dsp assignment question

Upload: muhammad-sabeeh

Post on 09-Mar-2016

11 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

dsp

TRANSCRIPT

  • EE004-3.5-3 Individual Assignment Page 1 of 8

    Level 3 Asia Pacific University of Technology and Innovation 2016

    Digital Signal Processing

    (EE004-3.5-3) Instruction:

    This assignment is to be carried out individually.

    LEARNING OUTCOMES

    Upon completion of this assignment, you should be able to demonstrate the following learning

    outcomes:

    LO4: DESIGN AND SIMULATE THE VARIOUS FILTERS FOR DIGITAL

    IMPLEMENTATION USING MATLAB - (PO2, PO3, PO5, PO6, PO10)

    PO2: Ability to identify engineering problems and apply basic engineering principles to

    solve them.

    PO3: Ability to recognise and apply suitable tools and techniques for engineering

    practical applications.

    PO5: Ability to design solutions for complex engineering problems.

    PO6: Ability to communicate effectively and professionally.

    PO10: Ability to function effectively as an individual or in a team.

    Question VS Taxonomy

    LR Cognitive Psychomotor Affective

    Q.N0 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5

    Assignment

    20M 25M

    30M

    25M

    POM 20% 25%

    30%

    25%

  • EE004-3.5-3 Individual Assignment Page 2 of 8

    Level 3 Asia Pacific University of Technology and Innovation 2016

    1.0 Introduction

    Biometric identifiers are the distinctive, measurable characteristics used to label and describe

    individuals. Biometric identifiers are often categorized as physiological versus behavioral

    characteristics. Behavioral characteristics are related to the pattern of behavior of a person such

    as typing rhythm, gait, voice and etc. Voice is one of the important features used to identify the

    person who have involved in the scene and conversations. It is very useful to have a speaker

    recognition system in the real time for many purposes. Speaker recognition is the process of

    automatically recognizing who is speaking on the basis of individual information included in

    speech waves. This technique makes it possible to use the speaker's voice to verify their identity

    and control access to services such as voice dialing, banking by telephone, telephone shopping,

    database access services, information services, voice mail, security control for confidential

    information areas, and remote access to computers.

    2.0 Design Requirement

    In this assignment, you are required to research on the concept of Biometric identifiers and

    proceed to design a speaker recognition system that can recognise 4 different voices as per your

    choice by taking noisy samples are an inputs. It is your responsibility to design and implement

    the recognition system appropriately and according to the requirement of the assignment.

    3.0 Design Verification

    The design of your system must be appropriately supported by relevant fundamental

    principles and all chosen design parameters have to be justified with calculations or with

    appropriate references. You are allowed and encouraged to refer to reputable publications (e.g.

    journal papers) for base-reference of your design.

    4.0 Report

    In this assignment, you are required to compile a technical report. The report should not be

    more than 35 pages long, inclusive of diagrams, with 1 spacing in-between lines. The format of

    the report is as follows:

    (i) Introduction

    (ii) Theoretical concepts

  • EE004-3.5-3 Individual Assignment Page 3 of 8

    Level 3 Asia Pacific University of Technology and Innovation 2016

    (iii) Design principles

    (iv) Analytical calculations

    (v) Simulation results

    (vi) Discussion

    (vii) Conclusion

    (viii) References

    (ix) Appendices

    5.0 Assessment Criteria (100%):

    Report format (5%) 5%

    - Presentation, flair of language, labeling, citation and referencing.

    Report documentation (75%)

    (i) Introduction 5 %

    (ii) Theoretical concepts 10 %

    (iii) Design principles 15 %

    (iv) Analytical calculations 15 %

    (v) Simulation results 20 %

    (vi) Discussion 5 %

    (vii) Conclusion 5 %

    Tutor Assessment (20%)

    (i) Presentation 10%

    (ii) Question and Answer 10%

  • EE004-3.5-3 Individual Assignment Page 4 of 8

    Level 3 Asia Pacific University of Technology and Innovation 2016

    APPENDIX A

    General requirements on Report

    The report must be formatted with a font size of 12pt if Times New Roman or a font size of 11pt if Arial and 1.5 line spacing. Please ensure the paragraphs are properly aligned/

    justified.

    There should be List of Tables and List of Figures after the Table of Content.

    The report should be in chapters and the structure should not go beyond the second level. Instead of adding subsections at the third level you may use bullets if required.

    All information provided must be straight to the point, precise and all information must be accordingly cited and well presented. Avoid plagiarism.

    All figures and tables must have a title and referenced i.e. indicate the source.

    The report must be in binding.

    Please also include the following in you report

    Page numbering at each page (Page X of Y)

    Figure and table caption font size : Times New Roman,10pt

    Position of figure and table: centre-aligned.

    Appendix B

    Instructions to Students on Discussion, Conclusion and Reference

    Discussion

    In the Discussion section you should give an overall appraisal of the results of your work. It is

    here that you will have the best opportunity to demonstrate your understanding of the work and

    to give a critical account of what has been achieved.

    Conclusion

  • EE004-3.5-3 Individual Assignment Page 5 of 8

    Level 3 Asia Pacific University of Technology and Innovation 2016

    The Conclusion is a short summary of the results of your work (about 200 words). The

    Conclusion should follow naturally from the Discussion. It should give a concise statement of

    what has been achieved. Anticipated application of techniques developed should be summarized

    very briefly. The Conclusion should be self-contained, i.e., it should not make reference to any

    sections, figures, or references in the report.

    References

    All references to books, papers, and other publications must be fully and correctly quoted to be

    useful to the reader.

    Citation Example

    In the text

    The analysis of the varactor diode multiplier has been extensively reviewed by Scanlan (1989)

    and will.

    In the References section

    Scanlan, J O (1989), Analysis of Varactor Harmonic Generators, Bell Systems Technical Journal, Vol. 44, pp75-92.

  • EE004-3.5-3 Individual Assignment Page 6 of 8

    Level 3 Asia Pacific University of Technology and Innovation 2016

    APPENDIX C Grading Criteria

    Name : _______________________________________ TP : ____________

    Criteria Fail Marginal Fail Pass Credit Distinction

    Report format

    (5%)

    0 1 2 3 4 5

    Very poor documentation standards

    No citation and references

    Rather poor documentation standards

    Some attempts made to do citation and

    referencing but

    either irrelevant / outdated or not

    according to Harvard

    Name Referencing

    Structure of report visible but missing various components

    Average documentation standards met

    Some citation and references noted but either irrelevant /

    outdated or not according

    to Harvard Name Referencing

    Structure of report visible but with some minor

    omissions

    Good documentation standards met

    Most citation and references noted and are relevant / up-to-

    date using Harvard

    Name Referencing

    Structure of report visible with one or two omissions (cover

    page/contents page/list

    of figures/references page)

    Excellent documentation standards

    All citation and references are relevant

    / up-to-date and using

    Harvard Name Referencing

    Report well-structured with hardly any

    omissions / errors

    Cover page, contents page, list of figures, references page

    All figures and tables have titles and captions

    Introduction

    (5%)

    0 1 2 3 4 5

    No introduction

    Attempted to provide introduction

    but irrelevant to the

    assignment

    Able to provide brief introduction and relevant

    to the assignment

    Good introduction is provided and relevant

    to the assignment

    A very well-written introduction and highly

    relevant to the

    assignment

    Theoretical concepts

    (10%)

    0 1 2 3 5 6 8 9 10

    No explanation on relevant

    theoretical concepts

    Poor and partial explanation on

    relevant theoretical concepts

    Basic explanation on relevant theoretical

    concepts

    Good explanation on relevant theoretical

    concepts

    Excellent explanation on relevant theoretical

    concepts

  • EE004-3.5-3 Individual Assignment Page 7 of 8

    Level 3 Asia Pacific University of Technology and Innovation 2016

    Design principles

    (15%)

    0 1 4 5 8 9 12 13 15

    Not done Attempt to identify and briefly describe

    some functional requirements of the

    Audio Signal

    Processor

    Able to identify and give a brief discussion of the

    main functional requirements of the Audio

    Signal Processor

    Able to identify and give a moderately

    detailed discussion of the main functional

    requirements of the

    Audio Signal Processor

    Explained the importance of these

    design properties

    Able to identify and give a detailed

    discussion of the main functional

    requirements of the

    Audio Signal Processor

    Explained the importance of these

    design properties

    Analytical calculations

    (15%)

    0 1 4 5 8 9 12 13 15

    Not done. Simple description of the calculation

    Did not manage to identify any specifications used

    Simple description of the calculation

    Able to identify only one specification used

    Extensive description of the calculation

    Able to identify the various specifications used

    Some details missing

    Extensive and detailed description of the calculation

    Able to identify the various specifications

    used

    Able to state reasons for the use of certain

    specifications

    Simulation results

    (20%)

    0 1 5 6 10 11 15 16 20

    Not done.

    Simple description of the steps and

    results

    Did not manage to identify all the steps

    used

    Simple description of the steps and results

    Able to identify only one step used

    Extensive description of the steps and results

    Able to identify the various steps used

    Some details missing

    Extensive and detailed description of the steps

    and results

    Able to identify the various steps used

    Able to state reasons for the use of all the

    steps

  • EE004-3.5-3 Individual Assignment Page 8 of 8

    Level 3 Asia Pacific University of Technology and Innovation 2016

    Discussion

    (5%)

    0 1 2 3 4 5

    No discussion on the work

    done and the

    simulation results

    Poor discussion on the work done and

    the simulation

    results

    Average discussion on the work done and the

    simulation results

    Good discussion on the work done and the

    simulation results

    Excellent discussion on the work done and the

    simulation results

    Conclusion

    (5%)

    0 1 2 3 4 5

    Not done

    Simple description of the future

    improvements

    Did not manage to identify any proposal

    Simple description of the future improvements

    Able to identify only one proposal

    Extensive description of the future

    improvements

    Able to identify the various proposals

    Some details missing

    Extensive and detailed description of the

    future improvements

    Able to identify the various proposals

    Able to state reasons for the proposals and conclusion

    Tutor

    Assessment

    (20%)

    Presentation

    (10%)

    0 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 10

    Did not turn up for the

    presentation

    Barely able to explain what was

    done in the

    assignment.

    Able to explain sufficiently what was

    done in the assignment

    Able to explain clearly and in detail what was

    done in the assignment

    Explanation was highly appropriate and

    coverage of the

    complete work done in the assignment

    Q & A

    (10%)

    0 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 10

    Did not turn up for the presentation or

    unable to

    answer any of the questions

    Able to answer up to 25% of the questions

    Able to answer up to 25% - 50% of the questions

    Able to answer up to 50% - 75% of the questions

    Excellent explanation and able to answers all questions

    Total Marks: Lecturer: Chandrasekharan Nataraj 100