ethics and social responibilities

Upload: anup-chauhan

Post on 10-Apr-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/8/2019 Ethics and Social Responibilities

    1/18

    ETHICS AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES IN

    MANAGEMENT

    By :- Anup Chauhan & Bhumika kapoor

  • 8/8/2019 Ethics and Social Responibilities

    2/18

    Social Responsibility

    Definition:- Is an ethical or ideological theory, that an entity whether a govt.corporation or private organization has a big responsibility to society at large.

    MNCs wants to lower the cost by locating in countries where human rights arenot a high priority. They justify by saying that they are bringing in jobs and

    strengthening the local economy.

    Are tobacco and alcoholic beverages companies socially responsible ?

    What factors influence the decision of managers in these situations ?

    Two Views of Social responsibilities:-

    Social Responsibility

    The Classical View Socio-Economic View

  • 8/8/2019 Ethics and Social Responibilities

    3/18

    Views of Social Responsibilities

    The Classical View:-

    Believes that managements only social responsibility is to maximizeprofits.

    Milton Friedman, the economist and Nobel prize winner strongly

    advocates this approach.

    According to this view doing Social good adds to the cost of doing

    business. This additional cost is compensated by:-

    Increasing the price of the product.

    Stockholders reduce their profit margins.

    Those who believe in this view are also socially responsible but their

    definition of social responsibility is different i.e. their extent of

    responsibility is to maximize profits for Stock holders.

  • 8/8/2019 Ethics and Social Responibilities

    4/18

  • 8/8/2019 Ethics and Social Responibilities

    5/18

    Comparison of the views

    The difference between the two perspectives is easy to understand as the

    Classical view is based on maximizing profits whereas the socio

    economic view goes beyond making profits to include protecting and

    improving societys welfare.

    Lesser Greater Social Responsibility

    Stage 1

    Owners and

    Management

    Stage 2

    Employees

    Stage 3

    Constituents in the

    specific environment

    (Customer)

    Stage 4

    Broader Society

  • 8/8/2019 Ethics and Social Responibilities

    6/18

    Corporate Social Responsibility

    Pyramid

    Carrolls four part definition:-

    Philanthropic

    Responsibilities

    Ethical

    Responsibilities

    Legal

    Responsibilities

    Economic

    Responsibilities

    Be a good

    Corporate citizen

    Be ethical

    Obey the law

    Be Profitable

    Contribute resources to

    communities; improve quality

    of life.

    Obligation to do what is right,

    just and fair. Avoid harm.

    Law is societys codification

    of right and wrong. Play by

    the rules of the game.

    The foundation on which all

    other rest.

  • 8/8/2019 Ethics and Social Responibilities

    7/18

    Obligations, Responsiveness,

    Responsibility

    Social Obligations.

    Engages in social actions because of its obligations to meet economic andlegal responsibilities.

    Social Responsiveness. Engages in social actions in response to some popular social need.

    Social Responsibility.

    Goes beyond social obligations and responsiveness and believes in getting

    involved in actions which can improve the society as its the right thing todo.

  • 8/8/2019 Ethics and Social Responibilities

    8/18

    Example

    Infosys:-

    Indian IT giant with over 1,00,000 employees and presence in 22 countries.

    Infosys as a socially responsible company aims at:-

    Conservation of Resources.

    Prevention of pollution. Adherence to all applicable legislations.

    Organizing and contributing in welfare programs, especially for under

    privileged children.

    The primary purpose of corporate leadership is to create wealth legally and

    ethically. This translates to bringing a high level of satisfaction to fiveconstituencies - customers, employees, investors, vendors and the society-at-large.

    - N.R Narayana Murthy (Chairman of board and Chief mentor)

  • 8/8/2019 Ethics and Social Responibilities

    9/18

    Arguments For and Against Social

    Responsibility

    For:-

    Public Expectations.

    Long Term Profits.

    Ethical Obligation.

    Public Image.

    Better Environment.

    Less Govt. Regulations

    Stakeholders Interest.

    Against:-

    Violation if profit

    maximization.

    Costs. Lack of necessary skills to

    address social issues.

    No direct lines of

    accountability for social

    actions.

  • 8/8/2019 Ethics and Social Responibilities

    10/18

    NATURE OF ETHICS

    Ethics The inner-guiding moral principles,

    values, and beliefs that people use to analyze or

    interpret a situation and then decide what is the

    right or appropriate way to behave.

    Ethical Dilemma

    quandary people find themselves in when

    they have to decide if they should act in away that might help another person even

    though doing so might go against their own

    self-interest.

  • 8/8/2019 Ethics and Social Responibilities

    11/18

    Reasons to Behave Ethically

    From Internal Customer point of view:-

    Improves the atmosphere at work and helps motivating theemployees.

    Ethic behavior of management sets a good example to the

    employees.

    Evokes a sense of pride for the company and improves its image in

    the eyes of employees.

    From External Customer point of view:- Improves the public image of the company adds to the overall

    development of ethical behaviour in the society

  • 8/8/2019 Ethics and Social Responibilities

    12/18

    FACTORS THAT AFFECT ETHICS

    The factors that affect ethics are as follows: Stage of moral development Individual characteristics

    Structural variablesOrganizations culture

    Issue intensity

  • 8/8/2019 Ethics and Social Responibilities

    13/18

    STAGE OF MORAL DEVELOPMENT

    There are three levels of moral development PRECONVENTIONAL: Sticking to rules to avoid physical

    punishment and following rules only when doing so is inyour immediate interest.

    CONVENTIONAL: Living upto what is expected bypeople close to you and maintaining conventional order byfulfilling obligations to which you have agreed.

    PRINCIPLED: Valuing rights of others and upholding

    absolute values and rights regardless of the majoritysopinion and following self-chosen ethical principles even ifthey violate the law.

  • 8/8/2019 Ethics and Social Responibilities

    14/18

    INDIVIDUAL CHARACTERISTICS

    Two personality variables influence an individuals actions. They are :

    EGO STRENGTH: It is a personality measure of the strength of a personsconvictions . People who score high on ego strength are likely to resist impulses toact unethically and instead follow their convictions. That is, individuals high on egostrength are more likely to do what they think is right.

    LOCUS OF CONTROL: It is a personality attribute that measures the degree towhich people believe they control their own fate. People with an internal locus ofcontrol believe that they control their own destinies ; those with an external locus

    believe that what happens to them is due to luck or chance. Externals are less likelyto take personal responsibility for the consequences of their behavior and are morelikely to rely on external forces. Internals on the other hand are more likely to takeresponsibility for consequences and rely on their internal standards of right andwrong to guide their behavior. Employees with an internal locus of control are likelyto be more consistent in their moral judgments and actions than external ones.

  • 8/8/2019 Ethics and Social Responibilities

    15/18

    STRUCTURAL VARIABLES

    An organizations structural design influences whether

    employees behave ethically. Some structures provide strong

    guidance , whereas others create ambiguity and uncertainty.

    Structural designs that minimize ambiguity and uncertainty

    through formal rules and regulations and those that

    continuously remind employees of what is ethical are more

    likely to encourage ethical behaviour. Other organizational

    mechanisms that influence ethics include the use of goals ,

    performance appraisal systems , and reward allocationprocedures.

  • 8/8/2019 Ethics and Social Responibilities

    16/18

    ORGANIZATIONS CULTURE

    An organizational culture most likely to encourage

    high ethical standards is one thats high in risk

    tolerance, control and conflict tolerance. The

    employees in such a culture are encouraged to beaggressive and innovative. If the culture is strong

    and supports high ethical standards, it has a very

    powerful and positive influence on their decision to

    act ethically or unethically.

  • 8/8/2019 Ethics and Social Responibilities

    17/18

    ISSUE INTENSITY

    The determinants of issue intensity are : Greatness of harm Consensus of wrong Probability of harm Immediacy of consequences Proximity to victims Concentration of effect The larger the number of people harmed ,the more agreement that the

    action is wrong , the greater the likelihood that the action will cause harm, the more immediately that the consequences of the action will be felt,

    the closer the person feels to the victim, and the more concentrated theeffect of the action on the victims , the greater the issue intensity. Themore intense an ethical issue is, the more the employees would behaveethically.

  • 8/8/2019 Ethics and Social Responibilities

    18/18