exergy analysis of direct and indirect combustion of methanol

3
Exergy Analysis of Direct and Indirect Combustion of Methanol by Utilizing Solar Energy or Waste Heat H. P. Nuwan S. De Alwis, Abdulmajeed A. Mohamad, and Anil K. Mehrotra The paper compares the Direct and indirect (conversion to syn gas before subsequent combustion) of methanol using exergy analysis. In the indirect process, waste heat or solar energy is being used to decompose methanol in Syn gas (CO and H 2 ) before combustion. Exergy can be defined as the available or net extractable heat of a system. According to the author's analysis, the indirect route not only extracts more energy but also has a higher exergetic efficiency (6-7% higher) compared to direct combustion of methanol. The main idea of the paper is to be able to convert and store waste heat or renewable energy in the form of chemical energy, thereby reducing consumption of petroleum fuels. Direct Combustion of Methanol: The overall exergetic efficiency of the direct combustion of methanol is defined as the ratio of net exergy output of the system to the exergy of methanol feed. That is, = + 1 0 × 100% Fig.1: Schematic of combustion system (direct combustion of methanol) showing the exergy transfer

Upload: sulabh-gupta

Post on 07-Nov-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Combustion Methanol

TRANSCRIPT

  • Exergy Analysis of Direct and Indirect Combustion of Methanol by

    Utilizing Solar Energy or Waste Heat

    H. P. Nuwan S. De Alwis, Abdulmajeed A. Mohamad, and Anil K. Mehrotra

    The paper compares the Direct and indirect (conversion to syn gas before subsequent

    combustion) of methanol using exergy analysis. In the indirect process, waste heat or

    solar energy is being used to decompose methanol in Syn gas (CO and H2) before

    combustion.

    Exergy can be defined as the available or net extractable heat of a system. According to

    the author's analysis, the indirect route not only extracts more energy but also has a

    higher exergetic efficiency (6-7% higher) compared to direct combustion of methanol.

    The main idea of the paper is to be able to convert and store waste heat or renewable

    energy in the form of chemical energy, thereby reducing consumption of petroleum fuels.

    Direct Combustion of Methanol:

    The overall exergetic efficiency of the direct combustion of methanol is defined as the ratio of net exergy output of the system to the exergy of methanol feed. That is,

    = + 1

    0

    100%

    Fig.1: Schematic of combustion system (direct combustion of

    methanol) showing the exergy transfer

  • Indirect Combustion of Methanol :

    The overall exergetic efficiency of the indirect combustion of methanol is defined as the ratio of net exergy output of the system to the total exergy input of the

    system, which consists of exergy of the total heat input and the exergy of ethanol

    feed. That is,

    = + 1

    0

    10 +

    100%

    Results and Analysis:

    Maximum exergy upgrade was possible between 400-500K which also corresponds to max decomposition efficiency.

    Exergy loss of Direct combustion is higher, as methanol has a tendency to convert to syn gas between 375-500K. Exergy losses in indirect process on the other hand

    are solely because of losses in decomposition and combustion processes.

    Fig.3: Exergy destruction of direct and indirect combustion with

    decomposition temperature.

    Fig.2: Schematic of reactor and combustion system (indirect combustion)

    showing the exergy transfer.

  • Nomenclature:

    out Exergy of the exit stream H2O Exergy of H2O CO2 Exergy of CO2 in Exergy of input stream (methanol) CH3OH Exergy of Methanol Qdirect Heat from combustion

    T0 Ambient temperature

    T Operating temperature

    Exergetic efficiency of indirect combustion Exergetic efficiency of direct combustion

    Q Heat Transfer

    Fig.4: Overall exergetic efficiency with decomposition temperature