1. Exploring Interagency Information Sharing
Ashley Cairns (1st Year PHd)

2. And More!
3. BackgroundQuotes
Importance of Information
Need to Cost Cut
For the police service to be intelligence led in protecting the public, preventing crime and bringing criminals to justice then the effective management of information is vital
MOPI Guidance 2005
15m of saving by 2011/12 with a further 19.4m by 2014/15 with a requirement to save the majority in the first two years of the plan
Chief Constables statement 2010
4. Why is Information Sharing important to the police?
Lord Laming
Review
2003
Climbie
Murder
2000
Impact
Program
2004
MOPI
2005
Soham
murders
2002
Bichard
Inquiry
2004
INI
2005
PND
2012?
5. Some of the Factors Influencing Interagency Information Sharing
6. Interorganizational Cooperation (Weiss)
Presence of a problem that benefits from a co-operative solution
Existence of resources to address the common problem
An institutional capacity to carry out a co-operative program.
OR An External crisis or change agent
7. Dawes Interagency Information Benefits and Barriers
Dawes Theoretical Model of Interagency Information Sharing
8. Frameworks
Hatalas Information Sharing Model
Pan and Scarbroughs Sociotechnical Model
Richardsons Outcomes of Information Sharing
9. Some Aims and current thoughts of my work ...

Understand the current information sharing environment at Leicestershire Constabulary 10. Identify existing barriers to information sharing and how these can be overcome. 11. Does a framework exist which can be used for designing future information sharing situations? 12. Is a cloud solution a viable option?

SomeReferences
BBC NEWS, 24/11/2010, , Council fined 100,000 after child sex abuse fax error. Available: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-11823671 [30/11, 2010].
IMPACT program - http://www.npia.police.uk/en/15087.htm
WEISS, J.A, 1987. Pathways to cooperation among public agencies. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 7(1), pp 94-117.
DAWES, S.S., 1996b. Interagency information sharing: Expected benefits, manageable risks. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 15(3), pp. 377-394.
HATALA, J.P. and LUTTA, J., 2009. Managing information sharing within an organizational setting: A social network perspective. - John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
PAN, S. and SCARBROUGH, H., 1998. A Socio-Technical View of Knowledge Sharing at Buckman Laboratories. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(1), pp. 55-66.
RICHARDSON, S. and ASTHANA, S., June 2006. Inter-agency Information Sharing in Health and Social Care Services: The Role of Professional Culture. British Journal of Social Work, 36(4), pp. 657-669.
LANDSBERGEN JR., D. and WOLKEN JR., G., 2001. Realizing the Promise: Government Information Systems and the Fourth Generation of Information Technology. Public administration review, 61(2), pp. 206-220.
PeterGottschalk andGeoff Deane.g.
DEAN, G. and GOTTSCHALK, P., 2007. Knowledge management in policing and law enforcement : foundations, structures, applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
GOTTSCHALK, P., 2010. Policing organized crime : intelligence strategy implementation. Boca Raton, Fla.; London: CRC; Taylor & Francis distributor.
GOTTSCHALK, P., 2009. Policing the police : knowledge management in law enforcement. Hauppauge, N.Y.: Nova Science.
GOTTSCHALK, P., 2006. Knowledge Management Systems in Law Enforcement : Technologies and Techniques. Hershey, PA: Idea Group, Inc.
13. Anyquestions?
Email - lsasc@lboro.ac.uk