▪educational program - history - automotive options ▪ practice fields - construction phasing

Date

▪ Educational Program- History

- Automotive Options

▪ Practice Fields - Construction Phasing

- Construction Options - Relocation Options

Agenda – Rebuild Stafford High School

Date

School Campus Site Plan

Date

▪ Educational Program

Date

Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School

• FY12- 17 CIP Development (Feb 2011)

• Used HS 2010 Building & SHS Site Cost Estimate• HS 2010 = 267,561 Gross SF• CTE Programs included (No Automotive)

• Detailed Development of Educational Program

• April – July, 2011 • Majority of program similar to HS2010• CTE - Compared HS2010 to SHS Program

• Could not replicate entire program

Date


• HS @ Cliff Farm 267,561 SF

• Current SHS 287,836 SF

• Difference 20,275 SF

Rebuild Cost Estimate Taken from this Project for CIP

Date


CTE Program HS @ CLIFF FARM Current SHS Rebuild SHSHealth & Medical X X XCarpentry (T&I) X XElectrical (T&I) X XMasonry (T&I) X XSmall Engine (T&I) X XAutomotive X Business & Info Tech X X XMarketing X X XFamily/Consumer X X XCulinary Arts X XCosmetology X XCriminal Science X Technical Drawings X X XTV Studio/Video Production X X XTechnology Lab X X XHorticulture X 26,600 SF 45,000 SF 30,000 SF*JROTC Stays In Amiee Building

Date


• SB Approved September 27, 2011

• Information Meetings July 12, 2011August 9, 2011September 13, 2011

• Work Session September 13, 2011

• Presentation May 8, 2012

• *All Information Posted on Web Site

Date


• Automotive Program Requirement for SHS

• 9,000 SF Facility • 6 Lifts• 2 Classrooms• Lockers, Toilets and Storage

• Options:• #1 - Replace Current Program Space• #2 - Add to Main HS Building• #3 - Detached Building on Campus• #4 - No Change from Approved Program

Date


• Option #1 - Replace 9,000 SF of Current Program Space with Automotive Program

• Pros:• Restores Automotive Program

• Cons:• Adds an estimated $150K for redesign & $750K for

construction• Delays school opening 1 year (Sep 2016)• Will reduce CTE and/or Core Programs

Date


• Option #2 - Add 9,000 SF to New HS Main Building

• Pros:• Restores Automotive Program

• Cons:• Adds an estimated $4M for design & construction

• Re-siting of building • Delays school opening 1 year (Sep 2016)

Date


• Option #3 - Add 9,000 SF as a Detached Building on School Campus

• Pros:• Restores Automotive Program• Proposed siting close to CTE Wing• Maintains current construction schedule

• Cons:• Adds an Estimated $3.5M - $4M for design &

construction• Reduces parking spots in staff parking• Change Order to Construction Contract

Date

OPTION 1PROS:⦁ Able to provide a façade that matches and responds to proposed building.⦁ Closer to proposed CTE program.

CONS:⦁ Lose 64 parking spaces (161 to 97 spaces).⦁ Tighter turning radius for access to Lab.

Date

PROS:⦁ Lose only 46 parking spaces (161 to 115 spaces).⦁ Comfortable turning radius for access to Lab.CONS:⦁ Garage doors on façade may be visible from school.⦁ Farther away from proposed CTE program.

OPTION 2

Date

*The current # of students enrolled in Auto Tech I, II & III at all three participating schools within the division is 275 (Levels II & III are taught in a double block).


• Option #4 - No Change from Approved SHS Educational Program (No Automotive Program @ SHS)

• Maximize Lab use at Brooke Point & North Stafford, and use Germanna Space

• Change Travel Allocation #’s to transport to 3 sites – BPHS, NSHS & GCC

• SCPS can service 160 students for Auto Tech I and 80 students for Auto Tech II/III (Max 240), if we use both the labs at NSHS and BPHS all four blocks – this would mean utilizing a floating teacher to teach one block at each school.

• GCC could service 40 students for Auto Tech I and 40 students for Auto Tech II/III – Max 80

Date

Stafford High School

Automotive Student

Enrollment (2012-13)

Stafford High School Automotive Student Enrollment (2012-13)

Auto. Tech. I

SecTotal

Enrollment SHS CFHS1 122 173 84 85 136 8

Totals 66 55 11

Auto. Tech. II & III Combined courses

Sec.Total

Enrollment

Total Enrollment (AT

II/AT III)

SHS Enrollment

(AT II/AT III)CFHS Enrollment (AT II/AT III)

1 15 12 / 3 / 11 / 2 / 1 / 1 /2 17 15 / 2 / 15 / 2 / 0 / 0 /3 17 13 / 4 / 11 / 2 / 2 / 2 /

Totals 49 40 / 9 / 37 / 6 / 3 / 3 /


Date

▪ Practice Fields

Date

Relocation of Athletic Team Practices

• SHS Construction Challenges

• Building on Existing Campus

• SHS Remains Operational

• Environmental Constraints

• Phased Construction

Date


• Option #1 – (Current Plan)

• Phase I – Main Building

• Phase II – Building Demo, Parking Lots and Fields

• Balanced Site – No off Site Soil Hauling

Date


Date


• Option #2

• Phase I – Main Building & Fields

• Phase II – Building Demo and Parking Lot

• Non Balanced Site

• Soil import during Phase I• Soil export during Phase II• Estimated additional cost $3M

Date


Date


• Assuming Phased Construction with Practice Fields Constructed in Phase II

• Maximize existing field use

• Maintain current Academic Program

• Limit off site busing of students

• Provide equivalent practice opportunities

Date


• Ground Truth: All Team practices can be accommodated on the existing SHS Campus or at their current locations with the exception of the following:

• Fall: Football (Varsity, JV & Freshman)

• Spring: Soccer (Boys Varsity & JV)

• Spring: Lacrosse (Varsity & JV)

• Spring: Tennis (B/G Varsity)

Date


• Ground Truth: All proposed options require boys/girls Tennis to be relocated off campus • Option A – Install Turf Field

• Option B – Stagger practice times on existing fields

• Option C – Stagger practice times on existing fields w/Chichester Park

• Option D – Cliff Farm

• Option E – Relocation displaced practices off campus

Date


• Options A – Turf Field

• B/G Tennis off site @ BPHS & CFHS

• Lacrosse - Competition Football Field Spring 2013

• Convert Football Field to Turf Field (Jun 15 – Aug 1)• Includes expansion of track (8 Lanes)• Cost = $1.5M

• Fall: Football Practice - Turf Field & Baseball/Softball Fields

• Spring: Boys Soccer and Lacrosse - Turf Field (stagger practice times)

Date


• Options A – Turf Field

• Pros:• Keeps 95% of team practices on Campus• Installs All Weather Turf Field• Expands SHS track to 8 lanes

• Cons: • Additional $1.5M for Turf Field Project• Summer construction will be tight• Staggered practice times in Spring• Baseball/Softball Fields used for Football in Fall• Limited Fall Baseball/Softball

Date


• Options B – NO TURF FIELD; Staggered Practice Times on Existing Fields


• Fall: Football Practice – Competition Football & Baseball/Softball Fields

• Spring: Lacrosse – Competition Football Field (stagger practice times)

• Spring: Boys Soccer – Competition Football Field and/or Field Hockey Field (stagger practice times)

Date


• Options B – NO TURF FIELD; Staggered Practice Times on Existing Fields

• Pros:• Keeps 95% of team practices on Campus

• Cons: • Field Conditions will be Poor

• Practice & Games• Weather will have compounding effect

• Requires $60 - $80K per year for Field Maintenance• Staggered practice times in Spring• Baseball/Softball Fields used for Football in Fall• Limited Fall Baseball/Softball

Date

Relocation of Athletic Team Practices• Options C – Stagger Practice Times on Existing Field & Use

Chichester Park


• Fall: Football Practice• Competition Football & Baseball/Softball Fields 2013

• Spring: Lacrosse• Competition Football Field (stagger practice times) 2013• Competition Football Field 2014 - 2016

• Spring: Boys Soccer• Competition Football/Field Hockey Fields (stagger

practice times) 2013• Chichester Park 2014 - 2016

Date


• Options C - Stagger Practice Times on Existing Field & Use Chichester Park

• Pros:• Keeps 95% of team practices on Campus

• Cons: • Field Conditions will be Poor

• Practice & Games• Weather will have compounding effect

• Requires $60 - $80K per year for Field Maintenance• Staggered practice times in Spring 2013• Baseball/Softball Fields used for Football in Fall• Limited Fall Baseball/Softball• Park Field used for Soccer

Date


• Options D – Build Fields @ Cliff Farm

• B/G Tennis Off Site @ BPHS & CFHS

• Fall: Football Practice – Cliff Farm

• Spring: Lacrosse – Cliff Farm

• Spring: Boys Soccer – Cliff Farm

Date


• Options D – Build Fields @ Cliff Farm

• Pros:• All Displaced Practices @ One Location

• Cons: • Requires Construction Project Spring/Summer 2013

• 2 Fields w/Temp Parking - $300K• Irrigation - $100K• No Support Facilities• No Potable Water• Requires $40K for annual Field Maintenance

• Estimated $50K to bus students off-on Campus/Year• Requires scheduling late Activities Bus• Could impact future school construction

Date


• Options E – Relocated Displaced Practices Off Campus

• B/G Tennis Off Site @ BPHS & CFHS

• Fall: Football Practice – Gari Melchers

• Spring: Lacrosse• Gari Melchers 2013• DSMS 2014 - 2016

• Spring: Boys Soccer – GMS

Date


• Options E – Relocate Displaced Practices Off Campus

• Pros:• Practices held in the Attendance Zone & at SCPS

Facilities• Existing Competition Fields @ SHS are not over

stressed

• Cons: • Practices will be delayed 45 minutes after school for

tutoring opportunities• Estimated $50K to bus students off-on Campus/Year• Requires scheduling late Activities Bus

▪educational program - history - automotive options ▪ practice fields - construction phasing

Documents

cipdate5educational

date10educational program

automotive program pros

automotive program cons

proposed cte program

sf of current program

majority of program

stafford high schooloption