ffimbft^ £znw&l^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm · 2014. 8. 26. · ffimbft^ £znw&l^y * -91...

29
m.mffim-b>?- ftmrns ≪25# 1992*11/1 ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t (dmm The Relationship between Satellite-derivedCloudParameters and Measured Maximum Wind Speed in the Typhoon Genesis Stage Yoshiyuki Abe, Yoshihisa Makino, Koetsu Chubachi and Tadayoshi Ueno Abstract The Tropical Cyclone Analysis Working Group in the Meteorological Satellite Center is promoting a subject for the technological development on the typhoon genesis judgement using GMS imagery since 1989 in cooperation with the RSMC Tokyo-Typhoon Center. The main purpose of this development is to establish the bases and method which can suggest the possibility of typhoon genesis roughly within 24 hours before using GMS infrared imagery. Next themes were aimed in the investigation for the technological development. (1) Using maximum wind speed near the tropical cyclone's depression center measured on the aircraft in the period from 1982 to 1986 as objective corre- spondence data. (2) Parameterizing the 6 hourly characteristics of the cloud appearance and the 6 h variation trend in the organizing stage of a tropical cyclone as follows, and investigating synthetically these parameter points. a) Appearance of Cumulonimbus (Cb) in 9 regions centering the cloud system center of a tropical cyclone that suggest the characteristic on deep convection. (Named "Cb parameter") 9 regions are devided by three circles (their radii are 250km, 500km and 750km) and two lines (NW-SE and NE-SW line through the cloud system center). Only the central region is circle, others are fan figure. b) Appearance of curved cloud band (for only a typhoon developed in "Band pattern") or dense cloud overcast (for only a typhoon developed in "DO (1992^8^280^, 1992^9 ft 6 B^S) -15-

Upload: others

Post on 02-Mar-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm · 2014. 8. 26. · ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm The Relationshipbetween Satellite-derivedCloud Parameters and Measured Maximum

m.mffim-b>?- ftmrns ≪25# 1992*11/1

ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t (dmm

The Relationship between Satellite-derivedCloud Parameters

and Measured Maximum Wind Speed in the Typhoon Genesis Stage

Yoshiyuki Abe, Yoshihisa Makino, Koetsu Chubachi and Tadayoshi Ueno

Abstract

The Tropical Cyclone Analysis Working Group in the Meteorological Satellite

Center is promoting a subject for the technological development on the typhoon

genesis judgement using GMS imagery since 1989 in cooperation with the RSMC

Tokyo-Typhoon Center.

The main purpose of this development is to establish the bases and method

which can suggest the possibility of typhoon genesis roughly within 24 hours before

using GMS infrared imagery.

Next themes were aimed in the investigation for the technological development.

(1) Using maximum wind speed near the tropical cyclone's depression center

measured on the aircraft in the period from 1982 to 1986 as objective corre-

spondence data.

(2) Parameterizing the 6 hourly characteristics of the cloud appearance and the

6 h variation trend in the organizing stage of a tropical cyclone as follows, and

investigating synthetically these parameter points.

a) Appearance of Cumulonimbus (Cb) in 9 regions centering the cloud

system center of a tropical cyclone that suggest the characteristic on deep

convection. (Named "Cb parameter")

9 regions are devided by three circles (their radii are 250km, 500km and

750km) and two lines (NW-SE and NE-SW line through the cloud system

center). Only the central region is circle, others are fan figure.

b) Appearance of curved cloud band (for only a typhoon developed in "Band

pattern") or dense cloud overcast (for only a typhoon developed in "DO

(1992^8^280^, 1992^9 ft 6 B^S)

-15-

Page 2: ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm · 2014. 8. 26. · ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm The Relationshipbetween Satellite-derivedCloud Parameters and Measured Maximum

METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE CENTER TECHNICAL NOTE No. 25 NOVEMBER 1992

pattern") that suggest the characteristic on deep convection too. (Named

"Band/DO parameter")

c) Appearance of Cirrus (Ci) streak that suggest the characteristic on

divergence at the upper layer. (Named "Ci parameter")

The following 3 subjects were clarifiedthrough the investigation.

(1) Each parameter point was defined as adding the appearance point and the

6 h variation trend point ("Cb parameter" was calculated as regional

weighed average). Three parameter points were added to the "total point",

and the "total point" at once was supposed that it meight describe the

maximum wind speed at the time.

In this situation, correlation coefficientsbetween the "total points" and

the measured maximum winds were smaller than 0.4. But, correlation

coefficientbetween the "total point" averages within 24 h before and the

maximum winds was higher as 0.575 for "DO pattern". On the other hand,

the same operation had not good correlation for "Band pattern".

(2) As the next process, "Cb parameter" points were checked individuallyin

each region considering the time average and time lag against the measured

maximum wind. As a result, time averaged "Cb parameter" points in the

peculiar region depending on the cloud pattern had higher correlation

coefficientsbetween the maximum winds considering the time lag extend to

increase in wind speed.

Likewise, time averaged "Band/DO parameter" points and "Ci parame-

ter" points considering the time lag had higher correlation coefficients

between the maximum winds.

(3) Using 3 parameter points which were detected through the(2) process and

had higher correlation coefficients, for "Band pattern", the "total points"

by the product of next 3 parameter points including the Coriolis factor

a) Average of "Cb parameter" point (adding the appearance point and the

6 h variation trend point in the central region) at -06h, -12h, -18h and

-24h.

b) Average of "Band/DO parameter" point (adding the appearance point

and the 6 h variation trend point) at -24h and -30h.

c ) Average of "Ci parameter" point (adding the appearance point and the

6 h variation trend point) at OOh and -06h.

d) The Coriolis factor depending on the latitude of the Cloud System

Center.

-16-

Page 3: ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm · 2014. 8. 26. · ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm The Relationshipbetween Satellite-derivedCloud Parameters and Measured Maximum

%Mffim.-t>9- mmms 8 25-s 1992*11*3

had higher correlation coefficient (0.539 for all wind speed, and 0.418 for

wind speed less than 35 knots) between the maximum winds.

And for "DO pattern", the "total points" by the sum of next 3 parameter

points multiplying by the multiple regression coefficientsincluding a bias

a ) Average of "Cb parameter" point (adding the appearance point and the

6 h variation trend point in the western medium region) at -12h and -18

h multiplying by 0.7407.

b) Average of "Band/DO parameter" point (adding the appearance point

and the 6 h variation trend point) at OOh and -06h multiplying by 0.3726.

c ) Average of "Ci parameter" point (adding the appearance point and the

6 h variation trend point) at -06h and -12h multiplying by 0.1883.

d) 2.7071 as a bias.

had higher correlation coefficient(0.607 for all wind speed, and 0.777 for

wind speed less than 35 knots).

Using the relationship between the "total points" decided through (3) and

measured maximum winds, the bases and method for the typhoon genesis judgement

were expected basically.

i. iii;≪>tc

*>,m^MMtmtimwLS^± (3iy ^ y, 17.2

(b) tisRftT, mzftmtTWfeLx, +

― j, %Mfrfm$, 1990)tzt>t TWLtzVTia

rTDj tvi-5) tm^Lrummmztezm^,

v Y*mi-tz*^frm\fe*%fflft\z.nsmt-t%

-17-

Page 4: ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm · 2014. 8. 26. · ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm The Relationshipbetween Satellite-derivedCloud Parameters and Measured Maximum

METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE CENTER TECHNICAL NOTE No. 25 NOVEMBER 1992

(i) m*imztt-t<m

(b) cb -emmztizm'*>Fmmvmwi

Cb -r#§/&£tizdo (wm-cPiB^^-t

(2) ±JI5SR*^"t!≫#ft

(c) SVXrAc^L^^^>^^tBt-CiX

6B#K£K:)ff>fyh^fco 3oc^^-^

T#^N"^-y@Wc^K\^≪"JIBb, /^ybv^

x h n y ^- y a-? fc#i*-r s) -r^i-^^\!j^^

iai≪^*M>b, DO^^-y-cttcm^c

^P (357 y h*≫lcflb*JiSJiJ:C:^C*fJ5£:fS#

*°-fy b *J, ^^ilUl^Ms^^ < sffi^-t§ - h

-18-

2. mmfmtwmjm

2. 1

ma

≪£*j£/^^-**ttarr*£S<&

1982^> h 1986*£K:f&£b fc-&l0 5 t>, JUT

(a) ^Xfh7^ (m#ijf I^WW

5^L^Bt^iJ^^C, TDlfH^C 2 @JU

±, ^H^±^24^KJU^J3 1@JU±c

(b) %^^^i^% (#1:7^ y tfynao

StRb^-^ill^, JUTc23<@t**5o

1982^ T8204, T8208, T8209,

T8210, T8211, T8212,

T8213, T8219, T8221,

T8222

1983^ T8309

1984^ T8405, T8406, T8408,

T8412, T8417, T8425,

T8426

1985^ T8509, T8520

1986^ T8606, T8607, T8610

2. 2 femuzm*

(i) ^n

(2) -<Xb h^y^r-^

g(≪≫s/igs),?sM≪fsm£E,&mijfa/mm

Page 5: ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm · 2014. 8. 26. · ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm The Relationshipbetween Satellite-derivedCloud Parameters and Measured Maximum

$mmm-&>*- mtmm *25# 1992*11 a

(3) mnmMMT-7

v>t>R 3 RECCO r - ^ t% %^MMM > ?

2. 3 matm

Cu/Cb c<fc6ff

?U^yFoft$*f

(b) Cb?yX?-(Dmi]nttp>\jffi^(DM

Cb^7X^-*5M3ifbU DO(Cb

(c) 0|gc^^fb

ho

TV^O

fit, ^fc0^^'J^/^^-^^31iRL,

-19-

ismmmm (Y-£?v?m k&vzwm.

£\!i£RrtgftiS3!t£gA,*foJsv^K^psoji

― j (MMfT^mffi, 1990) dot

(b) ≫?g^Mc^gSl (DO/^-y, Cb

-^> h cM#^ * tzo T tt, ^K±c#^SLc

(a) Cb ^^-^ : ^v^^tRc#^ 1

S^XrA^^ \&750kmJ^ p*g

(b) band/do /^ ^ -^ : m^Mun

> F^3 DO ZMfetZo ^> HVn°^-

Page 6: ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm · 2014. 8. 26. · ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm The Relationshipbetween Satellite-derivedCloud Parameters and Measured Maximum

+ 4

+ 6

+ 2

+ 2

0

- 4

-8

0

- 4

QO

+ 8

METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE CENTER TECHNICAL NOTE No. 25 NOVEMBER 1992

fl^LfcI->XfAW (CSC) **'Ci>t'tS^g250km, 500km, 750kmcP3fc, ;|tffi-p&Jfl?JfS]t^tS-^ffi^l"]c 2 jtHTH

ttl*Wh (APPT)

cb (m^mm) #**> Cb tfffl$,<D 9 SJJiLt£ fi * £

Cb a*^c 5 ffl~9 ≫J£ fiftS

Cb t>mm<D 1 ≫J~5 SI4- iS * 5

cb (m^mm hm^

[

&ffii% (R) tMfr (a) ]

CSC : iv'Xfi^

w <-

rtffllJRC^fi : 250km

^PbIRc^?! : 500km

fl-fflRc^ : 750km

mo

6 BffS^fbffilnJrfM y h (TRPT)

30

20

10

0

N

s

Cb<D&it>ZR£tmiJQltz

cb cfife s m-& &%.!£&

tz

zm^TMIJULtz

6 PfFaiMC h i tzCb ifi*<D&tmmvtz

t tzit, mtz g cb tm^. l tz

6mmmtit^xmmm<^

Ltztz&, mm^z\imm<D^.

oo\tmk*wmLx^z>

mmkM <%~>tz

6 mmffifrt>%itzim3iLtz a> **w-s

6 mmwiiz≪ cb ^ i #j~ 59M -dtz

emmm ^ a cb *? 5 m w±w o /c

a, = 8

a2 = 2

a, = 4

a, = 4

as = 2

a* = 1

a7 = 2E

≪81

CbA^M-?c*0^ y h

2 (APPT+TRPT)jXai

2 a\

-20-

Page 7: ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm · 2014. 8. 26. · ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm The Relationshipbetween Satellite-derivedCloud Parameters and Measured Maximum

%MRm-t>*- &mm% m25* 1992 s 111

2 BANDAR-;? (A'>F^7-yfIILfc6a) 2 DO^yJ-? (DO^5'->T%&Ltzi3m,)DOi^'L-tti&tDCblzXZmtDJimtiZttLX, r'-$kBj(DO

tztzU DO &mMlfflm\~eISi^li, #DOCMLtrtt

・ ・ m^t6^>h"^D0im^O2(D^^y Y = 0, mtciZ%-£.LtzOmkM&=+ 2 3,MLfcOfffifi=-2s ・・

ttlffirff-fy h (APPT) 6mm^.itm^s^^>h (trpt) WMtfj y y (appt) 6mm^tmfom > v (trpt)

CSC c iu.

B

SRIOOkm10

CSC c fiB

+1 c DO cUfa

fttSCSCcfig

DO 1*1 10 c DOOlfaj

fttscsc

+1

D0≪#± 5RlOOkm <

SR250km

5 mtttLSft*L 0 DO 9\- 0

;≪**"?/; - 1

> R250km 0Mitfr-^tz - 1 SD500km 10

±%<%otz + 1

1/2W± 10

ttcg£

(flllffi)

JK&ofc + 1 D200kmS

<D500km

5

S-ftfttL 0

1/4-1/2 5 mibML 0

<D200km 0'b$<%?tz - 1

1/4JJIT0

R.<%it<: -1

rDO a hi-,

ci§£ttR

Cbil/2 10

c*§£≫c '

mtaLtz + 1

(3) ^">Ffi

C fi * -5

Cb cffl£-

2/3JJl± 10

C £ & S

Cb c≪・£■

mtaLt: +1

ORc=0 01/3-2/3 5 SftML 0Cb^l/2 5

1/3JUT 0

m&Ltz - 1 ffi'PLtz - 1

Cb <l/2

ORc=0

0

APPT =R+c+(3)

+ fS^ (TI3)

T=c+c+c

TRPT = 2T (T> 0)

0 (T=0)

ABS(T)-2 (T <0)

T =c+c+c

TRPT = 2T (T> 0)

0 (T=0)

ABS(T)- 2 (T <0)

APPT =R+c+R

+mm (Tie)

ttt^-1"V h - 5

1. I-VXfAif'L'Cavw^F2. RfHftCjfiRbTV^^N'VK

* do<D&#.tmm :mm=3: 2^±cisr≫*^(i^am^

ymm yy - 5

1. S^XrA^'^CJfiv^DO2. B#pBTOC^fMLTV^DO3. ffJttAJRtlFr^nO

BAND/DO A7 * -?oyifs4 y h=APPT + TRPT

±mimnimo>'<7jt-9it

3 Ci^7J<~? (&/■?;?-ye&JI)

*>L^^fI750lunWftt^3iLT±Jffg|fc£^1-C i X h V~?<DWmis f&%J£&&mz*tLX, rttiL t r 6 B#W^fbffi

DO≫7->≫1A O #<l\'ttWro?7X*-JIgB;&>ioPfc££ii-tC i X h V-? iZ^BTZ

WMtfJ y Y (APPT) 6B#W£fl:ffi|fi]#-f >- h (TRPT)

9. ^oS!≪ffttfl**M-r5

30

CiX h ')-7(D* ・ 'M^B.'&tii^t bMfiULtz + 8

+ 420

Ci x l-u -?c≫ ・ M^.g.'&.&mb fctte'iv^ 0

ttcti,

SffliJW^f-i Ci X b i;- ? ≪WS A?,MMEttft\tt * *0 SLftn

10

- 4

Cix h 'j-^c≫-ffi≪;Ettft$tia^u/c -8

%%t.£^tmm% a x b y~?nm> 0 6m?3fm<D'tt.Mb±% te^LikteM^ 0

-8

Qa'^v t-9(Fn?s4yy = APPT 4- TRPT

-21-

Page 8: ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm · 2014. 8. 26. · ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm The Relationshipbetween Satellite-derivedCloud Parameters and Measured Maximum

METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE CENTER TECHNICAL NOTE No. 25 NOVEMBER 1992

(c) Ci^y*-9 :±S #§ifcc#ft

S^XrA^L^£4^1750kmJ^F*|

fcbT, 6 B#r^c#B#M^i3^S ^tL^^Lc

Mk^^-t r 6 Bfr≪M![R]*M y b j ^M^

J!Jfi24H#McfmH#KK:*fLT, 6^K≪T13

S&cff^XrA^i>£>fiigte, ^Xhb77

(D2MV TRML, £*l£Of@≪cfife'≪kt/^§

££l£5£fc:J:^>|g^*M > h cfit*, **R^

3. iiSMm

3 1 ft*H&£0)NUctiM&*#AL&i*

BAND/DO^'7^-;, Ci^?S~7(D&tf

%i m*m,mt(DmcmmMz%m.i-%^m£.mfe^£z>&tf'(>v tmxm&vmM

#4 yv

/*yY;<? ―V D0a7->

w&m <35Kt f&5£& <35Kt

Cb^-X-^dM y\- 0.235 0.090 0.003 -0.076

BAND/DO a?? * - 9 tf-f> b 0.301 0.154 0.230 0.197

C\><yA-?m >Y 0.248 -0.141 0.357 0.148

*g£rtM>h (TP fctt-T) 0.404 0.030 0.341 0.192

ffiffi?-?R&) I (58)J (26)J (69)J (20)

6mmwitm&<DTP_(Dmikm. | 0.277i 0.239 ―0.122i -0.305

(wmr-^mm.) 1 (57)・ (25)1 (69)■ (20)

m&Z&tsmiftM (00,-06,-12,-18h)<DTP (DW-tSm.

*1 fFffi≫L#WI

0.123 i

0.305 i

-0.068

-0.228

r<35Ktj : 35/ v Y%m(Dm±!&,&t, ttfot Z&tf-i > b t<OWS

―9.9―

-0.125 :

0.575 :

-0,118

0.371

Page 9: ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm · 2014. 8. 26. · ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm The Relationshipbetween Satellite-derivedCloud Parameters and Measured Maximum

mMRm-£>*- mm% i&25-§- 1992^11/1

MiRjrfM y h cin) £feT, *<DmM?<D&

> h ≪ 9 -o(DffimT(DiUS^i^ttSo

MStfjyv=

^WftM<D Cb ^y *-9iS4y

h

[≪i*M y v clac 9 ^^tc

+ ^MB#^!lc BAND/DO a°7 ^ -

(≪H*Mybh60#r≪fbM

i≪ijK^y h cin)

+ ^MS#^JcCi/No7^-^*°-f y

h

ft*°-f> b cla)

■ftzfo%, mmmmtD&tfjyvmtfzvmM

MLtzmmtemb^ 6 mrmommomt u

i2K, MXJMM t (DmC^rMM £#£t b ^

v^^^J^^(l)c≪k £#*°-f y h h§^:M^c

^jl^c L § vifil=&^^ u & vit^t cft^:R

r^^^j) t, 357 v YJm<DWKwm% (-t

yHc**^Clfei^ (^^c r<35Ktj)

c, 2RD-CfHffib^o

&K7Jk-tX 5 K,Cb^y *―9, BAND/DO

-23-

'*?*-?, Ci^°7^-?c#*My bfc'=tt/

->Tl3M&ti'i > Y (BMM) c0.404, DO

s*?->"C\*Citi'i>Y (W&M) c0.357*5

Kff^iS^C Cb ? 7 X * -d^'L^jfi^^

(00,-06,-12,-18 h) Tc\i^fiihbTM

cTI£K:^-fo

L^ U DO /n°- yttt, UStf-i > h cIff4

^"CO.575, 357 ^yb*icf-^^|hU

^#^cffiK"C0.371-e*t), ^^^MBt^iJc

-y-Ctt, fi^c/N°^^-^df-f y hc|U^J;

≫iir*M y b C^Kfi!J^\^fil*#ltf 5 i:,

7^-^^yf ^|g^jK>f y b c0#fH^fb*

S^otv^o icaftfi, #^°^-yTc-^

Jlf^CSS^c#R*s^*S ^ b *mLX^

Iffi§#^7-vt'^infi ^M^fe § b

Page 10: ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm · 2014. 8. 26. · ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm The Relationshipbetween Satellite-derivedCloud Parameters and Measured Maximum

3

METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE CENTER TECHNICAL NOTE No. 25 NOVEMBER 1992

Steranka fife(1986m, *Mff(Dm^i&%J±

^tosti^s (6 mm^-m **238K * * &*

fr&TT &o£#£ £, 71%(DmtiT2mfML

(DWckMMfi* 5 m/s SitzfcZfl\>X±MXU^j

fcfg'g-bT&D, Cb^7X^-c^£|t:*c

JUoi t *t)^ $ -frS ^ ti, m$(D Cb O^It tt

^・cfflfl^/J^^v^sshit, H;*;ratc^1

febtitzo

% z.Tmz., ^yb'fc'j;t/ DO c^^^±M

fl^(7)Cb/^^-^^M>b (9M^Tcjjn

t 6^H^<b1SlRl*M>bcffiJ;t^) cJ:b^

mMZfflM t [rICBf^lJ^ 6 6 B#f^^PBr24B#

v>) ^lu 6 0#rH^^fii24B#^^-r(Z)*M y b c

-24-

\Ml, S.tz ^357 v Y ^m(Dm.-XMMm. tzti

^MHtfcif 6 ^W^<b* (±t- 9 x*v$m%

^S18^^HU0ifl8^F^^<k≫ (357 v Y^m

T(Dmm%m.462) ^^T^m^M^o ^#

C, M^ 5 ^fl^ 9 Cfc'^ §Bf^^bl t(Dm

ffli>nm*m>xyo;7XTi%<t }m\wmm

nmm a*R*, tzimR 5*>mm5t9T8

M^cS^TV^o ^cffecpl^ (1, 4, 6,

8) T&l£^fc*a*v^XfBM£&oTV>£c

■frhim3tf&$&titdffi$ix*ib v, '*> f/^

―^, (2)c DO /N°^-y-T≪, ISM 1 \z38tf

0.428) h Wk 2 C Jo^ S 24^F^Bif c HU18^f^

^bM(35/ v v^m-c(Dwmm.5A21 mm

<, $>b&4:X-?>(i-ZW%fc%:^X\<>Zo |g

M^ISfec≪6*fM*50.4=&S^^14^|cd *≫^^

4-C7$l££&Tl><5a*, 180#r^ltlc^T-^

^l^< 6^^*^:1131357 7 b*^ (1-^b^

・^m^^fil) c^(^^f f-XlgMd^i < &

oTViSc≪, DO^n°^ ―>"C^it"S-^Mc

Jl^C, gJ/XrA^^^^]^{|ij^250kra^^

500hMm.mtitz&MT(D Cb ^ ^ X ^ -c0t

Page 11: ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm · 2014. 8. 26. · ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm The Relationshipbetween Satellite-derivedCloud Parameters and Measured Maximum

nmRm-b>?- mm% ≫25-§- \<m%.nn

^Zt atfiJ#^4M>g|WcCb^x^-c

&c ii(3)fcii(4)c, mm^mmmiz

≪t£?I≫JCb^9^^^yfi:ft:*dijt

2:cfBM (/^FA7-ytD0^7-≫ £

^1"o r^^Bil(l), (2)fc*lll&&|^i;;fc>\

(3)c/ N*> K /^ - y t*\t,%m 5 c^f^\^

(l)t*, /n*> hVNo^-yr^if S^Jl-C≪|lIi;

< ffi$.5 0^H^b**5ft^iajlfctBM*^v^

^ h &7ji ZtlX^ZW, Z.<Dffl$i,T<DCb ?

Bm\i%mm>-fM'79xmM'cm<, turn

&&<D$ttW&0A*M7Ltzl5ffl<D5%ffi$il 1

-C6$|££≪>TV>5O ^/i, M^4"CftWUi

^lf §i$M>'C\*nC < fl^ 4 c^rK^bM*5

£0≪fc5fc:, ^^JH^ctiMfcM^1-?> Cb

tfc^p^^ ^24B#^fMJtil*c^rH1^<b≫^Bt

MK, BAND/DO/N°7^-^^Ci/n°7 7-

-25-

1(5)^1211(8)^1-0 ft*?U Z(Dm&±X

**, BAND/DO ^°7^-^h Ci'*7* ―?<D

c 121^(i^iiScb T v^ v>o

(5)fc(6)c^M^{fc^L3STtt, BAND/DO/^

7^-^^M^b≪6B#rH1mJc^r-^ (357

y h*^-rctgMf^l^0.581),Ci^o-7^-^^

^yb≪i2B#^fiic^T-^ (^r-^-eoffi

M^ffcO.473) fc<DfSMas&V>0 b^b, BAND/

DO ^n°7 -^ jj?>f> h(D 6 ^f^BUO^t-^

v\,% tz, Ci ^°7 ^ -^ /K^fV b c12^f^huc

^r-^r≪, 357 y h^^rct@M^0.122

-^, (7)a8)0iri\^Ita, BAND/

D0/^7-^*°-f y h-ct@Mf^i^^o.5^M

-^rfpfffib^^-^t35y 7 Y^momMT

;■<>}?/■Zf-yTIZ, BAND/DO^y7-

i^oil^ll^f^^ot BAND/

Page 12: ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm · 2014. 8. 26. · ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm The Relationshipbetween Satellite-derivedCloud Parameters and Measured Maximum

METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE CENTER TECHNICAL NOTE No. 25 NOVEMBER 1992

30

25

20

15

10

5 5

o o

Q_

cd"

-10

-15

-20

-25

30

X Mi

X K /

< X

<

i X*

..H , '"

!""X X \ Tt __

./

H K

X

* *DATA NO. (]> = 56

DATA NO. (21 ・ 24

DATA NO. (31 = 32

CDEFF. ell = 0.082

CDEFF. 121 =■ Q. 477* *

CDEFF. (31 = -0. 0S7

EO HI 1- 0.08*0. 06X*

E0C2I 1--2l.22tl.01X

CO (31 1- 5. 16-0. 05X

R. It 5. (II ≫ 10. 8

R.It 5. (21 - 11. 2

R. n. S. (31 - 10. 4

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 SO 100 110 120

MAX WIND (KTJ

6 msmcom 6 mr&mtm (mm 4)

≪ am ≪ ft*Ba£offinatt

& mi) <35Kt(2) £35Kt(3)

6 m?g\m<D

ffl24ttHX<fbS

9 0.430 0.165 0.325

12fl$Pt8BU<0 6 -0.185 -0.412 -0.220

l!024l$fflKfcft

5 0.423 0.104 0.397

9 0.014 0.462 -0.034

6 0.097 0.424 -0.142

8 0.087 -0.402 0.200

9 0.143 0.437 0.093

24P$fHiIc5 0.245 0.416 0.237

30

2S

2D

IS

ID

S5

D

Q_

0

CD

-10

-15

-20

-25

30

X H

7< ;

x x H ;

y x \ h a )

x x /yX /,・*'* *

f x x A,'*

* J*

y x x

S X

( X X

X

DATA NO. (II = 56

DATA HO. (21 = 24

DATA HO. 131 = 32

CDEFF. 11) ≫ 0.504

COEFF. (21 - -D. 127

COEFF. 131 = 0.454

EQ(1I If- -1. 60*0. 37X

EQ(21 Y- 11. SO-0. 23X

C0C3I T" -5. 1640. 45X

K. n. S. (II ・ 11.5

R. M.S. (21 ・ 9.6

R. M. S. (31 = 10.8

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

MAX WIND (KT)

1 2l$IHlBc£7'-* (≪≪5)

m mm m &±mmt(omm%R.

£ *(i) <35Kt(2) 2;35Kt(3)

24R$Ft8ftjc 8 0.126 -0.482 0.035

5 0.180 0.427 0.226

lillSI&ffl&fcft

1-0.163 -0.486 0.002

4 -0.006 -0.599 0.180

g0.160 -0.413 0.252

[ mttMHMam ]

-24h -18h -12h ―06h OOh

mm

ittbl it

tf

tf

2. 0tfc*^jSilft≪, ft^cilaict§vifl|*IS^-&-fK:, ^Tc*^HiSkCb^<7^~^5K'f >hfccffl08t;:

<fcSI§I≫ji[||T*4o*^2*c|fflv^j≫tt, *^Hi£cU#^fil*35yy hCK5£tt, 35/y h*j≪*J:

3. 0k*C*4(l)*fifLfcitt, ≪^HiicLSVifit*S!:^L*^-C^7'-^*Jtl(l!tfc≪^*^-ro ttz(2)

k(3)*f5j-tfcffltt,ZtiZftaSSv h^Mfc'J: 1/357 y hi^±c*^:JKic*i:,*HiS-r4 Cb^°7^-^^M

-26-

Page 13: ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm · 2014. 8. 26. · ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm The Relationshipbetween Satellite-derivedCloud Parameters and Measured Maximum

3D

25

20

15

ID

^ 5

o °a

10

15

-20

-25

-30

$mmm-t>*- mm& *25* 1992*11*3

XXX i

* x

(

≪X X X^=

p

DATA NO. (II = 69*

DATA NO. (21 = 2Q

□*TA NO. (31 = 49

CDEFF. (II = 0. Q72

CDEFF. (21 ・ -0. 579

CDEFF. 13) = 0. J8S

ECim Y- 0. S6*0. 02X

EO (21 Y- 10. 12-0. 41X

ECH31 T- -2. 76+0. 09X

fl. M. S. Ill = 5. 2

ft. n. S. (21 = 4. 8

R, M. S. (31 = 5. 3

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

MAX WIND (KT)

30 100 110 120

SR≪f*1cl!i!l2l$IHKfli≫ (≪≪ 6)

hi ≪m i I

m±m&toftM&&

£ mi) < 35Kt(2) k35Kt(3)

4 -0.088 -0.508 0.175

6 0.110 -0.436 0.218

bu 6 RSRSKftft

6 -0.023 -0.447 -0.117

4 -0.093 -0.478 0.212

6 -0.160 -0.460 0.002

6 I$fl9flil0 2 -0.417 -0.216 -0.212

30

25

20

IS

ID

Q_

-5m

-10

-15

-20

-25

-30

x x ;

x x

X ;

" X :

■*'*/ X MX;

H X

( X

X

OATA NO. tl 1 = 69

DATA NO. 12) ・ 20

DATA NO. (3) * 43

COEFF. Ml = 0.42B

CQEFF. (21 . Q. 28S

COEFF. (31 = 0. 42*

EOtll T- 7. 40-.0. 23X

E0C2I T- 4. 77*0. 39X

CO (3! T= 4. 67-tO. 28X

R. ≪. 5. (II = B. 2

R. M. 5. (2) =9.4

R. M. S. (31 ≫ 7.3

1020 30 40 50 60 70 BQ 90

MAX WIND (KT)

i 8i≫!uc£t-* mm i)

ioo no 120

jo am ≪ m±mmt<Dmm&$!i

& mi) < 35Kt(2) £35Kt(3)

4 ― 0.174 -0.414 0.024

18fl$RI]f!tj<D

4 0.024 -0.459 -0.006

6 0.428 -0.273 0.457

4 0.014 -0.444 0.029

4 0.097 -0.521 0.108

2 0.024 0.542 0.025

-27-

Page 14: ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm · 2014. 8. 26. · ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm The Relationshipbetween Satellite-derivedCloud Parameters and Measured Maximum

EO

55

50

40

t;35

i―i

Q_

2Sm

20

15

10

5

0

METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE CENTER TECHNICAL NOTE No. 25 NOVEMBER 1992

EQ

55

50

45

4Q

1-35

25CD

CJ

20

15

10

5

0

10 2030 40 5U 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

MAX WTND (KT)

SRSIffliiiNDiUMRSJWiSffi(Htt5)

& sm ≪ m±mmt<Dffim%R.

£ mi) <35Kt(2) ^35Kt(3)

5 0.438 0.154 0.288

m 4m%mm5 0.442 0.172 0.284

6≪ffflBdcm 2 mwwfe

5 0.479 0.082 0.325

6m?3m<Dm 3 mtwism

5 0.484 0.127 0.330

12R3lfflliBRmi2 m$wmm

5 0.456 -0.003 0.413

12H5lfflffi|0m 3 mm^m

5 0.460 0.164 0.394

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

MAX WIND !KT)

m a& ≪ **as£c≪≪≪≫

£ **(i) <35Kt(2) ^35Kt(3)

m 4mm^&m5 0.487 0.107 0.488

m 2 m\\i%R

6 -0.150 -0.456 -0.034

7 -0.078 -0.414 0.136

― 24h -18h -12h -06h OOh

ISM

-28-

01(3) mm:\Rmnte£z,ffimmcb^9s~?tf'i>\-tmxmM(Dmm (a>k^-≫

Page 15: ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm · 2014. 8. 26. · ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm The Relationshipbetween Satellite-derivedCloud Parameters and Measured Maximum

*l

ED

55

50

45

40

O30

25

Q_J

r.J

20

15

10

5

0

JO 20 3040

MAX

m.mRm-t>?- mmm% £25^ 1992*11/1

ED

55

50

45

40

S35

O30

Q_

25m

20

15

ID

5

050 BO 70 80

WIND (KT)

90 100 110 120

12 B$pBiBucBij 2 Bsjiw^ffi mm i)

a. mm m **Ra£c≪≫≪≫

£ #(1) <35Kt(2) ^35Kt(3)

m 2mm\i%m

4 -0.031 -0.407 0.219

I3RI§*!Icm 3mtw^m

4 -0.103 -0.432 0.162

m 4 fticwmm

1 0.292 0.423 0.300

4 -0.083 -0.479 0.133

6RSIfflliiJcm 3 m%wm&

1 0.297 0.429 0.266

6mmmem 4 mw%iR

1 0.359 0.515 0.345

m 2mw^m4

-0.122 -0.437 -0.005

]020 30 40 50 60 70 80 30 100 110 120

MAX WIND (KT)

i 2 n^p^HucDmj 3 mwrnfc mm i)

& a

IS tt m*mRt(DmM&RL

£ mi) <35Kt(2) ^35Kt(3)

m 4 Wf≫|sEteffi

2 0.405 0.392 0.395

BU 2 flS≫l\&fi&

1 0.440 0.403 0.437

6 0.466 -0.015 0.422

m 3mw^m2 0.404 0.482 0.341

2 0.456 0.506 0.363

ffi 3 R#2l|\£l{i

2 0.433 0.500 0.357

hi(4) mm\&imnaz>^micb^7/~?tf'(>htm±m&<Dmm (do^-≫

r*5iP,*jn i±m\itt)yM\z

-29-

Page 16: ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm · 2014. 8. 26. · ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm The Relationshipbetween Satellite-derivedCloud Parameters and Measured Maximum

30

25

20

IS

I―

<=> 5

Q_

o

CD

-15

-2G

-25

30

METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE CENTER TECHNICAL NOTE No. 25 NOVEMBER 1992

K X £ X X

.・

A !

X \1X

< X X X ,≫"***'^**^**^

<■■, xx ..・・* ^^

x R .*>^^

t *J*^**

'&*'* X X

<X M

< X

X

/ X M iDATA NO. [11 = 69

sDATA NO. (21 = 20

DATA NO. 131 = 49

CDEFF. (II = 0.401

COEFF. 121 = 0. 581

COEFF. (31 = 0. 243

EQ (II 1- 7. 00+0. 28X

ED (2) T―II. 30*1. 13X

EQ(3) 1" II. 12+0. 19X

R. M. S. (1) - 10. 4

R. M. S. (21 - 13. 3

R. H. S. (31 = 8. 3

10 20 3CI 40 50 BO 70 80 90

MAX WIND (KT)

&mfflm<D*£7-fi

100 110 120

m mm±mmt<Dffim&R

£ ftd) < 35Kt(2) ^35Kt(3)

6 ttifflffiOm 6ftrnmtm

0.080 0.410 0.128

6 RtFtBi!c -0.139 0.492 -0.087

0.033 0.417 -0.010

do s*9 ~yt ttsa^s^*5M & * 01% '*>

^-Vhfe|nHtc^^T^^^^L^(Z)T% DO

30

25

20

IS

I―

O 5

o °a

o

CD

-15

-20

-25

30

-30-

K X XX

*

DATA NO. (II = 63

DATA NO. (21 = 20

DATA ND. (3) = 49

COEFF. (II = 0.562

CDEFF. (51 = D. 082

COEFF. (31 = 0. 350

EOm T- 0. 67*0. 39X

ED (21 Y- 4. 79*0. 12X

EO(3I T≪ B. 99*0. 27X

R. M. 5. (II = ]Q. 4

R. M. S. (2) * 9.6

fi.M. 5. (31 = 8.4

10 20 30 40 50 BO 70 80 90 100 110 120

MAX WIND (KT)

i smrsfficDtk?-'-*

BAND/DO '<7*-?b

rt?* ―?, BAND/DO;*?* ―? ,Ci'*7*

Page 17: ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm · 2014. 8. 26. · ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm The Relationshipbetween Satellite-derivedCloud Parameters and Measured Maximum

m&ffiM-tz>*- ftffims *25-§- 1992^ 11 ^

3D

25

2D

15

ID

g5

o o

Q_

-5

-ID

15

-20

-25

30

X

M

K X

X X X

* M K K H

X * X i

x ;

x ,v≫*5< s

i X fyt**"^*

DATA NO. (1) = 69

OATA ND. (21 - 20

DATA ND. (31 = 49

CDEFF. Hi = 0. 473

CDEFF. (21 = 0. 122

COEFF. (3) = 0. 153

EOdl T- 9. 49*0. 29X

ED (2) Y- ID. 39*0. 1SX

ED (31 T= 19.07*0. 11X

R. M. 5. (II = 9.4

R. M. S. (2) = 8. 2

R. M. S. (3) - 8. 0

10 20 30 40 SO 60 10 SO 90

MAX WIND (KT)

l zWIIDiWoifeT'-^

01(6) m!B\£{b*$l!Mte £ Z

> K/N'^-y-co BAND/DO^n°7 /~7 t

Ci sty * -9 <D-$4> Y%m.m$%:^t£ h (D

-31-

100 110 120

Page 18: ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm · 2014. 8. 26. · ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm The Relationshipbetween Satellite-derivedCloud Parameters and Measured Maximum

m mm-xmmt<Dmm%&.

£ tt(l) <35Kt(2) ^35Kt(3)

m 2 temw-teim

0.506 0.206 0.245

m 3mwmR0.545 0.268 0.342

m 2mwmm0.560 0.228 0.387

20 3D 40 50 E.0 70 80 90 100 110 120

MAX WIND (KT)

-32-

m i(7) mmmmmm^<t§ band/do a? ^^mvf ts^a^otaw (do /■?*- ≫

BO

55

50

45

^

40

Q_

CD 30

Cj

~~-25

CD

^ 20

cn

15

10

5

0

METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE CENTER TECHNICAL NOTE No. 25 NOVEMBER 1992

ED

55

50

4S

I―

Q_

D3Q

Q

*■"-25

CD

21

CD

15

10

5

0

20 30 40

MAX

50 BO 70

WIND ( K

80 90 100 110 120

T)

%Rm\vm 2 mmmm

m mm±mmt<Dffim&&

£ tt(l) <35Kt(2) ^35Kt(3)

fill4 mwm§.

0.522 0.436 0.249

6fltPa^HUc832 mWWfc0.424 0.498 0.185

6RSRBilifcm 3 mzwi%m0.545 0.418 0.302

6BSIfflftlcm 4 mwmfe0.581 0.425 0.394

JO

Page 19: ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm · 2014. 8. 26. · ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm The Relationshipbetween Satellite-derivedCloud Parameters and Measured Maximum

6Q

S5

50

45

4D

'-35

0 30

25

"~ 20

15

10

5

010 2CI 30

40

MAX

*Ufe≪fi-fe>*- mm% H25-& 1992^113

EO

5S

50

45

to

s35

Q_25

20

IS

10

5

0

50 BO 70 80 90 100 1)0 120

WIND (K.T)

mtffi$t<Dm 3 mtwmm

m a**aas &c≪≫≪≫

£ ft(l) <35Kt(2) ^35Kt(3)

m 4 mzwmm0.4G7 0.188 0.155

6\%mm<Dm 3 mwxim0.462 0.174 0.184

6 BSIIBiJcm 4 vznw&fe0.442 0.189 0.134

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 SO 90 100 110 120

HAX WIND (KT)

m mm-xmRt<Dfflm&M

£ mi) <35Kt(2) ^35Kt(3)

m 2 mmwrnm0.438 0.182 0.168

12i^^Bticm 3 mmw-%R

0.411 0.195 0.109

1111(8) mm:\i*3mwimfc£6Ci^7*~?tf'i> htm^^Momm cdo^^-≫

-33-

Page 20: ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm · 2014. 8. 26. · ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm The Relationshipbetween Satellite-derivedCloud Parameters and Measured Maximum

METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE CENTER TECHNICAL NOTE No. 25 NOVEMBER 1992

m 3 s*ratomcmmmzmm.l^n^\!i^^Kifflt5#*w>h^s^fiisc-ji

^-■-^ w7-y /<y ka*-> DOA*-y

≪.ffiH≪Rfcr-*ffl* fcn -an 2rt-

m&%WLt7i-?mwLKi >s. a*.

Rfete <35Kt wtjzm <35Kt

Cb^'^-^/tf-f y Y6 mmmoffi4 mm(-06,-12,-18,-24h)

cAPPT >2fcTRPT・30fflc\i5

0.471

55f!

0.249

23fli2≪rWircW 2 &2DJ(-12,-18)<D APPT t TRPT

0.418

67il

0.512

20fi

(-12, -18h)cAPPT t TRPT

0.393

69fi

0.524

20fi

BAND/DO /-?7* -9 dM V h s w≫scir 3 mm

(00,-06,-12h)cAPPTtTRPT<Dffl<D\-t%

0.117

56fl

-0.169

24f@

^mmmvM3 mm

(00,-06, -12h)<D APPT t TRPT

0.431

69<!

0.494

20f!

(-24,-30h)<DAPPT t TRPT

0.238

54{i

0.207

22fi

%mmm<Dm 2 mm

(00,-06h)c APPT t TRPT

0.414

69<I

0.561

20ffl

C\;<7 *-9tf4 y t- mwmnnm3 mn

(00,-06,-12h)CDAPPT t TRPT

0.234

56ii

-0.254

24fi(00, -06, -12h)cAPPT t TRPT

0.475

69fl

0.154

20fi

^mmnom2 mm

(00,-06h)(D APPT t TRPT

0.278

57ffl

-0.163

25fi

6fswfflow 2 mm(-06,-12h)<DAPPT t TRPT

0.478

69fi

0.122

2om

* 1

* 2

* 3

fpffficL # Wit

r<35Ktj : 35/ -yb^SSCft^jajSt^fJEt-S^jK^ > h tcfBBB, fc*il^^OfPfif-^fiS

APPT :*lC^Lfctt^*°-f >K ≪TEJi;TRPT :*lC^t^6B#P^^'ft:fifR]*Wh, WTIrII;

3. 3 **M£<*>MJ::B#M££#]*Lfc£

3. 2JMTfflffifcWttf-fc3-o<D/<:7jt-?<D

mmte&t\sx!m$\stz5m*w.-to %tz,

tztiU DO /^-XDH±*JS^i(6)T^, [5j^°

-34-

T*m*&feLx\,>zo

0.539K: %:o /io $ £^ft^il^35y y h 5^#i

Page 21: ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm · 2014. 8. 26. · ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm The Relationshipbetween Satellite-derivedCloud Parameters and Measured Maximum

≪ufe≪-tz>*- mm& %-&% 1992^11^

m 4 mxmm t c m c mmm * #* t tz&&&£&c-k

fE^*iJ3ES#^t'<^->BAND/DO '<7t-t

\'J^^(2)

/<y }?;<■?― >

(-06, - 12, -

18, -24h)

c A PPT *' t

TRPT <2cffic\

4

-

mwmn<om 3 mm

(00, -06, -12h)

c APPT t TRPT

+

mmsmnwi 3 mm

(00, -06, -12h)

c APPT t TRPT

D0'<7->i2B#wmicmf 3 mm

(-12, -18, -24h)c APPT tTRPTc*Qc\*5

W%&(3);<y V/<? ―y

@tztiL, -r-ii-X X

≪£5$(2)C|Hli;@tztiL, v-f^x

・3K:lO£fo]*.S

X

W3e≪(2)CBIU

DO^-y

mfem)/\*yK/\7-y

ctztz'L, -7-ff-x

SKlOfcj&n*.*

X

SKlO&Jn*.*

X @tztzL, -?M-K

SKlOS-j&n*.*

X

DOA-p-y

#J5£5£(5)

/■\*yY'*$ ― > ≪E5≪2)ciai;

+

24B$raifcmf 2 mm

(-24,-30h)

<DAPPT t TRPTc≫3CD\^

+

^mmmnm2mm

(00,-06h)c APPT t TRPT

do^-vummwiom 2 mm

(-12, -18h)<DAPPT t TRPT

^mmnom2 nm

(00,-06h)<DAPPT t TRPT

6 mr$m<Dm 2 mm(-06,-12h)c APPT t TRPTc#]c\*&

*1J^^(6)

/N*y Y'*9~- >X

・5 K10 tin*. S

X

*iJ3£5*(5)Klfi;

Rtct*L, v^f^-X X

(X20)

no/N'-p-y*3

≫ (0.7404) *&

+*l3E5≪5)crai;

RtztzL, S0≫^& (0.3726) *$

≫5

+*l£5≪5)eEM;

m (o.i883)%m

+

(2.7071)

*

1

2

3

TRPT :$tHZ.&Ltz6^pM^bffllRliK-Y > h, WTIrIU

h o tztf, m£$Hfe£l6)V \tO.4181 M< ft o

-35-

ft^fitbTV^)o :c^tt Gray (1975)

m^i&^Bomwm^m^ = dp x tp

tztiL DP (t}\-$T>isv)\')= ?V*V

@-?x (tg^fMS+5)x (1/

(>≪gTJi t ±m ^ fc-w-5 $&

tp (m^T-yy^^) =m^(Dm

x^;v^-x (5-SfJ^S

Page 22: ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm · 2014. 8. 26. · ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm The Relationshipbetween Satellite-derivedCloud Parameters and Measured Maximum

METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE CENTER TECHNICAL NOTE No. 25 NOVEMBER 1992

#4 v h ~-~―_

≪5g5£ (2) R5g5£ (3) ≪jea (4) flJEs* (5) wea (6>

&JZM <35Kt WtMM <35Kt wcfcm <35Kt tt£* <35Kt m%.m <35Kt

Cb'<7/-9tf4 >\- 0.471 0.249

m%&iL2)hmc mfe&wtmi;

Wfe&!L2)kmc ≪s*(2)trai;

BAND/DO ^7 / -9 #>f y Y 0.117 -0.169 0.238 0.207

fljeateterai;Ci sK-f V Y 0.234 -0.254 0.278 -0.163

fg^-dW >b 0.463 -0.070 0.472 0.040 0.522 0.283 0.490 0.101 0.539 0.418

(fFffif-^fflft) (55) (23) (55) (23) (55) (23) (54) (22) (54) (22)

(DO ;■?;?-≫

^―■≫>_ we a t vm WfeS (2) H5£5$ (3) fl5g5£ (4) WJ65S (5) n&& (6)

Vt&M <35Kt n%m <35Kt H£* <35Kt ikfem <35Kt &fem <35Kt

Oo'<?t-f-m yv 0.418 0.512

\J5£5$(2)fc|iOi; *ue5≪2)fcEii;

0.393 0.524

*y5E5$(5)fci5ii;BAND/DO/^y-^df-f V h 0.431 0.494 0.414 0.561

Ci iK'f y h 0.475 0.154 0.478 0.122

ifcg£rfW > Y 0.601 0.590 0.557 0.531 0.565 0.542 0.625 0.663 0.607 0.777

(fWif-*ffl≪O (67) (20) (67) (20) (67) (20) (69) (20) (69) (20)

* 1

r<35Kt, : 35/y h**c≪**≪≪t, ≫≪■*-*##-f V h hOlBH

g)x 0fWS^-40)/30

hftf S/N°7^-^*^fflbTV^^≪), SSL

fc',DO /^->m ^^^J^^(3)fcB±^J^

^ i;tzMM teMtiT v^ vio

―^, DO /n° - y-Cte, §^:iSl^ fccB#^M

c\*&**, ^:f - ^ ii i ^.ffiH^iCCO. 575, 35

-36-

0.625, f§£\U^(6)-C0.607, &tzWcfcfflM35

t, £yM\,*W§i>s&t>titzo

tci tzm& t, m^MMs^y yv^mt tzit

Page 23: ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm · 2014. 8. 26. · ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm The Relationshipbetween Satellite-derivedCloud Parameters and Measured Maximum

%tkmm-t>*- &mm% *25# muznn

1.57+0.55X34 (Kt)=20

[DO/^-y]

9.01+0.59X34 (Kt)=29

34 #§£\iJ£5t(6KcJ:£/\07>-^≫J

I―

■z.

o

60

55

5D

45

40

35

30

|_ Z5

O

H- 20

15

10

5

D

1020 30 40 SO 60 70 80 90

MAX WIND (KT)

]00 110 120

I―

dM >hci&|nj£tfci*U;teo 0 3(1)^0 3(3)

(l)tt, /^FV^->T^^b^ T8607c^!J

t**So BtrH1^^#^b^v^^^J^^(l)Ti#

56^jj:M S * t^pffl fct h c ≪^IliliKit* U

b^U ^±W^^(6H3j;^|g^o^yhr≪,

(2)fc*DO ^n° - >ti| L tz T8221c^IJ-T

60

55

50

45

40

O 35

Q_

30

|_ 25

O

I" 20

15

10

5

0

80 90 100 110 120

MAX WIND (KT)

E> O '< & ― :>-

[^IBSJi] fill 1(1)c 2. Jf*J≪fctf3. JgfcHU

-37-

Page 24: ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm · 2014. 8. 26. · ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm The Relationshipbetween Satellite-derivedCloud Parameters and Measured Maximum

METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE CENTER TECHNICAL NOTE No. 25 NOVEMBER 1992

CJ

o

a

03

CDo

I

I

o

■<cc

o

Vl LJ

I― LJ

O ~

CCcr

11 I c_J

≪ccc

azt―

en en

I― LU

o

CD

X LJ

-CCJ

51 UJ

z

*

― CDCDLU

\ ≫ n \izaiccul

s; lulu i―― o_ zs ―

UJ

Q_O

o

I

cc

m

UJ CO

CD UJ

EH

JZ _J

oooo

CM

a

enO O CXD O Ooo

CD

o

co

― o

I― O

o

to

00

O

Q

a..

A

V

H

M

m

CO

o

O

CD

1-

co

CM

o

-I-

o

■ I -

CO

o

o

-t-

CO

m

CD

O

O

[

z

o

0-

_ x:

_ ≪c

o

I \

i t

j j

:

: i

・ i

I

[I

I \'

1 I:

\t

i i

I =≫

I :i

( i

i ■

< : ;

v j I

)

i

I\

I

I

\ \

'I I

I I

1 I

I I

( '

I

CM

to

o

o

U1

CD

CO

#

a

*i

!

ID

LD

o

CM

eno

o

CO

*

i

CM

oo

o

CD

'te

*!

CO

CO

CM

o

CM

O

a

4

oo

o

*

*

o

00

o

CM

o

1X1

o

o

o

CM

O

1―

UJ I―

x; _

o

2: q

03

o

3

CM

O

Q_

CD

ooao

CM

o

en

oa

i_n

oo

CMen

o

Ten

o

IDo

en

o

o

o

CD CM

-38-

in

CM

in

CM

LO

CM

o

CM

o

o

CM

Page 25: ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm · 2014. 8. 26. · ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm The Relationshipbetween Satellite-derivedCloud Parameters and Measured Maximum

mM.mm.-b>*- mm& ≫25# 1992*11/!

CJ

I

I

I

o

CD

-z.

m

j

oooo

CM

a

CD

<_)

O

o

i―cd in

a

o ―,

o

F― CJ

II LU

o ^^

cc

≪;

o

11 I C_J

CD ≪C

<cn

CCh-

O I

t―UJ

■--.CD

O ―

O

CD

Z

o

X <_>

<C (_>

-c

21 O

CJ

~CDCO UJ

naraico

^ UJ LU I―

― Q_ZS ―

Q- CDrj_i

LJJ

o

j

・< .

ujcn_.

U~) UJ ^

s: o_ <c

3D 0=

z; _jf-

"UJCO

zr _jlu

CD

oo

CD

o

CD

~ o

I- O

T―I

CM

CM

CO

H

Sis

m

G

u~

A

V

H

M

w

en

en

o

+

o

^r

o

-t-

CM

COm

CD

O

-t-

i n

e n

o

+ ■

e n

o

+

a

- ) -

m

o

- t -

C M

C M

O

+ ■

CD

O+

en

― CDi― a

2: +

o

o

-<

_J

o

; i

j i

i

>/

i '' '

! i (

i i I

!I':

I

I

I

i ' a

i ' =*

:, i■ \

! I M

i -i

; i:-

I

i I ・ I

!i

\i\

\\ a

III;

! u I

: \ \ j

i |

V ;

\ i

I /

I

)

I

: I

\>

l\

I \

\I \

\ '

1

V

%

* r

i

i

i

i

CD

O

oo

o

CM

o

oo

o

CD

CD

O

oo

o

CO

CD

O

oo

o

ooo

oooo

CM

aooo

CD

CD

Oo

Q_

CDi:

-39-

Page 26: ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm · 2014. 8. 26. · ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm The Relationshipbetween Satellite-derivedCloud Parameters and Measured Maximum

METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE CENTER TECHNICAL NOTE No. 25 NOVEMBER 1992

c_>

Oa

a

CD

ooao

CM

o

OD

LJ

I

I

O

・T1

_J

o

UJ

a

or

o ~

a

cncj

i― o

II UJ

o ―

cc

-<

azt―

O I

coco

I― LU

□ ―

oxu

o

tnmnirOTC

rtrun

ilLULlJl――■Q_ ^ ―

CD

2:LUzz

LU>o

j

<:.

mu~> ,

cniui:occj

zr _jt―

・―'LUCO

2T_IUJm

o o ljo a

CNJ I―CD LD

oo

CD

o

COi― a

oo

o

CM00

H

O

G

A

V

HKJ

C M

O

- t -

C M

C O

o

- t -

C O

o

■ t -

IT)

CM

O

-t-

CO

COm

o

■ f -

C D

O

- t -

r s j

o

_l

I―

o

Z3D

ID

O

z:

o

a.

LU

_1

_ ・<

o

(

! I

I

I

:

i

・ /

: /

\t

|

h i

/!

/ ≪

■ n

! H

\ w

\ iv

\i

\ \

\ i

)

\\

/:

/・

u

J!

f }|

/ i

/ ;

j \

i :

I ;

\ |

\ ;

I

I

/

I

I

I

I

)

)

I

I

I

I

o

o

en

4

*o

CO

o

C\J

o

CM

O

eno

CM

o

CD

o

CM

CD

enm

tM

t- CM

o

CM

o

o

o

I―o

CD

Q*i

#in

CM

o

&

C\J

o

o

CM

CD

O

*

h

=o

CM

o

o

Q

&

COI―

CD

O

Q

2LU

>o

o

ooao

CM

□oo a

o

o

O

o - 3

a

12

X

z:

o__i

51

o

en

oo

CD

o

COen

o

o

oCM

CDCD

-40-

Page 27: ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm · 2014. 8. 26. · ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm The Relationshipbetween Satellite-derivedCloud Parameters and Measured Maximum

nmmm^?- R.mm% m25^ 1992^11^

-eVktotzi$mM£Mm& Di2JOTfti &-;*:£&

≪-a-*°-f >h-r&, ^c^fttr-^fcM&H

$ *l/f, > n*> F ^n° - y-CH3t Ufc T8607c^!l

fcI^^IK, H-^^-f y h tt^K i: t fe^Ulli^

g^tbTM^b/cE-^*o-f Vhc29<£ D^3

^^ ^ VmMTJb % i% 6 ^fWbu &27T& S ^

i:*^, ic6^F^F≫3t^Jiaifcbt:^^b^t

*^, (3)tt^N*y HV^^->T^tb/S T8208

t - ^ -e^fe ^^JH^±B#^iJ CSS JgjfiC^lg

c≪t .^-a-^-f >

h "Ctt^wjgjfic^^c^ ・;

mo 6H#ra&ctr-^*^[≪)hti&o i$nm±

t LtzJ$M<Di&&-tiJ y h ≪25^^bTfc' D,

&£o b^b, ic12^FKH&Cfei|g^'7K^>h

^ISScd^b^23Mc^Ji,c"5t., ^^>F

/N°^-yrc^i^≪i2M, DO^°^-y^n^ij

[yN'^hV^-y] spi^I 20

ft^:: 31 (T8210)

M/Jn : 11 (T8610)

ft* ' 37 (T8309)

M'h : 21 (T8405)

#l^(J(T9025, T9123) h, iS&iZ&TfgMl,

12*^ tz TD * 3 $J3IA,t\l^fe^J^^(6)C X

*m^jc^tt/c^m2mit, mmttbte

sK>f> h tt3. 3 M(D^Mrc-^MB^.(D a^ t

M^^T^Bb^^o/cTD^V^-ftLfe DC

4. Zttb

(i) h5v$m<D%&$\fe'*?*-?tmmqo)

m*(D^y*-?7K>f y b tli:-a-*o-fyYT

-41-

Page 28: ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm · 2014. 8. 26. · ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm The Relationshipbetween Satellite-derivedCloud Parameters and Measured Maximum

METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE CENTER TECHNICAL NOTE No. 25 NOVEMBER 1992

(2) &'*?*―9(D-#4>\-hWckMMh<Dffi

Tj^^'boiiM^Mt^m^^-yM^^w^.

$5・So

do ^ Ci x h ・;- ? *^t-±li^i$[c^li ^

(3) ft^cJijifc0^C^^^^#ltb^^±f!l

^n°7^―^cJ^^fy h^LSfitciR, DO/n°^-

5. ^&<7>3!B1

^ (^JlM3acTlil\lfflll^^b^^ttiffl, 04Z)

tzo tztzu ittmk<m&7i-9\t'M!%mzM

mLx^^tz^o

-42-

Page 29: ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm · 2014. 8. 26. · ffiMBft^ £znw&L^y * -91 ^m^^mom^mm t(dmm The Relationshipbetween Satellite-derivedCloud Parameters and Measured Maximum

##xi*

%MRm-t>*- &mm% ≫25-3 1992^11^

Gray, W.M., 1975:Tropical Cyclone Gene-

sis, Pap. No. 234. Dept. Atoms. Sci.,

Colorado State University, Fort Collins.

1-121.

MmFr^mR, 1990: "fmmum (tuja^g)

Steranka, J., R.B.Rodgers and R.C.Gen-

try, 1986: The Relationship between

SatelliteMeasured Convective Bursts and

Tropical Cyclone Intensification, Mon.

Wea. Rev., 114, 1539-1546.

-43-