitėLisa Koeman

HCI background !Founder of Dovetailed Senior Visiting Fellow at UCL (ICRI Cities)

Page 3: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Public visualisations

Page 4: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

0

25

50

75

100

April May June July

Page 5: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

0

25

50

75

100

April May June July

Page 6: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Nuage Vert

Page 7: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Candy Chang

Page 8: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Simon Heijden

Page 9: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 10: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Digital Slingshot

Page 11: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Neighbourhood Scoreboards

Page 12: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Mégaphone

Page 13: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Tidy Street

Page 14: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 15: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 16: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 17: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 18: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 19: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 20: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 21: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Aim: provoke discussion and reflection on different topics relating to the Mill Road community

Page 22: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 23: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 24: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 25: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 26: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 27: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 28: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 29: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 30: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 31: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 32: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

UBI-Hotspot Tidy Street

Come to Your Census

Page 33: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

UBI-Hotspot Tidy Street

Come to Your Census

Page 34: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

UBI-Hotspot Tidy Street

Come to Your Census

Page 35: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

UBI-Hotspot Tidy Street

Come to Your Census

Page 36: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 37: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 38: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

NEIGHBOURLINESS

COMMUNITY FEELING

HAPPINESS

SAFETY

LOCAL SHOPPING

STREET BUZZ

SOCIAL TIES

Page 39: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 40: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 41: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 42: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 43: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

“It has obviously been a really good talking point. People have been really interested in what is going on. I have heard some rumours that it is more positive on the other side of the bridge [Romsey] than it is from over here…”

Page 44: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 45: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

“So many people have been asking about it [the visualisation]. In fact, a guy just popped in and said ‘I just ! want to see what today’s question is’”

Page 46: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 47: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

“It being so temporary made it feel even more special, I found myself going to Mill Road more often”.

Page 48: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 49: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 50: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 51: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 52: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)
Page 53: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

What have we learnt?

Page 54: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Lessons for engaging a community

Use unobtrusive technology playfully

1

Page 55: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Lessons for engaging a community

Distribute input devices and visualisations

2

Page 56: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Lessons for engaging a community

Exploit the power of relative data

3

Page 57: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Lessons for engaging a community

Live data is not always best: slowly unfolding can match the rhythm of the community more

4

Page 58: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Lessons for engaging a community

Design displays with a finite lifetime

5

Page 59: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Lessons for engaging a community

1) Use unobtrusive technology playfully 2) Distribute technology & visualisations 3) Focus on relative data 4) Unfold data slowly 5) Design displays with finite lifetime

Page 60: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

What’s next?

Page 61: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Source: Mood Building Project

Page 62: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

VoxBox

Page 63: Engaging a Divided Urban Community with Public Visualisations and Voting Technology: A Case Study in Cambridge (Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaite)

Thank you!

Lisa Koeman, ICRI Cities, University College London Vaiva Kalnikaitė, Dovetailed / ICRI Cities, University College London Yvonne Rogers, ICRI Cities / UCLIC, University College London !!This work is funded by the Intel Collaborative Research Institute on Cities (ICRI Cities)