evaluation of transporter abundance variance and its ...evaluation of transporter abundance variance...
TRANSCRIPT
Evaluation of transporter abundance variance and its impact on IVIVE and inter-species comparison Buyun Chen June 14th, 2018
2 Transporter abundance is important for PBPK model
Physiological parameter
Compound parameter
PBPK model
3
Scaling transporter data: RAF vs REF
Relative Activity factor
Pitavastatin
CLhep=CLoatp8*RAF1
CLhep=CLoatp2*RAF2
CCK8 E2-Sulfate
Relative Expression Factor
Hepatocyte OATP2/8
Clhep=CLoatp8*REF1
Clhep=CLoatp2*REF2
OATP2 cell OATP8 cell
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
E2-17βGluc Pitavastatin
Hep
tatic
Cle
arnc
e
Predicted OATP8 CL
Predicted OATP2 CL
Observed Clearance
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
E2-17βGluc Pitavastatin
Hep
tatic
Cle
arnc
e
Predicted OATP8 CL
Predicted OATP2 CL
Observed Clearance
Hirano et al, 2004
Lack of selective probe for each transporter.
Over-prediction by REF using western blotting quantitation
4
Challenges in transporter IVIVE
No selective substrate Abundance very low
Welger, et al, Mol Pharm, 2017
5 Huge variation in literature results using LC-MS
Livers from 10 donors tested in 6 labs Variation of OATP1B1 abundance up to 120 fold
Welger, et al, Mol Pharm, 2017
• Significant clearance variation of atorvastatin resulted from
using different ISEF in absolute scaling
6
7 Sources of variation
Extraction
Peptide selection Digestion
8 Impact of peptide selection on quantitation result
Harwood, et al, DMD, 2015
Different peptide selection for PGP and BCRP from BPh and UoM
Different abundance reported for Caco-2 and intestinal abundance
9
Extraction
Digestion
Quantitation
Protein vs peptide based quantitation
Protein Conc Peptide Conc
Pept
ide
sign
al
Pept
ide
sign
al
Sample Standard Sample
Standard
MDR1
10 Peptide screening strategy
FASTA <UniProt>
Hepatocytes/Liver Tissues Membrane Protein Extraction
<Millpore Kit or whole cell lysate>
Protein Denature & Tryptic Digestion <5%DOC, spin column, trypsin>
LC-MS/MS Analysis <Sciex 6500 QTrap>
Trypsin Digestion, 6-16 AA Exist in all isoform No Cys, Met, His No Ragged end No PTM, SNP
No transmembrane region Spike in protein std
Overexpression cell line for low abundance transporters
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Selecting peptides with highest digestion efficiency
© 2009, Genentech
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
Pept
ide
Con
cent
ratio
n(nM
))
Surrogate Peptides
Pre-Spike
Post Spike
First example from MDR1
Digestion efficiency =Post Spike − Pre Spike peptide concentration
Spiked in protein concentration
8-10 fold higher than commonly used peptide
Chen, B. et al, The AAPS Journal 2017, epub
12 Reasons for different digestion efficiency
EALDESIPPVSFWR 1. “Elbow region” connecting two
halves of homo dimer in lower species
2. Not an integral part of large stretches of tertiary structures
STV and FYD Adjacent to ATP binding sequence, more accessible to digestion enzyme
Jian Payandeh
13
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
GAA EAL IIG NTT STV FYD VLL VVQ
Con
cent
ratio
n(nM
)
Surrogate Peptide
Male, 37, smokerMale, 61Male, 53Female, 62Female, 54, Alcohol, CocaineFemale, 84
Determination in liver and comparison to literature
Reference Ohtsuki et al, 201214 Prasad et al, 201315 Peng et al, 201512 This study
n= 17 64 141 6 MDR1(NTT) 1.50±0.44 0.4±0.2 0.6±0.2 0.90±0.37 MDR1(IAT) 0.3±0.2 0.77±0.47 MDR1(EAL) 16.78±5.48
Extraction Ultracentrifugation PM Millipore kit PM Millipore kit PM Millipore kit PM
Digestion enhancment procedure
6M Urea Extraction buffer II DOC, dilute/dry DOC, spin column
Chen, et al, AAPS J, 2017
14 Similar correlation for BSEP
Reference Li et al,. 2009 This study
n= 17 Pooled hepatocyte STALQLIQR 3.50±0.60
AAATSIFETIDR 5.41±0.40 VGFFQLFR 7.17±0.02
Extraction Millipore kit Crude membrane Millipore kit Crude membrane
Digestion enhancment procedure
N/A DOC, spin column
15 Extraction procedure effect
Cytosolic
Membrane
Pellet
Whole cell
lysate Hepatocyte
16 Extraction effect: Correction factor possible
• MDR1 Slope>1, not 100% on membrane;
• R2>0.9, a correction factor can be applied
17 Digestion condition effect
Solubilization • Deoxycholate, Urea, or extraction buffer
Detergent removal
• Spin column or MWCO filter
Digestion • Trypsin/LysC
18 Solubilization effect is dependent of peptide selection
Balogh et al., J Proteomics Bioinform 2012, S4
19 Digestion condition effect
• Slope<1: Digestion efficiency less than 5% DOC • R2<0.9, digestion factor not likely applicable
independent of peptide selection
20 Characterizing novel in vitro model
Knock out Canine Mdr1 gene
Overexpression of human MDR1 protein
Comparison with tranditional MDR1 overexpression cell lines
CRISPER-Cas9
Eugene Chen
21 Correlating activity and expression abundance
Human MDR1 with canine background
Human MDR1 without canine background
• Difference in substrate specificity? • Difference in expression abundance?
22 Selecting animal model for OATP DDI in vivo study
• Shared sequence
• Homologous sequence
Peptide seledtion
• Pooled heptoctyes • Comparison of multi-
peptide pairs
Quantitation • Extent of DDI in human and cyno
• Analyze in context of in vitro IC50
In vivo study
23 OATPs: comparison of different species
Literature data
1 B 1 _ H u ma n /C
y n o .ITP
1 B 1 _ H u ma n /C
y n o .NV T
1 B 1 _ H u ma n /C
y n o .YV E
1 B 3 _ H U M A N .NV T
1 B 3 _ H U M A N .IYN
1 B 3 _ H u ma n _ N Q T C
y n o _ S Q T
nM
OATP1B1 OATP1B3
Genentech data
• Hepatocyte o Liver
24 Homologous peptide in cyno and human
Distance to TMD longer
Continuous R/K near cleavage site
Cyno OATP1B3 Human
Cyno OATP1B1 Human
25 monkey as the model of human OATP DDI prediction
Maeda et al, Clinical pharmacology & therapeutics | volume 90 number 4 | october 2011
C o n trol
+ R if
Pra
va
sta
tin
AU
C/d
os
e
In vitro
In vivo
Eugene Chen and Kevin Dement
C o n trol
+ R if
Pra
va
sta
tin
AU
Cla
st
C o n trol
+ R if
Pra
va
sta
tin
AU
Cla
st
0
1
2
3
4
I C 5 0
o f R
i f Human Monkey
26 Conclusion and Future work
Peptide selection could have significant impact on quantitation result
Extraction effect can be corrected by a factor independent of peptide selection
Digestion effect is peptide dependent Interspecies correlation should be conducted with consideration
of homologous peptide selection
Bridging literature data gap and better DOE for meta-analysis Transporter localization/regulation/turn-over
Acknowledgement • Liling Liu • Yuan Chen • Jialin Mao, • Hoangdung Ho • Jian Payandeh • Eugene Chen • Kevin Dement • Edna Choo • Emile Plise • Jonathan Cheung • Laurent Salphati
Alan Deng Brian Dean Marcel Hop