electroceuticals in pain management · yokoyama m, sun x, oku s, et al. comparison of percutaneous...

95
Electroceuticals in Pain Management Robert A. Bonakdar, MD FAAFP FACN Director of Pain Management Scripps Center for Integrative Medicine Assistant Clinical Professor UCSD, School of Medicine (vol.) @DrB_Well

Upload: others

Post on 15-Jul-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Electroceuticals in Pain Management

Robert A. Bonakdar, MD FAAFP FACNDirector of Pain ManagementScripps Center for Integrative Medicine

Assistant Clinical ProfessorUCSD, School of Medicine (vol.)

@DrB_Well

Page 2: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Take two zaps and call me in the morning…

Salazar AP, Stein C, Marchese RR, Plentz RD, Pagnussat AS. Electric Stimulation for Pain Relief in Patients with Fibromyalgia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/electroceuticals/

The Hope of Electroceuticals…

Page 3: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

The Problem with Electroceuticals…

• Frequency?

• Pulse width?

• Burst Mode?...https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/products-and-medical-procedures

>6,000 devices FDA database

Page 4: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Electroceuticals for Pain: Learning Objectives

• Provide an overview of and scientific basis for electroceuticals

• Review the mechanism and clinical efficacy of electroceuticals

• Summarize the rationale for incorporation of electroceuticals for specific pain states

• Discuss optimal clinical incorporation of electroceuticals in pain management

Page 5: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Electroceuticals / Neuromodulation Defined

• Electroceuticals: devices that treat ailments with electrical impulses• A component of the more general term Neuromodulation

• Neuromodulation is a technique that employs stimulating the nervous system via electric currents or a fluctuating magnetic field to modulate pain pathways.

• Other terms

• Biostimulation

• Bioelectronics

• ElectroStimulation / E-Stim

• Electrotherapyhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483217308131https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/electroceuticals/

• Electrical Nerve Stimulation • Depth: Transcutaneous (TENS)

or Percutaneous (PENS)• Location: Tibial PTNS…

Page 6: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

? Can Neuromodulation be done with other stimuli?

• YES! • Acoustic / Vibration• Light• Sound• Temperature…

Page 7: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

History of Electrotherapy

• 3100 B.C.E.• Stone carvings of Nile catfish (malopterurus

electricus) for pain (Sakkara, Egypt)

• 400 B.C.E.• Torpedo Fish used for gout & hemorrhaging

• 1745 storage battery

• 1752 Benjamin Franklin treats convulsive fits with 4 “shocks” morning and night

• 1965 Melzack and Wall published their gate control theory of pain reduction

Page 8: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

A Brief History

AD 41. Scribonius Largus, physician to Emperor Claudius: “To immediately remove and permanently cure a headache, however long-lasting and intolerable, a live black torpedo is put on the place which is in pain, until the pain ceases and the part grows numb,”

New York Times, November 7, 2006

Page 9: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Acupuncture as earliest form of biostimulation

THERMOCOUPLE EFFECT

OF KELVIN-THOMAS

• Create an electrical gradient along the length of a homogenous conductor when a temperature gradient is produced by the ends of the conductor at different temperatures.

3 microvolts

Page 10: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Neuromodulation: The premise

• Pain causes (and is caused by) Disruption in the electrical system of the body which goes onto to disrupt multiple systems (neurochemical, immune…)

• Biostimulation, in various forms, can provide a Restorative Signal to the body which can improve function and pain

Page 11: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Arthritic Degeneration → Electrical Disruption

• Eraphy (EIP) signal around the knee have the potential for non-invasive diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis

Gajre SS, Singh U, Saxena RK, Anand S. Electrical impedance signal analysis in assessing the possibility of non-invasive

diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis. J Med Eng Technol. 2007 Jul-Aug;31(4):288-99

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Eduardo_Neves/publication/40693497_Knee_bioelectric_impedance_assessment_in_heal

thy_with_osteoarthritis_subjects/links/00b4951606d19b8c11000000/Knee-bioelectric-impedance-assessment-in-healthy-with-

osteoarthritis-subjects.pdf

Page 12: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

• There were positive MRI findings in 64% of the patients.

• Abnormal electrophysiological findings were recorded in 82% of the patients

Nafissi S, Niknam S, Hosseini SS. Electrophysiological evaluation in lumbosacral radiculopathy. Iran J Neurol. 2012;11(3):83–86.

Page 13: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Postsynaptic Stimulus (PSTIM)

Sator-Katzenschlager et al. Anesth Analg. 2004;98:1359-1364; Sator-Katzenschlager et al. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:1469-1473.

Page 14: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for
Page 15: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

BODY

INTEGRATIVE PAIN MANAGEMENT

MINDAcupunc

ture

SurgeryInjection

Exer./

P.T.

Massage/M.T.

Biostim

Medication

Diet /Supplements

MBSR

Visual

ization

Behavioral

Therapy

Guided

Imagery

Group

Support

Education

Bio

Feedback

Mindful

Exercise

Biofield

Therapy

Integrate

Joy /

Spirit

Page 16: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Electroceuticals for Pain: Learning Objectives

• Provide an overview of and scientific basis for electroceuticals

• Review the mechanism and clinical efficacy of electroceuticals

• Summarize the rationale for incorporation of electroceuticals for specific pain states

• Discuss optimal clinical incorporation of electroceuticals in pain management

Page 17: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Neuromodulation Overview

Neuromodulation

Non-Invasive / Self Treatment

TENS NMES IFC PEMF nVNS

Invasive / Clinic Treatment

rTMS PENS/ PTNS

VNSDBS/ SCS…

DBS: Deep brain StimulationInterferential Current (IFC)NMES: Neuromuscular electrical stimulationPEMF: Pulsed Electromagnetic Field TherapyPENS: Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation

Others: Microcurrent, CES…

PTNS: : Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation rTMS: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationSCS: Spinal Cord StimulationTENS:Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation

Page 18: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Kotze A, Simpson

K. Anesthesia

and Intensive

Care 9:1; 2007

Page 19: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Stimulation Analgesia

• High Freq. TENS• Activate A-delta fibers

• Low Freq. TENS• Release of -endorphins

from pituitary

• Brief-Intense TENS• Noxious stimulation to

active C fibers

Page 20: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Theories of Pain Modulation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gate_control_theory

PAIN Transmission

• Gate theory

• Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) • Experimental measure of the

endogenous pain inhibitorypathway

• Endorphin Theory

• …

PAIN Transmission

Page 21: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Summary – Conditioned Pain Modulation21

• Brainstem-mediated descending pain inhibition mechanism1

• Stimulus must activate nociceptive fibers but can be below perceived pain threshold2

• Stimulus must be remote from original pain location3

• Global effect that last a few minutes beyond stimulation3

1Nir & Yarnitsky, 2015; 2Lautenbacher et al, 2001; 3Le Bars et al, 1979

Page 22: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Conditioned Pain Modulation22

Nir and Yarnitsky, 2015; Yarnitsky, 2010

➢ Antinociceptive effects via descending serotonergic and noradrenergic pathways

➢ Via spinal nuclei, including cervical trigeminal complex

➢ Temporal and spatial effects suited to acute migraine treatment

Remote Noxious Stimulus

SubnucleusReticularis Dorsalis

Spinal Dorsal Horn

Caudal Medulla

Activation of descending pain modulation pathways in lower brainstem

Page 23: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Dec; 8(6): 848–856.

Page 24: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

E-Stim General Principles

• Hi Frequency (HF)

• Low Frequency (LF)

Page 25: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

TENS / NMES / IFC General comparison• Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) • Variable 1 Hz and 250 Hz

• Target: sensory neurons; acupoints

• Indications: chronic and acute pain; CPM

• Neuromuscular Electrical Nerve Stimulation (NMES) • ~25 Hz - 80 Hz with higher intensity

• Target: Stimulate muscle with placement over motorpoints

• Indications: muscle spasm, atrophy, muscle re-education, increase ROM

• Interferential Current (IFC) • High freq: ~ 3,000 Hz - 5,000 Hz

• Target: deeper tissue, circulation

• Indications: chronic and acute pain; edema reduction, increase circulation

Page 26: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

TENS / NMES / IFC General comparison

TENS• Reduce pain transmission

• Disuse Atrophy

• Swelling

• Active Muscle

• Gait / Muscular Retraining

• Deeper Penetration

NMES Interferential

Page 27: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

• 38 studies of ENS

• The overall results showed a significant decrease in pain with ENS therapy using a random-effects model (p < 0.0005).

• These results indicate that ENS is an effective treatment modality for chronic musculoskeletal pain and that previous, equivocal results may have been due to underpowered studies.

Page 28: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Which is Better?

• Groups A (conventional TENS), B (acupuncture-like TENS), and C (HVES) D (interferential)The least progress was recorded in group E (DD) and F (control)

1. Rajfur J, Pasternok M, Rajfur K, et al. Efficacy of Selected Electrical Therapies on Chronic Low Back Pain: A Comparative Clinical Pilot Study. Medical Science Monitor. 2017;23:85–100. doi:10.12659/msm.899461.

• N=123; Selected electrical therapies (interferential current, TENS, and high voltage) appear to be effective in treating cLBP

• …Interferential current more improvement of functional ability

Page 29: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

• group I received splint therapy,

• group II TENS on the palmar surface of the hand and the carpal tunnel

• group III IFC therapy applied on the palmar surface of the hand and the volar surface of the forearm.

• 5x / weekly x 3 weeks

• There was no statistically significant difference between TENS and splint therapy with respect to improvement in clinical scores, whereas IFC therapy provided a significantly greater improvement in VAS, mMDL, and mSNCV values than splint therapy

Page 30: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

• Five studies (across various neuropathic conditions) were suitable for pooled analysis of TENS versus sham TENS investigating pain intensity using a visual analogue scale. We found a mean difference in effect size favorring TENS of ‐1.58; n = 207

• 15 studies total;

• We found the quality of the studies overall to be low.

• We make recommendations with respect to future TENS study designs which may meaningfully reduce the uncertainty…

Page 31: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

• Pain and fatigue during movement, but not at rest, are reduced by a one-time 30 minute treatment with active TENS in individuals with fibromyalgia.

• The active TENS settings were 100 Hz, 200 μs at maximal tolerable intensity. The peak amplitude used in the active TENS treatment group was 39.93 mA

Pain. 2013 Nov; 154(11): 2554–2562.

Page 32: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for
Page 33: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

• Moderate evidence from systematic reviews suggests that TENS is superior to placebo (no current) TENS for reducing analgesic consumption and improving pain, pulmonary function, and nausea and vomiting.

1. Johnson MI. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) as an adjunct for pain management in perioperative settings: a critical review. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics. 2017;17(10):1013–1027. doi:10.1080/14737175.2017.1364158.

Page 34: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

AL-TENS

Page 35: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

• Bilateral acupuncture points included LI4 and LIV3, plus LI11 or ST36 were stimulated

• The results of this study suggests that ALTENS significantly reduces the mTNSscores and numbness in patients suffering from CIPN symptoms

Page 36: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

PEMFPulsed electromagnetic field therapy

Page 37: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

• Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF), uses electromagnetic fields

• Initiated by pulsing high-frequency (>1000 times a second), low-energy electromagnetic signals into the nerves in the target tissue where pain is present.

Page 38: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for
Page 39: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

• In 2017 PEMF Device was FDA 510k Cleared for "Adjunctive treatment of musculoskeletal pain related to: (1) plantar fasciitis of the heel; and (2) osteoarthritis of the knee"

• Postoperative Pain

• In 2019 PEMF Device was FDA Cleared for "Adjunctive treatment of postoperative pain".

Page 40: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Localized Percutaneous StimPENSPTNSPANS

Page 41: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (PENS) for Pain

Page 42: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

• Reduction in pain and pain medications more sig in PENS group and noted for 1 mo. After 8 weeks of treatment and Diminshedsubsequently

• Our results indicate that repeated PENS is more effective than TENS for chronic LBP but must be continued to sustain the analgesic effect.

1. Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Long-Term Pain Relief in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2004:1552–1556. doi:10.1213/01.ane.0000112312.94043.df.

Page 43: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

PTNS Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation

Page 44: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

BMC Urol. 2013; 13: 61.; Res Rep Urol. 2017; 9: 145–157.; Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Aug;290(2):291-8. https://www.urotoday.com/conference-highlights/sufu-winter-meeting-2019/110666-sufu-2019-randomized-controlled-trial-of-ptns-versus-sham-efficacy-in-treatment-of-bladder-pain-syndrome.html

Page 45: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

PANS

• ACP – 8 systematic reviews• ACP significant superiority over sham

for back pain, knee pain, and headache

• Auricular - 17 Trials • 8 perioperative, 4 acute, 5 chronic pain

• Superior to controls:

• pain intensity analgesic use

Page 46: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for
Page 47: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Electroceuticals for Pain: Learning Objectives

• Provide an overview of and scientific basis for electroceuticals

• Review the mechanism and clinical efficacy of electroceuticals

• Summarize the rationale for incorporation of electroceuticals for specific pain states

• Discuss optimal clinical incorporation of electroceuticals in pain management

Page 48: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Case in Point: Headache / Migraine

Page 49: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/treating-migraines-more-ways-fight-pain02/23/2017

Page 50: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for
Page 51: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

https://practicalneurology.com/articles/2019-may/neuromodulation-therapies-for-headache/pdf

Page 52: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

eTNS: External Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation

Page 53: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

eTNS

• 20 minutes of active stimulation daily for 3 months resulted in reduced mean number of headache days with a 50% responder rate of 38.1% vs 12.1% for active vs sham stimulation.12,13

• For acute migraine treatment, 1 hour of eTNS given in an outpatient clinic within 3 hours of onset resulted in 57.1% pain reduction after 1 hour and 52.8% after 2 hours.

• In addition, in the 24 hours after intervention, only 34.6% of patients had used rescue medication.

• ~May have muscle relaxing and sleep onset enhancing effect

Chou DE, Gross GJ, Casadei CH, Yugrakh MS. External trigeminal nerve stimulation for the acute treatment of migraine: open-label trial on safety and efficacy. Neuromodulation. 2017;20:678-683.https://practicalneurology.com/articles/2019-may/neuromodulation-therapies-for-headache

Page 54: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

https://americanmigrainefoundation.org/resource-library/spotlight-neuromodulation-devices-headache/

• nVNS: non-invasive Vagal Nerve Stimulation

Page 55: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Gammacore

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/891930https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30543270https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30328647

Page 56: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

nVNS: non-invasive Vagal Nerve Stimulation

• nVNS for acute self-treatment of 3 migraine attacks in a 3-week period, 64.6% of people with chronic migraine (CM) or high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) had pain relief within 2 hours., and 39.6% of responders had freedom from pain.

• Those with HFEM had more response than those with CM.6

• In a randomized sham-controlled study of 248 people with episodic migraine (EM) with or without aura, nVNS was superior to sham for acute treatment as early as 30 and 60 minutes after onset, although no there was no difference 120 minutes after pain onset.7

Barbanti P, Grazzi L, Egeo G, et al. Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for acute treatment of high-frequency and chronic migraine: an open-label study. J Headache Pain. 2015;16:617. Tassorelli C, Grazzi L, de Tommaso M, et al. Noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation as acute therapy for migraine: the randomized PRESTO study. Neurology. 2018;91:e364-e373.https://practicalneurology.com/articles/2019-may/neuromodulation-therapies-for-headache

Page 57: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/325532.php#1

• ?Other conditions with Vagal mediated pain• Fibromyalgia

• POTS…

Page 58: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

• After 10 sessions pain was reduced by 67%, especially regarding neuropathic components, while sleep disorders and fatigue also improved by 57–67%. The central sensitization inventory (CSI) score was reduced by 70%.

Front. Neurosci., 18 April 2019 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00388https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/8/4/508

Page 59: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Neuromodulation Overview

Neuromodulation

Non-Invasive / Self Treatment

TENS NMES IFC PEMF nVNS

Invasive / Clinic Treatment

rTMS PENS/ PTNS

VNSDBS/ SCS…

DBS: Deep brain StimulationInterferential Current (IFC)NMES: Neuromuscular electrical stimulationPEMF: Pulsed Electromagnetic Field TherapyPENS: Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation

Others: Microcurrent, CES…

PTNS: : Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation rTMS: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationSCS: Spinal Cord StimulationTENS:Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation

Page 60: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

https://time.com/collection/best-inventions-2019

Page 61: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Microcurrent for Sinus Pain• FDA cleared: To Treat Sinus

Pain Associated With Allergic Rhinitis/Hay Fever

Page 62: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

• RDBPCT

• N= 71 with sinus pain

• After one treatment, 74% achieved sinus pain relief

• 82% preferred it over their current treatment.

Maul XA, Borchard NA, Hwang PH, Nayak JV. Microcurrent technology for rapid relief of sinus pain: a randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blinded clinical trial. InInternational forum of allergy & rhinology 2019 Apr (Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 352-356).Goldsobel AB, Prabhakar N, Gurfein BT. Prospective trial examining safety and efficacy of microcurrent stimulation for the treatment of sinus pain and congestion. Bioelectronic Medicine. 2019 Dec;5(1):1-9.

• Significantly reducing moderate sinus pain for up to 6 hrs and significantly reducing pain and congestion over 4 weeks of daily use.

• Minor side effects that resolved without intervention

Page 63: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

REN: Remote Electrical Neuromodulation• FDA approved May 2019

• Indicated: acute treatment of

migraine with or without aura in

patients > 18 years of age

• Based on Conditioned Pain

Modulation (CPM)

• Applied to upper arm at onset of

a migraine attack

• Controlled via smartphone App

63

Page 64: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

REN vs TENS64

REN - CPM TENS – Gate Theory

MOA Descending Pain Inhibition Ascending Pain Inhibition

Nerve Fibers C and Aδ Fibers A Fibers

Stimulated sensation Nociceptive Touch

Location Remote from Pain Location At Pain Location

Typical Pulse Frequency 100 - 120 Hz 40 - 80 Hz

Typical Pulse Width 50 - 300 S 400 S

Impact Global Local

Page 65: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

• N = 252 from 12 HA clinics

• Criteria: 2‐8 migraine HAs/Mo

• Randomized in a 1:1 ratio to active or sham stimulation

• A smartphone‐controlled wireless device was applied for 30‐45 minutes on the upper arm within 1 hour of attack onset; electrical stimulation was at a perceptible but non‐painful intensity level.

1. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain. 2019;59(8). doi:10.1111/head.v59.8.

• At 2 hrs:

• Pain relief: 66.7% vs 38.8%

• Pain‐free: 37.4% vs 18.4%

P = .003)

• Symptom relief: 46.3% vs 22.2%, P = .0008)

• The pain relief was sustained 48 hours post‐treatment

• Adverse events was low: • 4.8% vs 2.4% P = .499)

Page 66: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

New migraine

Page 67: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

sTMS Single Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulator

• This is a magnet placed on the back of the head and turned on for a split-second pulse.

• Two pulses of the magnet stopped migraine with aura in around 40% of patients

https://americanmigrainefoundation.org/resource-library/spotlight-neuromodulation-devices-headache

Page 68: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

• …rTMS improves the efficacy of conventional medical treatment in chronic pain patients…not associated with any direct adverse effects…duration and frequency of rTMS therapy is presently highly variable and needs standardization.

1. Goudra B, Shah D, Balu G, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in chronic pain: A meta-analysis. Anesthesia: Essays and Researches. 2017;11(3):751. doi:10.4103/aer.aer_10_17.

Page 69: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

E M Khedr et al. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76:833-838

Page 70: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

https://thebrainstimulator.net/brain-stimulation-comparison/

Page 71: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Neuromodulation Overview

Neuromodulation

Non-Invasive / Self Treatment

TENS NMES IFC PEMF nVNS

Invasive / Clinic Treatment

rTMS PENS/ PTNS

VNSDBS/ SCS…

DBS: Deep brain StimulationInterferential Current (IFC)NMES: Neuromuscular electrical stimulationPEMF: Pulsed Electromagnetic Field TherapyPENS: Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation

Others: Microcurrent, CES…

PTNS: : Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation rTMS: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationSCS: Spinal Cord StimulationTENS:Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation

Page 72: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

? Can Neuromodulation be done with other stimuli?

• YES! • Acoustic / Vibration

• Light

• Sound

• Temperature…

Page 73: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

other

• Reduced expression of metalloproteinases and inflamm interleukins

• Positive expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines

• Up regulation of PCNA, TGF-beta1 gene expression, NO release and TGF-beta1 protein → collagen synthesis

• Enhancing activation of tenocytes (proliferation and migration), →tendon healing

• Increased expression of lubricin (Proteoglycan 4) a proteoglycan encoded by PRG4 gene acts as a joint lubricant

M.C. d'Agostino et al. / International Journal of Surgery 24 (2015) 147e153

Page 74: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

1. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2017;35(7). doi:10.1002/jor.v35.7.

Page 75: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

The Future…

Page 76: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for
Page 77: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for
Page 78: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for
Page 79: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for
Page 80: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for
Page 81: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

The Hope of Electroceuticals

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/325532.php#1

Page 82: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Electroceuticals for Pain: Learning Objectives

• Provide an overview of and scientific basis for electroceuticals

• Review the mechanism and clinical efficacy of electroceuticals

• Summarize the rationale for incorporation of electroceuticals for specific pain states

• Discuss optimal clinical incorporation of electroceuticals in pain management

Page 83: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Neuromodulation Overview

Neuromodulation

Non-Invasive / Self Treatment

TENS NMES IFC PEMF nVNS

Invasive / Clinic Treatment

rTMS PENS/ PTNS

VNSDBS/ SCS…

DBS: Deep brain StimulationInterferential Current (IFC)NMES: Neuromuscular electrical stimulationPEMF: Pulsed Electromagnetic Field TherapyPENS: Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation

Others: Microcurrent, CES…

PTNS: : Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation rTMS: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationSCS: Spinal Cord StimulationTENS:Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation

Page 84: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

What Electroceutical? Need to be an individualized• Electrotherapy is not one size fits all…

• To Find the best electroceutical (Restorative Signal) need to recognize the electrical disruption• Pain is local / neuropathic → TENS • Pain is cortical /central → ALTENS / PANS / REN / rTMS• Pain is acute / → High freq• Pain is chronic → Low freq / rTMS• Pain is deep → Interferential / PENS / PEMF• Pain associated with weakness → NMES…• Head and Facial pain / Migraine → REN, nVNS, eTNS• Pelvic pain → PTNS

Page 85: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Who?

• Preference

• Experience / Education

• Compliance

• Tolerance …

Page 86: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

• TENS success is optimized when new TENS users have realistic expectations from treatment and are provided with strategies to enable them to sustain motivation to self-administer treatment and troubleshoot declining response. • 20-30 min 2x/day

• Placement:

• Setting:

• Expectations:

• Care of equipment/pads:

23 Jun 2014https://doi.org/10.2217/pmt.14.13

Previous studies show the greatest analgesic effect of TENS with the highest tolerable intensities:

‘strong, tolerable and non-painful”

Page 87: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

When, Where & How: The Prescription

• Type of Biostimulation

• Frequency

• Intensity

• Duration

• Mode

• Positioning• Local, dermatomes, myotomes, nerve roots, trigger points, acupuncture

points…

Page 88: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Safety

• Rare skin irritation • Use hypoallergenic pads

• Avoid prolonged use

• Avoid with implantable devices*

• Pregnancy

Page 89: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Pregnancy – Safe Use

• https://www.oaa-anaes.ac.uk/assets/_managed/editor/File/PDF/info_for_mothers/TENS%20Statement%20JUNE%2007%20ACPWH%20Final.pdf

https://www.oaa-anaes.ac.uk/assets/_managed/editor/File/PDF/info_for_mothers/TENS%20Statement%20JUNE%2007%20ACPWH%20Final.pdf

Page 90: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Resources

• WWW.Electrotherapy.org

• Electrotherapy: evidence-based practice (Physiotherapy Essentials)• Tim Watson (Editor)

• Johnson M. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS). Research to Support Clinical Practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

Page 91: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Patient instructions: example U of Iowa

https://uihc.org/health-topics/transcutaneous-electrical-nerve-stimulator-tens

Page 92: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Conclusions – Electroceuticals • What is New in medicine is often a retelling of a therapeutic story

told through a modern filter…

• An attempt to correct disruption with a restorative signal

• Great reverence for the history that made today’s medicine possible

• Great hope for future options to improve pain management

Page 93: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Electroceuticals in Pain Management

Robert A. Bonakdar, MD FAAFP FACNDirector of Pain ManagementScripps Center for Integrative Medicine

Assistant Clinical ProfessorUCSD, School of Medicine (vol.)

@DrB_Well

Page 94: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

Appendix

Page 95: Electroceuticals in Pain Management · Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for

CODES

• General ESTIM = 97032

• PENS = (Electroacupuncture)• Code: 97813 97814

• 64999 Unlisted procedure, nervous system