erratum: reconnaissance of rockslide hazards in kananaskis country, alberta
TRANSCRIPT
ERRATUM
Erratum: Reconnaissance of rockslide hazards in Kananaskis Country, Alberta
D. M. CRUDEN AND T. M. EATON Department of Civil Engineering, Universiv of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta., Canada T6G 2G7
(Ref.: Can. Geotech. J. 24: 414-429 (1987))
Received December 15, 1987
Accepted December 2 1, 1987
Can. Geotech. J . 25, 41 1 (1988)
The information in Tables 2 and 3 on p. 421 was incorrectly submitted and leads to incorrect conclusions in the section on the stability analysis of Mount Indefatigable. Corrected versions of the tables are as follows:
TABLE 2. Sidescarp section, Mount Indefatigable: results of analysis using Sarma method
Rupture surface Earthquake Factor
Pore pressure Friction angle load, horizontal of safety
TABLE 3. Hypothetical section, Mount Indefatigable: results of analysis using Sarma method
Rupture surface Earthquake Factor
Pore pressure Friction angle load, horizontal of safety
0 40" 0.04 g 1.3 0 40" 0.04 g 1.6 0 30" 0.04 g 1 .O 0 30" 0.04 g 1.3 0 25" 0.04 g 0.9 0 25" 0.04 g 1.1
NOTE: g = acceleration of gravity; x = water table as indicated in NOTE: g = acceleration of gravity; x = water table as indicated in Fig. 15; rupture surface cohesion = 0 for all cases; interslice cohesion = Fig. 16; rupture surface cohesion = 0 for all cases; interslice cohesion = 100 kPa for all cases; interslice friction angle = 30" for all cases; unit 100 kPa for all cases; interslice friction angle = 30" for all cases; unit weight = 20 kN/m3. weight = 20 kNlm3.
Printed in Canada 1 Imprime au Canada
Can
. Geo
tech
. J. D
ownl
oade
d fr
om w
ww
.nrc
rese
arch
pres
s.co
m b
y Y
OR
K U
NIV
on
11/2
2/14
For
pers
onal
use
onl
y.