erratum: reconnaissance of rockslide hazards in kananaskis country, alberta

1
ERRATUM Erratum: Reconnaissance of rockslide hazards in Kananaskis Country, Alberta D. M. CRUDEN AND T. M. EATON Department of Civil Engineering, Universiv of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta., Canada T6G 2G7 (Ref.: Can. Geotech. J. 24: 414-429 (1987)) Received December 15, 1987 Accepted December 2 1, 1987 Can. Geotech. J. 25, 41 1 (1988) The information in Tables 2 and 3 on p. 421 was incorrectly submitted and leads to incorrect conclusions in the section on the stability analysis of Mount Indefatigable. Corrected versions of the tables are as follows: TABLE 2. Sidescarp section, Mount Indefatigable: results of analysis using Sarma method Rupture surface Earthquake Factor Pore pressure Friction angle load, horizontal of safety TABLE 3. Hypothetical section, Mount Indefatigable: results of analysis using Sarma method Rupture surface Earthquake Factor Pore pressure Friction angle load, horizontal of safety 0 40" 0.04 g 1.3 0 40" 0.04 g 1.6 0 30" 0.04 g 1 .O 0 30" 0.04 g 1.3 0 25" 0.04 g 0.9 0 25" 0.04 g 1.1 NOTE: g = acceleration of gravity; x = water table as indicated in NOTE: g = acceleration of gravity; x = water table as indicated in Fig. 15; rupture surface cohesion = 0 for all cases; interslice cohesion = Fig. 16; rupture surface cohesion = 0 for all cases; interslice cohesion = 100 kPa for all cases; interslice friction angle = 30" for all cases; unit 100 kPa for all cases; interslice friction angle = 30" for all cases; unit weight = 20 kN/m3. weight = 20 kNlm3. Printed in Canada 1 Imprime au Canada Can. Geotech. J. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by YORK UNIV on 11/22/14 For personal use only.

Upload: t-m

Post on 30-Mar-2017

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Erratum: Reconnaissance of rockslide hazards in Kananaskis Country, Alberta

ERRATUM

Erratum: Reconnaissance of rockslide hazards in Kananaskis Country, Alberta

D. M. CRUDEN AND T. M. EATON Department of Civil Engineering, Universiv of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta., Canada T6G 2G7

(Ref.: Can. Geotech. J. 24: 414-429 (1987))

Received December 15, 1987

Accepted December 2 1, 1987

Can. Geotech. J . 25, 41 1 (1988)

The information in Tables 2 and 3 on p. 421 was incorrectly submitted and leads to incorrect conclusions in the section on the stability analysis of Mount Indefatigable. Corrected versions of the tables are as follows:

TABLE 2. Sidescarp section, Mount Indefatigable: results of analysis using Sarma method

Rupture surface Earthquake Factor

Pore pressure Friction angle load, horizontal of safety

TABLE 3. Hypothetical section, Mount Indefatigable: results of analysis using Sarma method

Rupture surface Earthquake Factor

Pore pressure Friction angle load, horizontal of safety

0 40" 0.04 g 1.3 0 40" 0.04 g 1.6 0 30" 0.04 g 1 .O 0 30" 0.04 g 1.3 0 25" 0.04 g 0.9 0 25" 0.04 g 1.1

NOTE: g = acceleration of gravity; x = water table as indicated in NOTE: g = acceleration of gravity; x = water table as indicated in Fig. 15; rupture surface cohesion = 0 for all cases; interslice cohesion = Fig. 16; rupture surface cohesion = 0 for all cases; interslice cohesion = 100 kPa for all cases; interslice friction angle = 30" for all cases; unit 100 kPa for all cases; interslice friction angle = 30" for all cases; unit weight = 20 kN/m3. weight = 20 kNlm3.

Printed in Canada 1 Imprime au Canada

Can

. Geo

tech

. J. D

ownl

oade

d fr

om w

ww

.nrc

rese

arch

pres

s.co

m b

y Y

OR

K U

NIV

on

11/2

2/14

For

pers

onal

use

onl

y.