eecs 242: active technology for communication circuits

42
UC Berkeley EECS 242 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad Professor Ali M Niknejad Professor Ali M Niknejad Advanced Communication Integrated Circuits Advanced Communication Integrated Circuits University of California, Berkeley University of California, Berkeley EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

Upload: others

Post on 30-May-2022

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

Professor Ali M NiknejadProfessor Ali M NiknejadAdvanced Communication Integrated CircuitsAdvanced Communication Integrated Circuits

University of California, BerkeleyUniversity of California, Berkeley

EECS 242:

Active Technology for Communication Circuits

Page 2: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 2 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

Outline

Comparison of technology choices for communication circuits

Si npn, Si NMOS, SiGe HBT, CMOS, JFETs, MESFETs…

Key metricsLarge signal relationsSmall signal models

Page 3: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 3 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

Generic Three Terminal Device

Output current is dependent on input voltage:

Examples:

+

Vo

_+Vi_

Io

)(),( ioio VfVVfI ≈=

npn BJT n-ch JFET NMOS GaAs MESFET vacuum tube

Emerging Technologies: SOI, FinFETs, CNT

Page 4: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 4 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

Large Signal Equations

Bipolar: kTqV

So

BE

eII ≈2

1

−=

p

GSDSGD V

VIIJFET/MESFET:

2)(2 TGSoxn

D VVLWCI −=

µMOSFET:

(“forward active”)

(“pinch-off” regime)

(“saturation”)

Vacuum Tube:2/3

+=µo

ioVVGI

Page 5: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 5 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

Generic Device Behavior

slope is output resistance of device

“constant” current

resistor region

non-linear resistor region

1,iV

2,iV

3,iV

4,iV

5,iV

oV

oI

Page 6: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 6 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

Large Signal Models

Resistors and capacitors are non-linearRπ and Ro depend on bias pointRg (intrinsic) depends on channel inversion levelRb can change due to current spreading effectsCgs varies from accumulation to depletion to inversionJunction capacitors vary with bias

Page 7: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 7 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

Small Signal Models

In small signal regime, R & C linear about a bias point:

For BJT:rx = rb

For a FET input:

Page 8: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 8 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

Various Figures of Merit

Intrinsic Voltage GainPower GainUnilateral GainNoise

Noise figure (NF) and F∞ (Noise Measure)Flicker noise corner frequency

Unity Gain Frequency fTGain (normalized to current): gm/IGain Bandwidth: fT ×gm/I

Page 9: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 9 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

Other Important Metrics

Complementary devicesDevice with same order of magnitude of fT/fmaxLateral pnp a “dog” compared to vertical npn

Availability of Logic low power/high densityUseful with S/H (sample hold) and SC (switch capacitor) circuitsImportant for calibration

Breakdown voltagePower amplifiers, dynamic range of analog circuitry

Thermal conductivityPower amplifiers

Quality and precision of passivesinductors, capacitors, resistors, and transmission lines

Page 10: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 10 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

Current gain:

H-parameters:

Device Current Gain

Page 11: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 11 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

BJT Cross Section

Most transistor “action” occurs in the small npn sandwich under the emitter. The base width should be made as small as possible in order to minimize recombination. The emitter doping should be much larger than the base doping to maximize electron injection into the base.A SiGe HBT transistor behaves very similarly to a normal BJT, but has lower base resistance rb since the doping in the base can be increased without compromising performance of the structure.

Page 12: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 12 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

Bipolar Small-Signal Model

The resistor Rπ, dominates the input impedance at low frequency. At high frequency, though, Cπ dominates.Cµ is due to the collector-base reverse biased diode capacitance. Ccs is the collector to substrate parasitic capacitance. In some processes, this is reduced with an oxide layer.Cπ has two components, due to the junction capacitance (forward-biased) and a diffusion capacitance

Page 13: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 13 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

Bipolar Exponential

Due to Boltzmann statistics, the collector current is described very accurately with an exponential relationship

The device transconductance is therefore proportional to current

where kT/q = 26mV at room temperature. Compare this to the equation for the FET. Since we usually have kT/q < (Vgs -VT ), the bipolar has a much larger transconductance for the same current. This is the biggest advantage of a bipolar over a FET.

Page 14: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 14 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

Control Terminal SensitivityBJT:

=kTVq BEexp10

MOSFET:

mV6010ln ≈×=∆qkTVBE

2

2,

1,10

−−

=TGS

TGS

VVVV

TGSGS

TGS

VVVVV−∆+

−=

1,

1,10

( ) V1~10

1011, TGSGS VVV +

−=∆

mV60=∆ BEV

DSI

DSI⋅10

Page 15: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 15 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

Bipolar Unity Gain Frequency

The unity gain frequency of the BJT device is given by

where we assumed the forward bias junction has Cje ≈ 2 Cje0

Since the base-collector junction capacitance Cµ is a function of reverse bias, we should bias the collector voltage as high as possible for best performance.The diffusion capacitance is a function of collector current

Page 16: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 16 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

Bipolar Optimum Bias Point

We can clearly see that if we continue to increase IC, then gm ∝ IC increases and the limiting value of ωT is given by the forward transit time

In practice, though, we find that there is an optimum collector current. Beyond this current the τF increases. This optimum point occurs due to the Kirk Effect. It’s related to the “base widening” due to high level injection. (Not Star Trek!)

Page 17: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 17 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

• τf is the base transit time

• current gain unity freq.

mfdiffdiffji gCCCC ⋅=≈+= τ

RB

pn+ n+

n

n+ buried layer

p- substrate

E B C

WB

fi

mT C

gfτππ 2

12

≈=

qkT

Wf

B

nT 222πµ

BJT Base Transit Time

2

1

BW

fT ∝

Page 18: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 18 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

CMOS Cross Section

Modern short channel CMOS process has very short channel lengths (L < 100 nm). To ensure gate control of channel, as opposed to drain control (DIBL), we employ thin junctions and thin oxide (tox < 5 nm).Due to lithographic limitations, there is an overlap between the gate and the source/drain junctions. This leads to overlap capacitance. In a modern FET this is a substantial fraction of the gate capacitance.

Page 19: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 19 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

FET Small Signal Model

The junctions of a FET form reverse-biased pn junctions with the substrate (well), or the body node. This is another form of parasitic capacitance in the structure, Cdb and Csb.At DC, Rin ∼∞. The input impedance has a small real part due to the gate resistance Rg (polysilicon gate and NQS) and Rs,d account for junction and contact resistance.In the forward active (saturation) region, the input capacitance is given by Cgs

Ro is due to channel length modulation and other short channel effects (such as DIBL).

Page 20: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 20 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

FET Simplified Models

For low frequencies, the resistors are ignored. But these resistors play an important role at high frequencies.If the source is tied to the bulk, then the model simplifies a lot more.Don’t forget that layout parasitics increase the capacitance in the model, sometimes substantially.

Page 21: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 21 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

)(22

321

21

2 TGSn

gs

mT

gdgbgs

gdgbgs

mT

VVLC

gf

CCC

CCCgf

−=≈

+>>

++≈

πµ

π

π

FET Unity Gain FrequencyLong channel FET:Note that there is a peak f_T since eventually the mobility of the transistor drops due to high vertical fields

Short channel limit

satTGSoxinvsatDS vVVWCWQvI )( −=≈ satoxm vWCg =

LWLCvWC

Cgf

ox

satox

gs

mT

123

∝==

Bias dependent

Page 22: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 22 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

Intrinsic Voltage GainImportant metric for analog circuits

Communication circuits often work with low impedances in order to achieve high bandwidth, linearity, and matching. Inductive loads are also common to tune out the load capacitance and form a resonant circuit. The gain is thus given by

To achieve high fT, the Vdsat is relatively large so the current is increased to obtain sufficient gain.

Page 23: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 23 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

Normalized Gain

For a bipolar device, the exponential current relationship results in a high constant normalized gain

For a square law MOSFET, in saturation we have

In weak inversion, the MOSFET is also exponential

The factor n is set by the ratio of oxide to depletion capacitance

mV261

≈=kTq

Ig

Q

m

TGSD

m

VVIg

−=

2

nkTnq

Ig

Q

m 1mV261

≈=

Page 24: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 24 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

MOSFET in subthresholdIn sub-threshold, the surface potential varies linearity with VG

The surface charge, and hence current, is thus exponentially related to VG

S D

+ + + + + + + + + + + _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

VG

Gs V∝ψ

Cox

Cdep

Bulk

VG

Channel

kTnqV

D

mG

eIg ⋅∝

Page 25: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 25 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

MOS Transconductor Efficiency

Since the power dissipation is determined by and large by the DC current, we’d like to get the most “bang” for the “buck”.From this perspective, the weak and moderate inversion region is the optimal place to operate.The price we pay is the speed of the device which decreases with decreasing VGS

Page 26: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 26 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

High BJT Transconductance

for fixed current, BJT gives more gain

PrecisionImportant in multiplication, log, and exponential functionsMore difficult in FETs due to process/temp. dependenceIS process dependent in BJT ⇒ use circuit tricks

kTqIeI

kTq

VIg CkT

qV

Si

Cm

BE

=⋅=∂∂

=

Page 27: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 27 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

mV251

==kTq

Ig

C

m

mVVVIg

TGSDS

m

25012

≈−

=

kTqV

kTE

C

mBE

eeIg

∝∝−

Advantages of BJT

For high-speed applications,

Need to bias in strong inversion…

Results in 10x lower efficiency

For a BJT, this relationship is fundamental and related to the Boltzman statistics (approximation of Fermi-Dirac statistics)For a MOSFET, this relationship is actually only valid for a square-law device and varies with VT (body bias) and temperature

Page 28: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 28 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

Condition: measure at maximum gain Gmax

*

*

outL

inS

YY

YY

=

=

Maximum Two-Port Power Gain

YL

Yin Yout

YS

AmpY-Port

Page 29: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 29 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

Maximum Power Gain Fmax

fmax = max. freq. of operation = freq. when {power gain = 1}

Page 30: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 30 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

FET Fmax

Minimize all resistancesRg – use many small parallel gate fingers, <1 µm eachRsb, Rdb, Rbb – substrate contacts <1–2 µm from deviceRs, Rd – don’t use source/drain extensions to reduce L

dsschggggdmg

tmax

gg

mt

g)RrR()CCg(R2f

f

C2g

f

+++≈

π≈

Page 31: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 31 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

Better precisionAbout 4 decades (420mV) of linearity

Example:

Can build exp, log, roots, vector mag …Lower 1/f noise cornerLower offset voltage

Advantage of BJT over FET (2)

3

3

21

21

321

ln

S

C

SS

CC

S

CTBE

BEBEBE

II

IIII

IIVV

VVV

=

=

=+

mV1~OSV

420 mV

Page 32: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 32 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

Disadvantage of BJTrb → hurts gain (power), NF

SiGe allows fast transistors with low rb

Exponential transfer function (advantage and disadvantage)

Exponential → non-linear → restoration Expensive

Lower volume than CMOS

Absence of a switch

Old CMOS gets cheaper!0.09µ ≈ $1M

0.25µ ≈ $40k

Page 33: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 33 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

Advantage of FET over BJT

Cheaper and more widely available (many fabs in US, Asia, and Europe)Square law → less distortionP-FET widely availableTriode region → variable resistorWidely available digital logicLow leakage in gates

Sample and hold (S/H) and switch cap filters (SCF)Dense digital circuitry / DSP for calibration

Offset voltages and mismatches can be compensated digitally

Dense metal layers allows MIM (“MOM”) capacitors for free

Page 34: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 34 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

SiGe TechnologyHigher Performance: GHz350≥Tf

WB

h+

e-

E B C

n+ p n

- +

Depletion region due to reverse bias

B

C

II

=βRB

pn+ n+

n

n+ buried layer

p- substrate

E B C

WB

Problem:As WB ↓ rb↑Solution:SiGe base allows for higher fTwithout reducing WB

Page 35: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 35 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

A SiGe BJT is often called a HBT (heterojunction bipolar transistor)Ge epitaxially grown in base

Causes strain in crystalCauses extra potential barrier for holes (majority carrier) in the base from flowing into emitter

Beneficial effectsWB↓ NB↑ rb lowNE↓Cj↓

SiGe HBT Action

Page 36: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 36 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

GaAs/InP Technology

One of the primary advantages of the III-V based transistors is the higher peak mobility compared to Si. The insulating substrate also allows higher Q passives.The extra cost of these technologies limits it to niche applications such as very high frequencies, high performance, and power amplifiers.

Page 37: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 37 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

FinFETs and Multigate Transistors

To combat the problems with scaling of MOSFETs below 45nm, Berkeley researchers introduced the “FinFET”, a double gate device.Due to thin body and double gates, there is better “gate control” as opposed to drain control, leading to enhanced output resistance and lower leakage in subthreshold.

Source Drain

Gate

Source Drain

Gate

Source Drain

Gate

Page 38: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 38 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

FinFET Structure and Layout

Multi-fin layout

Bulk-Si MOSFET

Sour

ce

Dra

in

Gate 2Gate 2

Fin Width Wfin = TSi

Fin Height = Hfin = W

Gate Length = Lg

Current Flow

Gate 1Gate 1

Sour

ce

Dra

in

Gate 2Gate 2

Fin Width Wfin = TSi

Fin Height = Hfin = W

Gate Length = Lg

Current Flow

Gate 1Gate 1

Source

Drain

Source

GateSource

Drain

Source

Gate

GateSource

Drain

Source

Pfin

GateSource

Drain

Source

GateSource

Drain

Source

PfinPfin

Source (all images): T-J King, et al, “FinFET Technology Optimization…” presentation slides, Oct. 2003

Gate straddles thin silicon fin, forming two conducting channels on sidewall

Page 39: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 39 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

Stressed Transistors

Page 40: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 40 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

An Aside on Thermal Conductivity

GaAs semi-insulating substrate not very good conductor of heatHigh quality passive elements (next topic)

Sisemi-conducting substrategood conductor of heatLossy substrate leads to lower quality passives

Page 41: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 41 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

An Aside on Thermal conductivity (2)

Also depends on packagingExample: in flip-chip bonding, thermal conductivity function of # of bumps rather than substrateBack-side of die can lose heat through radiation or convection through air but thermal contact is much more effective

Die

Package

Flip chip bonding Wire bonding

heat

heat

Page 42: EECS 242: Active Technology for Communication Circuits

UC Berkeley EECS 242 42 Copyright © Prof. Ali M Niknejad

References and Further Reading

UCB EECS 142/242 Class Notes (Niknejad/Meyer)UCB EECS 240 Class Notes, (Niknejad/Boser) Analysis and design of analog integrated circuits, Paul R. Gray, Robert G. Meyer. 3rd ed. New York : Wiley, c1993.Microwave CMOS-device physics and design, Manku, T., IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol.34, (no.3), March 1999. p.277-85. 32